Regards,
Peter H.

Regards,
Peter H.

As a gay journalist, Maddow is perfectly in-sync with the conventional gay mindset of liberals. She’s got more than enough of her own hate ruminating below the surface of that impeccable makeup. She does a fair amont of sneers and snarks like the Left’s best cynics but without KeithO’s bloated, sportsbased, hyper-alliterative double-speak that leaves most listeners puzzled.

She is still hammering W even as we approach Obama’s 100th day and that will be her STAYING power at MSNBC. She still wonders aloud if anyone at the Hague is looking into Cheney, Blackwater, Halliburton, rightwinged conspiracies and the internl arms merchant cabal (which Maddow seems to think is synonymous with the RNC). And every chance she gets, it’s a zinger fired at anything GOPish –even those wrongly confused as such on talk/entertainment shows.

When KeithO tosses the Baton of Hate to her at the blessed end of his “show”, she rarely lets it cool.

She might be a good looking dyke; but she is all venom below that $500 haircut and the impeccable makeup. Just like we can’t take the sports newsreader out of KeithO; one can’t take the venom out of Rachel, either. She speaks the “truth” to MSNBC listeners (just like Matthews and HerrOlbermann) and that’s why she’ll last. She says it with a smile, but the smile is made up of barracuda-like teeth clenched onto some GOPer’s backside.

Like JonStewart, BillMaher, StevenColbert, Janeane Garofalo or Lewis Black (well, maybe not Black, he does look mad) and tons of other voices on the farLeft, Maddow shouldn’t be mistaken for a soft peddle of her Hate just because she smiles. People did that with JonStewart for years and paid royally.

Regards,
Peter H.

I reported that I could find no real comparison between Rush and Maddow, because Maddow is short topic consumed with no thread(s) of principle to weave the tapestry.

My friend said that Rush is also short topic consumed, but he keeps pounding on the same tired old conservative boilerplate.

So, there you have it. I was looking for Maddow’s principles and my friend thought Rush was less effective because he was chained to his principles. I guess Rush doesn’t “think outside the box.”

My friend also thinks Kucinich is a political marvel.

Until Maddow, Overbite, Matthews and the MSM develop principles and a philosophy for their world of “feeling” and “fairness,” there is really nothing to talk to them about. I feel it would be fair if the government gave me a really huge, impressive, all the bells and whistles Lionel train set.

Anyway, back to the topic. Rachel Madcow is slightly more sane than Olbermann. Slightly.

so anger does seem to sell to a certain segment of our population.

It would seem that anger (and stupidity) IS a certain segment of our population.

#3 I call shenanigans. When did Kucinich have any credibility? The ghost chasing Roto-Rooter guys are more believable than that ass clown.

I’m not sure when Hersh started this nonsense, but Kucinich was spouting off about the Dick Cheney assassination ring back when he was allegedly a contender. Of course it caused him to lose all credibility, but now…here come the rest, to peddle it some more.

I’ve said it before – I hope the Cheney Assassination squads ride dinosaurs equipped with laser beams. Robots would be cool, too, but putting a robot on a dinosaur is just asking for trouble.

Doubt Olbermann would question the authenticity of a Bush-basher.