The “Ideology-Free” Election of 2008
If people voted this year on which party’s general philosophy more closely matched their own view of government, John McCain would win in a walk while Republicans picked up seats in both Houses of Congress. While the GOP does not now have the standing it did four years ago, conservative ideas still hold sway. Voters still distrust government solutions to our problems, economic as well social. America remains a center-right country.
Alas that political ideas don’t seem to matter much in this election. As Dick Morris put it in his column this week:
But [voters] are more likely just distracted by the financial meltdown all around them. We have never had a presidential race, since 1944, where the contest was not the most important news in the four weeks before the election. (In 1944, the war overshadowed the election much to the frustration of the Republican candidate Thomas E. Dewey).
Indeed, former Bush adviser Michael Gerson attributes Obama’s current standing in the polls to the economic crisis:
In the middle of September, the net favorable rating for each candidate was about the same. By Oct. 7, Obama was ahead on this measure by about 16 points. Did McCain suddenly become a stumbling failure? No, the world suddenly went into an economic slide.
As a results, voters turned to the candidate of the out-of-power party, primarily because he represented change (how prescient his campaign slogan) from the party in power.
This election is not a referendum on conservatism, as some on the left would have it. If it were, the GOP would have a better-than-even chance of winning. Given John McCain’s failure to articulate a consistent conservative message of change (from a less-than conservative Administration), his economic message has so far failed to resonate with voters.
At the same time, Obama has, in the debates and his speeches, tried to distance himself from his far-left record, appearing in the first debate “as a moderate Democrat — even a David Boren or Sam Nunn.” (Only in unscripted moments does he let his real views slip out.)
As a result, this election seems the most ideology-free campaign at least since 1992, possibly even 1976. People seem to be judging the candidates by their apparent differences from the powers that be in our nation’s capital, not evaluating them by their basic political philosophy.
Should Obama win and govern as his record suggests, we should have that debate four years hence.
6 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
I think the country is now center left, and it will be for the foreseeable future. W has been a s****ty president, and McCain proposals are not that conservative. This conservative (not a GOP member) will vote for Bob Barr.
Comment by Richard — October 15, 2008 @ 11:12 pm - October 15, 2008
Richard, what evidence do you have that we’re center-left, polls showing people favoring more government?
Comment by GayPatriotWest — October 15, 2008 @ 11:15 pm - October 15, 2008
“Should Obama win and govern as his record suggests, we should have that debate four years hence.”
Nah. We’ll have it in two, with the Congressional races.
But that’s a poor consolation prize, and a poor remedy to the harm an Obama administration would do, both to the World and to this country.
Comment by Clint — October 16, 2008 @ 12:48 am - October 16, 2008
[...] Ideology-Free Election of 2008 “If people voted this year on which party’s general philosophy more closely matched their [...]
Pingback by The Personal is Political « How May I inconvenience You Today? — October 16, 2008 @ 12:36 pm - October 16, 2008
[...] The “Ideology-Free” Election of 2008 [...]
Pingback by GayPatriot » Palin, Obama and Reagan — October 16, 2008 @ 1:46 pm - October 16, 2008
[...] another sign that in a relatively ideology-free election, our new president had the right campaign slogan. People wanted change. Let’s hope he [...]
Pingback by GayPatriot » Change, not Ideology, won the Election — January 21, 2009 @ 2:24 am - January 21, 2009