http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brad-wilmouth/2009/02/23/olbermann-attacks-sick-liar-palin-gutting-special-olympics-defends-ob

Between Olbermann and Matthews, MSNBC is becoming the short bus of networks.

Now those are two guys that need to come out of the closet.

Regards,
Peter H.

So you DO admit that it was Clinton who dropped the ball during his administration, which resulted in 9/11 that your ilk constantly reminds us was done under Bush’s watch! No Gorelick wall = no 9/11 attacks.

Maybe you could announce this little factoid to your friends at HuffPo, DailyKos and Moveon.org. But somehow I doubt you will.

Regards,
Peter H.

You’re right, Levi. Liberals aren’t wrapped up in Obama. They’re actually SHRINK-wrapped up in Obama. Hence, that muffled sound you hear whenever an ACORN operative is speaking.

Liberals aren’t wrapped up in Obama the way that conservatives were wrapped up in Bush.

Damn! Now I gotta clean Dr. Pepper off my monitor and out of my nose.

Start? Why, Levi, you’re knee-deep in them. You’ve already stated that Obama cannot be held accountable for anything he’s done since he’s only been in office for less than a month. Therefore, his support of torture, his support of wiretapping, his finding that detaining people is perfectly legitimate, his finding that extraordinary rendition is OK, all that is quite all right.

What we’re going to find is that that 30 days will stretch into 60 days, 120 days, a year — all with policies that liberal leftists like yourself said were automatically wrong and should be immediately repealed.

I disagree, Levi. I think Obama’s done a bang up job tearing down capitalism, contract law, national security, and welfare reform in his first 30 days. At that pace, he should be able to burn down the entire f-ing country by the close of year 2.

The more you dance, the more you demonstrate the hypocrisy of the left — and worse, how you were willing to destroy the security of our country and give up all sorts of state secrets that you allow Obama to claim so that you could make political attacks on Bush.

If you think I’m going to start making excuses for Obama, I’m not. But it’s unrealistic to expect a new President to undo 8 years of policy in one month and you know it. Don’t you remember the Gorelick Wall?

Spin, spin, spin, Obama boy!

If you were consistent, Obama’s adoption of and support of these policies in the first place would be grounds for immediate impeachment. There is no “path to walk down”, there is no excuse whatsoever for this behavior, there is nothing that would justify this at all — at least that’s what you were saying when you were having your aneurysms about Bush doing it.

The more you dance, the more you demonstrate the hypocrisy of the left — and worse, how you were willing to destroy the security of our country and give up all sorts of state secrets that you allow Obama to claim so that you could make political attacks on Bush.

Answer: Because it’s not wrong when Obama does it. That’s the only thing you and your fellow leftists believe consistently, Levi. You fully support wiretapping when Obama needs it.

No, that’s not how this is playing out. I certainly don’t support Obama’s retention of these idiotic Bush policies, and soon enough, the blood on Bush’s hands will be on Obama’s if he keeps walking down this path. There is also nothing resembling the full-throated support of such policies by conservative media in liberal media.

I’ve been thoroughly disappointed by Obama’s administration so far, and I only expect that it’s going to get worse. Liberals aren’t wrapped up in Obama the way that conservatives were wrapped up in Bush.

Really? How do you reconcile that with your support of this?

Answer: Because it’s not wrong when Obama does it. That’s the only thing you and your fellow leftists believe consistently, Levi. You fully support wiretapping when Obama needs it.

One, given the fact that nearly a majority of the country voted Republican in the last election, that’s hardly “abandonment”.

Two, given that the media lies with impunity about Republicans while covering up scandal after scandal after scandal among Obama Party members helps. Do you think Obama would have been elected had it been revealed that his Cabinet picks and advisors would all be tax cheats — and that he himself fully supports and endorses not paying your taxes?

That’s exactly the sort of thing I’m talking about. I presume you’re talking about the secret prisons, aren’t you? Those weren’t being kept secret because of national security, doofus, they were being kept secret because they violated all sorts of American and international laws. This is a case of a reporter exposing government corruption, and you think she’s a traitor. That’s a typical reaction and you know it.

Like what? balancing the budget? The Republican congress is the ONLY congress to have written a balanced budget in the last 30 years, and it was actually only 14 years ago.

Who cares about what you did 14 years ago? 8 years ago you were spending like crackheads, isn’t that more reflective of where the party is at? I’d say so. Ken Griffey Jr. was the best player in baseball 14 years ago, and in recent years he’s been extremely mediocre if he wasn’t totally sidelined with injuries. If you’re a general manager, which information is more relevant to whether or not you’d want to put him on your team? Griffey as he was 14 years ago, or Griffey as he was last season?

I’d also note that Republicans were decreasing the deficit and were on track to have the budget balanced again by 2010… that is before Democrats took over congress in 2006 and blew that out of the water, and long before Obama took over and more than doubled it in just his first month.

Sure, sure. All of the economic crisis is on the Democrats, because they’ve been in control of Congress for the past 2 years. That makes sense.

I wonder, if the Republicans were doing such a good job in the first place, why did you guys go from winning the Presidency and bigger majorities in both Houses in 2004 to getting swept by the Democrats in 2006? If you guys were doing such a good job, why has the American people totally abandoned your party in the past two elections? You know the only Democratic seat you’ve been able to flip in the past 4 years was William Jefferson’s? Why would that be happening if you guys were doing such a great job?

PeeJ, I’m still having issues taking you seriously when you argued that we have a right (apparenetly in the penumbras and emmenations of the Constitution) to drive

So Taliban boy in the Cali prison isn’t a traitor? Or what about ‘the American Taliban’ who makes the fun Jihadi videos?

As to Non Al-quida Americans being beyond the pale, lets not forget the NYT (mentioned above) and the stupid comments that lead to damage like Dianne Feinstein’s disclosure of us operations in Pakistan.

There are traitors, some of us actually have the onions to call them such.

If we want to broaden the brush, we can compare Michael Moore, and Billy Zane to Tokyo Rose, with their propeganda films.

and it will be impossible for you to get any credibility until you regain control and actually do what you’ve been promising to do for the last 30 years.

Like what? balancing the budget? The Republican congress is the ONLY congress to have written a balanced budget in the last 30 years, and it was actually only 14 years ago.

I’d also note that Republicans were decreasing the deficit and were on track to have the budget balanced again by 2010… that is before Democrats took over congress in 2006 and blew that out of the water, and long before Obama took over and more than doubled it in just his first month.

Uh, you’ve got to be kidding. There’s nothing even remotely specific about anything GPW has said in this threrad, let alone ‘very specific.’ But to acknowledge your joke of an argument, I’m guessing you’re referring to the New York Times and their stories about CIA black sites and shit? That was hardly the only thing labeled as traitorous by the Republicans during the Bush years, and you know it.

You boys need to work on your collective problem with selective memory. It makes you sound really stupid.

As the old saying goes, when that has happened, the one doing it has obviously lost the debate and has nothing left other than to tear down his superiors.