<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dinner at El Coyote Sunday 01/04</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/01/02/dinner-at-el-coyote-sunday-0104/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/01/02/dinner-at-el-coyote-sunday-0104/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:15:33 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bingo &#171; lookingforlissa</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/01/02/dinner-at-el-coyote-sunday-0104/comment-page-2/#comment-357324</link>
		<dc:creator>Bingo &#171; lookingforlissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=7484#comment-357324</guid>
		<description>[...] is what spurs artists and customersÂ to protest until a Theater Artistic Director resignsÂ and a restaurant risks going out of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is what spurs artists and customersÂ to protest until a Theater Artistic Director resignsÂ and a restaurant risks going out of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Privacy Advocate</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/01/02/dinner-at-el-coyote-sunday-0104/comment-page-2/#comment-357086</link>
		<dc:creator>Privacy Advocate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=7484#comment-357086</guid>
		<description>Just stumbled on your site as a link off of Michelle Malkin&#039;s.  As a hetero breeder type, I don&#039;t often seek gay-specific sites (ok time to throw stones, trolls).  

However the whole prop-8 debate makes me mad from the sense of privacy and respect.  Some idiot has now put up eightmaps.com which will allow any nutcase radical activist type to hunt down and harass those with whom they disagree.  Google is party to this, and should be made to take it down or at least remove people&#039;s names and adresses.  

Let&#039;s all hope that fair-minded and decent people of all viewpoints can see the danger in this.  This time you might smirk that it has those &#039;evil conservative minded types&#039; on the run.  I guarantee if it was a similar breech of privacy for left-thinking individuals (pick ANY leftist issue), people would be screaming bloody murder from the highest mountaintop.  The hypocrisy is mind boggling here.   Any number of groups involved in terrorism or human rights violations could use the google map technology for bad intentions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just stumbled on your site as a link off of Michelle Malkin&#8217;s.  As a hetero breeder type, I don&#8217;t often seek gay-specific sites (ok time to throw stones, trolls).  </p>
<p>However the whole prop-8 debate makes me mad from the sense of privacy and respect.  Some idiot has now put up eightmaps.com which will allow any nutcase radical activist type to hunt down and harass those with whom they disagree.  Google is party to this, and should be made to take it down or at least remove people&#8217;s names and adresses.  </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s all hope that fair-minded and decent people of all viewpoints can see the danger in this.  This time you might smirk that it has those &#8216;evil conservative minded types&#8217; on the run.  I guarantee if it was a similar breech of privacy for left-thinking individuals (pick ANY leftist issue), people would be screaming bloody murder from the highest mountaintop.  The hypocrisy is mind boggling here.   Any number of groups involved in terrorism or human rights violations could use the google map technology for bad intentions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Livewire</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/01/02/dinner-at-el-coyote-sunday-0104/comment-page-2/#comment-353215</link>
		<dc:creator>The_Livewire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=7484#comment-353215</guid>
		<description>paragon of honesty?  no.  By your own words more ethical and honest than Obama.  Yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>paragon of honesty?  no.  By your own words more ethical and honest than Obama.  Yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/01/02/dinner-at-el-coyote-sunday-0104/comment-page-2/#comment-352815</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=7484#comment-352815</guid>
		<description>Oh, and adDave, any chance of you condemning the people brought up for supporting gay marriage bans, like you do to everyone else? Any chance of you demanding a boycott and public shaming of HRC and the Democrat Party, the way you do everyone else? Any chance of you saying that gays who vote for Democrats who support gay marriage bans and believe that marriage is a &quot;sacred union&quot; that should be limited to a man and a woman are self-loathing, just like you do everyone else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and adDave, any chance of you condemning the people brought up for supporting gay marriage bans, like you do to everyone else? Any chance of you demanding a boycott and public shaming of HRC and the Democrat Party, the way you do everyone else? Any chance of you saying that gays who vote for Democrats who support gay marriage bans and believe that marriage is a &#8220;sacred union&#8221; that should be limited to a man and a woman are self-loathing, just like you do everyone else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/01/02/dinner-at-el-coyote-sunday-0104/comment-page-2/#comment-352814</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=7484#comment-352814</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;NDT, any chance you have more than one person to use as an example?&lt;/i&gt; 

Try reading the link, in which you not only see Hilary Rosen, but examples of DNC leadership like Andrew Tobias supporting and endorsing said gay marriage bans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>NDT, any chance you have more than one person to use as an example?</i> </p>
<p>Try reading the link, in which you not only see Hilary Rosen, but examples of DNC leadership like Andrew Tobias supporting and endorsing said gay marriage bans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/01/02/dinner-at-el-coyote-sunday-0104/comment-page-2/#comment-352761</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=7484#comment-352761</guid>
		<description>#82 - OK, Ash, I see your point.  And yes, the wrestling scene in D.H. Lawrence&#039;s &quot;Women in Love&quot; is very homoerotic.  Still, I don&#039;t think that expressions of pure love between two men should be in any way limited - which was my main point.  Plus, a kiss between two males has been documented all the way back to Old Testament days - witness the kiss between David and Jonathan to name one example.

That being said - I also agree with your point that masculinity is more compatible with being a so-called &quot;man&#039;s man&quot; and expressing one&#039;s emotions through physical contact.  I&#039;ve always said that gay men are more &quot;masculine&quot; than straight men because of our appreciation for the male form and physique.

And not to hijack the thread or open a can of worms, but there tends to be a dichotomy between &quot;masculine&quot; gay men and the feminized ones.  As I&#039;ve always told my friends and family, being gay doesn&#039;t necessarily mean being a pansy.  If I wanted to have sex with a woman, I&#039;d have married one.  (Fortunately I didn&#039;t - Hubby is truly a man&#039;s man.  But I digress.)

Bruce and/or Dave, maybe there&#039;s a blog topic in all of this somewhere?

BTW - Ash, good points and all.  Would love to hear more from you about this.

Regards,
Peter H.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#82 &#8211; OK, Ash, I see your point.  And yes, the wrestling scene in D.H. Lawrence&#8217;s &#8220;Women in Love&#8221; is very homoerotic.  Still, I don&#8217;t think that expressions of pure love between two men should be in any way limited &#8211; which was my main point.  Plus, a kiss between two males has been documented all the way back to Old Testament days &#8211; witness the kiss between David and Jonathan to name one example.</p>
<p>That being said &#8211; I also agree with your point that masculinity is more compatible with being a so-called &#8220;man&#8217;s man&#8221; and expressing one&#8217;s emotions through physical contact.  I&#8217;ve always said that gay men are more &#8220;masculine&#8221; than straight men because of our appreciation for the male form and physique.</p>
<p>And not to hijack the thread or open a can of worms, but there tends to be a dichotomy between &#8220;masculine&#8221; gay men and the feminized ones.  As I&#8217;ve always told my friends and family, being gay doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean being a pansy.  If I wanted to have sex with a woman, I&#8217;d have married one.  (Fortunately I didn&#8217;t &#8211; Hubby is truly a man&#8217;s man.  But I digress.)</p>
<p>Bruce and/or Dave, maybe there&#8217;s a blog topic in all of this somewhere?</p>
<p>BTW &#8211; Ash, good points and all.  Would love to hear more from you about this.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Peter H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Livewire</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/01/02/dinner-at-el-coyote-sunday-0104/comment-page-2/#comment-352731</link>
		<dc:creator>The Livewire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=7484#comment-352731</guid>
		<description>Comment pointing out that Dave can&#039;t read eaten by the spam filter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment pointing out that Dave can&#8217;t read eaten by the spam filter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a different Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/01/02/dinner-at-el-coyote-sunday-0104/comment-page-2/#comment-352678</link>
		<dc:creator>a different Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=7484#comment-352678</guid>
		<description>#87  yeah, you would. Nixon was a paragon of virtue and honesty.  In your hallucinations perhaps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#87  yeah, you would. Nixon was a paragon of virtue and honesty.  In your hallucinations perhaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommyz</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/01/02/dinner-at-el-coyote-sunday-0104/comment-page-2/#comment-352661</link>
		<dc:creator>tommyz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=7484#comment-352661</guid>
		<description>Boycotts are part of Free speech.  I guess this blog writer is against free speech?  Funny how free speech is supported in one case, but not when the writer disagrees with the topic.  Lol.  I love conservatives - they are so easily debunked.  I believe everyone has a right to boycott whoever they like for whatever reason they want.  And the writer has shown no connection between &quot;this is the wrong approach&quot; and history.  In fact - boycotts and protests have worked.  Including those against businesses supporting the Vietnam war, companies that refuse to serve blacks, and other folks.  You may disagree with the boycott - but please - provide some &quot;facts&quot; as to why its the wrong approach so we can see what you think the final goal should be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boycotts are part of Free speech.  I guess this blog writer is against free speech?  Funny how free speech is supported in one case, but not when the writer disagrees with the topic.  Lol.  I love conservatives &#8211; they are so easily debunked.  I believe everyone has a right to boycott whoever they like for whatever reason they want.  And the writer has shown no connection between &#8220;this is the wrong approach&#8221; and history.  In fact &#8211; boycotts and protests have worked.  Including those against businesses supporting the Vietnam war, companies that refuse to serve blacks, and other folks.  You may disagree with the boycott &#8211; but please &#8211; provide some &#8220;facts&#8221; as to why its the wrong approach so we can see what you think the final goal should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Livewire</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/01/02/dinner-at-el-coyote-sunday-0104/comment-page-2/#comment-352637</link>
		<dc:creator>The Livewire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=7484#comment-352637</guid>
		<description>81.

Let me think of 3 off the top of my head.

1) Steve Stivers who, despite some voting irregularities certified by a blatently partisan democrat Sec of state, didn&#039;t challenge the loss to Mary Jo Kilroy.

2) That Gov of Washington who was blatently cheated out of an election by the democrats, but didn&#039;t fight it &#039;for the good of the state of Washington.&#039;

3) Richard Nixon, 1960.  Who lost to blatent manipulation by the Daley machine and LBJ in Texas, but didn&#039;t fight, for the good of the nation.

Yes, this means I&#039;m rating Nixon as having higher standards than Obama, since you conceed he&#039;d do or say anything to be elected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>81.</p>
<p>Let me think of 3 off the top of my head.</p>
<p>1) Steve Stivers who, despite some voting irregularities certified by a blatently partisan democrat Sec of state, didn&#8217;t challenge the loss to Mary Jo Kilroy.</p>
<p>2) That Gov of Washington who was blatently cheated out of an election by the democrats, but didn&#8217;t fight it &#8216;for the good of the state of Washington.&#8217;</p>
<p>3) Richard Nixon, 1960.  Who lost to blatent manipulation by the Daley machine and LBJ in Texas, but didn&#8217;t fight, for the good of the nation.</p>
<p>Yes, this means I&#8217;m rating Nixon as having higher standards than Obama, since you conceed he&#8217;d do or say anything to be elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Livewire</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/01/02/dinner-at-el-coyote-sunday-0104/comment-page-2/#comment-352399</link>
		<dc:creator>The_Livewire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=7484#comment-352399</guid>
		<description>So...

How did the gathering go?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230;</p>
<p>How did the gathering go?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a different Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/01/02/dinner-at-el-coyote-sunday-0104/comment-page-2/#comment-352382</link>
		<dc:creator>a different Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=7484#comment-352382</guid>
		<description>#84  NDT, any chance you have more than one person to use as an example?   And I don&#039;t see anyone in that article name Tex so it appears it is just another case of you lying about someone because they disagree with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#84  NDT, any chance you have more than one person to use as an example?   And I don&#8217;t see anyone in that article name Tex so it appears it is just another case of you lying about someone because they disagree with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/01/02/dinner-at-el-coyote-sunday-0104/comment-page-2/#comment-352327</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=7484#comment-352327</guid>
		<description>I do so love it when the Democrat slaves like Tex who &lt;a href=&quot;http://mpetrelis.blogspot.com/2007/02/lets-see-if-we-can-follow-bouncing.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; support and endorse gay marriage bans in order to grovel to their party massas&lt;/a&gt; project their self-loathing onto everyone else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do so love it when the Democrat slaves like Tex who <a href="http://mpetrelis.blogspot.com/2007/02/lets-see-if-we-can-follow-bouncing.html" rel="nofollow"> support and endorse gay marriage bans in order to grovel to their party massas</a> project their self-loathing onto everyone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tex...</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/01/02/dinner-at-el-coyote-sunday-0104/comment-page-2/#comment-352309</link>
		<dc:creator>Tex...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=7484#comment-352309</guid>
		<description>I would expect nothing less from your absurd group. Hope no one choked on the bitter bile of hate from the LDS owners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would expect nothing less from your absurd group. Hope no one choked on the bitter bile of hate from the LDS owners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashpenaz</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/01/02/dinner-at-el-coyote-sunday-0104/comment-page-2/#comment-352245</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashpenaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=7484#comment-352245</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think men in love should try to model their relationships on heterosexual couples. Does that sound not-gay? My image of male love comes from Achilles and Patroclus, Bacchus and Sergius, Alexander and Hephaeston, David and Jonathan, etc. and that sort of pure masculine bonding D. H. Lawrence describes in Women in Love. It is difficult to imagine this kind of masculine love being expressed by public cuddling. Far from being separate but equal, I think male love is separate but better. I think that civil unions will allow men to show how much deeper, how much more monogamous and faithful and intense, male love is than the weak and somewhat effeminate bonds men have with women. OK, maybe I&#039;m not gay--I love masculinity too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think men in love should try to model their relationships on heterosexual couples. Does that sound not-gay? My image of male love comes from Achilles and Patroclus, Bacchus and Sergius, Alexander and Hephaeston, David and Jonathan, etc. and that sort of pure masculine bonding D. H. Lawrence describes in Women in Love. It is difficult to imagine this kind of masculine love being expressed by public cuddling. Far from being separate but equal, I think male love is separate but better. I think that civil unions will allow men to show how much deeper, how much more monogamous and faithful and intense, male love is than the weak and somewhat effeminate bonds men have with women. OK, maybe I&#8217;m not gay&#8211;I love masculinity too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a different Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/01/02/dinner-at-el-coyote-sunday-0104/comment-page-2/#comment-352207</link>
		<dc:creator>a different Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=7484#comment-352207</guid>
		<description>&quot;which is that Obama will say and do whatever he has to to get elected&quot;

like every single candidate for every single office from both major parties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;which is that Obama will say and do whatever he has to to get elected&#8221;</p>
<p>like every single candidate for every single office from both major parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/01/02/dinner-at-el-coyote-sunday-0104/comment-page-2/#comment-352185</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=7484#comment-352185</guid>
		<description>#76 - Ash, are you sure you are gay, or are you just confused?

Just wondering.

Regards,
Peter H.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#76 &#8211; Ash, are you sure you are gay, or are you just confused?</p>
<p>Just wondering.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Peter H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/01/02/dinner-at-el-coyote-sunday-0104/comment-page-2/#comment-352145</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=7484#comment-352145</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Funny how when Wright rants and raves about the US and white folk heâ€™s a hateful liar. When he claims something about Obama that you agree with heâ€™s suddenly telling the truth.&lt;/i&gt;

Actually, I don&#039;t think Wright is lying, in the sense that he knows better and is deliberately telling a falsehood, when he rants about the United States and white people; he&#039;s just saying what he actually believes, regardless of how stupid it is.  Ultimately what got Wright disowned was that he told the truth about Obama, which is that Obama will say and do whatever he has to to get elected -- including denouncing Hamas when Wright knows Obama supported him and his support of Hamas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Funny how when Wright rants and raves about the US and white folk heâ€™s a hateful liar. When he claims something about Obama that you agree with heâ€™s suddenly telling the truth.</i></p>
<p>Actually, I don&#8217;t think Wright is lying, in the sense that he knows better and is deliberately telling a falsehood, when he rants about the United States and white people; he&#8217;s just saying what he actually believes, regardless of how stupid it is.  Ultimately what got Wright disowned was that he told the truth about Obama, which is that Obama will say and do whatever he has to to get elected &#8212; including denouncing Hamas when Wright knows Obama supported him and his support of Hamas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a different Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/01/02/dinner-at-el-coyote-sunday-0104/comment-page-2/#comment-352026</link>
		<dc:creator>a different Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=7484#comment-352026</guid>
		<description>&quot;But of course, like a good liberal, you wonâ€™t hold Obama accountable for this behavior because of Obamaâ€™s skin color.&quot;

Congratulations NDT, you&#039;ve found a new BS lie to sling at me.   A person&#039;s skin color, or language, or blah blah blah does not excuse them from being held accountable and gives them no extra priviliges with me, never has and never will.

Funny how when Wright rants and raves about the US and white folk he&#039;s a hateful liar.  When he claims something about Obama that you agree with he&#039;s suddenly telling the truth.  You are so full of sh*T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But of course, like a good liberal, you wonâ€™t hold Obama accountable for this behavior because of Obamaâ€™s skin color.&#8221;</p>
<p>Congratulations NDT, you&#8217;ve found a new BS lie to sling at me.   A person&#8217;s skin color, or language, or blah blah blah does not excuse them from being held accountable and gives them no extra priviliges with me, never has and never will.</p>
<p>Funny how when Wright rants and raves about the US and white folk he&#8217;s a hateful liar.  When he claims something about Obama that you agree with he&#8217;s suddenly telling the truth.  You are so full of sh*T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGayConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/01/02/dinner-at-el-coyote-sunday-0104/comment-page-2/#comment-351953</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGayConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=7484#comment-351953</guid>
		<description>(Other comment filtered)

What&#039;s more, dingleberry, I was told by two HFD batallion chiefs that I was wasting my time applying BECAUSE they were looking for blacks and Hispanics. Foolishly, I applied anyway because I thought that my credentials would speak louder than the color of my skin. But I was younger and dumber back then. And no, no other white candidates were accepted during that hiring process.

In an industry dominated by favoritism of who you know (literally and biblically) rather than what you know, knowing Dr. &quot;Red&quot; Duke, Dr. Paul Pepe and one of Dr. Debakey&#039;s chest cutters didn&#039;t hold a candle to my lack of melanin.

I&#039;m quite aware of why I didn&#039;t make it into HFD and why I didn&#039;t make it in Emergency Management. Clearly you don&#039;t, nor do you know jack shit about me and my work aptitude. You don&#039;t even know that I don&#039;t wallow in victimhood as liberals are wont to do. 

I&#039;ll give you kudos though. Generally liberals won&#039;t answer my questions, I suppose, out of fear that they&#039;ll actually expose their ignorance or what they really think. Fact remains that they don&#039;t have to. You at least tried.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Other comment filtered)</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more, dingleberry, I was told by two HFD batallion chiefs that I was wasting my time applying BECAUSE they were looking for blacks and Hispanics. Foolishly, I applied anyway because I thought that my credentials would speak louder than the color of my skin. But I was younger and dumber back then. And no, no other white candidates were accepted during that hiring process.</p>
<p>In an industry dominated by favoritism of who you know (literally and biblically) rather than what you know, knowing Dr. &#8220;Red&#8221; Duke, Dr. Paul Pepe and one of Dr. Debakey&#8217;s chest cutters didn&#8217;t hold a candle to my lack of melanin.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m quite aware of why I didn&#8217;t make it into HFD and why I didn&#8217;t make it in Emergency Management. Clearly you don&#8217;t, nor do you know jack shit about me and my work aptitude. You don&#8217;t even know that I don&#8217;t wallow in victimhood as liberals are wont to do. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll give you kudos though. Generally liberals won&#8217;t answer my questions, I suppose, out of fear that they&#8217;ll actually expose their ignorance or what they really think. Fact remains that they don&#8217;t have to. You at least tried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

