how can we miss you if you never go away?

If you hold off two weeks, I’ll have a new girl in the area who would love to go. *laugh*

Indeed, the courts upheld slavery. See Dred Scott.

So VtheK and NDT, I think this discussion has really reached an end point. Anything I say will merely be responded to with more name calling and ad hominem attacks, so I’ll just wish you a happy new year and good health and freedom in 2009. Oh, and I also condemn gay rights groups that advocate for having sex with minors, and parents who dress their children up in bondage outfits.

“

In response to #112 — no I can’t read Marjorie’s mind, but I think it is reasonable to assume that if someone donates to a proposition campaign, they support that campaign.

“Assumption, my dear, is the mother of all fuckups. It couldn’t possibly be because that while she favors gay marriage, she opposed how it came about? Maybe she opposes the way the court system handled it. Maybe she approves of gay marriage, but doesn’t want to see Californians shat on to get it. Maybe she, like President Bush, opposes gay marriage, but supports the states, and not the courts, in deciding on their own to allow unions.

You’ve told us that you know how she thinks and used the claim that you don’t as a CYA.

What’s more, why don’t you answer NDT’s questions instead of replying with questions of your own? He’s not the issue here. If you can’t answer, just say so or ignore it. Don’t get all defensive and attack him (yes, you did) instead.

Which is why, of course, they were allowed into the fair, they were bragging about what they’d done in the newspaper, and there was exactly zero condemnation of their behavior from either the fair leadership, HRC, or any of the other gay groups out there.

One would THINK that such abnormal behavior would result in some sort of condemnation or investigation. Nope.

LOL…and again, sarah, all you demonstrate is that you put the highest priority, not on attacking pedophilia or NAMBLA’s behavior, but on criticizing the people who point it out.

No comment on why “gay rights” groups are arguing that sex with minors is a good thing? Not surprising; that would require you to actually criticize them.

Which kind, sarah?

The kind that you use to make excuses for child molesters and pedophiles?

The kind that you use to make excuses for punishing people whose religious beliefs and thoughts you don’t like?

The kind you use to equivocate and rationalize your campaign to drive people out of business and throw them out of jobs over a $100 donation?

Because that’s all homosexuality really is to you; it’s an excuse for you to carry out your leftist hate agenda. Hence your inability to recognize that I am gay — because in your twisted little leftist world, no “real” gay person would be opposing you or your ideas.

“As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.”

I have a theory that there is another law that the longer a usenet discussion related to gays grows longer, the probability of a comparison to pedophilia or NAMBLA approaches one. Can I be the first to call this “NorthDallasThirty’s Law”?

I’m not surprised you do, sarah; it should be obvious to everyone by now that investigation of facts, the use of logic, and the avoidance of stereotyping aren’t characteristic of either your thought process or your postings.

So let me ask you again — how do you feel about homosexuality? Can you answer that very simple and direct question?

Better question, Sarah; why don’t you have anything to say about the gay people who, in the two examples I cited, specifically link homosexuality to pedophilia?

Answer: Because you don’t condemn pedophilia when your fellow gay liberals practice it. You only are interested in attacking me for CRITICIZING gay liberals who engage in child sexualization and pedophilia, which you consider to be “being hostile towards homosexuality”. You are concerned less with what is happening than the possibility of being branded homophobic or hateful.