<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moyers:  Still Lyin&#8217; about Goldwater after all these years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/25/moyers-still-lyin-about-goldwater-after-all-these-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/25/moyers-still-lyin-about-goldwater-after-all-these-years/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:32:12 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Livewire</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/25/moyers-still-lyin-about-goldwater-after-all-these-years/comment-page-1/#comment-377559</link>
		<dc:creator>The Livewire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9124#comment-377559</guid>
		<description>#4, Brief search on this blog alone, as firewall hampers research at work:
http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/12/19/log-cabin-reacts-to-rick-warren-inaugural-invite/
&quot;President-Elect Obama didnâ€™t appoint even one openly gay person to his senior staff. 21 senior staff positions in the White House. Not one LGBT person.&quot;

http://www.lagaycenter.org/site/PageServer?pagename=Rick_Warren_Response

&quot;If President-elect Obamaâ€™s selection of Rick Warren to give his inaugural invocation is intended to send a message to America that he will be an inclusive leader, then he has clearly made a decision that the exclusion of the LGBT community is acceptable.&quot;

http://blogs.laweekly.com/ladaily/queer-town/queer-town-obama-insider-tells/index.php
&quot;As of today, Obama has told us by his actions, gays will not stand in the way of his political agendaâ€“no matter how valid the argument.&quot;

But don&#039;t worry.  I&#039;m sure he&#039;ll take his message of human rights to the world.

Oh, wait http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.42a44b0f5d9cf5c9762e80574e79a3d5.831&amp;show_article=1

Clinton had sought to focus on economic and environmental issues in Beijing, saying Washington&#039;s concerns about the human rights situation in China should not be a distraction from those vital matters.

Never mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#4, Brief search on this blog alone, as firewall hampers research at work:<br />
<a href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/12/19/log-cabin-reacts-to-rick-warren-inaugural-invite/" rel="nofollow">http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/12/19/log-cabin-reacts-to-rick-warren-inaugural-invite/</a><br />
&#8220;President-Elect Obama didnâ€™t appoint even one openly gay person to his senior staff. 21 senior staff positions in the White House. Not one LGBT person.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lagaycenter.org/site/PageServer?pagename=Rick_Warren_Response" rel="nofollow">http://www.lagaycenter.org/site/PageServer?pagename=Rick_Warren_Response</a></p>
<p>&#8220;If President-elect Obamaâ€™s selection of Rick Warren to give his inaugural invocation is intended to send a message to America that he will be an inclusive leader, then he has clearly made a decision that the exclusion of the LGBT community is acceptable.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.laweekly.com/ladaily/queer-town/queer-town-obama-insider-tells/index.php" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.laweekly.com/ladaily/queer-town/queer-town-obama-insider-tells/index.php</a><br />
&#8220;As of today, Obama has told us by his actions, gays will not stand in the way of his political agendaâ€“no matter how valid the argument.&#8221;</p>
<p>But don&#8217;t worry.  I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;ll take his message of human rights to the world.</p>
<p>Oh, wait <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.42a44b0f5d9cf5c9762e80574e79a3d5.831&#038;show_article=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.42a44b0f5d9cf5c9762e80574e79a3d5.831&#038;show_article=1</a></p>
<p>Clinton had sought to focus on economic and environmental issues in Beijing, saying Washington&#8217;s concerns about the human rights situation in China should not be a distraction from those vital matters.</p>
<p>Never mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/25/moyers-still-lyin-about-goldwater-after-all-these-years/comment-page-1/#comment-377503</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9124#comment-377503</guid>
		<description>#4 - &quot;Wouldnâ€™t be caught dead with gay people? Wow. Thatâ€™s illuminating. I had no earthly idea. Whatâ€™s the evidence for that assertion?&quot;

When Obama said he would support Prop 8 in CA and talked about marriage being between &quot;one man and one woman&quot; during his 2008 campaign.

Try again.

Regards,
Peter H.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#4 &#8211; &#8220;Wouldnâ€™t be caught dead with gay people? Wow. Thatâ€™s illuminating. I had no earthly idea. Whatâ€™s the evidence for that assertion?&#8221;</p>
<p>When Obama said he would support Prop 8 in CA and talked about marriage being between &#8220;one man and one woman&#8221; during his 2008 campaign.</p>
<p>Try again.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Peter H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Livewire</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/25/moyers-still-lyin-about-goldwater-after-all-these-years/comment-page-1/#comment-377453</link>
		<dc:creator>The Livewire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9124#comment-377453</guid>
		<description>&quot;I&#039;m tired of having someone who supports democracy in the Middle East. bring on the people who will talk with those who want us dead!&quot;

There fixed it for you.

Welcome to Who&#039;s Administration is it anyway? Where the taxes go up, and the spending doesn&#039;t matter.  Yes, just like human rights to President Obama, the spending just doesn&#039;t matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m tired of having someone who supports democracy in the Middle East. bring on the people who will talk with those who want us dead!&#8221;</p>
<p>There fixed it for you.</p>
<p>Welcome to Who&#8217;s Administration is it anyway? Where the taxes go up, and the spending doesn&#8217;t matter.  Yes, just like human rights to President Obama, the spending just doesn&#8217;t matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGayConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/25/moyers-still-lyin-about-goldwater-after-all-these-years/comment-page-1/#comment-377419</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGayConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9124#comment-377419</guid>
		<description>Filtered post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Filtered post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriotWest</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/25/moyers-still-lyin-about-goldwater-after-all-these-years/comment-page-1/#comment-377309</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriotWest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9124#comment-377309</guid>
		<description>Inlookout, please address the substance of the post, thanks.

How would you react if it were discovered that when a sermonizing Republican with a television show once used the FBI to spy on political opponents and professional colleagues when he worked in the White House?

So, wait, you want me to believe I&#039;m not being very constructive when you&#039;re asking me to attack Republicans you don&#039;t like.  So, by your very statement, you&#039;re admitting not to being very constructive because you don&#039;t take Charles Rangel, Chris Dodd, Roland Burris, Kent Conrad and other Democrats with ethical lapses to task.

Can you defend Bill Moyers, the subject of this post?  Did I get any facts wrong?  Please let me know.  If not, I&#039;m curious why you chose to post your rant here, trying to deflect the topic from Moyers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inlookout, please address the substance of the post, thanks.</p>
<p>How would you react if it were discovered that when a sermonizing Republican with a television show once used the FBI to spy on political opponents and professional colleagues when he worked in the White House?</p>
<p>So, wait, you want me to believe I&#8217;m not being very constructive when you&#8217;re asking me to attack Republicans you don&#8217;t like.  So, by your very statement, you&#8217;re admitting not to being very constructive because you don&#8217;t take Charles Rangel, Chris Dodd, Roland Burris, Kent Conrad and other Democrats with ethical lapses to task.</p>
<p>Can you defend Bill Moyers, the subject of this post?  Did I get any facts wrong?  Please let me know.  If not, I&#8217;m curious why you chose to post your rant here, trying to deflect the topic from Moyers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/25/moyers-still-lyin-about-goldwater-after-all-these-years/comment-page-1/#comment-377305</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9124#comment-377305</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Here we go, now Iâ€™m sure to be labeled anti-Semitic?&lt;/i&gt;

That label really should be saved for people like Obama who actually are, not for people like you who are merely repeating what their party tells them to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Here we go, now Iâ€™m sure to be labeled anti-Semitic?</i></p>
<p>That label really should be saved for people like Obama who actually are, not for people like you who are merely repeating what their party tells them to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inlookout</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/25/moyers-still-lyin-about-goldwater-after-all-these-years/comment-page-1/#comment-377295</link>
		<dc:creator>Inlookout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 05:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9124#comment-377295</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t be caught dead with gay people? Wow. That&#039;s illuminating. I had no earthly idea. What&#039;s the evidence for that assertion? Any first hand knowledge? Please. As for Freeman, no I don&#039;t agree with all his views. But then I am also tired of always backing Israel to the Nth degree. And I am ready to have someone in there with a different perspective, as the perspective of the last 8 years certainly hasn&#039;t gotten us anywhere. Someone not afraid to call out Israel when deserved, and not always be their b!tch. Here we go, now I&#039;m sure to be labeled anti-Semitic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t be caught dead with gay people? Wow. That&#8217;s illuminating. I had no earthly idea. What&#8217;s the evidence for that assertion? Any first hand knowledge? Please. As for Freeman, no I don&#8217;t agree with all his views. But then I am also tired of always backing Israel to the Nth degree. And I am ready to have someone in there with a different perspective, as the perspective of the last 8 years certainly hasn&#8217;t gotten us anywhere. Someone not afraid to call out Israel when deserved, and not always be their b!tch. Here we go, now I&#8217;m sure to be labeled anti-Semitic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGayConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/25/moyers-still-lyin-about-goldwater-after-all-these-years/comment-page-1/#comment-377289</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGayConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 05:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9124#comment-377289</guid>
		<description>#1 Are the liberals talking about the Israel basher and China apologist as head of the National Intelligence Council? Are they talking about the fact that Chairman Obama still wouldn&#039;t be caught dead appearing with gay people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1 Are the liberals talking about the Israel basher and China apologist as head of the National Intelligence Council? Are they talking about the fact that Chairman Obama still wouldn&#8217;t be caught dead appearing with gay people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John W</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/25/moyers-still-lyin-about-goldwater-after-all-these-years/comment-page-1/#comment-377230</link>
		<dc:creator>John W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 03:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9124#comment-377230</guid>
		<description>When Goldwater was asked if he approves of gays in the army, his reply was (if I remember correctly), &quot;I don&#039;t care as long as he can shoot straight.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Goldwater was asked if he approves of gays in the army, his reply was (if I remember correctly), &#8220;I don&#8217;t care as long as he can shoot straight.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inlookout</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/25/moyers-still-lyin-about-goldwater-after-all-these-years/comment-page-1/#comment-377206</link>
		<dc:creator>Inlookout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9124#comment-377206</guid>
		<description>What?! Nobody is talking about Bobby Jindal? Or &quot;What are you, crazy?&quot; Michael Steele? Or Sen. Richard Shelby? Or even Sen. Jim Bunning? You folks really need to take your party back instead of harping on the same old &quot;liberal&quot; villains. Doesn&#039;t seem terribly constructive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What?! Nobody is talking about Bobby Jindal? Or &#8220;What are you, crazy?&#8221; Michael Steele? Or Sen. Richard Shelby? Or even Sen. Jim Bunning? You folks really need to take your party back instead of harping on the same old &#8220;liberal&#8221; villains. Doesn&#8217;t seem terribly constructive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

