Gay Patriot Header Image

LIVE & Drug-Induced Blogging of Presidential Debate

Posted by Bruce Carroll at 8:54 pm - September 26, 2008.
Filed under: Post 9-11 America

From GayPatriot Back Injury Central, the Presidential Debate is about to begin and I’m liveblogging under the influence of some strong stuff.

Here’s my view.  I am watching CNN, to my dismay.  Hey, FOX News Channel REALLY needs to discover high-definition TV broadcasting.

The debate is 10 minutes away…..

9:00 PM – Wolf Blitzer says we are a minute away.  Hey, if he took my drugs — he’d be Wolf Blitzed!   LOL.

9:02 PM – Jim Lehrer is now giving the intro and the rules.  Is it just me, or do his wide, glassy-eyed gaze make him look as stoned as I feel?

I almost forgot!  My Pajamas Media colleague, Steven Green from VodkaPundit, is drunkblogging at Pajamas Media.

9:06 PM – First question about the Economic Meltdown of 2008.  Barack spews out the same talking points he’s been regurgitating all week.  Took a shot at blaming the whole mess on McCain and the GOP.  Bill Clinton would disagree.

9:08 PM – Good deal with McCain explaining the Bailout and also for bringing up the need for energy independence.

9:10 PM – McCain is going heavy on the need for accountability in Washington & Wall Street.  Those of us watching on CNN are being shown a real-time graph of a focus group in Ohio.  I am noticing something interesting so far — when McCain answers, the Independents are frequently scoring above Republicans and Democrats.

9:15 PM – Question is about the differences of approach to governing the economy.  McCain comes out hard on opposing earmarking and points out the Obama has been a huge earmarking whore.

Oh, everybody — take a drink everytime Barack says “aaaaand”, “ooooor”, “ahhhhh” and “buuuuuut.”

9:19 PM – Ooooh, a feisty tussle over taxes.  Independents in the CNN focus group didn’t like it when Obama butted into McCain’s answer.

Did Obama just say as President that he would go “line-by-line” to eliminate earmarks.  Does the Constitutional Scholar not know that the US President does NOT have a line-item veto? Good heavens!

9:21 PM – I almost forgot another Debate Drinking Game rule:  Take a swig when McCain says “my friends”.

It is interesting that McCain seems to put Obama on the defense all the time.  Obama is quicker to get defensive than McCain has been so far.

McCain seems to be in control of the flow so far — especially now when he pointed out Obama’s record of supporting earmarks for oil companies in the energy legislation.

9:26 PM – Hey, Jim Lehrer — this was supposed to be a FOREIGN POLICY debate.  We are 30 minutes into it and I’m getting bored with the economic crap.  It is depressing and I’m on drugs that already depress me.

By the way, Barack is doing better so far than I thought he would.  I thought I should mention that.  Although he does have a penchant for holding up China as a good example to follow.   China is a communist nation, Senator, remember?

Best line of the night so far:  McCain – “Sen. Obama is the most liberal member of the Senate.  It is hard to find consensus in the middle when you are reaching so far over from the left.”   Good one, Mac.

9:31 PM – Really now, just answer Jim’s question about which priorities you will drop because of Barney Frank’s Financial Meltdown so we can get back to the FOREIGN POLICY DEBATE!

Good answer by McCain on proposing a Spending Freeze.  I’m all for that.

Obama says, end the war in Iraq to save some money.  McCain returns to the differences between he and Obama on energy policy; drilling and nuclear energy.  Good pivoting there, John.  Oh and he points out he and Senator Clinton agree on that.

Independents in the CNN focus group didn’t like McCain opposing a government-run healthcare system.  Interesting, scary.  They did like when McCain says Obama should plan to stop his $800 billion plan.

9:39 PM – FINALLY, a foreign policy question.  What are the lessons in Iraq?  McCain – when you have a strategy that is failing, change it.

He is smart to talk about the “consequences of defeat.”  Petraeus’ name lights up the Focus Group chart!

Obama:  this is where we differ a lot.  I opposed the war in Iraq six years ago, while BushMcCain supported it.

Now we are focused on the surge question and McCain points out Obama’s flip-flops on his positions on the topic.  Obama gets defensive again.  Now the anti-war Obama comes out guns blazing about McCain’s position on the original invasion.

McCain again puts Obama on the defense with the question of the surge.  “Sen. Obama doesn’t know the difference between a strategy and a tactic.”

9:49 PM – McCain points out that Petraeus and Osama bin Laden agree on one thing – the war on terror’s central front was in Iraq.  McCain is really cleaning Obama’s clock on Iraq.  Barack gets very flustered.  He should go on some of my drugs.  He wouldn’t care about anything.

Why does Obama pronounce Taliban as “Tal-ih-ban”??  It makes it sound like a Japanese restaurant.

Pah-ki-stan, Tal-ih-ban.  Ghen-gis Khan.  Obama, Kerry.

Thanks Senator Obama!  I forgot about the poppy fields.  Maybe if my current pain meds fail, I can take a trip to Kabul.

9:54 PM – Nice connection McCain is doing:  Obama wants to employ a strategy in Afghanistan that he opposed in Iraq.

I’ll give these guys this much:  WIth this longer format, thank God this is not George W. Bush and John Kerry.  I’d need much more drugs than I have now.

New Debate Drinking Game:  Swig when McCain says “Senator Obama doesn’t understand.”

Okay, Barry.  The “I have a bracelet, too” thing was pretty dumb.

10:03 PM – Question on the threat from Iran.  McCain says if Iran acquires nuclear weapons it is an existential threat to Israel and to the region.  He proposes a “League of Democracies” to impose severe sanctions on Iran.  Oh good, another world body.  Just what we need.

Barack says he believes Iran’s Republican Guard is a terrorist organization — but his Senate record is the opposite.  I see a GOP TV commercial here.

10:07 PM – Dan (GayPatriotWest) emails this:  “I’m thinking McCain is doing better than Obama, but isn’t doing great.  He missed a great comeback.  After Obama talked about four years of failiure in Iraq (you know, right after he said that the war didn’t begin in 2007).

McCain should have retorted, “And I tried to prevent those four years of failure.  I spoke out on numerous occasions telling President Bush he needed to change strategy.  I wish it hadn’t taken him so long to listen.  But at least he did.”

I also think McCain should have told The Constitutional Scholar that US President’s don’t have a line-item veto.

Ooooo.  Barry’s response on meeting with Ahmedinijad was weak.  He sounds like a lightweight.  By the way, spelling doesn’t count when I’m on vicodin.

10:11 PM – “John is right”.

FOX NEWS blog by Mosheh Oinounou

OXFORD, MS — Keeping tabs

Obama has said “John is right” five times in the debate so far. Fodder for the next McCain political ad perhaps?

Yeah, I noticed this too.

10:13 PM – “Senator Obama just doesn’t understand.” — DRINK!

10:15 PM – Is the Kissinger comment by Obama a big deal?  I’m not sure.  I have never really been sure what Henry ever says.  He’s kind of like the political version of Bob Dylan.

Kissinger: “Well, I am in favor of negotiating with Iran. And one utility of negotiation is to put before Iran our vision of a Middle East, of a stable Middle East, and our notion on nuclear proliferation at a high enough level so that they have to study it. And, therefore, I actually have preferred doing it at the secretary of state level so that we — we know we’re dealing with authentic…” Sesno: “Put at a very high level right out of the box?” Kissinger: “Initially, yes. And I always believed that the best way to begin a negotiation is to tell the other side exactly what you have in mind and what you are — what the outcome is that you’re trying to achieve so that they have something that they can react to. Now, the permanent members of the Security Council, plus Japan and Germany, have all said nuclear weapons in Iran are unacceptable. They’ve never explained what they mean by this. So if we go into a negotiation, we ought to have a clear understanding of what is it we’re trying to prevent. What is it going to do if we can’t achieve what we’re talking about? But I do not believe that we can make conditions for the opening of negotiations. We ought, however, to be very clear about the content of negotiations and work it out with other countries and with our own government.” (CNN’s “Live Event,” 9/20/08)

Question about Russia.  Barack seems to be acting like he’s taking a foreign policy test.  It reminds me when George W. Bush struggled hard to drop names in his foreign policy debate with Al Gore.

Then again, did McCain REALLY have to pronounce the name of the Georgian President?

It would be great if one of them really flubbed and said something like “As soon as I heard about the invasion of Russia, I flew to Atlanta.”

10:22 PM – Wow, McCain really gets under Obama’s skin.  Obama can’t help himself in responding to every single point McCain makes against him.   Fascinating.   Very Clinton-esque.  He has to have everyone love him.

10:24 PM – Dan writes again:  “The more I watch this, the better McCain gets.  You’re right.  He’s been playing offense all night.  Obama defense.  So far that’s the big takeaway.  And I read it first in your live-blogging (though readers have since IMed reaching similar conclusions).

He was very good on Russia.  Very, very good.  And used a lot fewer “um”.

Though if there were an “um”-counter, I think Obama has McCain beat (by factor of 3 or 4 to 1).”

10:25 PM – McCain really seems in charge tonight.  If his goal was to put Obama on the defensive and to make him look like a lightweight — he won.

10:27 PM – Will there be another 9/11 on US homeland?  McCain points out that he and Lieberman urged for the 9/11 Commission and it was opposed by Bush at first.  We are safer than we were on Sept. 12, 2001.   Nice closing remark on securing the border, Sen. McCain !!!

Barack just quoted Reagan!  A “shiny city on a hill”.   Interesting.

Nice one on McCain’s part — we’ve seen this kind of stubborness (Obama) before with this administration (Bush) in not realizing that they were wrong.

I’m losing interest and frankly, getting tired.  In closing, I think this debate was interesting — but it wasn’t a game changer.  It does seem like Obama tacked back to the left with his language, especially on Iraq.

It will be interesting to see what the flash polls say.  I’m going to bed.

Vicodin-Blogging over!

-Bruce (GayPatriot)

Share

22 Comments

  1. […] Here’s a better link to Bruce’s […]

    Pingback by Pajamas Media » Drunkblogging the First Presidential Debate — September 26, 2008 @ 8:57 pm - September 26, 2008

  2. […] LIVE & Drug-Induced Blogging of Presidential Debate […]

    Pingback by GayPatriot » Preview of First Presidential Debate — UPDATE — September 26, 2008 @ 9:05 pm - September 26, 2008

  3. I sure hope McCain gets comfortable – sounds really nervous.

    Comment by SoCalRobert — September 26, 2008 @ 9:10 pm - September 26, 2008

  4. Hey guy.. whatever you are taking sounds like fun..sorry for your pain though.

    Comment by Linda Strickland — September 26, 2008 @ 9:14 pm - September 26, 2008

  5. Oh, everybody — take a drink everytime Barack says “aaaaand”, “ooooor”, “ahhhhh” and “buuuuuut.”

    Dear Lord, Bruce, do you want all of your readers passed out by 9:45?

    Comment by kaz — September 26, 2008 @ 9:23 pm - September 26, 2008

  6. So, what’s your new handle? “Ibuprofenpundit”? 😉

    Comment by Jeremayakovka — September 26, 2008 @ 9:25 pm - September 26, 2008

  7. Hey Bruce ??? Are you still awake???? Just checking>>>

    Comment by Linda Strickland — September 26, 2008 @ 9:29 pm - September 26, 2008

  8. Obama just said he wants to see us “invest in energy so we can give up our dependence on foreign oil.” Must have some of your pills….I made a solar oven when I was in 6th grade and solar energy was going to “change the future” That was 50 years ago in my science fair. They haven’t made much advance.

    Comment by Linda Strickland — September 26, 2008 @ 9:32 pm - September 26, 2008

  9. Ok I give up… I thought this was going to be on foreign policy and now Obama is talking about education…???

    Comment by Linda Strickland — September 26, 2008 @ 9:34 pm - September 26, 2008

  10. Obama disappoints. No vision just policy wonkery with the usual dem half truths.

    J; Nuclear powah ftw!

    Comment by Mark Hanna — September 26, 2008 @ 9:34 pm - September 26, 2008

  11. Mark…You got it…he is putting me to sleep…Yawn…

    Comment by Linda Strickland — September 26, 2008 @ 9:42 pm - September 26, 2008

  12. O: The first question is whether we should have gotten into the war in the first place. WTF??? It’s six years later and we won. Same ole same ole We should have been in Arghanistan.

    Comment by Mark Hanna — September 26, 2008 @ 9:43 pm - September 26, 2008

  13. Obama is getting hot and bothered and then he talks to the difference for about two sentences and then changes the subject and the theater of war.

    Comment by Linda Strickland — September 26, 2008 @ 9:49 pm - September 26, 2008

  14. How many times has Bambi said “That is not true.”???

    Comment by Linda Strickland — September 26, 2008 @ 9:50 pm - September 26, 2008

  15. We lost credibility in Pakistan. Huh?

    brb vicodin

    Comment by Mark Hanna — September 26, 2008 @ 9:58 pm - September 26, 2008

  16. While O speaks:

    Breaking news:

    Tom Cruise Kicked Out of Scientology!

    http://bilde.com/

    Comment by Mark Hanna — September 26, 2008 @ 10:00 pm - September 26, 2008

  17. Oh noeess! it’s the

    BRACELET DEBATE!!!!11

    I am registering Independent tomorrow.

    Comment by Mark Hanna — September 26, 2008 @ 10:01 pm - September 26, 2008

  18. I have not been watching, but just listening to the debate. Obama has been on defense for 75% of the time……………however, I am biased. I must admit that I just don’t like the tone of Obama’s voice. It is like he is standing on a box in Hyde Park, looking down his nose at oppose anything that he says.

    Comment by Swampfox — September 26, 2008 @ 10:32 pm - September 26, 2008

  19. Oops, I left out a word…..

    I must admit that I just don’t like the tone of Obama’s voice. It is like he is standing on a box in Hyde Park, looking down his nose at “anyone” opposes anything that he says.

    Comment by Swampfox — September 26, 2008 @ 10:34 pm - September 26, 2008

  20. McCain pwned Obama.

    Obama didn’t do badly. No major gaffes. No dramatic setbacks. He didn’t cry, which honestly I was almost half-expect to happen at some point in this campaign. His answers were semi-reasonable, most of the time. But he was very “me, too”. For the most part, he danced to McCain’s tune.

    Example – When McCain talked about veterans and POWs, you knew he was being real. Because McCain *is* one – he’s lived it. He was speaking in an absolutely real way. When Obama talked about it, Obama was the lightweight trying to prove he was real… with a constant, barely-suppressed undertone of arrogance and anger at having to prove that. Same thing on many questions.

    “I have a bracelet, too!” – That quote of Obama’s epitomizes his lack of balls; his lightweight (if not phony/pretender) status and his “Me, too – I can SO be President!” attitude. Who knows, it may ultimately be his epitaph. Let’s hope.

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — September 26, 2008 @ 10:44 pm - September 26, 2008

  21. And the barely-suppressed anger that underlies most of Obama’s facial expressions.

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — September 26, 2008 @ 10:48 pm - September 26, 2008

  22. No surprises from Obama. Anti-Iraq war boilerplate, negotiate with Iran, attack Pakistan, impose statist economic plan. The guy looks like he’s aged 20 years in 20 months.

    Comment by Attmay — September 26, 2008 @ 11:11 pm - September 26, 2008

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.