So although feminists in the states scream about the slightest real, imagined or flat out made up discomfort from reality’s clash with their latest doctoral thesis at Marxist U, they can’t stand up for woman who are KILLED for having the NERVE to not be able to stop their own gang rape.

That would disparage another’s culture, and we can’t have that!

Not the place to discuss this but sheesh! Like every couple that ever gets married from now on will be gay and unable to raise a child (because they don’t have sperm or eggs and it’s physically impossible for them to adopt children). Gee, that’s not ridiculously insulting, is it?

Does he advocate every straight couple be FORCED to have children “naturally” (no more in-vitro, no more adoption, no more fertilization clinics, no more surrogacy, etc.)? Or that couples without children for any reason whatsoever should have their marriages annulled?

I don’t think I’ve ever listened to the guy but if this is an example of one of his arguments that ARE persuasive, I’m not missing a darn thing.

—–

“Will Gay Leaders Press Obama on Iran’s Treatment of Gays?”

In a word, no. It’s good to point out the hypocrisy, but challenges to Obama’s policies are one type of “change” we’re not likely to see within the next four years.

try replying to the post. The question is, are the democrats going to to anything besides complain “Bush didn’t do anything!”

I think we see the answer, and it’s a damn shame.

Having a fairly busy weekend. So – after reading a basketful of good posts over at my friend Dan Blatt’s blog, Gay Patriot, I’m going to let Dan do some of the heavy lifting! Michael Steele for RNC chair. Yes!……

Gays are less than 5% of the world’s population. No one cares about these issues. (Mohammed Atta was widely suspected of being a homesexual and we all know how that turned out.) My advice to homos in theocracies is the same as my advice to the sperm donor to the woman who had the octuplets and can be summed up in one word:

“RUN!!”

Iran and Radical Islam are a useful tool for The Community Organizer. He understands that there is no there there in terms of diplomacy. He only has to make people “feel” there is a there there. That is the substance of “hope” and “change.”

Iran is a process. There is no goal. There is no outline. There is no strategy. You meet, you talk, you ask for patience, you say soothing words, you meet, you talk, you ask for patience, you say soothing words, you meet, you talk, you ask for patience, you say soothing words, ……

Much stronger than our president who won’t stand up to the Muslims and say: we must find a way to work together without us, the West giving up on our sacred principals of liberty and freedom for all – gays, women, minorities.

The point here is some conservatives do a better job of reminding us of the plight of our gay peers under Islamofascism than do the heads of leading gay organizations.

Which is to be expected.

The leading gay organizations function as organs of the Democratic Party. They will take their lead from the Dems’ new leader.

[Obama] favors a return to “the same respect and partnership that America had with the Muslim world as recently as 20 or 30 years ago.“ A generation ago, we didn’t challenge those autocratic regimes’ despotism and human rights’ violations.

Which led to 9-11. What an awesome point. It says alot.

Let’s see. 20 or 30 years ago, would be 1979-1989. What was going on then?
- Iran’s theo-fascists were holding our people hostage.
- Iraq had one of the world’s most vicious, evil dicators; a man that Jimmuh Carter had helped (on some level) gain power. And was chemical-bombing its own people.
- Iran and Iraq were slaughtering each other’s kids in a war that we did little to discourage.
- It is true, we were helping vicious mujahadeen (what later became the Taliban) in Afghanistan.
- We tried to help in Lebanon, but did it wrong (arguably), suffered a disaster and withdrew, throwing Lebanon to the wolves.

Yup. Some “respect and partnership”. The very things that bred 9-11. Maybe Obama meaning is that we should go back to being on the side of the mujahedeen / Taliban / al Qaeda.

Also weird that Obama would cite, as an ideal time of partnership, a time that Carter helped create BUT that chiefly consisted of Reagan’s years. Obama must like Reagan after all.