<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Washington Blade: Log Cabin Controlled by Democrats!?!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/26/washington-blade-log-cabin-controlled-by-democrats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/26/washington-blade-log-cabin-controlled-by-democrats/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:11:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Cabin is On Fire &#171; Welcome to GayConservative.org</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/26/washington-blade-log-cabin-controlled-by-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-578994</link>
		<dc:creator>The Cabin is On Fire &#171; Welcome to GayConservative.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 05:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9150#comment-578994</guid>
		<description>[...] has happened to this organization? When did the Log Cabin Republicans become a left-leaning, superficially-Republican, Dede Scozzafava-supporting, Tom Campbell-supporting group, that makes a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has happened to this organization? When did the Log Cabin Republicans become a left-leaning, superficially-Republican, Dede Scozzafava-supporting, Tom Campbell-supporting group, that makes a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pink Elephant</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/26/washington-blade-log-cabin-controlled-by-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-409110</link>
		<dc:creator>Pink Elephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 23:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9150#comment-409110</guid>
		<description>Tim Gill&#039;s primary focus is gay rights issues, and being based in Colorado where Focus on the Family type social conservatives dominate the state GOP, that has often translated on a practical level to support of Democrats.  I agree with Dan at #24:  Gill&#039;s support of Log Cabin is part of his focus on gay rights issues, and does not suggest that LCR is some sort of Democratic spy organization trying to infiltrate the GOP.  Besides, I&#039;d rather he spend his money on LCR than some overtly left leaning PAC.

Perhaps the national org has some problems, but every local chapter I have visited is filled with True Republicans (from moderate to very conservative) who are also gay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim Gill&#8217;s primary focus is gay rights issues, and being based in Colorado where Focus on the Family type social conservatives dominate the state GOP, that has often translated on a practical level to support of Democrats.  I agree with Dan at #24:  Gill&#8217;s support of Log Cabin is part of his focus on gay rights issues, and does not suggest that LCR is some sort of Democratic spy organization trying to infiltrate the GOP.  Besides, I&#8217;d rather he spend his money on LCR than some overtly left leaning PAC.</p>
<p>Perhaps the national org has some problems, but every local chapter I have visited is filled with True Republicans (from moderate to very conservative) who are also gay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriot &#187; The Decline and Fall of the Log Cabin Republicans</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/26/washington-blade-log-cabin-controlled-by-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-409069</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriot &#187; The Decline and Fall of the Log Cabin Republicans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9150#comment-409069</guid>
		<description>[...] or Republican organization.Â Â  That failure become magnified when we learned that the group got substantial funding from a leading left-wing philanthropist.Â  Its credibility was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or Republican organization.Â Â  That failure become magnified when we learned that the group got substantial funding from a leading left-wing philanthropist.Â  Its credibility was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberto</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/26/washington-blade-log-cabin-controlled-by-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-377993</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9150#comment-377993</guid>
		<description>JSF.  

William Orozco, Kevin McCarthy, and Mary Toman were chairmen of the LA(GOP) Republican County Central Committee and as former member of the CCC  I can tell you they were all solid conservatives. The family that you refer too bought the organization in 2002. 

Bruce, if you want to dig why not contact some of the chairs of the state LCRÂ´s, such as Terry Hamilton of the LCR CA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JSF.  </p>
<p>William Orozco, Kevin McCarthy, and Mary Toman were chairmen of the LA(GOP) Republican County Central Committee and as former member of the CCC  I can tell you they were all solid conservatives. The family that you refer too bought the organization in 2002. </p>
<p>Bruce, if you want to dig why not contact some of the chairs of the state LCRÂ´s, such as Terry Hamilton of the LCR CA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/26/washington-blade-log-cabin-controlled-by-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-377839</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9150#comment-377839</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with others here: um, this surprises you how, exactly?  It seems pretty obvious to me that the left would control an openly gay organization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with others here: um, this surprises you how, exactly?  It seems pretty obvious to me that the left would control an openly gay organization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriot</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/26/washington-blade-log-cabin-controlled-by-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-377768</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9150#comment-377768</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;GAYPATRIOT EXCLUSIVE:Log Cabin Insider Discloses Shocking Detailsof Gay GOP&#8217;s Tim Gill Connection...&lt;/strong&gt;

***GAYPATRIOT EXCLUSIVE***
In the wake of the Washington Blade story yesterdayÂ suggesting strong ties between Log Cabin Republicans and left-wing liberal activist Tim Gill, I was contacted by a long-time Log Cabin insider.Â Â He is aware of my long-time ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>GAYPATRIOT EXCLUSIVE:Log Cabin Insider Discloses Shocking Detailsof Gay GOP&#8217;s Tim Gill Connection&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>***GAYPATRIOT EXCLUSIVE***<br />
In the wake of the Washington Blade story yesterdayÂ suggesting strong ties between Log Cabin Republicans and left-wing liberal activist Tim Gill, I was contacted by a long-time Log Cabin insider.Â Â He is aware of my long-time &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan L</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/26/washington-blade-log-cabin-controlled-by-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-377731</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9150#comment-377731</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s worth pointing out that the Gill Action Fund very truly is a gay organization, not a democratic organization pretending to be a gay one, like the Human Rights Campaign.  I remember reading a lengthy article about Gill&#039;s organization some time ago (I&#039;ll see if I can find it), that emphasized that Gill Action truly is a single-issue organization and dedicated to promoting candidates across the political spectrum who support gay rights.  The mere fact that Gill is willing to support Log Cabin show the truth of this attitude, and Log Cabin&#039;s actions under Patrick Sammon prove the absurdity of any accusation of Democratic control.  There is zero evidence of operational control--endorsing McCain/Palin would surely not have been on any Democratically-dictated script--and the whole article seems based on disgruntled anonymous sources.  Obviously we should wait to see how this goes, but I think this is likely to be a much smaller deal than it&#039;s been presented here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s worth pointing out that the Gill Action Fund very truly is a gay organization, not a democratic organization pretending to be a gay one, like the Human Rights Campaign.  I remember reading a lengthy article about Gill&#8217;s organization some time ago (I&#8217;ll see if I can find it), that emphasized that Gill Action truly is a single-issue organization and dedicated to promoting candidates across the political spectrum who support gay rights.  The mere fact that Gill is willing to support Log Cabin show the truth of this attitude, and Log Cabin&#8217;s actions under Patrick Sammon prove the absurdity of any accusation of Democratic control.  There is zero evidence of operational control&#8211;endorsing McCain/Palin would surely not have been on any Democratically-dictated script&#8211;and the whole article seems based on disgruntled anonymous sources.  Obviously we should wait to see how this goes, but I think this is likely to be a much smaller deal than it&#8217;s been presented here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriot &#187; Media Silent when Democratic Philanthropist Funds Republican Group&#8217;s ads targeting Republican candidates</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/26/washington-blade-log-cabin-controlled-by-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-377721</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriot &#187; Media Silent when Democratic Philanthropist Funds Republican Group&#8217;s ads targeting Republican candidates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9150#comment-377721</guid>
		<description>[...] Washington Blade: Log Cabin Controlled by Democrats!?! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Washington Blade: Log Cabin Controlled by Democrats!?! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/26/washington-blade-log-cabin-controlled-by-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-377718</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9150#comment-377718</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve rather suspected this ever since Obama Party paid shills and criminals Mike Rogers and John Aravosis were bragging back in 2004 that LCR staffers were feeding them information for their harassment campaigns against conservative and Republican gays.

Looks like the GOP called it correctly when it treated LCR like a bunch of Judases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve rather suspected this ever since Obama Party paid shills and criminals Mike Rogers and John Aravosis were bragging back in 2004 that LCR staffers were feeding them information for their harassment campaigns against conservative and Republican gays.</p>
<p>Looks like the GOP called it correctly when it treated LCR like a bunch of Judases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ILoveCapitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/26/washington-blade-log-cabin-controlled-by-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-377677</link>
		<dc:creator>ILoveCapitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9150#comment-377677</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;perhaps the time for Log Cabin has passed and a Gay Conservative (note: not REPUBLICAN) group should take its place?&lt;/blockquote&gt;How about... a group that tries to spread libertarian-conservative and Republican principles to gays... rather than a group that attempts, most unwisely and pathetically, to spread &quot;gay principles&quot; (i.e., leftist and Democratic principles) to conservatives?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>perhaps the time for Log Cabin has passed and a Gay Conservative (note: not REPUBLICAN) group should take its place?</p></blockquote>
<p>How about&#8230; a group that tries to spread libertarian-conservative and Republican principles to gays&#8230; rather than a group that attempts, most unwisely and pathetically, to spread &#8220;gay principles&#8221; (i.e., leftist and Democratic principles) to conservatives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ILoveCapitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/26/washington-blade-log-cabin-controlled-by-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-377675</link>
		<dc:creator>ILoveCapitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9150#comment-377675</guid>
		<description>GPW - I was also thinking of those anti-Bush ads Log Cabin ran in 2004.  You know, the ones suggesting he was a monster because he disagreed with them on gay marriage.  Ran in August.  And the fall campaign.  Not endorsing Kerry, but basically trying to help Kerry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GPW &#8211; I was also thinking of those anti-Bush ads Log Cabin ran in 2004.  You know, the ones suggesting he was a monster because he disagreed with them on gay marriage.  Ran in August.  And the fall campaign.  Not endorsing Kerry, but basically trying to help Kerry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ignatius</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/26/washington-blade-log-cabin-controlled-by-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-377668</link>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 03:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9150#comment-377668</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a bit hard to take seriously anyone who joins or is otherwise supportive of the idea of an organization based upon the well-traveled intersection of sexuality and politics and then expresses distaste (mock or true) when shenanigans occur, as they have since the beginning of politics.  

If being gay doesn&#039;t or shouldn&#039;t matter in GOP politics, if the party philosophy truly practices the idea that what matters is who rather than what you are, isn&#039;t LCR a contradiction?  LCR&#039;s public/private philosophical crisis is due to Gill&#039;s influence, Gill&#039;s influence is borne of lack of funds, lack of funds is due to lack of rank-and-file membership, lack of rank-and-file membership is due to a philosophical crisis: Republicans generally aren&#039;t joiners and don&#039;t practice identity politics.    

LCR is an excuse for Democrats to point to chimerical schisms in the GOP platform and for confused gay Republican men to have sex in second-rate convention hotel rooms.

Close the doors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a bit hard to take seriously anyone who joins or is otherwise supportive of the idea of an organization based upon the well-traveled intersection of sexuality and politics and then expresses distaste (mock or true) when shenanigans occur, as they have since the beginning of politics.  </p>
<p>If being gay doesn&#8217;t or shouldn&#8217;t matter in GOP politics, if the party philosophy truly practices the idea that what matters is who rather than what you are, isn&#8217;t LCR a contradiction?  LCR&#8217;s public/private philosophical crisis is due to Gill&#8217;s influence, Gill&#8217;s influence is borne of lack of funds, lack of funds is due to lack of rank-and-file membership, lack of rank-and-file membership is due to a philosophical crisis: Republicans generally aren&#8217;t joiners and don&#8217;t practice identity politics.    </p>
<p>LCR is an excuse for Democrats to point to chimerical schisms in the GOP platform and for confused gay Republican men to have sex in second-rate convention hotel rooms.</p>
<p>Close the doors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce (GayPatriot)</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/26/washington-blade-log-cabin-controlled-by-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-377663</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce (GayPatriot)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 03:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9150#comment-377663</guid>
		<description>Section 9 - Great comments.  All I have to say is &quot;I TOLD YOU SO.&quot;

I have been hounding on Tim Gill &amp; Log Cabin for almost four years.  I didn&#039;t have time to do the kind of reporting the Blade did.  Although I note that all of their sources are &quot;anonymous&quot;.  I happen to think we share a couple of the same sources.  :)

Regardless, I did do many hours of research here at GayPatriot trying to &quot;follow the money&quot; and lay out at least a circumstantial case that Gill controlled Log Cabin, and Log Cabin needed Gill or they would go bankrupt.

*whew*

That being said, perhaps the time for Log Cabin has passed and a Gay Conservative (note: not REPUBLICAN) group should take its place?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Section 9 &#8211; Great comments.  All I have to say is &#8220;I TOLD YOU SO.&#8221;</p>
<p>I have been hounding on Tim Gill &amp; Log Cabin for almost four years.  I didn&#8217;t have time to do the kind of reporting the Blade did.  Although I note that all of their sources are &#8220;anonymous&#8221;.  I happen to think we share a couple of the same sources.  <img src='http://www.gaypatriot.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Regardless, I did do many hours of research here at GayPatriot trying to &#8220;follow the money&#8221; and lay out at least a circumstantial case that Gill controlled Log Cabin, and Log Cabin needed Gill or they would go bankrupt.</p>
<p>*whew*</p>
<p>That being said, perhaps the time for Log Cabin has passed and a Gay Conservative (note: not REPUBLICAN) group should take its place?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Potomac Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/26/washington-blade-log-cabin-controlled-by-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-377661</link>
		<dc:creator>Potomac Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 03:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9150#comment-377661</guid>
		<description>I had been thinking lately about getting involved with LCR because it seemed like a good time to help out and give the the organization some support. With the right seeming to unite on economic issues again thanks to Obama, I thought maybe LCR could get a better seat at the GOP table.

But this Blade article gives me second thoughts. What&#039;s an out and proud gay Republican boy to do? Is it worth trying to take LCR back, or is it time to start another group?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had been thinking lately about getting involved with LCR because it seemed like a good time to help out and give the the organization some support. With the right seeming to unite on economic issues again thanks to Obama, I thought maybe LCR could get a better seat at the GOP table.</p>
<p>But this Blade article gives me second thoughts. What&#8217;s an out and proud gay Republican boy to do? Is it worth trying to take LCR back, or is it time to start another group?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Livewire</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/26/washington-blade-log-cabin-controlled-by-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-377655</link>
		<dc:creator>The Livewire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9150#comment-377655</guid>
		<description>Dan, 

Look at the grief Operation Chaos caused, and that was grass roots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, </p>
<p>Look at the grief Operation Chaos caused, and that was grass roots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriotWest</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/26/washington-blade-log-cabin-controlled-by-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-377654</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriotWest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9150#comment-377654</guid>
		<description>ILC,  it is exactly for running ads like Log Cabin did against Romney that cost them the financial support of gay Republicans. 

But, you can imagine the media firestorm if it were reported that a major GOP donor gave money to a Democratic auxiliary to make mischief in that party&#039;s primary?

Hmmm. . .  maybe there&#039;s a post in that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ILC,  it is exactly for running ads like Log Cabin did against Romney that cost them the financial support of gay Republicans. </p>
<p>But, you can imagine the media firestorm if it were reported that a major GOP donor gave money to a Democratic auxiliary to make mischief in that party&#8217;s primary?</p>
<p>Hmmm. . .  maybe there&#8217;s a post in that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ILoveCapitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/26/washington-blade-log-cabin-controlled-by-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-377652</link>
		<dc:creator>ILoveCapitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9150#comment-377652</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;UP-UPDATE: Ben Smith at Politico has an interesting take on this story saying itâ€™s a â€œsign of how hard it is for gay Republicans to survive in theâ€ GOP.&lt;/blockquote&gt;That cracks me up.  Oh, poh wittle gay Republicans!  So wejected in the 21st centuwy!

To grasp the full ridiculousness: imagine if the Democratic Hispanic caucus inexplicably, yet consistently ran ads that served the strategic aims of the other party, the GOP - and then were found to be on the take from Rush Limbaugh&#039;s foundation, the last several years, and passing every significant decision by him - and then GPW (say) tsk-tsked, &quot;It&#039;s just a sign of how hard it is for Hispanic Democrats to survive in that party.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>UP-UPDATE: Ben Smith at Politico has an interesting take on this story saying itâ€™s a â€œsign of how hard it is for gay Republicans to survive in theâ€ GOP.</p></blockquote>
<p>That cracks me up.  Oh, poh wittle gay Republicans!  So wejected in the 21st centuwy!</p>
<p>To grasp the full ridiculousness: imagine if the Democratic Hispanic caucus inexplicably, yet consistently ran ads that served the strategic aims of the other party, the GOP &#8211; and then were found to be on the take from Rush Limbaugh&#8217;s foundation, the last several years, and passing every significant decision by him &#8211; and then GPW (say) tsk-tsked, &#8220;It&#8217;s just a sign of how hard it is for Hispanic Democrats to survive in that party.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: section9</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/26/washington-blade-log-cabin-controlled-by-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-377616</link>
		<dc:creator>section9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9150#comment-377616</guid>
		<description>This is a damn shame. I&#039;m a straight Republican who wanted to see a much more prominent role for Gay Republicans, to counter the &lt;i&gt;Sturmabteilungen&lt;/i&gt; tactics of Mike Rogers and the Ideology Police of the Gay Left. Now, given the groundbreaking reporting of the &lt;i&gt;Blade&lt;/i&gt;, how are the rank and file of the Republican Party&#039;s activist community supposed to treat outfits like Log Cabin, except with suspicion.

It&#039;s obvious what was going on. Gill and his group was controlling Log Cabin and using their good name as a front to act as &lt;i&gt;augents provacateurs&lt;/i&gt; to make sure that Gay Republicans would never have any sort of entree into the Party. For example, I consider Mitt Romney to be a malignant a force in our party, and believe me, no one considers him more of a phony than I. However, attacking him directly was designed to give Gay Republicans a bad name among the rest of the Republican party. I suspect that the tactic worked like a charm.

It is good that the Democrats control of Log Cabin has been exposed. Perhaps the organization can be salvaged?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a damn shame. I&#8217;m a straight Republican who wanted to see a much more prominent role for Gay Republicans, to counter the <i>Sturmabteilungen</i> tactics of Mike Rogers and the Ideology Police of the Gay Left. Now, given the groundbreaking reporting of the <i>Blade</i>, how are the rank and file of the Republican Party&#8217;s activist community supposed to treat outfits like Log Cabin, except with suspicion.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s obvious what was going on. Gill and his group was controlling Log Cabin and using their good name as a front to act as <i>augents provacateurs</i> to make sure that Gay Republicans would never have any sort of entree into the Party. For example, I consider Mitt Romney to be a malignant a force in our party, and believe me, no one considers him more of a phony than I. However, attacking him directly was designed to give Gay Republicans a bad name among the rest of the Republican party. I suspect that the tactic worked like a charm.</p>
<p>It is good that the Democrats control of Log Cabin has been exposed. Perhaps the organization can be salvaged?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DANEgerus</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/26/washington-blade-log-cabin-controlled-by-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-377611</link>
		<dc:creator>DANEgerus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9150#comment-377611</guid>
		<description>Log Cabin Controlled by Democrats!?! 

Duh.

Next you&#039;ll discover Andrew Sullivan isn&#039;t a conservative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Log Cabin Controlled by Democrats!?! </p>
<p>Duh.</p>
<p>Next you&#8217;ll discover Andrew Sullivan isn&#8217;t a conservative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JSF</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/26/washington-blade-log-cabin-controlled-by-democrats/comment-page-1/#comment-377592</link>
		<dc:creator>JSF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9150#comment-377592</guid>
		<description>Unfortunatley, since the 1990&#039;s, there have been some Democrats running the California republican party (NOT the Chairman, but a former one and a family that ran the LAGOP).

Democrats want NO OPPOSITION to their policies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunatley, since the 1990&#8242;s, there have been some Democrats running the California republican party (NOT the Chairman, but a former one and a family that ran the LAGOP).</p>
<p>Democrats want NO OPPOSITION to their policies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

