Uh oh, Attmay. Let me know when the next bus to the rubber room comes by.

Not a bad idea. I would also include in the counseling about the possibility that a couple could have a gay child. If deemed that the parents would not be able to accept a child’s homosexuality, the counselor should recommend that the couple not get married. This would eliminate a lot of dysfunction.

Jesus, anyone who’s rented the Prince of Tides DVD is qualified to have you should be committed.

There, fixed it for ya.

The state already has to do that on an epic scale for heterosexual couples. It doesn’t need to add more dysfunctionals. If anything, California should tighten the rules to require premarital counseling, as do most churches, and a waiting period for marriage licenses.

Who the fu*k would marry these pathetic, obnoxious children?

Sean A, they can marry each other, and that’s the beauty of the marriage system. Let them fight at home.

Average Gay Joe was right. I renounce any tolerance I had for bigotry of any kind just because I hated the left. I will be changing my voter registration to Independent until the GOP gets its shit together and completely purges gay-bashers from the party. These people need to be totally ostracized by society the way that racists and anti-semites are.

And unlike them, I will make an effort to tolerate non-bigoted heterosexuals from now on. I don’t enjoy hating. It can’t be much fun for homophobes and social “conservatives” (Christian Socialists is what they really are, and the sooner we kick them out of the party forever the better).

Just remember, Al-Qaeda doesn’t support gay marriage, either.

Attmay, nothing I’ve written about your intelligence or mental health can be characterized as “aspersions.” They’re observations. And I would never dream of going after your family–I’m sure they’ve suffered enough.

“Aren’t heterosexuals just the kindest, most wonderful people you ever knew?”

Yes, they are. But more to the point, do you think I’m straight?! Oh, you poor thing. Were you under the gross misapprehension that only those mean ol’ straight people think your ideas and view of the world is fu*ked up? Let me assure you, I am as gay as the day is long, and I too think you’re a psychotic, bigoted nut bag. Your brand of crazy transcends sexuality.

I have never insulted you personally, but you apparently feel the need to cast aspersions on me, my intelligence, my mental health. Would you care to go after my family next?

Aren’t heterosexuals just the kindest, most wonderful people you ever knew?

Yep. Complete fu*king imbecile.

“I came up with the phrase to mirror the paranoid religious wrong who claim there is a ‘homosexual agenda.’”

Yeah, I got that. However, a person that is not psychotic would typically use it as the basis for a parody. For example, “I don’t have anything against straight people as long as they act gay in public.” Ha ha. But you have made it unequivocally clear that you actually see the world as a place where you are assaulted daily by the offensive promotion of a lifestyle you find repugnant–the same one, in fact, that is responsible for your existence. That makes you a complete fu*king imbecile.

“My dislike of heterosexuality is limited to the sexual act itself. It grosses me out.”

Shocker.

“However, I begrudgingly concede the fact that this is currently the best way to continue the species.”

Begrudgingly concede? Well, I bet you put up a hell of a fight in that debate, you complete fu*king imbecile.

“Get your DVR from the cable company and get a 500GB DVR expander.”

Why would someone who complains of being unable to escape the promotion of the heterosexual agenda in every medium want to record 500GB of digital television? Oh yeah, I forgot. Complete fu*king imbecile.

In fact, you sound like a complete fuc*king imbecile and I wouldn’t trust you with the responsibility of setting up my Tivo.

Way to sound like an adult.

These protests are not stupid. You think it’s “stupid” to fight back when attacked by bigots (which the Mormons are)? I am the only one here who has attacked heterosexuality per se. Not even the leftist moonbat trolls (you know who you are) had one bad word to say about the “straights”. And your calling me an imbecile is supposed to make me change my mind about you people?

At every move, heterosexuality is promoted in every medium. There is no refuge from it. I came up with the phrase to mirror the paranoid religious wrong who claim there is a “homosexual agenda.” And it seems there is a heterosexual supremacist agenda, even from posters here who admit that they consider heterosexuality superior to homosexuality, and don’t even consider blended families or adopted children “real” families.

My dislike of heterosexuality is limited to the sexual act itself. It grosses me out. But I would not use that disgust as a basis for public policy. However, I begrudgingly concede the fact that this is currently the best way to continue the species.

Tivo sucks, BTW. Get your DVR from the cable company and get a 500GB DVR expander.

Heterosexual supremacist agenda? Now THAT is one for the record books. Attmay, of course my comment was childish. You and your fellow crusaders should not and will not be taken seriously as long as you continue to fly further and further off the charts with these unbelievable histrionics. I thought the “second class citizens” rhetoric was the limit, but you’ve completely re-set that bar, Attmay.

Heterosexual marriage is NOT an “agenda,” much less one being “shoved down your throat.” I have no doubt that elsewhere on this blog or on others you have passionately argued that same-sex marriage is not a “threat” to heterosexual marriage, but here you are, bitterly complaining about the sinister “agenda” of those terrifying freaks who practice the dark art of heterosexuality. You are not helping your cause. You are only revealing the vile, bigoted intentions behind all of these stupid protests and candlelight vigils. In fact, you sound like a complete fuc*king imbecile and I wouldn’t trust you with the responsibility of setting up my Tivo.

Sorry libs, It was Obama supporters that banned gay marriage. Even if every Republican in the state voted for the proposition (they didn’t by a long shot) that would still only be 35% of the population. The proposition passed with over 52% support. Do the math.

Sean A:

Who the fu*k would marry these pathetic, obnoxious children?

Peter Hughes:

Second – it is a rant like this which gives the Pro-Choice crowd a reason to exist.

You don’t consider these sort of comments to be childish?

Perhaps I was a little too hostile to heterosexuals. Some of them did vote against the amendment. But I am sick of having the heterosexual supremacist agenda shoved down my throat at every turn.

As the hours pass, the predominant question in this dispute is rapidly going from:

Is it unconstitutional to exclude same sex couples from state laws governing marriage?

To:

Who the fu*k would marry these pathetic, obnoxious children?