Regards,
Peter H.

I believe SoCalRobert was refering to then Senators Biden, Obama, and Clinton. Being three senators in the majority party in the congress, and now discovering all these horrible things that happend while they were… voting on them in the senate.

Obama, Biden, Clinton were just too darn busy the last few years to do anything about the nation’s problems… they take off for a while to run for president and, next thing you know, the country’s gone to hell in a basket.

#5 BC – it’s simple… tell people to see Article i, Section 8 of our (increasingly irrelevant) Constitution: Congress holds the purse strings, not the president.

Oh and Gene: I like how Hot Air is referring to “TOTUS”.

It seems to be the standard Democratic practice now to blame the economic crisis on George W. Bush

The motto of the Democrat party is “A lie oft repeated becomes truth”.

They know the importance of repeating their message. Republicans do not. Simple reasons like these bear a huge role in Republican losses.

Could the President please come home and try to calm the country down a bit.

Are you kidding me? He is trying to distract us while Congress passes socialized health care without any debate.

BC,

You might want to point out to your friends that Congress writes the budgets and laws not the president

Could the President please come home and try to calm the country down a bit.

HELL NO!! He needs to stay put and send for the libs in congress. We can do just fine on our own. Let them start their own Socialist Utopia somewhere and leave us the hell alone.

In the past, in fact, he trained ACORN members to harass bankers into extending more loans to the poor (those that we now term “toxic loans”) and, as a lawyer, helped to sue Citibank when they failed to make enough risky loans.

He is SO lucky that the press is too polite to raise ANY of this, as he self-righteously shouts that he “inherited this crisis.”

Senator Harry Reid
333 Las Vegas Blvd., South # 8016
Las Vegas, NV 89101

Dear Senator Reid:

As a respected elected official and concern for the public interest the enclosed a matter of bribery and influence peddling in the Executive Branch, Department of Justice. The correspondence or evidence is seen to prevent an investigation of a federal criminal statute, title 18 sec. 1510. Casework, or review, is provided in the enclosed Integrity Committee letter dated February 13, 2009.

To directly or indirectly, corruptly give, offer or promise anything of value to influence an act or to prevent an act can be construed as bribery.

The Integrity Committee letter states the Inspector General EEOC has discretion to open an investigation of a violation of law, title 18. This is patently untrue. To forward a matter of apparent violation of title 18 to a criminal investigator is a 15-minute task. No mention of EEOC ethics official that is required by 28 U.S. Code sec. 535 to report any information relating to violation of any criminal statute, title 18. Assistant Legal Counsel APR 2006 letter has an opposite story to direct a matter of alteration of records, title 18 sec. 1001, to the United States Attorney’s Office. No mention in the OLC letter the IG discretion to open an investigation. What is EEOC hiding not to comply with laws, rules and regulations of the United States? How many other hard working Americans may have been denied fair and impartial treatment?

The Inspector General apparently was promised or given something of value to have duped, misled, or possibly lied to a federal investigative agent to make a false writing of a review in a civil rights claim. Public service is public trust. Each employee has a responsibility to the United States Government and its citizens. This is a force, sense of duty an obligation of public service to comply with the law, rules, and regulations of the United States. Clearly EEOC Washington, DC, field offices, Nevada, California, Arizona, North Carolina and others have a double standard of the obligation of public service and do not share the concept of equal treatment under the law.

As an elected official and Oath of Office to uphold the Constitution and equal treatment under the law that your office promptly forward the entire correspondence to the Attorney General for comment. It is the obligation, an Oath of Office the Attorney General to defend the Constitution and defend equal treatment under the law. Not to do so would only embolden others in public service to perpetuate bribery and influence peddling for private gain. This would add the perception there are those that choose not to have a responsibility to the United States and its citizens may not be fit for public service.

I feel confident your office and colleagues would like to hear the comment and proposed action by the Attorney General of the United States in a civil rights matter.

Sincerely,

CERTIFIED MAIL

Richard J. Davidson
5122 Cedros Ave.
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
Enclosures
cc: Honorable Nancy Pelosi, House Speaker
EEOC & others