The Chris Matthews Comedy Hour
Yesterday when “climbing” the Stairmaster, they had MSNBC on at my gym. I had quite a laught watching Chris Matthews. He was talking about the President’s European trip. And while he didn’t quite get a thrill up his leg, I was wondering if they kept drool buckets on hand at MSNBC.
He reported the trip much as Soviet television must have reported a Brezhnev trip to North America back in Communism’s heyday. Mathews just couldn’t praise him enough. And then he brought on two panelists to discuss the speech, Richard Wolfe, the network’s political analyst and E. Steven Collins, a radio talk show host.
The primary difference between the two panelists was the words they used to praise the president’s trip and to distinguish him from his predecessor. Contrast their shared political sentiments with those of most two-person panels on FoxNews (excluding Hannity’s show). That news network almost always pairs ideological adversaries, Republican with Democrat, conservative with liberal, Bush-supporter with Bush-critic, Obama-critic with Obama-supporter.
It was in watching FoxNews that I grew to respect such Democrats as Bill Richardson, Susan Estrich and Geraldine Ferraro for their sober commentary and intelligent criticism of Republicans. They eschewed ad hominem and often made thoughtful arguments for liberal candidates and ideas.
And yet, the left accuses that more balanced network of being biased.
As I laughed at Matthews’s sycophancy, I wondered at his fellow MSNBC anchor Keith Olbermann’s anger, how each of us reacted differently to his political adversaries. And struck me how frequently conservative media personalities (including bloggers) use humor to respond to liberals whereas our left-wing counterparts respond with wrath. (This is not to say that there are not angry conservatives, there are. It’s just that there’s a lot more humor on our side.)
This is another reason why I think Rachel Maddow will do very well. From the times I’ve watched her, she strikes me as someone having fun while making fun of her adversaries. She thus stands in marked contrast to the man who precedes her in the MSNBC lineup.
3 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.








They are on FOX NEWS.
MSNBC plays to a different audience and Richardson, Estrich and Ferraro are too grown up to shimmy at an MSNBC orgy. But they would still let their guard down.
The greatest value of FOX NEWS is that hit and run cheap shots do not go unchecked. (Except in Geraldo’s case. He is the resident drama queen.)
Comment by heliotrope — April 4, 2009 @ 11:51 am - April 4, 2009
#1 – Right on about Geraldo Rivera.
He lost me as a viewer when he threatened to spit on Michelle Malkin.
Regards,
Peter H.
Comment by Peter Hughes — April 4, 2009 @ 12:13 pm - April 4, 2009
Chris Matthew’s “man-crush” is getting embarassing. It’s okay to admire someone but don’t be such a sloven idiot about it, especially while trying to claim one is “objective”.
Peter: I turned off Rivera for the final time when he revealed military tactics during a campaign while on-air. I must say though that I do recall his broken nose a few years ago on his “Jerry Springer” type show quite fondly now…
Comment by John — April 5, 2009 @ 8:45 am - April 5, 2009