You’ve missed the best part of Anonymous’ truly hilarious comment:

Yours sincerely,

A left leaning, self loving, accepting-of-others homosexual American

PS – Hypocritical Faggots

Bwah Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha! Accepting of others indeed!

I hope never to encounter your kind in real life

The feeling is mutual, I’m sure.

How about instead of causing trouble, we just promote our candidates?

That could work. Promoting our candidates would be considered causing trouble in Weho.

Why would you want to cause trouble? What does that say about your views of democratic practices and the use of voter suppression as a means to an end?

WTF dude!! Light the F up and get a life!! I’m not going to suppress anyone’s vote. I was only implying getting into a friendly debate with the partisans when they approach me about registering.

I’ve come out of the grocery store here in West Hollywood many a time and get approached by someone registering people saying “would you like to help Obama win?” I try to say something clever just to watch ‘em get all flustered. It’s just typical sh*t stirring.

But jeez dude, get a life!

Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this. They can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.

The way to counteract this is simple; fight fire with fire.

Point out how gay Democrats like Blake and gay organizations like HRC have fully endorsed and supported FMA supporters. Point out how gays like Blake have supported Democrats like Howard Dean pandering to Pat Robertson. Point out how gay Democrats like Blake have fully endorsed and supported fraudulent voter registration by Democrat organizations. Point out how gay Democrats like Blake regularly practice hate against gay conservatives and wish death on their children. Point out how gay Democrats like Blake have previously screamed that anyone who opposed gay marriage and considered marriage to be a “sacred union” were religious bigots.

I saw my psychologist this afternoon for one hour. I am doing well. One thing she and I discussed was my conservatism and the fact that I will be voting for McCain. As I told her if I only voted on the gay issue I would vote for Obama, but for me it is more complex.

I’ve basically faulted the media for failing to cover her record while dwelling on insignificant things.

And no, we don’t think she’s above criticism nor ever have said as much. Wherever would you get that notion? It seems the MSM assume she’s beneath praise.

Yes, let’s focus on Palin if you like. But, on her complete record and not just a few silly comments she’s made. You say we engage in blind adoration? Go check my posts and see how I’ve faulted her for the way she handled the Couric interview.

I’ll get around to addrressing her comments on a constitutional amendment, but on my own schedule.

When are you going to get around to acknowledging her qualities?

Like wind in autumn
Conservative gays scare me
I must insult you.

Why would you want to cause trouble? What does that say about your views of democratic practices and the use of voter suppression as a means to an end? The implication is that you want to stop some Americans from registering to vote because you disagree with their political views. Am I right? It sounds that way. If that is the case, isn’t that highly immoral and unethical behavior? How do you reconcile that with conservative values?
__

As for the comments on the Stonewall Democrats, it’s a shame that they are making a blanket statement on Palin’s church. I’m sure that Palin’s church must do some good works.

However, have not many conservatives done similar things with Obama and his associations? Obama must believe certain things because he knows someone, etc.

The sword cuts both ways.
____

As for curative therapy, one can’t pray the gay away. Being gay isn’t a mental illness. Why do some of you believe that? There is plenty of evidence that shows that homosexuality is a naturally occurring development based on in utero exposure to hormones and or genetic expression. (To the latter, there does not have to be a specific “gay” gene, as much as some genes can express themselves differently because of exposure to different environmental factors.)

That said, haven’t Palin’s comments about wanting a federal amendment to ban all forms of domestic partnerships recognized by the state an area of concern? Warrant a question of support of her? Why is it not possible to say that John McCain is a better person than Palin because of his more tolerant stances?

I find myself a bit confused by some of the statements on this site. On the one hand, I’ve seen endorsements of McCain’s position to denounce any kind of federal amendment but on the other hand, I continue to see blind adoration of Palin.

Again, instead of name calling and invective, why not discuss the issue?

I lean more progressive and independent. I can say that I like Obama well enough. Think Bill Clinton is a sleaze bag. Jimmy Carter is a nice Christian but was not a great president. I can also give Reagan some credit for helping to take down the Soviets. But, I’ll also criticize Reagan for his use of documented racism to win votes by invoking States Rights at Philadelphia, MS.

Do you folks believe in blind party loyalty? Is Palin above criticism? If so, why? Doesn’t it disturb you that she would like to see gays be permanently made second class citizens through an amendment to the U.S. Constitution? I can’t imagine Barry Goldwater or Ronald Reagan supporting such a move. Neither man was a saint, but given Reagan’s support of gays when he was governor, I think he would be very shocked.

Again, can we have a discussion? (In particular, ND30, please don’t try to connect me to some idiot liberal who supports the FMA since I don’t support him). Lets focus on Palin.