<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bobby Jindal v. Barack Obama:Real Accomplishments or a Polished Performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/27/bobby-jindal-v-barack-obamacomparing-real-accomplishments-with-polish-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/27/bobby-jindal-v-barack-obamacomparing-real-accomplishments-with-polish-performance/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:12:13 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGayConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/27/bobby-jindal-v-barack-obamacomparing-real-accomplishments-with-polish-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-378224</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGayConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9163#comment-378224</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So now we have at least three liberals (Hillary, Biden and this schmuck) who have made racist stereotypical comments about Indian-Americans in the recent past. Hypocrisy, anyone?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s not hypocrisy because it&#039;s common knowledge that liberals are racist bigots.

&lt;blockquote&gt;by refusing the bailout money, Jindal will be remembered as one who put partisan politics over the welfare of his state.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Jindal will be remembered as the one who didn&#039;t add thousands to the welfare rolls only to have to come up with ass loads of cash or cut those folks off when the federal money runs out in 2-3 years.

He&#039;ll also be rememberred as being mocked by those racist bastards on the liberal left.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Tick, tock, tick, tock. His 15 minutes are quickly coming to an end.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Tick tock, tick tock. Chairman Obama couldn&#039;t make it 30 days (let alone 100) without taking the crown for Fuck-up in Chief. His approval numbers are in a free-fall and only 33% of the country believe we are headed in the right direction, while 73% of the American people trust Americans over the government.

Ain&#039;t looking so hot, is it buckeyedspoogelover?

&lt;blockquote&gt;the middle class (and the upper middle class) did much better under clinton than bush.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

We&#039;re talking about reality, not your wildest wet dream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So now we have at least three liberals (Hillary, Biden and this schmuck) who have made racist stereotypical comments about Indian-Americans in the recent past. Hypocrisy, anyone?</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s not hypocrisy because it&#8217;s common knowledge that liberals are racist bigots.</p>
<blockquote><p>by refusing the bailout money, Jindal will be remembered as one who put partisan politics over the welfare of his state.</p></blockquote>
<p>Jindal will be remembered as the one who didn&#8217;t add thousands to the welfare rolls only to have to come up with ass loads of cash or cut those folks off when the federal money runs out in 2-3 years.</p>
<p>He&#8217;ll also be rememberred as being mocked by those racist bastards on the liberal left.</p>
<blockquote><p>Tick, tock, tick, tock. His 15 minutes are quickly coming to an end.</p></blockquote>
<p>Tick tock, tick tock. Chairman Obama couldn&#8217;t make it 30 days (let alone 100) without taking the crown for Fuck-up in Chief. His approval numbers are in a free-fall and only 33% of the country believe we are headed in the right direction, while 73% of the American people trust Americans over the government.</p>
<p>Ain&#8217;t looking so hot, is it buckeyedspoogelover?</p>
<blockquote><p>the middle class (and the upper middle class) did much better under clinton than bush.</p></blockquote>
<p>We&#8217;re talking about reality, not your wildest wet dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ILoveCapitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/27/bobby-jindal-v-barack-obamacomparing-real-accomplishments-with-polish-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-378014</link>
		<dc:creator>ILoveCapitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9163#comment-378014</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If your point is that the top 1% did better under Bush and worse under Clinton, you just proved ILCâ€™s point; the Obama Partyâ€™s policy is to keep other people from rising to the level of the Kennedys, Kerrys, Pelosis, Obamas, Soroses, and Buffetts...&lt;/blockquote&gt;Excellent point.  The Democrats&#039; super-rich, limousine-socialist donors - which include Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford, btw - aren&#039;t the top 1%, and therefore *didn&#039;t* necessarily do better under Bush.  They&#039;re maybe the top 0.0001%.  The top 1% would be 3 million Americans!  For the top *3 million* Americans to do better under Bush is, comparatively speaking, a sign of improved economic opportunity for the masses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If your point is that the top 1% did better under Bush and worse under Clinton, you just proved ILCâ€™s point; the Obama Partyâ€™s policy is to keep other people from rising to the level of the Kennedys, Kerrys, Pelosis, Obamas, Soroses, and Buffetts&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Excellent point.  The Democrats&#8217; super-rich, limousine-socialist donors &#8211; which include Bernard Madoff and Allen Stanford, btw &#8211; aren&#8217;t the top 1%, and therefore *didn&#8217;t* necessarily do better under Bush.  They&#8217;re maybe the top 0.0001%.  The top 1% would be 3 million Americans!  For the top *3 million* Americans to do better under Bush is, comparatively speaking, a sign of improved economic opportunity for the masses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob (aka boob)</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/27/bobby-jindal-v-barack-obamacomparing-real-accomplishments-with-polish-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-378004</link>
		<dc:creator>bob (aka boob)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9163#comment-378004</guid>
		<description>just the reverse, NDT.  the middle class (and the upper middle class) did much better under clinton than bush.  the only people who did better under bush than clinton were the super rich.  wages for virtually everyone else were stagnant w/r/t inflation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just the reverse, NDT.  the middle class (and the upper middle class) did much better under clinton than bush.  the only people who did better under bush than clinton were the super rich.  wages for virtually everyone else were stagnant w/r/t inflation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/27/bobby-jindal-v-barack-obamacomparing-real-accomplishments-with-polish-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-377995</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9163#comment-377995</guid>
		<description>#24 - And how many times have Dhimmicrats put their party over their country&#039;s needs?

Every damn time, that&#039;s how many.

Let&#039;s face it - if it&#039;s good for the Dhimmicrats, it&#039;s bad for America.  Or are you too blind to see that, Nutso?

Regards,
Peter H.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#24 &#8211; And how many times have Dhimmicrats put their party over their country&#8217;s needs?</p>
<p>Every damn time, that&#8217;s how many.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s face it &#8211; if it&#8217;s good for the Dhimmicrats, it&#8217;s bad for America.  Or are you too blind to see that, Nutso?</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Peter H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/27/bobby-jindal-v-barack-obamacomparing-real-accomplishments-with-polish-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-377994</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9163#comment-377994</guid>
		<description>The funny part is watching leftists like buckeyenutlover who praised the states for refusing Federal funds for sex education because it would require them to teach abstinence now whining about states refusing funds because it would require them to commit to ridiculous spending requirements down the road.

What the Obama Party is doing is no different than handing out crack to children; the idea is to get them addicted and make them dependent. Obama knows he can control his puppets like buckeyenutlover because they&#039;re dependent on the welfare checks he sends them and have no other choice. He wants the states exactly the same way -- helpless and dependent on the Federal government for everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The funny part is watching leftists like buckeyenutlover who praised the states for refusing Federal funds for sex education because it would require them to teach abstinence now whining about states refusing funds because it would require them to commit to ridiculous spending requirements down the road.</p>
<p>What the Obama Party is doing is no different than handing out crack to children; the idea is to get them addicted and make them dependent. Obama knows he can control his puppets like buckeyenutlover because they&#8217;re dependent on the welfare checks he sends them and have no other choice. He wants the states exactly the same way &#8212; helpless and dependent on the Federal government for everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buckeyenutlover</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/27/bobby-jindal-v-barack-obamacomparing-real-accomplishments-with-polish-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-377987</link>
		<dc:creator>buckeyenutlover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9163#comment-377987</guid>
		<description>by refusing the bailout money, Jindal will be remembered as one who put partisan politics over the welfare of his state.  Tick, tock, tick, tock.  His 15 minutes are quickly coming to an end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by refusing the bailout money, Jindal will be remembered as one who put partisan politics over the welfare of his state.  Tick, tock, tick, tock.  His 15 minutes are quickly coming to an end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/27/bobby-jindal-v-barack-obamacomparing-real-accomplishments-with-polish-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-377973</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9163#comment-377973</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Jindal, did anyone catch the racist parody that libtard talk radio host Mike Malloy did which portrayed Jindal as a computer tech in India?  Here it is:  http://newsbusters.org/blogs/warner-todd-huston/2009/02/27/lib-talker-malloy-racist-spoof-jindal-computer-tech-india

So now we have at least three liberals (Hillary, Biden and this schmuck) who have made racist stereotypical comments about Indian-Americans in the recent past.  Hypocrisy, anyone?

Regards,
Peter H.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Jindal, did anyone catch the racist parody that libtard talk radio host Mike Malloy did which portrayed Jindal as a computer tech in India?  Here it is:  <a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/warner-todd-huston/2009/02/27/lib-talker-malloy-racist-spoof-jindal-computer-tech-india" rel="nofollow">http://newsbusters.org/blogs/warner-todd-huston/2009/02/27/lib-talker-malloy-racist-spoof-jindal-computer-tech-india</a></p>
<p>So now we have at least three liberals (Hillary, Biden and this schmuck) who have made racist stereotypical comments about Indian-Americans in the recent past.  Hypocrisy, anyone?</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Peter H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom in Lazybrook</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/27/bobby-jindal-v-barack-obamacomparing-real-accomplishments-with-polish-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-377971</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom in Lazybrook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9163#comment-377971</guid>
		<description>After watching Jindal&#039;s &quot;performance&quot;, I turned it to FOX NEWS to hear them praise that performance.  To my utter shock, they panned it as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After watching Jindal&#8217;s &#8220;performance&#8221;, I turned it to FOX NEWS to hear them praise that performance.  To my utter shock, they panned it as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGayConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/27/bobby-jindal-v-barack-obamacomparing-real-accomplishments-with-polish-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-377970</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGayConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9163#comment-377970</guid>
		<description>Curses! Filtered again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curses! Filtered again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGayConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/27/bobby-jindal-v-barack-obamacomparing-real-accomplishments-with-polish-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-377969</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGayConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9163#comment-377969</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why do hypocrisy and style-with-zero-substance triumph? Because we, as a society and culture, have officially degenerated.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So glad I don&#039;t watch American Idol. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;He insulted peopleâ€™s intelligence by speaking as if he was talking to a bunch of 8 year olds&lt;/blockquote&gt;

He was speaking to the people who still think Republicans control congress, don&#039;t have any idea who Joe Biden is, nor can offer a reason why they voted for Chairman Obama, other than &quot;Changeâ„¢&quot;.


&lt;blockquote&gt;he decided to bring up Hurricane Katrina (the single biggest &lt;strike&gt;political failure of the Republicans&lt;/strike&gt; example of the failure of liberalism in recent years).&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Fixed it for ya!

Ya just don&#039;t get it, do ya! If it ain&#039;t on a bumper sticker, you have no fucking clue how to deal with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why do hypocrisy and style-with-zero-substance triumph? Because we, as a society and culture, have officially degenerated.</p></blockquote>
<p>So glad I don&#8217;t watch American Idol. </p>
<blockquote><p>He insulted peopleâ€™s intelligence by speaking as if he was talking to a bunch of 8 year olds</p></blockquote>
<p>He was speaking to the people who still think Republicans control congress, don&#8217;t have any idea who Joe Biden is, nor can offer a reason why they voted for Chairman Obama, other than &#8220;Changeâ„¢&#8221;.</p>
<blockquote><p>he decided to bring up Hurricane Katrina (the single biggest <strike>political failure of the Republicans</strike> example of the failure of liberalism in recent years).</p></blockquote>
<p>Fixed it for ya!</p>
<p>Ya just don&#8217;t get it, do ya! If it ain&#8217;t on a bumper sticker, you have no fucking clue how to deal with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/27/bobby-jindal-v-barack-obamacomparing-real-accomplishments-with-polish-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-377954</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9163#comment-377954</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;ILC â€” go pull up some data to see how the top 1% did versus everyone else under bush. now compare that to how those groups did under clinton. go ahead. iâ€™ll wait.&lt;/i&gt;

If your point is that the top 1% did better under Bush and worse under Clinton, you just proved ILC&#039;s point; the Obama Party&#039;s policy is to keep other people from rising to the level of the Kennedys, Kerrys, Pelosis, Obamas, Soroses, and Buffetts by punishing those who work and save and earn money -- while not paying any taxes themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>ILC â€” go pull up some data to see how the top 1% did versus everyone else under bush. now compare that to how those groups did under clinton. go ahead. iâ€™ll wait.</i></p>
<p>If your point is that the top 1% did better under Bush and worse under Clinton, you just proved ILC&#8217;s point; the Obama Party&#8217;s policy is to keep other people from rising to the level of the Kennedys, Kerrys, Pelosis, Obamas, Soroses, and Buffetts by punishing those who work and save and earn money &#8212; while not paying any taxes themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob (aka boob)</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/27/bobby-jindal-v-barack-obamacomparing-real-accomplishments-with-polish-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-377912</link>
		<dc:creator>bob (aka boob)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9163#comment-377912</guid>
		<description>um i&#039;m pretty sure that is not public information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>um i&#8217;m pretty sure that is not public information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ILoveCapitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/27/bobby-jindal-v-barack-obamacomparing-real-accomplishments-with-polish-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-377905</link>
		<dc:creator>ILoveCapitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9163#comment-377905</guid>
		<description>Bob - go pull up a list of Democratic billionaire donors.  And what taxes they pay (or rather, don&#039;t).  NDT and I will wait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob &#8211; go pull up a list of Democratic billionaire donors.  And what taxes they pay (or rather, don&#8217;t).  NDT and I will wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob (aka boob)</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/27/bobby-jindal-v-barack-obamacomparing-real-accomplishments-with-polish-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-377899</link>
		<dc:creator>bob (aka boob)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9163#comment-377899</guid>
		<description>ILC -- go pull up some data to see how the top 1% did versus everyone else under bush.  now compare that to how those groups did under clinton.  go ahead.  i&#039;ll wait.

NDT --  you&#039;re hardly worth responding to anymore.  so because something like &lt; 1% of obama&#039;s cabinet had a tax issue, suddenly all democrats are rich elites who don&#039;t pay their taxes.  

puhh--leazzze</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ILC &#8212; go pull up some data to see how the top 1% did versus everyone else under bush.  now compare that to how those groups did under clinton.  go ahead.  i&#8217;ll wait.</p>
<p>NDT &#8212;  you&#8217;re hardly worth responding to anymore.  so because something like &lt; 1% of obama&#8217;s cabinet had a tax issue, suddenly all democrats are rich elites who don&#8217;t pay their taxes.  </p>
<p>puhh&#8211;leazzze</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ILoveCapitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/27/bobby-jindal-v-barack-obamacomparing-real-accomplishments-with-polish-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-377885</link>
		<dc:creator>ILoveCapitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9163#comment-377885</guid>
		<description>NDT, exactly.  The Democrats are truly the party of billionaires - who want to stay that way by keeping others from rising up.  Their tax policies are designed to make it difficult for people who don&#039;t have capital to accumulate it.  But the people who have it?  They can afford the lawyers and accountants and lobbyists needed to keep themselves on top.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NDT, exactly.  The Democrats are truly the party of billionaires &#8211; who want to stay that way by keeping others from rising up.  Their tax policies are designed to make it difficult for people who don&#8217;t have capital to accumulate it.  But the people who have it?  They can afford the lawyers and accountants and lobbyists needed to keep themselves on top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/27/bobby-jindal-v-barack-obamacomparing-real-accomplishments-with-polish-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-377877</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9163#comment-377877</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;i get a real kick out of republicans screaming about dems playing â€œclass warfare.â€ first off, obama won voters making over $250k by a five-point margin.&lt;/i&gt;

Of course -- because there were plenty of people like Warren Buffett, George Soros, Tom Daschle, Solis, Geithner, Rangel, and others who know that, if you support Obama and the Obama Party, you don&#039;t have to pay taxes, no matter what your income is.

Leftists like boob are hilarious to watch as they defend their massas. You would think that boob would be smart enough to realize that it&#039;s hypocritical for Obama to scream and wet himself about the need to raise taxes when he&#039;s goofily grinning as he endorses and supports outright tax cheats for governmental positions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>i get a real kick out of republicans screaming about dems playing â€œclass warfare.â€ first off, obama won voters making over $250k by a five-point margin.</i></p>
<p>Of course &#8212; because there were plenty of people like Warren Buffett, George Soros, Tom Daschle, Solis, Geithner, Rangel, and others who know that, if you support Obama and the Obama Party, you don&#8217;t have to pay taxes, no matter what your income is.</p>
<p>Leftists like boob are hilarious to watch as they defend their massas. You would think that boob would be smart enough to realize that it&#8217;s hypocritical for Obama to scream and wet himself about the need to raise taxes when he&#8217;s goofily grinning as he endorses and supports outright tax cheats for governmental positions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob (aka boob)</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/27/bobby-jindal-v-barack-obamacomparing-real-accomplishments-with-polish-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-377868</link>
		<dc:creator>bob (aka boob)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9163#comment-377868</guid>
		<description>&quot;Not to mention heâ€™s not above playing class warfare and scaring the bejeezus out of the American public.&quot;

i get a real kick out of republicans screaming about dems playing &quot;class warfare.&quot;  first off, obama won voters making over $250k by a five-point margin.  he won people with post-graduate degrees by 18 percent.  whenever he talks about raising taxes on the highest-income groups, he usually prefaces this by saying something like &quot;most of them didn&#039;t ask for those tax cuts from george bush.&quot;  

but more importantly, the republicans are the ones pitting classes against each other.  they&#039;re the ones talking about the &quot;real&quot; america.  they&#039;re the ones calling northern virginia &quot;communist country.&quot;  they&#039;re the ones talking about &quot;small town values&quot; and railing against &quot;big city values.&quot;  last i checked, we&#039;re all americans, and there are people of all political persuasions  in both rural and urban settings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Not to mention heâ€™s not above playing class warfare and scaring the bejeezus out of the American public.&#8221;</p>
<p>i get a real kick out of republicans screaming about dems playing &#8220;class warfare.&#8221;  first off, obama won voters making over $250k by a five-point margin.  he won people with post-graduate degrees by 18 percent.  whenever he talks about raising taxes on the highest-income groups, he usually prefaces this by saying something like &#8220;most of them didn&#8217;t ask for those tax cuts from george bush.&#8221;  </p>
<p>but more importantly, the republicans are the ones pitting classes against each other.  they&#8217;re the ones talking about the &#8220;real&#8221; america.  they&#8217;re the ones calling northern virginia &#8220;communist country.&#8221;  they&#8217;re the ones talking about &#8220;small town values&#8221; and railing against &#8220;big city values.&#8221;  last i checked, we&#8217;re all americans, and there are people of all political persuasions  in both rural and urban settings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ignatius</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/27/bobby-jindal-v-barack-obamacomparing-real-accomplishments-with-polish-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-377860</link>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9163#comment-377860</guid>
		<description>Comment filtered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment filtered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ignatius</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/27/bobby-jindal-v-barack-obamacomparing-real-accomplishments-with-polish-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-377859</link>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9163#comment-377859</guid>
		<description>polly, thank you.  Newt is an excellent thinker and &lt;i&gt;should&lt;/i&gt; be one of the architects of the future.  Whether the GOP&#039;s thinking is excellent enough to recognize that our current dilemma is tailor-made for him remains to be seen.  1994 was either watershed or Waterloo, depending upon your point of view, but Newt&#039;s Contract was unsustainable.  We need fundamental changes, primarily in the attitude toward image as exemplified by this thread.

I recommend several things.  As you&#039;ve implied, catch rising stars and promote them.  Governor Pawlenty, Congressman Ryan, Senator DeMint come to mind.  Engage in the constant refinement of our party platform, meaning keep our core principles intact but massage the message by keeping an ear to ground zero of popular culture.  Conduct media training seminars for current and future candidates, preparing them with mock interviews and complete with gotcha questions and grooming tips.  (And yes, Republican women are babes.)  Distribute talking points proudly and unashamedly.  In fact, if the media and Democrats get hold of them, write them so that in their criticism and analyses, those media figures do our advertising for us.  (But strategy should be relatively secret.)  Work to build the party at the state level, tapping the executive experiences of our fine Republican governors together with conservative/libertarian think tanks.  Start an advertising campaign that emphasizes common sense and uses positive but pointed criticism; make time work in our favor such as the end of the Obama honeymoon, the first 100 days, the 2-year &quot;Do Everything&quot; Congress led by Pelosi and Reid, etc.  Start building bridges to communities poorly served by the GOP in the past.  I dimly recall a candidate for mayor of Oakland, California -- an African-American who really had a good message.  The GOP didn&#039;t give him a dime because they needed the money for &quot;more important races elsewhere&quot;.  We&#039;ll never build a future party with that kind of attitude.  

There are lots of things we can do to improve.  Let&#039;s channel our collective outrage, clear out the cobwebs in our thinking, and seize the day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>polly, thank you.  Newt is an excellent thinker and <i>should</i> be one of the architects of the future.  Whether the GOP&#8217;s thinking is excellent enough to recognize that our current dilemma is tailor-made for him remains to be seen.  1994 was either watershed or Waterloo, depending upon your point of view, but Newt&#8217;s Contract was unsustainable.  We need fundamental changes, primarily in the attitude toward image as exemplified by this thread.</p>
<p>I recommend several things.  As you&#8217;ve implied, catch rising stars and promote them.  Governor Pawlenty, Congressman Ryan, Senator DeMint come to mind.  Engage in the constant refinement of our party platform, meaning keep our core principles intact but massage the message by keeping an ear to ground zero of popular culture.  Conduct media training seminars for current and future candidates, preparing them with mock interviews and complete with gotcha questions and grooming tips.  (And yes, Republican women are babes.)  Distribute talking points proudly and unashamedly.  In fact, if the media and Democrats get hold of them, write them so that in their criticism and analyses, those media figures do our advertising for us.  (But strategy should be relatively secret.)  Work to build the party at the state level, tapping the executive experiences of our fine Republican governors together with conservative/libertarian think tanks.  Start an advertising campaign that emphasizes common sense and uses positive but pointed criticism; make time work in our favor such as the end of the Obama honeymoon, the first 100 days, the 2-year &#8220;Do Everything&#8221; Congress led by Pelosi and Reid, etc.  Start building bridges to communities poorly served by the GOP in the past.  I dimly recall a candidate for mayor of Oakland, California &#8212; an African-American who really had a good message.  The GOP didn&#8217;t give him a dime because they needed the money for &#8220;more important races elsewhere&#8221;.  We&#8217;ll never build a future party with that kind of attitude.  </p>
<p>There are lots of things we can do to improve.  Let&#8217;s channel our collective outrage, clear out the cobwebs in our thinking, and seize the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: polly</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/02/27/bobby-jindal-v-barack-obamacomparing-real-accomplishments-with-polish-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-377849</link>
		<dc:creator>polly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9163#comment-377849</guid>
		<description>Good points, Ignatius, but what do we do about it?  Try to cajole Newt Gingrich into coming back?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points, Ignatius, but what do we do about it?  Try to cajole Newt Gingrich into coming back?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

