Comments on: Given that Obama Supports “Tax Cuts” for Those Who Don’t Pay Taxes . . .

By: Geithner Tax Problems

Geithner Tax Problems — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:26:32 +0000

GEITHNER & RANGEL TO BE SUBPOENAED IN TAX FRAUD CASE

Federal Case Alleges Political Elite Get Favorable Tax Treatment Over Ordinary Citizens

On 5 March 2009 a Motion was filed in U.S. v. David Jacquot, Case # CR 08-1171, in the Federal District Court, in San Diego, California seeking to dismiss a false tax return indictment on the grounds that the Defendant was not treated in the same manner as politically prominent individuals. A hearing on this matter is set for 30 March 2009 in San Diego and the Defendant in this case intends to subpoena Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner, House Ways and Means Chairman Charles Rangel, former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, and others.

The Defendant in this case is David Jacquot, an attorney and retired Army Officer. He is a decorated disabled Desert Storm veteran living in rural Idaho with his family.

This â€œGeithner Motionâ€ cites HR 735 titled the â€œRangel Rule Act of 2009,â€ which if enacted, would eliminate penalties and interest for common citizens to allow them to be treated in the same manner as House Ways and Means Chairman Representative Charles Rangel. The Geithner Motion also quotes President Obama stressing the need to â€œtreat common citizens in the same manner as politically prominent individuals in regards to tax mattersâ€.

The Geithner Motion details how Mr. Jacquot was vindictively indicted in retaliation for his successful defense of his clients against the IRS. The tax returns of his corporate law firm for the four (4) years of 2001 to 2004 were investigated and the government alleges that the law firm declared almost $200,000 TOO MUCH income during this time period. The Geithner Motion contains descriptions of numerous actions by the government and Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA) Faith Devine that are the basis for the claim of retaliation against Mr. Jacquot for his zealous representation of his clientâ€™s Constitutional and statutory rights. The improper actions of AUSA Devine have been reported to the DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility for disciplinary action and are currently under review.

A copy of the Geithner Motion and the complaint against AUSA Faith Devine can be downloaded at:

http://www.jacquotlaw.com/vindictive-prosecution.html

Vindictive-Prosecution

By: ThatGayConservative

ThatGayConservative — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:26:41 +0000

Joe Biden said that paying taxes was patriotic. Clearly, the nominee for Treasury Secretary ain’t.

By: Priceless… Geithner Took Tax Reimbursements For Taxes He Didn’t Pay « Conservative Thoughts and Profundity

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:30:57 +0000

[...] Given that Obama Supports â€œTax Cutsâ€ for Those Who Donâ€™t Pay Taxes… it makes sense heâ€™d pick a man to serve as Treasury Secretary who took tax reimbursements for [...]

By: zeke

zeke — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:49:26 +0000

Ugh… I have to go to a party for my good friend’s birthday which also happens to celebrate the inauguration of BHO on Jan. 2oth.

By: GayPatriotWest

GayPatriotWest — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:47:24 +0000

so, torrentprime, you’re saying Obama was lying that he intends to tax cut or lying when he called tax cuts government giveaways that are anything but tax cuts?

By: torrentprime

torrentprime — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:38:58 +0000

I’m glad you were wise enough to place the phrase “tax cuts” in your post title in quotes, since it was a lie during the campaign, and it’s a lie now.

By: Leah

Leah — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:18:52 +0000

only high-level Democrats (Geithner, Rangel, Franken) allowed to do that?

Of course, us hard working rubes have to pay for our overlords!

By: V the K

V the K — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:14:08 +0000

I’m just wondering, do you think the rest of us could ditch out on paying our taxes and then use the Steve Martin “I forgot” defense? Or, are only high-level Democrats (Geithner, Rangel, Franken) allowed to do that?