Obama Admin Officials:
Come Out, Come Out, Where Ever You Are!
Come Out, Come Out, Where Ever You Are!
From Bill Moyers to Mike Rogers – liberals now have a documented history of shamelessly and ruthlessly rooting out The Gays(tm) who are in public service in Washington, DC.
So, since we have such an alleged “progressive” Administration now…. there is simply no reason for any gay or lesbian to be in the closet if they work in the Obama Executive branch.
Therefore, I am officially kicking off an effort to promote the openly gay and lesbian staff and officials who work in the Obama Administration. Come out, come out, all of you!  I’m now accepting names and titles and will proudly publish them as I get them.  You can’t be afraid of anything — you work for the OBAMA Administration, right???
I fully expect liberals and progressives to avalanche me with emails with these out and proud public servants.  Again, there is simply no reason for all gay and lesbians in the Obama Administration to publicly declare their sexual orientation.
So let’s see how this turns out, folks.  My email address is BRUCE@GAYPATRIOT.ORG.
-Bruce (GayPatriot)
22 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
First, Mike Rogers is a putz. But he only targets hypocrites, closeted people who actively, vigorously oppose equality for people you and me. The people who are outed are outed not because they are gay, but because they are hypocrites.
Now,
On Dec 10, Obama appointed Nancy Sutley, a prominent lesbian from Los Angeles, to lead the White House Council on Environmental Quality.
Don’t look now but Janet Napolitano is running Homeland Security.
Obama’s Transition Team Includes Seven Openly Gay Advisors
Ellie Schafer, a veteran softball player and co-founder of the ForeUS lesbian golf tour is director of the White House Visitors Office. (source:outsports.com)
President Barack Obama appointed Alison J. Nathan as his associate counsel. Nathan who is openly lesbian…
Mark Perriello is a Director in the White House Office of Presidential Personnel.
Nancy Sutley is chair of the White House Council on Environmental Quality.
I’m sure there’s more. But what the heck is your point? There’s no need for anyone in the Obama admin to be in the closet. In fact, there’s no need for any Democrat to be closted, as far as the party goes. Unlike the Rs, gay people can be open aboiut it instead of seducing underage boys, hanging out in tea rooms, etc. etc.
Finally, you wrote Again, there is simply no reason for all gay and lesbians in the Obama Administration to publicly declare their sexual orientation. Is that a typo?
I completely agree with it as written. I also say there’s no reason for them not to. As many have clearly done.
Also, why the obsession with Bill Moyers of forty years ago? Regardless of what he may have done before you were born, what has done to you lately?
Comment by PeeJ — February 23, 2009 @ 1:59 pm - February 23, 2009
All stock market gains since Bush took office wiped out. Thanks, Obamacrats.
Comment by V the K — February 23, 2009 @ 3:26 pm - February 23, 2009
Bruce, I’m SOOOOOOOOOOOOO disappointed! You promised us Sadly-Naughts on Friday that you’d have a blockbuster post that would out at least one Obama official, and it turns out, you got nothing?
I’m as disappointed as your last sex partner!
[GP Ed. Note - Geez, actor212... you must not be able to read. I said I would be inviting all gay and lesbians in the Obamacon White House to out THEMSELVES, since there must not be anything to worry about anymore. So far, just crickets chirping.... as I suspected. Hypocrites.]
Comment by actor212 — February 23, 2009 @ 3:36 pm - February 23, 2009
In the interest of staying off topic, how much of that loss occurred before Obama took office? What were those gains, by the way? As I recall, W had the slowest economic growth of any administration since Hoover.
Obama is attempting to pull the bus that W and your dear conservatives drove off the cliff back up. Why do you continue to work against your own best interests? Why do you hate America?
Comment by PeeJ — February 23, 2009 @ 3:41 pm - February 23, 2009
If that were the case, why has the stock market dropped more, rather than less, PeeJ? Why has the Obama “bank rescue” plan and the Obama Party plan to nationalize banks tanked the market even farther?
Furthermore, PeeJ, what the Obama plans entail are massive taxes on productive working people like ourselves to fund illegal immigrants like Obama’s aunt, who receives subsidized housing, a no-show job, free healthcare, and other benefits despite her being a criminal under a deportation order. How is our supporting that and the Obama Party’s goal to expand such behavior even farther helping our self-interest?
Comment by North Dallas Thirty — February 23, 2009 @ 3:58 pm - February 23, 2009
Back to the issue.
If it’s ok to out Republicans, then it should be ok to out Democrats!
The Democrats have nothing to hide with the Great One in office; do they? What goes around comes around!
Wayne
Comment by Wayne — February 23, 2009 @ 4:34 pm - February 23, 2009
If that were the case, why has the stock market dropped more, rather than less, PeeJ?
post hoc ergo proper hoc
Why has the Obama “bank rescue†plan and the Obama Party plan to nationalize banks tanked the market even farther?
What plan is that? Oh, you mean the plan where he said he did NOT want to nationalize the banks? What’s more, you are conflating the stock market with the economy. They are linked yes, but not so tightly as you seem to think. The stock market reacts more to perception than fact. Panics have killed many companies that were otherwise profitable and stable.
Furthermore, PeeJ, what the Obama plans entail are massive taxes on productive working people like ourselves [citation needed]
Stop drinking the KoolAid and look up the frigging facts. That is GOP talking point garbage. It’s just plain false. Unless by “productive working class people you mean you and others who make more than $250,000 per year, it is a misconception at best – lie is a better word. Please feel free refute me by citing data from the actaual documents available for download from whitehouse.gov.
How convenient that you use Obama’s aunt as a way to link him to policies he and programs he had no involvement in creating. Especially since he was unaware that she was even in the country. Cripes, the M.O. here is all about attacking people. Especially especially convenient that you omit his saying “whatever laws are in place should apply to her.” She scammed the INS, the Boston Housing Authority and lots more besides. Toss her ass out, I say. Aside from her being one of many relatives he knows almost nothing about and has only met twice, this has what, exactly to do with Obama? More to the point, what dies it have to do with the, you know, laws and written down shit that actually counts for anything?
How is our supporting that and the Obama Party’s goal to expand such behavior even farther helping our self-interest? [citation needed]
I am unaware of anyone in Democratic party who advocates “expanding such behavior.” I am aware of no existing or pending legislation, party platfomr or white paper making such advocacy. Please supply some facts to support your baseless assertion. Or admit that you are only regurgitating the pap the conservatives have been feeding you.
Finally, it’s difficult to find even one credible economist who disputes that that the TARP and the stimpak are necessary. They’ll difer on the details but even several “loyal bushie” economists have endorsed the principles. Seriously, the GOP has perefected the art of getting people to act against their own best interests. Wake up and smell the coffee.
Comment by PeeJ — February 23, 2009 @ 7:24 pm - February 23, 2009
Wayne, I wrote a long (go figure!) response to you but it seems to have gone into the bit bucket.
The gist is, not all Dems think it’s okay to out Rs. Secondly, it’s their hypocrisy that’s being outed, it’s not only becuase they’re gay. Only the pols that essentailly make aliving (figuratively) bashing gays who are themselves secretl;y gay get the treatment.
And, there just aren’t many closted Dems, there being no real reason for them to be closeted. No one in the party cares.
But watching ythe antics in this inane exercise is amusing so please, everyone, keep it up.
Comment by PeeJ — February 23, 2009 @ 8:03 pm - February 23, 2009
Only??? Are you sure?
And can you provide examples to back up your statement?
Comment by ThatGayConservative — February 23, 2009 @ 11:22 pm - February 23, 2009
Yes, I am sure of it. I’ll get around to documenting it tomorrow after I’ve had some snooze time. I’ll dig up every record of outing (of the last ten or maybe fifteen years) and attach the “victim”s anti-gay statements, motions, legislative initiatives, etc.
In the meantime, please cite an example of Mike Rogers or anyone else outing a closeted R who has demonstarted the least bit of support of gay equality.
Comment by PeeJ — February 24, 2009 @ 12:31 am - February 24, 2009
What plan is that? Oh, you mean the plan where he said he did NOT want to nationalize the banks?
Senator Dodd said that banks will be nationalized. Are you calling Dodd a liar?
Unless by “productive working class people you mean you and others who make more than $250,000 per year, it is a misconception at best – lie is a better word.
Let’s see, just for one example, how is the S-CHIP program expansion to be funded? That’s right, by tripling the tax rate on tobacco products — a tax which, according to previous research by the Obama Party, disproportionately affects those of lower income and minorities.
Aside from her being one of many relatives he knows almost nothing about and has only met twice, this has what, exactly to do with Obama?
It shows nicely how he and his leftist Obama Party intend to take tax dollars away from working Americans and use them to fund cheap housing, free medical care, and no-show jobs for people who aren’t even citizens. Meanwhile, it also shows how he lies, given that he mentioned her in his memoirs, solicited political contributions which she gladly made, was at his Senate swearing-in, and had, according to Obama’s own campaign, visited him and his family in Chicago and called him two years ago and told him specifically that she was in Boston.
Meanwhile, Obama’s aunt didn’t “scam” anyone; she merely took advantage of the fact that the Obama Party opposes requiring people to show proof of immigration status.
Massachusetts, where Obama’s aunt occupied one of about 50,000 state-funded units, doesn’t ask immigration status under a 1977 federal consent decree in a class-action lawsuit that prohibits the state from denying the benefit to illegal immigrants.
Comment by North Dallas Thirty — February 24, 2009 @ 3:02 am - February 24, 2009
In the meantime, please cite an example of Mike Rogers or anyone else outing a closeted R who has demonstarted the least bit of support of gay equality.
Unfortunately for that argument, given that Mike Rogers and his fellow leftist gays fully endorsed as pro-gay and gay-supportive those politicians who advocated state and Federal constitutional bans on gay marriage, what one figures out very quickly is that PeeJ and his fellow leftist gays like Mike Rogers are nothing more than hypocrites when they talk about “equality”. They’re merely party shills who attempt to destroy the lives of other people in an attempt to please their massas.
Comment by North Dallas Thirty — February 24, 2009 @ 3:06 am - February 24, 2009
LOL. Are you freaking kidding me??? Its a wonder Democrats can get anything done at all with all the time they spend f**king little kids!
45 year old Democrat Mayor of Portland caught in relationship with 17 year old boy.
Democrat SD Senator charged with groping, bedding teenage male page.
Mel Reynolds, House of Representatives (D-Il) convicted on 12 counts of sexual assault, obstruction of justice and solicitation of child pornography resulting from a sexual relationship with a 16-year-old campaign volunteer.
Senate Aide to Democrat Maria Cantwell Arrested in Underage Sex Sting
Democrat DHS Deputy Press Secretary Brian Doyle arrested for trying to screw a 14 year old.
Carl Stanley McGee, 38, prominent gay activist, assistant secretary for policy and planning and top aid to democrat governor Deval Patrick of Massachusetts, accused of sexually assaulting a 15 year old boy
Top aide to Barbara Boxer and Liberal Radio Talk Show Host Bernie Ward of San Francisco convicted of child pornography
Davidson County Democratic Party Chairman Rodney Mullins resigned Thursday morning amid child pornography allegations, according to press secretary Jean Carter Wilson of the Davidson County Democratic Party.
Democrat Boston city councilor David Scondras is facing charges for attempting to lure a teenage boy over the Internet.
Charles Rust-Tierney, 51, is a former president of the Virginia chapter of the ACLU from 2002 to 2005. On February 23, 2007, Rust-Tierney was arrested and charged with possession of child pornography
Andrew Douglas Reed, 53, a North Carolina Democrat activist plead guilty to a page-long list of counts of 2nd-degree sexual exploitation of a minor
And thats just a partial list of recent offenses and doesnt even begin to include things like Barney Frank running a prositution ring out of his home, or Elliott Spitzer, prostitute-crazed sex addict, and on and on and on…
Comment by American Elephant — February 24, 2009 @ 5:31 am - February 24, 2009
Filtered.
Comment by American Elephant — February 24, 2009 @ 5:31 am - February 24, 2009
PeeJ,
I don’t have the attribution, but I recall one case where Act Up went after a soldier and forced him out of the closet because of his father’s support of DADT.
And didn’t Harvey Milk out someone for political gain?
Also ‘gay equality’ is a non-sequetor. In that a gay man/woman is a full equal member of society, congratualtions, you win.
If you mean someone who doesn’t support ‘gay marriage’ then that’s a non-sequetor. I beleive you yourself said your partner of 20 years (congratulations, BTW, you’ve outlasted both my marriages) have no plans to take advantage of any sort of marriage. If someone who is gay supports DOMA because they feel it should be kept out of the courts, then are they opposing ‘gay equality’? Or are they seeking another path (i.e. Fred)?
Comment by The Livewire — February 24, 2009 @ 7:23 am - February 24, 2009
And didn’t Harvey Milk out someone for political gain?
Yup, Oliver Sipple, the man who prevented Sara Jane Moore from assassinating President Ford.
Milk’s exact quote when discussing whether or not to out Sipple: “It’s too good an opportunity. For once we can show that gays do heroic things, not just all that ca-ca about molesting children and hanging out in bathrooms.”
In other words, they completely violated a man’s privacy to use his behavior as a smokescreen for their inability to keep their hands off children and stop having public sex.
Comment by North Dallas Thirty — February 24, 2009 @ 12:19 pm - February 24, 2009
Then again, Milk, being a good Obama Party member, probably thought Sipple was “opposing gay equality” by keeping a Republican President from being assassinated.
Comment by North Dallas Thirty — February 24, 2009 @ 3:06 pm - February 24, 2009
American Elephant, molesting boys is like tax evasion… it’s always OK when a Democrat does it. Larry Craig and Tom Foley acted sleazy, but they didn’t actually consummate with anyone as far as we know, and they were booted out by Republicans. The Democrats in your list not only actually molestered underage boys and girls, their party continued to support them afterwards.
So, I guess the moral of the story is, child molestation is all right, so long as you support full marriage rights for the molester.
Comment by V the K — February 24, 2009 @ 3:53 pm - February 24, 2009
What exactly is the Obama Party? Where does it exist except in your febrile little mind? I’m not a member, I bnever even heqard of it until I started reading the tripe you post.
NDT, your ability to reason logicall is nonexistent. Get back on your meds beofre you injure yourself or someone else.
Comment by PeeJ — February 24, 2009 @ 6:42 pm - February 24, 2009
PeeJ ‘get back on your meds’? Speaking as one on antidepressants and anti-anxiety meds, how DARE you slur the mentally ill. You, you.. psychophobe you! You’re bigotry against the mentally ill is reprehensible.
Sorry, ok, took my meds, so I’ll stop thinking like a liberal now *sigh* that was close.
Comment by The Livewire — February 24, 2009 @ 9:31 pm - February 24, 2009
LOL….Livewire, the amusement value for me is that liberals like PeeJ will regularly scream that I should be put on “meds” or get “therapy” or be institutionalized “before I hurt someone”…..but, when it comes to the crazies who populate the streets of San Francisco, insist that these people who are crapping on themselves, assaulting passersby, and vandalizing areas should be free to “express themselves”.
You figure out very quickly that liberals like PeeJ will use any methods necessary to silence conservatives and dissenting voices. That’s why they support outing people, that’s why they demand that conservatives be put on drugs, etc.; it’s all about getting rid of anyone who might dare challenge them — as we see with liberal teachers like PeeJ.
Comment by North Dallas Thirty — February 24, 2009 @ 9:45 pm - February 24, 2009
Bugger, filter..
Comment by The Livewire — February 25, 2009 @ 7:18 am - February 25, 2009