You never commented on the discrimination of smokers. The problem with the left is that their liberalism isn´t really liberal it is about control. Controlling what people can think, say or do.

What makes this funny, Tom, is that you can’t “exclude” people from a community based on sexual orientation just because of the way they think — unless, of course, you are stating that one’s sexual orientation exercises complete determination over thoughts and opinions. Your attempts to do so make it clear that you consider sexual orientation to be so dominating, so overwhelming to a person’s psyche that they should always think exactly the way you do, have the same opinions you do, and vote the way you do.

Your whines of “selfish” and “self-loathing” are no different than black liberals who call black conservatives and Republicans “Uncle Toms” and “oreos”. It is little more than a control mechanism to get rid of people who challenge your worldview and might force you to think about things rather than simply writing all your opinions and goals off to your sexual orientation.

47, Santorum compared being gay to screwing animals. Then was livid when Texas’ sodomy laws were overturned. You vote selfish. Don’t whine when others in the Gay community exclude you for voting against our community for people who advocate you being a criminal (and being ineligible to be lawyer, a doctor, hold a professional degree, etc.) because you are an illegallity.

Today is most of the USA it is LEGAL for a Christian to fire someone simply because they are Gay, but ILLEGAL for someone who is Gay to fire someone simply because they are Christian. You want to talk about people of faith being discriminated against. Oh and by the way, if a group discriminates, it isn’t discrimination to say NO taxpayer subsidies for you.

Give an example of some filthy lies, particularly as told by Former Senator Santorum. Straight people as a group are not discriminated against but there are groups of straight who are discriminated against, for example, people of faith. Then of course there are smokers (both straight and gay). A woman in a California community was fined for smoking inside her apartment.

I vote my pocket book over my sexuality

How so, Tom? Because they upset bigots like you, who get your jollies out of targeting gay Republicans and threatening their families?

Your comments do tremendous damage to the gaypatriot community.

So, until people like you stop that there’s a need for such laws and deny it all you want sexual orientation is one thing that basher like you justify discriminating against and many str8s fall into one catagory or another that invites hate.

Does that sentence make any sense to anyone?

A system created by pathetic liberals like yourself, adDave. Remember, you’re the ones who insisted that children should be taken away from their parents and put in the government’s care. The fact that your system is pathetically broken is your fault, not ours. Indeed, is the reason you make foster care and other programs so bad so that you can justify “redistributing” children from their parents to gay liberals like yourself who need dress-up dolls to take to sex fairs to show off?

Or more precisely, who tell the truth about what gay liberal folk like you fully support and endorse.

When you blast gay folk who take children to sex fairs and who demand that five-year-olds be taught gay sex, you can speak. But until then, all you’ve demonstrated is that you consider any criticism of that to be “homophobic”, which makes obvious the kind of “filth” that you and your fellow gay liberals consider to be a normal part of gay behavior.

“straight people do not have laws protecting them from being discriminated against,” shouldn’t be any need for anti-discrimination laws, but people like you single out specific groups for hate. So, until people like you stop that there’s a need for such laws and deny it all you want sexual orientation is one thing that basher like you justify discriminating against and many str8s fall into one catagory or another that invites hate.

“straight people do not have laws that demand higher penalties when crimes are committed against them,” same as above

“straight people can be barred from adoption,” some should be, but sexual orientation is NOT an indication of unfit to raise a child, that fact that those you worship believe would rather see children rot in the system or live in harmful conditions rather than being part of a loving gay family exposes yet again how anti-family you really are.

“straight people do not get to import their sex partners without following immigration practice” straight people aren’t told that their relationships aren’t real or are disqualified simply because of who the partner is (terrorists etc excluded from that statement of course)

“straight people do not get to serve in the same quarters as people to whom they’re sexually attracted in the military” If str8 people cannot control their sexual urges enough to be around those who they are attracted to that is not our problem. Should we also make it illegal for gays to use locker rooms, bathrooms, stay in dormitories or any other group situation where their might be a sexually attractive person?

abusing their postion? right because every gay person would and no str8 person ever wood.

Everything that oozes from your toxic brain is based on anti-gay hate. You deserve someone like Santorum

Of course I would, because all of those men have demonstrated that they support my values, my beliefs, and my opinions about the role of our government, taxes, business, and the innumerable other things that affect my life far more than my sexual orientation ever has or will.

Meanwhile, as for the innumerable attempts you make to prove how persecuted you are, realize this: straight people do not have laws protecting them from being discriminated against, straight people do not have laws that demand higher penalties when crimes are committed against them, straight people can be barred from adoption, straight people do not get to import their sex partners without following immigration practice, and straight people do not get to serve in the same quarters as people to whom they’re sexually attracted in the military.

You want all of these, even though straight people don’t have them, based on your sexual orientation. That exposes you nicely as a spoiled brat who wants preferential treatment because of your sexual orientation, and who, when he gets it, will go off and abuse it.

I am a gay man who functions just fine in society without this special treatment. The fact that you can’t is not anyone’s problem but your own.

Ah, but you see, nevermore, you and your fellow gay leftists have publicly stated that bans on gay marriage, workplace discrimination, and the like are pro-gay and gay-supportive when carried out by Obama Party members.

Hence, what should be obvious is that actions, words, and policies have nothing to do with being antigay in the eyes of bigots like yourself; it’s all about political affiliation.

I didn’t do a damn thing to help out Harold Ford. But that doesn’t mean that Bob Corker is any better on Gay issues. So I stayed out of that one. In a Congress with a large Dem majority, I have the luxury of punishing Dems while not significantly helping the (usually) much more anti-Gay Republicans.

I’m not a member of HRC. They’re way to willing to take the ‘slowly, slowly’ approach on Gay rights. Besides after they appeared to be ‘greenlighting’ the delay of DADT repeal, I’ve started telling the frequent requests for me to join them that I will consider it when DADT is repealed.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m usually a Democrat. But I support Gay rights.

I believe you to be a partisan who doesn’t like Gay rights. How about letting us know your opinion on ENDA and your old buddies up in Collin County TX firing a Gay republican from County government simply because he was Gay? The Matt Shepard Act? Bans on Adoption by Gays? The Permanent Partner Immigration Act? The repeal of Don’t ask Don’t tell?

If you oppose all of those things, then keep voting and supporting Republicans, regardless of how anti-Gay they are. If you want any of those things done, how are you HELPING get these things passed? By voting for Rick Perry/George Bush/Pete Sessions? I really don’t understand your strategy.

Ok Bill Clinton signed DOMA 13 YEARS ago. Harold Ford isn’t in government. Can you please update your few examples of anti-Gay Democrats.

1) I supported Anh Cao (and yes with MONEY) against anti-Gay Bill Jefferson.

2) I will be financially supporting a movement to undervote against likely Dem nominee Artur Davis in Alabama. He’s hideously anti-Gay.

3) I personally told (face to face) to Nick Lampson when he asked me if I was supporting him again, that I couldn’t give him anything because he started voting really anti-Gay.

Don’t think that I wont support a Republican or vote against a Democrat. NDT, who was the last Democrat you voted for or gave moeny too? I think you’re just a partisan guy who would vote for Mike Huckabee, Bobby Jindal, or Rick Santorum rather than a Democrat who supports Gay rights.

It’s not that the financial pool isn’t big enough, it’s that the it can’t motivate enough like-minded people to financially support it. The key word in that sentence is motivate. There’s plenty of money out there. Hell, you could probably buy the whole Republican Party for what’s dropped down the g-strings of the pay-for-gay strippers the Gay community supports in one year. Or, for what you extra-generously tip that cute bartender in the hopes he’ll “like” you. That’s what the Religious Right did, they tapped into the collection plate-reflex of their parishoners. And so do the unions who get a cut from every member’s paycheck.

Ah, but you see, Tom, given that you consider those who openly promote Federal bans on gay marriage to be “pro-gay and gay-supportive”, why on earth should we believe your characterization of Jindal? You’ve made it obvious that you are a bigot who is prejudiced against Republicans and cannot judge them fairly — which is also an excellent argument from excluding liberal gays like yourself from holding any sort of job or public office, given that your sexual orientation causes you to discriminate against people.