<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MSM More Interested in Palin Gossip than her Record</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/23/msm-more-interested-in-palin-gossip-than-her-record/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/23/msm-more-interested-in-palin-gossip-than-her-record/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:11:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriot &#187; My nutshell position on Sarah Palin</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/23/msm-more-interested-in-palin-gossip-than-her-record/comment-page-1/#comment-326009</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriot &#187; My nutshell position on Sarah Palin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 17:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5935#comment-326009</guid>
		<description>[...] her as inexperienced have little or no knowledge of her record.Â  I&#8217;m stunned at her critics indifference to that record. One reader who slammed me for my support of the Alaska Governor included this in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] her as inexperienced have little or no knowledge of her record.Â  I&#8217;m stunned at her critics indifference to that record. One reader who slammed me for my support of the Alaska Governor included this in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriot &#187; Why I &#8220;Dwell&#8221; on Sarah Palin</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/23/msm-more-interested-in-palin-gossip-than-her-record/comment-page-1/#comment-325728</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriot &#187; Why I &#8220;Dwell&#8221; on Sarah Palin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5935#comment-325728</guid>
		<description>[...] While giving Barack Obama a pass, the media have shown interest into delving into her personal life than in parsing her political record. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] While giving Barack Obama a pass, the media have shown interest into delving into her personal life than in parsing her political record. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebekah K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/23/msm-more-interested-in-palin-gossip-than-her-record/comment-page-1/#comment-325016</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebekah K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5935#comment-325016</guid>
		<description>&quot;Iâ€™m a registered Republican, who went door to door for Nixon.&quot;

And Hillary was a Goldwater Girl.  If you&#039;re a Republican, what have you done within the party, &lt;em&gt;lately?&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Iâ€™m a registered Republican, who went door to door for Nixon.&#8221;</p>
<p>And Hillary was a Goldwater Girl.  If you&#8217;re a Republican, what have you done within the party, <em>lately?</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/23/msm-more-interested-in-palin-gossip-than-her-record/comment-page-1/#comment-324942</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5935#comment-324942</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;iâ€™m also really wondering what your idea of the â€œright choicesâ€ are, and how sarah palin has made â€œright choicesâ€ and the â€œfeminist leftâ€ does not.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

She got educated. She married the father of her children and stayed with him. She obviously respects and supports him, and he does the same for her. She worked hard. She sustained herself with her personal responsibility and faith, not demanding that the government take care of her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>iâ€™m also really wondering what your idea of the â€œright choicesâ€ are, and how sarah palin has made â€œright choicesâ€ and the â€œfeminist leftâ€ does not.</p></blockquote>
<p>She got educated. She married the father of her children and stayed with him. She obviously respects and supports him, and he does the same for her. She worked hard. She sustained herself with her personal responsibility and faith, not demanding that the government take care of her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heliotrope</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/23/msm-more-interested-in-palin-gossip-than-her-record/comment-page-1/#comment-324935</link>
		<dc:creator>heliotrope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5935#comment-324935</guid>
		<description>LB, if a conservative has told you to vote for Sarah Palin because she is a woman and you are a woman, that conservative is a full blown idiot. On the other hand, there are women who want to vote for a woman, so those of us who support Sarah Palin are perfectly happy to have their votes.

You seem to have selected women&#039;s &quot;issues&quot; as your focus. Fine. Many voters limit themselves to narrow issues such as gay marriage, pro-choice, evangelical values, skin color or expanded socialism. Those voters have to choose who best fits their driving concerns. Sarah Palin is not promoting a separate feminist agenda.

Apparently, you favor the liberal feminist agenda. You will not be happy among conservatives in general. We do not favor holding women back, denying women&#039;s health care, making women get pregnant and forcing them to carry the baby as punishment, being subject to unfair pay, or submitting to domestic violence. In fact, we conservatives would like to see proof of discrimination against women so we can make sure the multitude of existing laws are enforced. We do not believe that cutting a government check, sending a social worker around, taking guns away from everyone or establishing another agency is even remotely effective in confronting the problems some women have. The 14th Amendment guarantees women the equal protection and due process of the law. Conservatives love to enforce the Constitution.

If you have great faith in Obama and his hope and change fog of comfort talk, then you should hitch your wagon to his unicorn and enjoy the ride.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LB, if a conservative has told you to vote for Sarah Palin because she is a woman and you are a woman, that conservative is a full blown idiot. On the other hand, there are women who want to vote for a woman, so those of us who support Sarah Palin are perfectly happy to have their votes.</p>
<p>You seem to have selected women&#8217;s &#8220;issues&#8221; as your focus. Fine. Many voters limit themselves to narrow issues such as gay marriage, pro-choice, evangelical values, skin color or expanded socialism. Those voters have to choose who best fits their driving concerns. Sarah Palin is not promoting a separate feminist agenda.</p>
<p>Apparently, you favor the liberal feminist agenda. You will not be happy among conservatives in general. We do not favor holding women back, denying women&#8217;s health care, making women get pregnant and forcing them to carry the baby as punishment, being subject to unfair pay, or submitting to domestic violence. In fact, we conservatives would like to see proof of discrimination against women so we can make sure the multitude of existing laws are enforced. We do not believe that cutting a government check, sending a social worker around, taking guns away from everyone or establishing another agency is even remotely effective in confronting the problems some women have. The 14th Amendment guarantees women the equal protection and due process of the law. Conservatives love to enforce the Constitution.</p>
<p>If you have great faith in Obama and his hope and change fog of comfort talk, then you should hitch your wagon to his unicorn and enjoy the ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/23/msm-more-interested-in-palin-gossip-than-her-record/comment-page-1/#comment-324934</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5935#comment-324934</guid>
		<description>Fellas, fellas, remember, we&#039;re talking to a Democrat woman here.

For example, she whines about &quot;fair pay&quot; for women, and insists she supports Obama because he supports it -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ocregister.com/articles/obama-women-mccain-2154423-pay-equal&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; even though he doesn&#039;t practice it&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;i&gt;Based on these calculations, Obama&#039;s 28 male staffers divided among themselves total payroll expenditures of $1,523,120. Thus, Obama&#039;s average male employee earned $54,397.

Obama&#039;s 30 female employees split $1,354,580 among themselves, or $45,152, on average.

Why this disparity? One reason may be the underrepresentation of women in Obama&#039;s highest-compensated ranks. Among Obama&#039;s five best-paid advisers, one was a woman. Among his top 20, seven were women.

Again, on average, Obama&#039;s female staffers earn just 83 cents for every dollar his male staffers make. This figure certainly exceeds the 77-cent threshold that Obama&#039;s campaign Web site condemns. However, 83 cents do not equal $1.00. In spite of this 17-cent gap between Obama&#039;s rhetoric and reality, he chose to chide GOP presidential contender John McCain on this issue.

Obama responded Aug. 31 to Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin&#039;s Republican vice-presidential nomination. Palin &quot;seems like a very engaging person,&quot; Obama told voters in Toledo, Ohio. &quot;But I&#039;ve got to say, she&#039;s opposed â€“ like John McCain is â€“ to equal pay for equal work. That doesn&#039;t make much sense to me.&quot;

Obama&#039;s criticism notwithstanding, McCain&#039;s payment patterns are the stuff of feminist dreams.

McCain&#039;s 17 male staffers split $916,914, thus averaging $53,936. His 25 female employees divided $1,396,958 and averaged $55,878.

On average, according to these data, women in John McCain&#039;s office make $1.04 for every dollar a man makes. In fact, all other things being equal, a typical female staffer could earn 21 cents more per dollar paid to her male counterpart â€“ while adding $10,726 to her annual income â€“ by leaving Barack Obama&#039;s office and going to work for John McCain.

How could this be?

One explanation could be that women compose a majority of McCain&#039;s highest-paid aides. Among his top-five best-compensated staffers, three are women. Of his 20-highest-salaried employees, 13 are women. The Republican presidential nominee relies on women â€“ much more than men â€“ for advice at the highest, and thus, best-paid levels.&lt;/i&gt;

So let&#039;s see. Obama blabbers about supporting &quot;fair pay&quot; but doesn&#039;t practice it; McCain says that people should be paid on their merits regardless of gender and more than practices it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fellas, fellas, remember, we&#8217;re talking to a Democrat woman here.</p>
<p>For example, she whines about &#8220;fair pay&#8221; for women, and insists she supports Obama because he supports it &#8212; <a href="http://www.ocregister.com/articles/obama-women-mccain-2154423-pay-equal" rel="nofollow"> even though he doesn&#8217;t practice it</a>.</p>
<p><i>Based on these calculations, Obama&#8217;s 28 male staffers divided among themselves total payroll expenditures of $1,523,120. Thus, Obama&#8217;s average male employee earned $54,397.</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s 30 female employees split $1,354,580 among themselves, or $45,152, on average.</p>
<p>Why this disparity? One reason may be the underrepresentation of women in Obama&#8217;s highest-compensated ranks. Among Obama&#8217;s five best-paid advisers, one was a woman. Among his top 20, seven were women.</p>
<p>Again, on average, Obama&#8217;s female staffers earn just 83 cents for every dollar his male staffers make. This figure certainly exceeds the 77-cent threshold that Obama&#8217;s campaign Web site condemns. However, 83 cents do not equal $1.00. In spite of this 17-cent gap between Obama&#8217;s rhetoric and reality, he chose to chide GOP presidential contender John McCain on this issue.</p>
<p>Obama responded Aug. 31 to Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin&#8217;s Republican vice-presidential nomination. Palin &#8220;seems like a very engaging person,&#8221; Obama told voters in Toledo, Ohio. &#8220;But I&#8217;ve got to say, she&#8217;s opposed â€“ like John McCain is â€“ to equal pay for equal work. That doesn&#8217;t make much sense to me.&#8221;</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s criticism notwithstanding, McCain&#8217;s payment patterns are the stuff of feminist dreams.</p>
<p>McCain&#8217;s 17 male staffers split $916,914, thus averaging $53,936. His 25 female employees divided $1,396,958 and averaged $55,878.</p>
<p>On average, according to these data, women in John McCain&#8217;s office make $1.04 for every dollar a man makes. In fact, all other things being equal, a typical female staffer could earn 21 cents more per dollar paid to her male counterpart â€“ while adding $10,726 to her annual income â€“ by leaving Barack Obama&#8217;s office and going to work for John McCain.</p>
<p>How could this be?</p>
<p>One explanation could be that women compose a majority of McCain&#8217;s highest-paid aides. Among his top-five best-compensated staffers, three are women. Of his 20-highest-salaried employees, 13 are women. The Republican presidential nominee relies on women â€“ much more than men â€“ for advice at the highest, and thus, best-paid levels.</i></p>
<p>So let&#8217;s see. Obama blabbers about supporting &#8220;fair pay&#8221; but doesn&#8217;t practice it; McCain says that people should be paid on their merits regardless of gender and more than practices it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriotWest</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/23/msm-more-interested-in-palin-gossip-than-her-record/comment-page-1/#comment-324918</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriotWest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5935#comment-324918</guid>
		<description>LB, well, it&#039;s gross to me that someone would comment to my post without addressing its points.  The left-wing talking points I reference are your comments on Governor Palin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LB, well, it&#8217;s gross to me that someone would comment to my post without addressing its points.  The left-wing talking points I reference are your comments on Governor Palin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LB</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/23/msm-more-interested-in-palin-gossip-than-her-record/comment-page-1/#comment-324916</link>
		<dc:creator>LB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5935#comment-324916</guid>
		<description>ughhhh. do i think that barack obama or anyone else ONLY represents women&#039;s interests and not the interests of society as a whole? of course not and i dont think that anyone should. but ignoring women&#039;s rights altogether and doing nothing to prevent or investigate the alarming rate of sexual assaults in alaska is a little bit gross. to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ughhhh. do i think that barack obama or anyone else ONLY represents women&#8217;s interests and not the interests of society as a whole? of course not and i dont think that anyone should. but ignoring women&#8217;s rights altogether and doing nothing to prevent or investigate the alarming rate of sexual assaults in alaska is a little bit gross. to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LB</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/23/msm-more-interested-in-palin-gossip-than-her-record/comment-page-1/#comment-324914</link>
		<dc:creator>LB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5935#comment-324914</guid>
		<description>oh it was a small joke! i didn&#039;t know that my personal beliefs on women&#039;s rights were left-wing talking points, but, uh, okay! i did admit my ignorance of sarah palin&#039;s record on women&#039;s issues, and from your explanation, she doesn&#039;t have one. apparently now ignorance is classified as not believing facts that... don&#039;t exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh it was a small joke! i didn&#8217;t know that my personal beliefs on women&#8217;s rights were left-wing talking points, but, uh, okay! i did admit my ignorance of sarah palin&#8217;s record on women&#8217;s issues, and from your explanation, she doesn&#8217;t have one. apparently now ignorance is classified as not believing facts that&#8230; don&#8217;t exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Always Right</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/23/msm-more-interested-in-palin-gossip-than-her-record/comment-page-1/#comment-324912</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Always Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5935#comment-324912</guid>
		<description>I would assume that in a perfect world we elect someone to represent all of the people, not just some particular segment of society. At least that is what most rational people probably want their elected officials to do. It seems the Democrats have a different set of standards and want an elected offical to represent only certain segments of society. So I for one am glad that Gov Palin is not stuck on an agenda just to look out for the interests of the women of her state but in fact pays attention to the interests of all of her constituents regardless of gender.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would assume that in a perfect world we elect someone to represent all of the people, not just some particular segment of society. At least that is what most rational people probably want their elected officials to do. It seems the Democrats have a different set of standards and want an elected offical to represent only certain segments of society. So I for one am glad that Gov Palin is not stuck on an agenda just to look out for the interests of the women of her state but in fact pays attention to the interests of all of her constituents regardless of gender.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriotWest</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/23/msm-more-interested-in-palin-gossip-than-her-record/comment-page-1/#comment-324907</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriotWest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5935#comment-324907</guid>
		<description>Mean, LB.  C&#039;mon, give me a break.  You come to our side, comment to my post, but ignore my points, deciding to weigh in with your left-wing talking points.

You weigh in on Sarah Palin, but from your very comment, you demonstrate an incredible ignorance of her record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mean, LB.  C&#8217;mon, give me a break.  You come to our side, comment to my post, but ignore my points, deciding to weigh in with your left-wing talking points.</p>
<p>You weigh in on Sarah Palin, but from your very comment, you demonstrate an incredible ignorance of her record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LB</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/23/msm-more-interested-in-palin-gossip-than-her-record/comment-page-1/#comment-324904</link>
		<dc:creator>LB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5935#comment-324904</guid>
		<description>i didn&#039;t know that y&#039;all would be so mean on the internet! really, i&#039;m actually curious about these things.

i, as a woman who is very concerned about women&#039;s issues that affect women on a daily basis, like: health care, domestic violence, fair pay, reproductive rights, am being told by conservatives that i should be ashamed of myself as a feminist for not voting for a woman like sarah palin JUST BECAUSE she is a woman. natural gas pipelines, wasteful spending and her &quot;maverick&quot; status are not women&#039;s issues. if she isn&#039;t actively pursuing the betterment of women&#039;s lives in her state -- especially a state where the incident of sexual assault is phenomenally higher than any other state! i have serious problems with voting for her. i&#039;m not saying that a woman should be pursuing these goals because she&#039;s a woman, but that PEOPLE who have the power to make and change policy, male or female, should. is that sexist for me to vote for the candidates who have done that the most?

i&#039;m also really wondering what your idea of the &quot;right choices&quot; are, and how sarah palin has made &quot;right choices&quot; and the &quot;feminist left&quot; does not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i didn&#8217;t know that y&#8217;all would be so mean on the internet! really, i&#8217;m actually curious about these things.</p>
<p>i, as a woman who is very concerned about women&#8217;s issues that affect women on a daily basis, like: health care, domestic violence, fair pay, reproductive rights, am being told by conservatives that i should be ashamed of myself as a feminist for not voting for a woman like sarah palin JUST BECAUSE she is a woman. natural gas pipelines, wasteful spending and her &#8220;maverick&#8221; status are not women&#8217;s issues. if she isn&#8217;t actively pursuing the betterment of women&#8217;s lives in her state &#8212; especially a state where the incident of sexual assault is phenomenally higher than any other state! i have serious problems with voting for her. i&#8217;m not saying that a woman should be pursuing these goals because she&#8217;s a woman, but that PEOPLE who have the power to make and change policy, male or female, should. is that sexist for me to vote for the candidates who have done that the most?</p>
<p>i&#8217;m also really wondering what your idea of the &#8220;right choices&#8221; are, and how sarah palin has made &#8220;right choices&#8221; and the &#8220;feminist left&#8221; does not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heliotrope</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/23/msm-more-interested-in-palin-gossip-than-her-record/comment-page-1/#comment-324895</link>
		<dc:creator>heliotrope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5935#comment-324895</guid>
		<description>My previous comments to LB are still resting in the spam filter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My previous comments to LB are still resting in the spam filter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heliotrope</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/23/msm-more-interested-in-palin-gossip-than-her-record/comment-page-1/#comment-324894</link>
		<dc:creator>heliotrope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5935#comment-324894</guid>
		<description>LB begs:&lt;blockquote&gt;okay: what are some things that sarah palin has actively done for women in her tenure as mayor and governor that i donâ€™t know about? if i am ignorant, iâ€™m legitimately curious.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Huh? Where is it written that a female governor or mayor must &quot;actively&quot; do something just for women? What kind of sexist bigotry ungirds such foolish thinking?

I will pass on contemplating your level of ignorance, but what do you ask when you are illegitimately curious?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LB begs:<br />
<blockquote>okay: what are some things that sarah palin has actively done for women in her tenure as mayor and governor that i donâ€™t know about? if i am ignorant, iâ€™m legitimately curious.</p></blockquote>
<p>Huh? Where is it written that a female governor or mayor must &#8220;actively&#8221; do something just for women? What kind of sexist bigotry ungirds such foolish thinking?</p>
<p>I will pass on contemplating your level of ignorance, but what do you ask when you are illegitimately curious?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/23/msm-more-interested-in-palin-gossip-than-her-record/comment-page-1/#comment-324891</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5935#comment-324891</guid>
		<description>What has she done for women? 

1. She eliminated wasteful spending from Alaska&#039;s budget, benefiting Alaska&#039;s taxpayers... half of whom are women. 

2. She secured a deal to build a natural gas pipeline... securing jobs for women and for men who support women, as well as securing fuel for all women who use it. 

3. She fought corruption in her own party, benefiting all women who care about an honest political system. 

4. She provided a courageous example for women who have Down&#039;s Syndrome pregnancies. 

5. She showed by example that a woman can achieve success without having to tolerate a philandering husband (Hillary) or being born into a wealthy, connected family (Pelosi, Snowe, Collins, Sebelius, Landrieu, McCaskill). 

6. She showed that a woman can govern a state competently, unlike Michigan&#039;s Jenny &quot;one state recession&quot; Granholm. 

7. She stood up for domestic energy production creating jobs and lower energy costs for workers and consumers... half of whom are women. 

8. She demonstrates that if women work hard and make the right choices, there&#039;s no limit to what they can achieve. Even if they grow up in a cabin and have to hunt for their own food. She showed women you don&#039;t have to kowtow to the feminist left to achieve success. 

9. She served her constituents in Wasilla well enough to win re-election handily, and achieve an 80 per cent approval rating in Alaska. I would estimate that about half of her constituents are women. 

10. She inquired into the firing of a wife and child-abusing cop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What has she done for women? </p>
<p>1. She eliminated wasteful spending from Alaska&#8217;s budget, benefiting Alaska&#8217;s taxpayers&#8230; half of whom are women. </p>
<p>2. She secured a deal to build a natural gas pipeline&#8230; securing jobs for women and for men who support women, as well as securing fuel for all women who use it. </p>
<p>3. She fought corruption in her own party, benefiting all women who care about an honest political system. </p>
<p>4. She provided a courageous example for women who have Down&#8217;s Syndrome pregnancies. </p>
<p>5. She showed by example that a woman can achieve success without having to tolerate a philandering husband (Hillary) or being born into a wealthy, connected family (Pelosi, Snowe, Collins, Sebelius, Landrieu, McCaskill). </p>
<p>6. She showed that a woman can govern a state competently, unlike Michigan&#8217;s Jenny &#8220;one state recession&#8221; Granholm. </p>
<p>7. She stood up for domestic energy production creating jobs and lower energy costs for workers and consumers&#8230; half of whom are women. </p>
<p>8. She demonstrates that if women work hard and make the right choices, there&#8217;s no limit to what they can achieve. Even if they grow up in a cabin and have to hunt for their own food. She showed women you don&#8217;t have to kowtow to the feminist left to achieve success. </p>
<p>9. She served her constituents in Wasilla well enough to win re-election handily, and achieve an 80 per cent approval rating in Alaska. I would estimate that about half of her constituents are women. </p>
<p>10. She inquired into the firing of a wife and child-abusing cop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LB</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/23/msm-more-interested-in-palin-gossip-than-her-record/comment-page-1/#comment-324886</link>
		<dc:creator>LB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5935#comment-324886</guid>
		<description>okay: what are some things that sarah palin has actively done for women in her tenure as mayor and governor that i don&#039;t know about? if i am ignorant, i&#039;m legitimately curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>okay: what are some things that sarah palin has actively done for women in her tenure as mayor and governor that i don&#8217;t know about? if i am ignorant, i&#8217;m legitimately curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/23/msm-more-interested-in-palin-gossip-than-her-record/comment-page-1/#comment-324872</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5935#comment-324872</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://ace.mu.nu/archives/276395.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Obama&#039;s Campaign Finance Fraud&lt;/a&gt;. About as accidental as those &#039;accidental&#039; phony ACORN voter registrations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ace.mu.nu/archives/276395.php" rel="nofollow">Obama&#8217;s Campaign Finance Fraud</a>. About as accidental as those &#8216;accidental&#8217; phony ACORN voter registrations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heliotrope</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/23/msm-more-interested-in-palin-gossip-than-her-record/comment-page-1/#comment-324864</link>
		<dc:creator>heliotrope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5935#comment-324864</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;to be a woman and offended by sarah palin and her nomination for vice president is far from sexist. the fact that mccain never, ever, ever! would have chosen a new male governor of alaska with limited qualifications is offensive.&lt;/blockquote&gt;What limited qualifications? Spell them out.

Of course McCain was swayed by gender in this particular election. The Democrats chose Obama because of his race. Had he been white, we wouldn&#039;t even know of him. So what is the deal here?

Sarah Palin is no different than Joe the plumber in her bedrock conservative principles. McCain might very well have chosen the male governor of Alaska version of Sarah Palin.

Why would a woman be offended by Sarah Palin? What has she done or represent that is &quot;offensive&quot;? Pro-life? Large family? Confidence? Conservative values? An engaging personality? Achievement? Christian beliefs? Straight talk? Maverick qualities? Being a fast learner? Not being a part of the pseudo-intellectual, connected, chattering, preppie Eastern elite? Shopping at Wal-Mart? Not killing a Downs baby? Helping her pregnant teen deal with responsibility? Understanding the lives of regular, hard working Americans?

Do inform us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>to be a woman and offended by sarah palin and her nomination for vice president is far from sexist. the fact that mccain never, ever, ever! would have chosen a new male governor of alaska with limited qualifications is offensive.</p></blockquote>
<p>What limited qualifications? Spell them out.</p>
<p>Of course McCain was swayed by gender in this particular election. The Democrats chose Obama because of his race. Had he been white, we wouldn&#8217;t even know of him. So what is the deal here?</p>
<p>Sarah Palin is no different than Joe the plumber in her bedrock conservative principles. McCain might very well have chosen the male governor of Alaska version of Sarah Palin.</p>
<p>Why would a woman be offended by Sarah Palin? What has she done or represent that is &#8220;offensive&#8221;? Pro-life? Large family? Confidence? Conservative values? An engaging personality? Achievement? Christian beliefs? Straight talk? Maverick qualities? Being a fast learner? Not being a part of the pseudo-intellectual, connected, chattering, preppie Eastern elite? Shopping at Wal-Mart? Not killing a Downs baby? Helping her pregnant teen deal with responsibility? Understanding the lives of regular, hard working Americans?</p>
<p>Do inform us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/23/msm-more-interested-in-palin-gossip-than-her-record/comment-page-1/#comment-324858</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5935#comment-324858</guid>
		<description>Maybe arthur is jealous because a mere woman has run a business, been mayor of a city, run a state regulatory board over an important industry, and become governor of a state while his greatest political accomplishment is handing out Tricky Dicky campaign literature forty years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe arthur is jealous because a mere woman has run a business, been mayor of a city, run a state regulatory board over an important industry, and become governor of a state while his greatest political accomplishment is handing out Tricky Dicky campaign literature forty years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/10/23/msm-more-interested-in-palin-gossip-than-her-record/comment-page-1/#comment-324856</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=5935#comment-324856</guid>
		<description>arthur-  Alaskans seem pretty happy with how she&#039;s run their state.  But what do they know.

original post- Mostly, formerly reputable news organizations are discovering that gossip and scandal sells... there&#039;s a reason that the National Enquirer sold more than ten times as well as the New York Times even before the media implosion of the past few years.

Update-  We&#039;re talking about the same Barack Obama who feels put upon because some of the talking heads at Fox don&#039;t support him, and whines about it all the time?  Yeah.  He&#039;d do smashingly in Palin&#039;s shoes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>arthur-  Alaskans seem pretty happy with how she&#8217;s run their state.  But what do they know.</p>
<p>original post- Mostly, formerly reputable news organizations are discovering that gossip and scandal sells&#8230; there&#8217;s a reason that the National Enquirer sold more than ten times as well as the New York Times even before the media implosion of the past few years.</p>
<p>Update-  We&#8217;re talking about the same Barack Obama who feels put upon because some of the talking heads at Fox don&#8217;t support him, and whines about it all the time?  Yeah.  He&#8217;d do smashingly in Palin&#8217;s shoes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

