http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/11/07/gay-marriage-and-the-2008-election/ The Internet home for American gay conservatives. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:00:47 -0700 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/11/07/gay-marriage-and-the-2008-election/comment-page-1/#comment-348118 Gay Marriage and the 2008 election « Gay Reading Sat, 27 Dec 2008 13:24:32 +0000 http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=6633#comment-348118 [...] Learn more here. [...] [...] Learn more here. [...]

]]> http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/11/07/gay-marriage-and-the-2008-election/comment-page-1/#comment-329943 Jimbo Sat, 08 Nov 2008 15:55:37 +0000 http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=6633#comment-329943 Allow me to go off topic with regards to Prop 8. That's all anybody seems to talk about. But what about the adoption ban in Arkansas? What will happen to the many unmarried couples who already adopted children? Will state officials come knocking & snatch their kids away? Or will they have to drop them off at an undisclosed location? Passage of all these anti-gay laws may make the social conservatives feel better, but they will be tearing apart real families. A legal morass also awaits same-sex couples in California. Are those 18,000 couples validly married or not? Allow me to go off topic with regards to Prop 8. That’s all anybody seems to talk about. But what about the adoption ban in Arkansas? What will happen to the many unmarried couples who already adopted children? Will state officials come knocking & snatch their kids away? Or will they have to drop them off at an undisclosed location? Passage of all these anti-gay laws may make the social conservatives feel better, but they will be tearing apart real families. A legal morass also awaits same-sex couples in California. Are those 18,000 couples validly married or not?

]]> http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/11/07/gay-marriage-and-the-2008-election/comment-page-1/#comment-329710 Ignatius Fri, 07 Nov 2008 19:30:31 +0000 http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=6633#comment-329710 The margin of victory might well have been larger had the proposition been differently worded, i.e. presenting a 'No' to same-sex marriage rather than a 'Yes' to amend the state constitution. Though difficult to measure, some voters might have thought a 'No' vote meant 'No to same-sex marriage'. The margin of victory might well have been larger had the proposition been differently worded, i.e. presenting a ‘No’ to same-sex marriage rather than a ‘Yes’ to amend the state constitution. Though difficult to measure, some voters might have thought a ‘No’ vote meant ‘No to same-sex marriage’.

]]>