<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Palin:  Reaganesque</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-reaganesque/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-reaganesque/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:30:41 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriot &#187; My nutshell position on Sarah Palin</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-reaganesque/comment-page-1/#comment-326067</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriot &#187; My nutshell position on Sarah Palin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5205#comment-326067</guid>
		<description>[...] when, in 1968, he launched his first bid for the White.Â  I believe that (as I expressed in these posts) if she applies herself, she has it within her to become his equivalent as a leader.Â  She&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] when, in 1968, he launched his first bid for the White.Â  I believe that (as I expressed in these posts) if she applies herself, she has it within her to become his equivalent as a leader.Â  She&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriot &#187; Palin, Obama and Reagan</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-reaganesque/comment-page-1/#comment-321661</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriot &#187; Palin, Obama and Reagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5205#comment-321661</guid>
		<description>[...] I have compared Palin to the Gipper, calling her Reaganesque, I agree with that assessment.&#160; She is considerably younger now (nine years younger in fact) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have compared Palin to the Gipper, calling her Reaganesque, I agree with that assessment.&nbsp; She is considerably younger now (nine years younger in fact) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Elephant</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-reaganesque/comment-page-1/#comment-316944</link>
		<dc:creator>American Elephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 09:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5205#comment-316944</guid>
		<description>Filtered again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Filtered again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Elephant</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-reaganesque/comment-page-1/#comment-316943</link>
		<dc:creator>American Elephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 09:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5205#comment-316943</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;AE, I know youâ€™re content with your erroneous idea that liberals hate and deny God&lt;/blockquote&gt;Nothing erroneous about it. They proclaim it themselves, loud and proud from tons of movies mocking, deriding and claiming to disprove Christianity, to S&amp;M Last Suppers, to &quot;Piss&quot; Christs and Elephant dung Mary&#039;s, and on and on... Go into a gay chatroom and mention Jesus, and watch the hate spew forth. None of which is ever decried by the left, but rather embraced, hailed and promoted. Huge gallery showings, reproductions, gala movie events. Never any criticism, just praise. Sorry, its just fact. &lt;blockquote&gt; but the biggest show of hatred towards God in this country today is the perversion of Christianity practiced by those who you support. When Christ is used as a weapon against those who donâ€™t fit a tiny little man made view of what is acceptable THAT is denying God.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Wrong again. I don&#039;t support anyone who shows hatred towards God or perverts Christianity, or uses Christ as a weapon. 

Indeed, the  ONLY &quot;Christians&quot; that I know of who use God or Christ as a weapon against anyone (widely denounced by Christians conservatives) is Fred Phelps church. And the Phelps&#039; are big party &lt;a href=&quot;http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/al_gore_fred_phelps.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Democrats. &lt;/a&gt;

And isn&#039;t it uncanny how similar the behaviors of Phelps and his followers are to those of the liberal left. From the childish, anti-Christian banalities that liberals call art to the psychoses displayed at your average liberal protest. &quot;God Hates Fags&quot; &quot;Bush is Hitler!&quot; 

Its all the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>AE, I know youâ€™re content with your erroneous idea that liberals hate and deny God</p></blockquote>
<p>Nothing erroneous about it. They proclaim it themselves, loud and proud from tons of movies mocking, deriding and claiming to disprove Christianity, to S&amp;M Last Suppers, to &#8220;Piss&#8221; Christs and Elephant dung Mary&#8217;s, and on and on&#8230; Go into a gay chatroom and mention Jesus, and watch the hate spew forth. None of which is ever decried by the left, but rather embraced, hailed and promoted. Huge gallery showings, reproductions, gala movie events. Never any criticism, just praise. Sorry, its just fact.<br />
<blockquote> but the biggest show of hatred towards God in this country today is the perversion of Christianity practiced by those who you support. When Christ is used as a weapon against those who donâ€™t fit a tiny little man made view of what is acceptable THAT is denying God.</p></blockquote>
<p>Wrong again. I don&#8217;t support anyone who shows hatred towards God or perverts Christianity, or uses Christ as a weapon. </p>
<p>Indeed, the  ONLY &#8220;Christians&#8221; that I know of who use God or Christ as a weapon against anyone (widely denounced by Christians conservatives) is Fred Phelps church. And the Phelps&#8217; are big party <a href="http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/al_gore_fred_phelps.jpg" rel="nofollow">Democrats. </a></p>
<p>And isn&#8217;t it uncanny how similar the behaviors of Phelps and his followers are to those of the liberal left. From the childish, anti-Christian banalities that liberals call art to the psychoses displayed at your average liberal protest. &#8220;God Hates Fags&#8221; &#8220;Bush is Hitler!&#8221; </p>
<p>Its all the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kit</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-reaganesque/comment-page-1/#comment-316773</link>
		<dc:creator>Kit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 22:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5205#comment-316773</guid>
		<description>Her convention speech!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCDxXJSucF4

Freddy Krueger has nightmares about Sarah Palin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Her convention speech!<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCDxXJSucF4" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCDxXJSucF4</a></p>
<p>Freddy Krueger has nightmares about Sarah Palin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-reaganesque/comment-page-1/#comment-316764</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 22:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5205#comment-316764</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;digusts me. â€œGodâ€™s will has to be done in unifying people and companies to get that gas line built, so pray for that.â€&lt;/i&gt;

Doubtful, since you fully support and endorse Obama &lt;a href=&quot;http://race42008.com/2008/05/12/barack-obamas-pitch-in-kentucky/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; claiming that he is &quot;fulfilling God&#039;s will&quot; and doing &quot;the Lord&#039;s work&quot;&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>digusts me. â€œGodâ€™s will has to be done in unifying people and companies to get that gas line built, so pray for that.â€</i></p>
<p>Doubtful, since you fully support and endorse Obama <a href="http://race42008.com/2008/05/12/barack-obamas-pitch-in-kentucky/" rel="nofollow"> claiming that he is &#8220;fulfilling God&#8217;s will&#8221; and doing &#8220;the Lord&#8217;s work&#8221;</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Elephant</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-reaganesque/comment-page-1/#comment-316708</link>
		<dc:creator>American Elephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 19:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5205#comment-316708</guid>
		<description>Barack Obama said, &quot;John McCain doesn&#039;t know what he&#039;s up against.&quot;

With fraud-rampant ACORN and now &quot;Camp Obama&quot; where Obama supporters are trained in Saul Alinsky tactics -- coupled with John McCain&#039;s refusal to point the finger of blame where it belongs, I fear that was a gross understatement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama said, &#8220;John McCain doesn&#8217;t know what he&#8217;s up against.&#8221;</p>
<p>With fraud-rampant ACORN and now &#8220;Camp Obama&#8221; where Obama supporters are trained in Saul Alinsky tactics &#8212; coupled with John McCain&#8217;s refusal to point the finger of blame where it belongs, I fear that was a gross understatement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-reaganesque/comment-page-1/#comment-316589</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 13:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5205#comment-316589</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If Obama wins, I hope Republicans will do like Democrats and start campaigning for 2012 immediately.&lt;/i&gt;


We can start by pointing to the Obama campaign&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nypost.com/php/pfriendly/print.php?url=http://www.nypost.com/seven/10052008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/voter_fraud_expected_to_be_rampant_132170.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;rampant use of vote fraud&lt;/a&gt; to de-legitimize his victory. Just like the Democrats did with Bush in 2000.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If Obama wins, I hope Republicans will do like Democrats and start campaigning for 2012 immediately.</i></p>
<p>We can start by pointing to the Obama campaign&#8217;s <a href="http://www.nypost.com/php/pfriendly/print.php?url=http://www.nypost.com/seven/10052008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/voter_fraud_expected_to_be_rampant_132170.htm" rel="nofollow">rampant use of vote fraud</a> to de-legitimize his victory. Just like the Democrats did with Bush in 2000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexandra</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-reaganesque/comment-page-1/#comment-316504</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 07:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5205#comment-316504</guid>
		<description>First off, I love your blog. I have to say that. I agree with a lot of the things you have to say, but I really feel the need to ask you something:

You do understand that Palin regards being homosexual as a life choice? You do know that, don&#039;t you?

Palin&#039;s religion (and the woman herself) subscribe to the fact that you have CHOSEN to be gay and that you can indeed be cured. I know there&#039;s some people on your site who are trying to defend her archaic behavior, and Palin has no intention of separating church from State, but the fact of the matter is to her core, she is an evangelical Christian. And she believes you can be cured of your Life Choice.

I just wanted to hear your thoughts on that. I&#039;m intensely curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, I love your blog. I have to say that. I agree with a lot of the things you have to say, but I really feel the need to ask you something:</p>
<p>You do understand that Palin regards being homosexual as a life choice? You do know that, don&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>Palin&#8217;s religion (and the woman herself) subscribe to the fact that you have CHOSEN to be gay and that you can indeed be cured. I know there&#8217;s some people on your site who are trying to defend her archaic behavior, and Palin has no intention of separating church from State, but the fact of the matter is to her core, she is an evangelical Christian. And she believes you can be cured of your Life Choice.</p>
<p>I just wanted to hear your thoughts on that. I&#8217;m intensely curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Elephant</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-reaganesque/comment-page-1/#comment-316469</link>
		<dc:creator>American Elephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 05:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5205#comment-316469</guid>
		<description>If McCain/Palin dont win, I predict Bobby Jindal will be the 45th president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If McCain/Palin dont win, I predict Bobby Jindal will be the 45th president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Elephant</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-reaganesque/comment-page-1/#comment-316465</link>
		<dc:creator>American Elephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 05:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5205#comment-316465</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;McCain is toast. And let me be the first to call Barack Obama the worst U.S. President in history.&lt;/blockquote&gt;If Obama wins, I hope Republicans will do like Democrats and start campaigning for 2012 immediately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>McCain is toast. And let me be the first to call Barack Obama the worst U.S. President in history.</p></blockquote>
<p>If Obama wins, I hope Republicans will do like Democrats and start campaigning for 2012 immediately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocket</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-reaganesque/comment-page-1/#comment-316450</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 04:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5205#comment-316450</guid>
		<description>V the K..once again this election so reminds me of 1976....and I have this sinking feeling that McCain is toast. As I have said in too many posts....Marxist Nobama is going to make Jimmy Carter appear to be for lack of a better word Reaganesque as a President. Carter gave us 20 plus percent interest rates, double digit inflation, gas lines, the worst economy since the Depression and the Iran hostage crisis and the worst foreign policy in the 20th century......Marixst Nobama will make Carter look like a genius.

Palin reminds me of a younger Reagan and like in 1976 when many thought Reagan should have been the GOP nominee, I did post back when Palin was picked for VP that she should be on top of the ticket. I predicted then and I say it again (it seems all my posts seem to say it since like you V the K, I deep down think McCain is toast), just like with Reagan, who became President 4 years later, Sarah Palin will be our 45th President of the United States.

The sad part is that McCain should have kept attacking Nobama non stop and then use the Palin VP nominating acceptance speech as the GOP mantra: lower taxes, cut spending except for defense, Veterans benefits/ cut down on government bureaucracy, Energy Independence and the Commander in Chief argument/Win the War on Terror/Win the War in Iraq and in Afghanistan.

It was what Reagan won on in 1980 (cut taxes, restore our economy, strong defense) It worked then and would work now.

I still can&#039;t believe his campaign publicly announced they were abandoning Michigan..duh, why gave away the game plan out loud and they should have sent in the Palins to talk the auto workers and do as she said (we are with you and will do whatever we can to help you keep your jobs and create new ones since we will need Michigan to create energy independence and hit that hard.)

All I  keep thinking is I sure hope the GOP if it loses with McCain does not throw its best asset under the bus....and grooms Sarah Palin for 2012.

sign me up now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>V the K..once again this election so reminds me of 1976&#8230;.and I have this sinking feeling that McCain is toast. As I have said in too many posts&#8230;.Marxist Nobama is going to make Jimmy Carter appear to be for lack of a better word Reaganesque as a President. Carter gave us 20 plus percent interest rates, double digit inflation, gas lines, the worst economy since the Depression and the Iran hostage crisis and the worst foreign policy in the 20th century&#8230;&#8230;Marixst Nobama will make Carter look like a genius.</p>
<p>Palin reminds me of a younger Reagan and like in 1976 when many thought Reagan should have been the GOP nominee, I did post back when Palin was picked for VP that she should be on top of the ticket. I predicted then and I say it again (it seems all my posts seem to say it since like you V the K, I deep down think McCain is toast), just like with Reagan, who became President 4 years later, Sarah Palin will be our 45th President of the United States.</p>
<p>The sad part is that McCain should have kept attacking Nobama non stop and then use the Palin VP nominating acceptance speech as the GOP mantra: lower taxes, cut spending except for defense, Veterans benefits/ cut down on government bureaucracy, Energy Independence and the Commander in Chief argument/Win the War on Terror/Win the War in Iraq and in Afghanistan.</p>
<p>It was what Reagan won on in 1980 (cut taxes, restore our economy, strong defense) It worked then and would work now.</p>
<p>I still can&#8217;t believe his campaign publicly announced they were abandoning Michigan..duh, why gave away the game plan out loud and they should have sent in the Palins to talk the auto workers and do as she said (we are with you and will do whatever we can to help you keep your jobs and create new ones since we will need Michigan to create energy independence and hit that hard.)</p>
<p>All I  keep thinking is I sure hope the GOP if it loses with McCain does not throw its best asset under the bus&#8230;.and grooms Sarah Palin for 2012.</p>
<p>sign me up now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Elephant</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-reaganesque/comment-page-1/#comment-316422</link>
		<dc:creator>American Elephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 03:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5205#comment-316422</guid>
		<description>Brendan,&lt;blockquote&gt;Yet as many people have since pointed out, Palinâ€™s quote from Reagan comes from his attack on Medicare as socialized medicine, a program the vast majority of Americans now support.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Americans may support it, but it&#039;s even closer to bankruptcy than social security and is unsustainable. Reagan was right.&lt;blockquote&gt;The unavoidable truth is that Palinâ€™s performance at the debate was passable only by comparing it to her prior interviews where even many right-wing commentators were appalled by her lack of knowledge on basic policy issues.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Translation: Her knowledge of policy is not the problem, biased editing is. Turns out when the media isnt able to &quot;filter&quot; her answers, she does just fine. &lt;blockquote&gt;The debates have not stopped what appears to be growing momentum in the polls for Obama.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;Among 944 likely voters, the Kerry-Edwards ticket led Bush-Cheney 50 percent to 46 percent. The Oct. 4-6 survey had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;â€œThe founder of the AIP was a man named Joe Vogler. Hereâ€™s what he had to say in a 1991 interview, only a few years before Palin attended its convention&lt;/blockquote&gt;bring it on. First off, Palin didnt attend their convention, she sent them a &quot;congratulations on your convention&quot; video taped message that basically said how important the free flow of ideas is to democracy. I know this is galling stuff to dictatorial liberals, but to most Americans its a yawner, but kicking off your political career with an unrepentant domestic terrorist is not. Especially in light of all the other criminals and radicals Obama associates with. 

Just out of curiosity, when liberals talk about truth, is anyone else reminded of Inigo Montoya in the Princess Bride? &quot;I do not think that word means what you think it means&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brendan,<br />
<blockquote>Yet as many people have since pointed out, Palinâ€™s quote from Reagan comes from his attack on Medicare as socialized medicine, a program the vast majority of Americans now support.</p></blockquote>
<p>Americans may support it, but it&#8217;s even closer to bankruptcy than social security and is unsustainable. Reagan was right.<br />
<blockquote>The unavoidable truth is that Palinâ€™s performance at the debate was passable only by comparing it to her prior interviews where even many right-wing commentators were appalled by her lack of knowledge on basic policy issues.</p></blockquote>
<p>Translation: Her knowledge of policy is not the problem, biased editing is. Turns out when the media isnt able to &#8220;filter&#8221; her answers, she does just fine.<br />
<blockquote>The debates have not stopped what appears to be growing momentum in the polls for Obama.</p></blockquote>
<p><i>&#8220;Among 944 likely voters, the Kerry-Edwards ticket led Bush-Cheney 50 percent to 46 percent. The Oct. 4-6 survey had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.&#8221;</i><br />
<blockquote>â€œThe founder of the AIP was a man named Joe Vogler. Hereâ€™s what he had to say in a 1991 interview, only a few years before Palin attended its convention</p></blockquote>
<p>bring it on. First off, Palin didnt attend their convention, she sent them a &#8220;congratulations on your convention&#8221; video taped message that basically said how important the free flow of ideas is to democracy. I know this is galling stuff to dictatorial liberals, but to most Americans its a yawner, but kicking off your political career with an unrepentant domestic terrorist is not. Especially in light of all the other criminals and radicals Obama associates with. </p>
<p>Just out of curiosity, when liberals talk about truth, is anyone else reminded of Inigo Montoya in the Princess Bride? &#8220;I do not think that word means what you think it means&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince P</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-reaganesque/comment-page-1/#comment-316400</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 02:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5205#comment-316400</guid>
		<description>must  s/b most</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>must  s/b most</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince P</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-reaganesque/comment-page-1/#comment-316399</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 02:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5205#comment-316399</guid>
		<description>oh one thing.. only a person who DOESN&#039;T know the extent of the Ayers-Obama relationship would say that their info leads them to think its irrelvelnt.

But anyone who knows just how tight these people are would know how important it is.

So Brendan, just like with so many other &quot;outraged&quot; Lefties (on so many different topics), the thing you bitch must about , you know jack shit about it.

So. Shut th fuck up and learn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh one thing.. only a person who DOESN&#8217;T know the extent of the Ayers-Obama relationship would say that their info leads them to think its irrelvelnt.</p>
<p>But anyone who knows just how tight these people are would know how important it is.</p>
<p>So Brendan, just like with so many other &#8220;outraged&#8221; Lefties (on so many different topics), the thing you bitch must about , you know jack shit about it.</p>
<p>So. Shut th fuck up and learn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince P</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-reaganesque/comment-page-1/#comment-316397</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 02:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5205#comment-316397</guid>
		<description>So Brendan isn&#039;t disputing the charge?

So Brendan , that means Obama lied then, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Brendan isn&#8217;t disputing the charge?</p>
<p>So Brendan , that means Obama lied then, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-reaganesque/comment-page-1/#comment-316390</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 01:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5205#comment-316390</guid>
		<description>By the way, Brendan, three of William Ayers buddies were killed while assembling a nail bomb that William Ayers designed, which they intended to set off a dance where American soldiers would be gathered, in hopes of killing American soldiers. 

Can you point to *anything* in the AIP that even comes close to that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, Brendan, three of William Ayers buddies were killed while assembling a nail bomb that William Ayers designed, which they intended to set off a dance where American soldiers would be gathered, in hopes of killing American soldiers. </p>
<p>Can you point to *anything* in the AIP that even comes close to that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-reaganesque/comment-page-1/#comment-316388</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 01:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5205#comment-316388</guid>
		<description>So, Brendan, did the AIP set off bombs in the Pentagon, the Capitol, and the NYC Police Headquarters? 

Didn&#039;t think so. 

In fact, some people would say the AIP was peacefully assembling to petition the government for a redress of grievances... a.k.a. &lt;b&gt;exercising their constitutional rights&lt;/b&gt;. Do you lefties have a thing against people exercising their Constitutional rights? Is this the kind of thing we can expect from Comrade Obama when he has absolute power over the government?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Brendan, did the AIP set off bombs in the Pentagon, the Capitol, and the NYC Police Headquarters? </p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t think so. </p>
<p>In fact, some people would say the AIP was peacefully assembling to petition the government for a redress of grievances&#8230; a.k.a. <b>exercising their constitutional rights</b>. Do you lefties have a thing against people exercising their Constitutional rights? Is this the kind of thing we can expect from Comrade Obama when he has absolute power over the government?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-reaganesque/comment-page-1/#comment-316379</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 01:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5205#comment-316379</guid>
		<description>&quot;CNN FRONT PAGE NEWS: Palin says Obama pals with â€˜terroristsâ€™&quot;

okay fair game.  If Obama relationship with William Ayers is on the table, what about Palin&#039;s relationship to the  Alaska Independence Party, a secessionist party her husband was quite recently a member  and a party Sarah Palin has openly courted. 

 As reported by Greg Sargent:
  &quot;The founder of the AIP was a man named Joe Vogler. Here&#039;s what he had to say in a  1991 interview, only a few years before Palin attended its convention: &quot;The fires of hell are frozen glaciers compared to my hatred for the American government.&quot;

I would think such statements would horrify gay patriots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;CNN FRONT PAGE NEWS: Palin says Obama pals with â€˜terroristsâ€™&#8221;</p>
<p>okay fair game.  If Obama relationship with William Ayers is on the table, what about Palin&#8217;s relationship to the  Alaska Independence Party, a secessionist party her husband was quite recently a member  and a party Sarah Palin has openly courted. </p>
<p> As reported by Greg Sargent:<br />
  &#8220;The founder of the AIP was a man named Joe Vogler. Here&#8217;s what he had to say in a  1991 interview, only a few years before Palin attended its convention: &#8220;The fires of hell are frozen glaciers compared to my hatred for the American government.&#8221;</p>
<p>I would think such statements would horrify gay patriots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-reaganesque/comment-page-1/#comment-316375</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 00:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5205#comment-316375</guid>
		<description>(Hint: In Britain and Canada, the answer has been &quot;Both.&quot; And there&#039;s still a six week wait for a CAT scan.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Hint: In Britain and Canada, the answer has been &#8220;Both.&#8221; And there&#8217;s still a six week wait for a CAT scan.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

