<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This is the Voice of a Unifier?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/09/17/this-is-the-voice-of-a-unifier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/09/17/this-is-the-voice-of-a-unifier/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:49:12 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Livewire</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/09/17/this-is-the-voice-of-a-unifier/comment-page-2/#comment-308991</link>
		<dc:creator>The Livewire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=4519#comment-308991</guid>
		<description>#58.  I think I saw the adventures of the little letter people on Sesame Street as a kid.

They all wandered aimlessley until a Capital &#039;O&#039; came and told them what to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#58.  I think I saw the adventures of the little letter people on Sesame Street as a kid.</p>
<p>They all wandered aimlessley until a Capital &#8216;O&#8217; came and told them what to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heliotrope</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/09/17/this-is-the-voice-of-a-unifier/comment-page-2/#comment-308484</link>
		<dc:creator>heliotrope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=4519#comment-308484</guid>
		<description>michael only posts in spurts. Its a synapse and attention span thing. Little letter people can&#039;t transition with the &quot;shift&quot; key because it causes &quot;cognito spurtus interruptus.&quot; Also, posting is a form of masturbation for little letter people. After three posts they are worn down to &quot;god is dead.&quot; Strangely, it makes perfect sense to them. All the little letter people gather around the screen and giggle and howl with delight. Did I mention that all the little letter people are gathered inside of one cranium where they talk to each other? There is a cacaphony of voices in there, but not much else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>michael only posts in spurts. Its a synapse and attention span thing. Little letter people can&#8217;t transition with the &#8220;shift&#8221; key because it causes &#8220;cognito spurtus interruptus.&#8221; Also, posting is a form of masturbation for little letter people. After three posts they are worn down to &#8220;god is dead.&#8221; Strangely, it makes perfect sense to them. All the little letter people gather around the screen and giggle and howl with delight. Did I mention that all the little letter people are gathered inside of one cranium where they talk to each other? There is a cacaphony of voices in there, but not much else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean A</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/09/17/this-is-the-voice-of-a-unifier/comment-page-2/#comment-308482</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=4519#comment-308482</guid>
		<description>#56: &quot;but the atheist can only manage disjointed, ungrammatical fragments...&quot;

Bumper stickers are like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#56: &#8220;but the atheist can only manage disjointed, ungrammatical fragments&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Bumper stickers are like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/09/17/this-is-the-voice-of-a-unifier/comment-page-2/#comment-308437</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=4519#comment-308437</guid>
		<description>Interesting how the believers post complete thoughts in properly punctuated sentences, but the atheist can only manage disjointed, ungrammatical fragments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting how the believers post complete thoughts in properly punctuated sentences, but the atheist can only manage disjointed, ungrammatical fragments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean A</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/09/17/this-is-the-voice-of-a-unifier/comment-page-2/#comment-308371</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 08:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=4519#comment-308371</guid>
		<description>&quot;ding dong, your god is dead&quot;

Oh no.  I&#039;m sure he&#039;ll be crushed when he finds out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;ding dong, your god is dead&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh no.  I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;ll be crushed when he finds out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGayConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/09/17/this-is-the-voice-of-a-unifier/comment-page-2/#comment-308364</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGayConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=4519#comment-308364</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;ding dong, your god is dead&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&quot;God is dead!&quot; - Nietzche

&quot;Nietzche is dead!&quot; - God</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>ding dong, your god is dead</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;God is dead!&#8221; &#8211; Nietzche</p>
<p>&#8220;Nietzche is dead!&#8221; &#8211; God</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean A</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/09/17/this-is-the-voice-of-a-unifier/comment-page-2/#comment-308272</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 02:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=4519#comment-308272</guid>
		<description>Yeah, &quot;narrow.&quot;  That&#039;s liberal-speak for people who think for themselves and won&#039;t just agree with the leftist position.  michael, you&#039;re the narrow one.  You just pop in here to type your leftist haiku verse and then refuse to engage in honest, open debate and answer questions to defend your beliefs.  You&#039;re too &quot;narrow&quot; to adopt principled positions that you can discuss and defend on the fly, no matter what the opposition says or where the debate goes.  You depend on keeping the discussion &quot;narrow&quot; so that you won&#039;t forget what you&#039;re supposed to believe.  Staying narrow keeps you from getting lost in a challenging discussion where you might have to admit that you&#039;re wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, &#8220;narrow.&#8221;  That&#8217;s liberal-speak for people who think for themselves and won&#8217;t just agree with the leftist position.  michael, you&#8217;re the narrow one.  You just pop in here to type your leftist haiku verse and then refuse to engage in honest, open debate and answer questions to defend your beliefs.  You&#8217;re too &#8220;narrow&#8221; to adopt principled positions that you can discuss and defend on the fly, no matter what the opposition says or where the debate goes.  You depend on keeping the discussion &#8220;narrow&#8221; so that you won&#8217;t forget what you&#8217;re supposed to believe.  Staying narrow keeps you from getting lost in a challenging discussion where you might have to admit that you&#8217;re wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/09/17/this-is-the-voice-of-a-unifier/comment-page-2/#comment-308256</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 02:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=4519#comment-308256</guid>
		<description>it never ceases to amaze me how narrow some peeps are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it never ceases to amaze me how narrow some peeps are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/09/17/this-is-the-voice-of-a-unifier/comment-page-2/#comment-308240</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=4519#comment-308240</guid>
		<description>ding dong, your god is dead</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ding dong, your god is dead</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene in Pennsylvania</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/09/17/this-is-the-voice-of-a-unifier/comment-page-1/#comment-308235</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene in Pennsylvania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=4519#comment-308235</guid>
		<description>This is why I come to this blog. Truth wills out. After discussions and links it is now obvious that the Obama trolls are lying about what the bill and Baracks intentions were. He was for K-12 sex ed. Now because he is a Presidential candidate, he is backtracking on his intentions back then because it is obviously out of the American mainstream. Instead of admitting his extremeism his supporters obfuscate. The figure if they stonewall thru a couple news cycles this abomanation will go away. This is the new tone, the post partisianship, the mainstream candidate who will bring us together. Extreme liberalism. Hiding out until after November 4th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why I come to this blog. Truth wills out. After discussions and links it is now obvious that the Obama trolls are lying about what the bill and Baracks intentions were. He was for K-12 sex ed. Now because he is a Presidential candidate, he is backtracking on his intentions back then because it is obviously out of the American mainstream. Instead of admitting his extremeism his supporters obfuscate. The figure if they stonewall thru a couple news cycles this abomanation will go away. This is the new tone, the post partisianship, the mainstream candidate who will bring us together. Extreme liberalism. Hiding out until after November 4th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/09/17/this-is-the-voice-of-a-unifier/comment-page-1/#comment-308226</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=4519#comment-308226</guid>
		<description>Some penicillin should clear that up for you, mikey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some penicillin should clear that up for you, mikey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/09/17/this-is-the-voice-of-a-unifier/comment-page-1/#comment-308220</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=4519#comment-308220</guid>
		<description>pants on fire</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pants on fire</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriotWest</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/09/17/this-is-the-voice-of-a-unifier/comment-page-1/#comment-308219</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriotWest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 00:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=4519#comment-308219</guid>
		<description>Um, Nick, you can ramble on all you want about what the article clearly states, but the article you cite is an opinion piece.  And I have linked the actual legislation.

Have you read it yet?  The legislation that is, not the article?

And the second link you provide is not only to an opinion piece, but one by a notoriously liberal columnist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, Nick, you can ramble on all you want about what the article clearly states, but the article you cite is an opinion piece.  And I have linked the actual legislation.</p>
<p>Have you read it yet?  The legislation that is, not the article?</p>
<p>And the second link you provide is not only to an opinion piece, but one by a notoriously liberal columnist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/09/17/this-is-the-voice-of-a-unifier/comment-page-1/#comment-308196</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=4519#comment-308196</guid>
		<description>I could sum up by saying that Nick is using the tactic of trying to convince us to to reject the obvious and believe the implausible. 

And then he has the audacity to suggest that it is somehow unethical of us to base our opinion on the actual language of the bill instead of the spin put out by Obama&#039;s shills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could sum up by saying that Nick is using the tactic of trying to convince us to to reject the obvious and believe the implausible. </p>
<p>And then he has the audacity to suggest that it is somehow unethical of us to base our opinion on the actual language of the bill instead of the spin put out by Obama&#8217;s shills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGayConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/09/17/this-is-the-voice-of-a-unifier/comment-page-1/#comment-308189</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGayConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=4519#comment-308189</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;it also includes mocking the media some Americans choose to read, hear and watch.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;i&gt;Choose&lt;/i&gt; is the operative word. Under Obama, choice will be a crime unless you want to get a carve job and chuck your kid in the closet to die.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Good people do not spread false rumors.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So, by your standard, you&#039;re a sorry lying POS, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>it also includes mocking the media some Americans choose to read, hear and watch.</p></blockquote>
<p><i>Choose</i> is the operative word. Under Obama, choice will be a crime unless you want to get a carve job and chuck your kid in the closet to die.</p>
<blockquote><p>Good people do not spread false rumors.</p></blockquote>
<p>So, by your standard, you&#8217;re a sorry lying POS, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/09/17/this-is-the-voice-of-a-unifier/comment-page-1/#comment-308176</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=4519#comment-308176</guid>
		<description>Following up on NDT&#039;s (pre-Spam filter bump) #34

Alleged Comedian Doug Stanhope: &lt;i&gt;&quot;I was once in a similar situation where I&#039;d accidentally impregnated a girl and she had to make that same fateful decision that now faces you. It was easy for her ... we are great friends who high-five over our decision and have all the free time and disposable income that young mothers never know.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

What a sick, inhuman, selfish f--k.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following up on NDT&#8217;s (pre-Spam filter bump) #34</p>
<p>Alleged Comedian Doug Stanhope: <i>&#8220;I was once in a similar situation where I&#8217;d accidentally impregnated a girl and she had to make that same fateful decision that now faces you. It was easy for her &#8230; we are great friends who high-five over our decision and have all the free time and disposable income that young mothers never know.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>What a sick, inhuman, selfish f&#8211;k.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/09/17/this-is-the-voice-of-a-unifier/comment-page-1/#comment-308168</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=4519#comment-308168</guid>
		<description>Nick is BS, and I don&#039;t mean Bachelor of Science. The relevant section of the Bill is Section 3a, and there isn&#039;t a damn word in it (or anywhere else) in the bill about avoiding sexual predators. The closest thing is section 6, where the course materials are required to explain statutory rape, but this is directed at kids not doing it. 

It&#039;s also worth noting that the requests for the change from 6-12 to K-12 came from Planned Parenthood, a company with a financial interest in both expanding sex ed and in maximizing the number of teen pregnancies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick is BS, and I don&#8217;t mean Bachelor of Science. The relevant section of the Bill is Section 3a, and there isn&#8217;t a damn word in it (or anywhere else) in the bill about avoiding sexual predators. The closest thing is section 6, where the course materials are required to explain statutory rape, but this is directed at kids not doing it. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s also worth noting that the requests for the change from 6-12 to K-12 came from Planned Parenthood, a company with a financial interest in both expanding sex ed and in maximizing the number of teen pregnancies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/09/17/this-is-the-voice-of-a-unifier/comment-page-1/#comment-308164</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 21:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=4519#comment-308164</guid>
		<description>Again, the article clearly states that the ad and claim are misleading.  Kindergartners were to be taught how to protect themselves from sexual predators.  You continue to skirt that issue, why?  You want to make this about icky sex and diseases instead of protecting children from rapists.

 The author of the article is quite direct in saying that the McCain ad is misleading.  Why are pushing misinformation?  Moreover, Richard Cohen and other conservative commentators have been quite blunt in denouncing this attack.

Moreover, the legislation, which Obama did not author, provided parents and schools the ability to opt-in and opt-out.  Are you saying that parents should not be able to teach their children how to protect themselves against sexual predators?

Are you also saying that parents who choose to have schools educate their children about predators or disease don&#039;t have the right to do so?  

As for factcheck.org, I stand corrected on their non-partisanship.  The Annenberg Foundation, however, has always been noted for its conservative bent.  See, I&#039;m able to admit a mistake.  

You&#039;re being quite Orwellian in your twisting of facts to suit your purpose. 

From Richard Cohen of the Washington Post:

&quot;The precise moment of McCain&#039;s abasement came, would you believe, not at some news conference or on one of the Sunday shows but on &quot;The View,&quot; the daytime TV show created by Barbara Walters. Last week, one of the co-hosts, Joy Behar, took McCain to task for some of the ads his campaign has been running. One deliberately mischaracterized what Barack Obama had said about putting lipstick on a pig -- an Americanism that McCain himself has used. The other asserted that Obama supported teaching sex education to kindergarteners.
ad_icon

&quot;We know that those two ads are untrue,&quot; Behar said. &quot;They are lies.&quot;

Freeze. Close in on McCain. This was the moment. He has largely been avoiding the press. The Straight Talk Express is now just a brand, an ad slogan like &quot;Home Cooking&quot; or &quot;We Will Not Be Undersold.&quot; Until then, it was possible for McCain to say that he had not really known about the ads, that the formulation &quot;I approve this message&quot; was just boilerplate. But he didn&#039;t.

&quot;Actually, they are not lies,&quot; he said.

Actually, they are.

McCain has turned ugly. His dishonesty would be unacceptable in any politician, but McCain has always set his own bar higher than most. He has contempt for most of his colleagues for that very reason: They lie. He tells the truth. He internalizes the code of the McCains -- his grandfather, his father: both admirals of the shining sea. He serves his country differently, that&#039;s all -- but just as honorably. No more, though. &quot;

Are you going to say that Cohen is not a conservative?  That would come to a shock to most.  If you say he is an Obama supporter, you would easily be disproved given Cohen&#039;s long history of dislike for Obama.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/15/AR2008091502406.html

You are parsing words and meaning to try to smear Obama.  You&#039;re failure to acknowledge a mistake only digs a deeper whole in which you bury yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, the article clearly states that the ad and claim are misleading.  Kindergartners were to be taught how to protect themselves from sexual predators.  You continue to skirt that issue, why?  You want to make this about icky sex and diseases instead of protecting children from rapists.</p>
<p> The author of the article is quite direct in saying that the McCain ad is misleading.  Why are pushing misinformation?  Moreover, Richard Cohen and other conservative commentators have been quite blunt in denouncing this attack.</p>
<p>Moreover, the legislation, which Obama did not author, provided parents and schools the ability to opt-in and opt-out.  Are you saying that parents should not be able to teach their children how to protect themselves against sexual predators?</p>
<p>Are you also saying that parents who choose to have schools educate their children about predators or disease don&#8217;t have the right to do so?  </p>
<p>As for factcheck.org, I stand corrected on their non-partisanship.  The Annenberg Foundation, however, has always been noted for its conservative bent.  See, I&#8217;m able to admit a mistake.  </p>
<p>You&#8217;re being quite Orwellian in your twisting of facts to suit your purpose. </p>
<p>From Richard Cohen of the Washington Post:</p>
<p>&#8220;The precise moment of McCain&#8217;s abasement came, would you believe, not at some news conference or on one of the Sunday shows but on &#8220;The View,&#8221; the daytime TV show created by Barbara Walters. Last week, one of the co-hosts, Joy Behar, took McCain to task for some of the ads his campaign has been running. One deliberately mischaracterized what Barack Obama had said about putting lipstick on a pig &#8212; an Americanism that McCain himself has used. The other asserted that Obama supported teaching sex education to kindergarteners.<br />
ad_icon</p>
<p>&#8220;We know that those two ads are untrue,&#8221; Behar said. &#8220;They are lies.&#8221;</p>
<p>Freeze. Close in on McCain. This was the moment. He has largely been avoiding the press. The Straight Talk Express is now just a brand, an ad slogan like &#8220;Home Cooking&#8221; or &#8220;We Will Not Be Undersold.&#8221; Until then, it was possible for McCain to say that he had not really known about the ads, that the formulation &#8220;I approve this message&#8221; was just boilerplate. But he didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>&#8220;Actually, they are not lies,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>Actually, they are.</p>
<p>McCain has turned ugly. His dishonesty would be unacceptable in any politician, but McCain has always set his own bar higher than most. He has contempt for most of his colleagues for that very reason: They lie. He tells the truth. He internalizes the code of the McCains &#8212; his grandfather, his father: both admirals of the shining sea. He serves his country differently, that&#8217;s all &#8212; but just as honorably. No more, though. &#8221;</p>
<p>Are you going to say that Cohen is not a conservative?  That would come to a shock to most.  If you say he is an Obama supporter, you would easily be disproved given Cohen&#8217;s long history of dislike for Obama.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/15/AR2008091502406.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/15/AR2008091502406.html</a></p>
<p>You are parsing words and meaning to try to smear Obama.  You&#8217;re failure to acknowledge a mistake only digs a deeper whole in which you bury yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/09/17/this-is-the-voice-of-a-unifier/comment-page-1/#comment-308146</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=4519#comment-308146</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Youâ€™re arguing semantics. You know quite well that it was not â€œsex educationâ€ but was directed at teaching children how to protect themselves from predators. There was no education on sex but on helping children to defend themselves from bad people.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I can only conclude after reading &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/fulltext.asp?DocName=&amp;SessionId=3&amp;GA=93&amp;DocTypeId=SB&amp;DocNum=99&amp;GAID=3&amp;LegID=734&amp;SpecSess=&amp;Session&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the bill&lt;/a&gt; for myself that you have not done likewise and instead are spouting Democrat talking points.  Yes, &quot;teaching children how to protect themselves from predators&quot; is in the bill, but so is this on sex ed:

&lt;i&gt;Each class or course in comprehensive sex education in any of grades &lt;b&gt;K through 12&lt;/b&gt; shall include instruction on the prevention of sexually transmitted infections, including the prevention, transmission and spread of HIV.&lt;/i&gt;

Last time I checked, &quot;K&quot; usually refers to &quot;kindergarten&quot; in the context it is used. 
&lt;blockquote&gt;the conservative Annenberg Foundation&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&quot;Conservative&quot;?  How do you arrive at this conclusion and what happened to its claim of non-partisanship?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Youâ€™re arguing semantics. You know quite well that it was not â€œsex educationâ€ but was directed at teaching children how to protect themselves from predators. There was no education on sex but on helping children to defend themselves from bad people.</p></blockquote>
<p>I can only conclude after reading <a href="http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/fulltext.asp?DocName=&amp;SessionId=3&amp;GA=93&amp;DocTypeId=SB&amp;DocNum=99&amp;GAID=3&amp;LegID=734&amp;SpecSess=&amp;Session" rel="nofollow">the bill</a> for myself that you have not done likewise and instead are spouting Democrat talking points.  Yes, &#8220;teaching children how to protect themselves from predators&#8221; is in the bill, but so is this on sex ed:</p>
<p><i>Each class or course in comprehensive sex education in any of grades <b>K through 12</b> shall include instruction on the prevention of sexually transmitted infections, including the prevention, transmission and spread of HIV.</i></p>
<p>Last time I checked, &#8220;K&#8221; usually refers to &#8220;kindergarten&#8221; in the context it is used. </p>
<blockquote><p>the conservative Annenberg Foundation</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;Conservative&#8221;?  How do you arrive at this conclusion and what happened to its claim of non-partisanship?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/09/17/this-is-the-voice-of-a-unifier/comment-page-1/#comment-308145</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 20:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=4519#comment-308145</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Youâ€™re arguing semantics. You know quite well that it was not â€œsex educationâ€ but was directed at teaching children how to protect themselves from predators.&lt;/i&gt;

Nick, I believe we already dealt with you on this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gaypatriot.net/?comments_popup=4485#comment-307830&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; yesterday&lt;/a&gt;.

Put bluntly, only in the liberal world would it be considered &quot;protecting themselves from predators&quot; to teach kindergartners the joy of masturbation. But then again, given your support of taking children to sex fairs where adults masturbate and have sex in front of them, we shouldn&#039;t be surprised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Youâ€™re arguing semantics. You know quite well that it was not â€œsex educationâ€ but was directed at teaching children how to protect themselves from predators.</i></p>
<p>Nick, I believe we already dealt with you on this <a href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/?comments_popup=4485#comment-307830" rel="nofollow"> yesterday</a>.</p>
<p>Put bluntly, only in the liberal world would it be considered &#8220;protecting themselves from predators&#8221; to teach kindergartners the joy of masturbation. But then again, given your support of taking children to sex fairs where adults masturbate and have sex in front of them, we shouldn&#8217;t be surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

