Aint that the truth

And how does this side-issue relate to how Obama is going to lead the country?

I’ll try to connect the dots for you. See if you can follow along. Obama surrounding himself his entire career with radicals strongly suggests that he would lead America in a radical direction. (as do his policy proposals) The fact that he lies about said relationships suggests he is lying when he says he wont lead in a radical direction. And the same goes for all the crooks he has associated himself with.

I hope you’re right. I’ve learned to distrust Republicans resolve to defend themselves and to point the finger at Democrats for even the most blatant wrongdoing. Besides, McCain gets some screwy, and inconsistent, ideas about what is and isnt honorable sometimes.

Where has he said this, Eric?

He hasn’t, but you’re not supposed to ask questions. ACHTUNG!!

Let’s see….Obama worked with someone who fully supports firebombing houses of sleeping children because their parents are doing their job……to make decisions on educational grants and programs.

Eric, did you even read the post? The issue is that Obama lied about his relationship with Ayers. Is someone fit to lead a nation when he misrepresents his past associations?

Don’t worry.

The McCain campaign knows all about this. (If they were so incompetent that they wouldn’t, things would not be all tied up in the polls at this point…)

They’ll be getting the word out to swing voters in swing states when it will do the most good.

People have a very short attention span, and a very short memory — especially with the MSM working frantically to distract and confuse.

Ironically, the MSM’s extraordinary bias this year works against Obama — if they’d covered all this stuff during the Democratic Primary, or just after he locked it up, then it would be old news now, and he would have been able to work his way past it all. (Remember Clinton and Flowers — totally “old news” and boring by the time November rolled around…)

Next topic..