M

M

You deserve nothing more.

The will of the judges interred the Japanese

Your buddy Michelle Malkin had no problem with that.

None of these Republican judges were going to take marriage rights away from heterosexuals, though Lord knows they’ve been asking for it for decades; after seeing a news report about the “Ashley Madison” website, I wonder why heterosexuals are defensive about an institution they seem to take lightly.

The will of the judges interred the Japanese, declared slavery was allowed throughout the union and decided that the state can seize the property of free men and give it to other men to make it ‘profitable’.

The Will of the people shoved their Homosexual Supremacist definition of marriage down the throats of the state of California.

There. Fixed it for you.

How dare you talk about Dear Leader Obamamessiah like that! Off to the Glorious Revolution Reeducation Camp in remote Wyoming for you! You will receive your pink star upon arrival.

Regards,
Peter H.

The will of the people elected a cryptofascist with the economic sense of Jimmy Carter, the respect for individual rights of Woodrow Wilson, and the ethical code of Richard Nixon.

The will of the people shoved their heterosexual supremacist definition of marriage down the throats of the state of California.

Must frost you, living in a state that honours the will of the people, eh?

The court won’t overturn Prop 8.

Perhaps, perhaps not. The SanFran Chronicle seems to think it won’t be either since Kennard dissented in hearing the case. I do disagree with Dan that this isn’t a revision, just like I believe these bans are violations of the 14th Amendment, but it really doesn’t matter. In legal thinking I suspect we are in the pre-Brown years one could say when Plessy was not seen in any way as violating the 14th Amendment. Guess that leaves us with a lot more work to do in the meantime.

it’ll be repealed in 2010 or 2012. I’d put my money on 2010.

I wish I shared your optimism but if the CA Supremes uphold Prop 8, I very seriously doubt a repeal will be successful for at least the next 10 years.

If the CSC is anything like the 9th Circus, they’ll agree to anything that runs counter to common sense.

Which means they’ll uphold Prop 8 then. Boi From Troy made an interesting point yesterday that the GOP may get a very phyrric victory out of threats to ‘recall’ those Justices who ruled for SSM in May.

http://boifromtroy.com/?p=7575

Should the new RNC chair look into this, we’ll be back in the game not just in time for the 2010 elections, but in time to wrest the Virginia Governor’s mansion from the Democrats.

I find that to be very, VERY doubtful Dan. Well, except for the Virginia Guv spot. That is a possibility, especially if the Dems are stupid enough to put Terry McCauliffe up as their nominee.

Lesson from 2000: just because something uses the Internet doesn’t make up for the fact that it’s a lousy product.

I used to believe that until Obama won handily earlier this month. Now I’m not sure what to think.

M

Didn’t you here that djjd djjd is being offered a position in the treasury department?

Made up names, indeed

is going to somehow be successful because it’s — wooooo — Internet-based.

lol.

The Republican fundraising advantage? Gone.

Only cus Democrats actively pursue illegal contributions. Going out of their way to remove safeguards against them, courting illegal foreign campaign contributions, nearly destroying the country trying to hide it from the FBI.

I’ve read enough posts to know that leading Republicans are aware of the problem. Should the new RNC chair look into this, we’ll be back in the game not just in time for the 2010 elections, but in time to wrest the Virginia Governor’s mansion from the Democrats. And possibly Drumthwacket as well.