<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Early On, FDR Understood the Threat of Fascism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/03/21/early-on-fdr-understood-the-threat-of-fascism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/03/21/early-on-fdr-understood-the-threat-of-fascism/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:37:49 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C. Randolph</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/03/21/early-on-fdr-understood-the-threat-of-fascism/comment-page-1/#comment-393553</link>
		<dc:creator>John C. Randolph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9735#comment-393553</guid>
		<description>Roosevelt WAS a fascist.  The SOB locked up thousands of innocent American citizens for the non-crime of being members of an unfashionable race, he imprisoned a man for pressing a suit for ten cents less than the government-fixed price, he STOLE OUR GOLD, he tried to turn the supreme court into a rubber stamp, and that&#039;s just scratching the surface.

Yeah, he understood fascism all right:  he was the man who inflicted it on America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roosevelt WAS a fascist.  The SOB locked up thousands of innocent American citizens for the non-crime of being members of an unfashionable race, he imprisoned a man for pressing a suit for ten cents less than the government-fixed price, he STOLE OUR GOLD, he tried to turn the supreme court into a rubber stamp, and that&#8217;s just scratching the surface.</p>
<p>Yeah, he understood fascism all right:  he was the man who inflicted it on America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scottland</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/03/21/early-on-fdr-understood-the-threat-of-fascism/comment-page-1/#comment-392165</link>
		<dc:creator>Scottland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9735#comment-392165</guid>
		<description>FILTERED</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FILTERED</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scottland</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/03/21/early-on-fdr-understood-the-threat-of-fascism/comment-page-1/#comment-392164</link>
		<dc:creator>Scottland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9735#comment-392164</guid>
		<description>#6 Executive prerogative is a fascinating topic, and claims of executive prerogative have existed as far back as Jefferson, particularly in the field of foreign policy. Jefferson thought that congressional permission for certain executive action was politically helpful, but not necessary. I believe that this was concerning issues about merchant vessels, but dont quote me on that. Check out Imbalance of Power by Gordon Silverstein for an authoritative look.

As for the New Deal, there were certainly efforts within it that could be seen as &#039;conservative&#039;, that is to say, trying to keep the existing economic and business order viable, particularly with regards to Agribusiness. the reason why so many sharecroppers got shafted in the new deal was because the laws put in place by FDR favoured Big farmers, not little ones.

There was a demonstrable increase in the extent of governement control of the economy and society, but this was very much based on the powers outlined in the constitution:

&#039;Article I, Section 8, Clause 3: The Congress shall have power . . . To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes&#039;
All Congress had to asert was that legislation that would affect individual behaviour had an aggregated effect on American society at large, crossing state boundaries. It was that kind of expanse of federal power that other laws such as the 1960s civil rights laws were based on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#6 Executive prerogative is a fascinating topic, and claims of executive prerogative have existed as far back as Jefferson, particularly in the field of foreign policy. Jefferson thought that congressional permission for certain executive action was politically helpful, but not necessary. I believe that this was concerning issues about merchant vessels, but dont quote me on that. Check out Imbalance of Power by Gordon Silverstein for an authoritative look.</p>
<p>As for the New Deal, there were certainly efforts within it that could be seen as &#8216;conservative&#8217;, that is to say, trying to keep the existing economic and business order viable, particularly with regards to Agribusiness. the reason why so many sharecroppers got shafted in the new deal was because the laws put in place by FDR favoured Big farmers, not little ones.</p>
<p>There was a demonstrable increase in the extent of governement control of the economy and society, but this was very much based on the powers outlined in the constitution:</p>
<p>&#8216;Article I, Section 8, Clause 3: The Congress shall have power . . . To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes&#8217;<br />
All Congress had to asert was that legislation that would affect individual behaviour had an aggregated effect on American society at large, crossing state boundaries. It was that kind of expanse of federal power that other laws such as the 1960s civil rights laws were based on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scottland</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/03/21/early-on-fdr-understood-the-threat-of-fascism/comment-page-1/#comment-392163</link>
		<dc:creator>Scottland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9735#comment-392163</guid>
		<description>#6 Executive prerogative is a fascinating topic, and claims of executive prerogative have existed as far back as Jefferson, particularly in the field of foreign policy. Jefferson thought that congressional permission for certain executive action was politically helpful, but not necessary. I believe that this was concerning issues about merchant vessels, but dont quote me on that. Check out Imbalance of Power by Gordon Silverstein for an authoritative look.

As for the New Deal, there were certainly efforts within it that could be seen as &#039;conservative&#039;, that is to say, trying to keep the existing economic and business order viable, particularly with regards to Agribusiness. the reason why so many sharecroppers got screwed in the new deal was because the laws put in place by FDR favoured Big farmers, not little ones.

There was a demonstrable increase in the extent of governement control of the economy and society, but this was very much based on the powers outlined in the constitution:

&#039;Article I, Section 8, Clause 3: The Congress shall have power . . . To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes&#039;
All Congress had to assert was that legislation that would affect individual behaviour had an aggregated effect on American society at large, crossing state boundaries. It was that kind of expanse of federal power that other laws such as the 1960s civil rights laws were based on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#6 Executive prerogative is a fascinating topic, and claims of executive prerogative have existed as far back as Jefferson, particularly in the field of foreign policy. Jefferson thought that congressional permission for certain executive action was politically helpful, but not necessary. I believe that this was concerning issues about merchant vessels, but dont quote me on that. Check out Imbalance of Power by Gordon Silverstein for an authoritative look.</p>
<p>As for the New Deal, there were certainly efforts within it that could be seen as &#8216;conservative&#8217;, that is to say, trying to keep the existing economic and business order viable, particularly with regards to Agribusiness. the reason why so many sharecroppers got screwed in the new deal was because the laws put in place by FDR favoured Big farmers, not little ones.</p>
<p>There was a demonstrable increase in the extent of governement control of the economy and society, but this was very much based on the powers outlined in the constitution:</p>
<p>&#8216;Article I, Section 8, Clause 3: The Congress shall have power . . . To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes&#8217;<br />
All Congress had to assert was that legislation that would affect individual behaviour had an aggregated effect on American society at large, crossing state boundaries. It was that kind of expanse of federal power that other laws such as the 1960s civil rights laws were based on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGayConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/03/21/early-on-fdr-understood-the-threat-of-fascism/comment-page-1/#comment-392087</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGayConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 08:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9735#comment-392087</guid>
		<description>Saw something tonight on the History Chanel that FDR wanted to work along with Stalin for a peaceful world. Guess he didn&#039;t recognise that fascism.

I&#039;ve also read where FDR had a tendency to do what he wanted and asked congress for permission later. Could a Republican do that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw something tonight on the History Chanel that FDR wanted to work along with Stalin for a peaceful world. Guess he didn&#8217;t recognise that fascism.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also read where FDR had a tendency to do what he wanted and asked congress for permission later. Could a Republican do that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ignatius</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/03/21/early-on-fdr-understood-the-threat-of-fascism/comment-page-1/#comment-391814</link>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 01:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9735#comment-391814</guid>
		<description>Testing posting a comment from my Kindle.  Seems to be working.  Live preview doesn&#039;t seem to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Testing posting a comment from my Kindle.  Seems to be working.  Live preview doesn&#8217;t seem to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ILoveCapitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/03/21/early-on-fdr-understood-the-threat-of-fascism/comment-page-1/#comment-391788</link>
		<dc:creator>ILoveCapitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9735#comment-391788</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Rooseveltâ€™s economic ideas were so terrible that I fear talking too much about when Roosevelt was right tempts people to think his economic ideas werenâ€™t bad after all.&lt;/blockquote&gt;The irony is that, while Roosevelt did a great job of fighting fascism abroad, most of his New Deal was modeled on fascist ideas, i.e., taken from American Left admirers of Mussolini and Hitler.

I don&#039;t regard Roosevelt as unequivocally good or bad.  I credit him with being a staunch pro-American leader .  I discredit him with being a fool or worse, on everything to do with economic freedom.  Incidentally, that is also my view of George W. Bush.  If I were ranking the Presidents, Bush and Roosevelt would appear somewhere near each other, perhaps in the middle quintile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Rooseveltâ€™s economic ideas were so terrible that I fear talking too much about when Roosevelt was right tempts people to think his economic ideas werenâ€™t bad after all.</p></blockquote>
<p>The irony is that, while Roosevelt did a great job of fighting fascism abroad, most of his New Deal was modeled on fascist ideas, i.e., taken from American Left admirers of Mussolini and Hitler.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t regard Roosevelt as unequivocally good or bad.  I credit him with being a staunch pro-American leader .  I discredit him with being a fool or worse, on everything to do with economic freedom.  Incidentally, that is also my view of George W. Bush.  If I were ranking the Presidents, Bush and Roosevelt would appear somewhere near each other, perhaps in the middle quintile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ILoveCapitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/03/21/early-on-fdr-understood-the-threat-of-fascism/comment-page-1/#comment-391654</link>
		<dc:creator>ILoveCapitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 23:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9735#comment-391654</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s fun to imagine how today&#039;s lefties would have dealt with Roosevelt&#039;s foreign policy and conduct of the War  on Fascism.  &quot;Germany never attacked us!  Roosevelt lied, people died!&quot; and other such rubbish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s fun to imagine how today&#8217;s lefties would have dealt with Roosevelt&#8217;s foreign policy and conduct of the War  on Fascism.  &#8220;Germany never attacked us!  Roosevelt lied, people died!&#8221; and other such rubbish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ignatius</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/03/21/early-on-fdr-understood-the-threat-of-fascism/comment-page-1/#comment-391588</link>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9735#comment-391588</guid>
		<description>We shouldn&#039;t fail to mention the Japanese menace and our response, begun with FDR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We shouldn&#8217;t fail to mention the Japanese menace and our response, begun with FDR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aeshna23</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/03/21/early-on-fdr-understood-the-threat-of-fascism/comment-page-1/#comment-391541</link>
		<dc:creator>aeshna23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=9735#comment-391541</guid>
		<description>I struggle with this issue.  I suppose we have to tell each other something about Roosevelt, but I keep quiet about just this subject.  Roosevelt&#039;s economic ideas were so terrible that I fear talking too much about when Roosevelt was right tempts people to think his economic ideas weren&#039;t bad after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I struggle with this issue.  I suppose we have to tell each other something about Roosevelt, but I keep quiet about just this subject.  Roosevelt&#8217;s economic ideas were so terrible that I fear talking too much about when Roosevelt was right tempts people to think his economic ideas weren&#8217;t bad after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

