How quickly they forget.

So, go back there. In the world that you folks apparently want to live in this website would not exist.

You are not referring to a single individual. You are referring to all of us; however, as usual, you are trying to dodge and spin out of your obvious behavior because you got called on it. Just like you and your fellow liberal gays who practice and promote promiscuous sex, who spread lethal diseases to others, who are sexualizing five-year-old children, and who act like irresponsible spoiled brats try to avoid accepting any responsibility for how other people view them.

Oh, wait. We didn’t.

Good. Glad you didn’t need to. I guess left handed persons don’t have to marry right handed persons, and marry those with the same handedness now.

isn’t it ironic that blacks and Hispanics, who they themselves perceive as perpetual victims of a so-called “racist” society, are the first ones to the polls to vote on DOMAs? And that the black community at large is still homophobic to this day?

Yep. It’s a darn shame.

Regards,
Peter H.

Perhaps you will note that “closet queen” was only mentioned in response to the one who suggested what a nice place it was.

As usual the rest of your drool is so far off base it’s not worth answering. Maybe someday you will grow up and see how ignorant and baseless your attacks are. I doubt it.

I have the statistical proof in terms of voter breakdowns for any screaming liberal queen (hello, ADD) that dares to refute it.

Go ahead. Make my day.

Regards,
Peter H.

Oh, wait. We didn’t.

your point?

That homosexuals and left handed people shouldn’t have been persecuted. And these acts shouldn’t have been punishable by death. That ignorance reigned supreme back in the day. At least it doesn’t for lefthandedness anymore.

your point?

Do you have a point? And if so, what is it?

The point is that homosexual sex, like petty theft, was recognized as a crime. That’s not enough? If heterosexual sex was also recognized as a crime punishable by death, that might be a problem as well.

The reason we don’t is simple. We have principles. We are not going to turn a blind eye to people who advocate sexualizing five-year-olds because of their sexual orientation and insist that anyone who criticizes that hates gays, like you do. You have absolutely zero moral values or principles; your only rule is that your sexual orientation makes all the decisions for you. You are the equivalent of the black racists like Kwame Kilpatrick; you will excuse any crime, any action, anything of the sort based on your sexual orientation or that of your fellow gays, and that is why you have problems.

And that is exactly the point of this post; the gay community has reaped the seeds of promiscuity, antireligious bigotry, leftist politics, taking children to sex fairs, and spoiled-brat behavior that it sowed.

There were also laws in 1534 that allowed the death penalty for petty theft.

Do you have a point? And if so, what is it?

No. It just means that you are inaccurate. That’s all.

Ashpenaz, you asked for another name, and I gave you one. But I also pointed out that persecution happened to countless other non-celebrities/historical figures. Or they don’t count?

Here’s the point–you have your opinion, I have mine. What frustrates me, and what the original blog is about, is that the gay community simply cannot tolerate dissent.

You may have a point there. However…

I would think I’m exhibit A of a homosexual who can’t express a divergent opinion on even the most conservative gay blogs without being demeaned and insulted. Why is that?

I don’t know. The thing is, you are entitled to express your opinion, and you did. And I respect that. Now others are entitled to share their opinion as well. You’re not trying to play the victim here are you?

Until the gay community is willing to consider approaches other than victimhood, they will never make any gains in traditional society.

I agree, but mostly for individuals. But it goes both ways though. The gay community has plenty of faults. I think that is something we can all agree on. But one can’t keep saying it’s the gay community’s fault and blaming them for ones own shortcomings. You don’t want to use any community as an excuse for not having a partner, a social life, etc., and wait until they change to your satisfaction. If so, it’s going to be one hell of a miserable life ahead.

Sure, I kvetch about what I believe are injustices against gay persons. I do this in the hope that things can be better for others. Just like when conservatives gripe about how bad or stupid liberals are, I don’t necessarily assume they are victims. As for me, I’m fine. Victimhood sucks.

Regards,
Peter H.

I am Victim, hear me roar
in numbers too great to ignore…

Here’s the point–you have your opinion, I have mine. What frustrates me, and what the original blog is about, is that the gay community simply cannot tolerate dissent. I would think I’m exhibit A of a homosexual who can’t express a divergent opinion on even the most conservative gay blogs without being demeaned and insulted. Why is that?

If I said, “Extremist pro-life rallies are causing women all over the world to die in back-alley abortions,” most gays would go, “Huzzah!” But if I say that extremist Pride rallies are causing problems for gays in conservative countries, then I’m a hate-monger. Until the gay community is willing to consider approaches other than victimhood, they will never make any gains in traditional society.