And as I said in an another thread. I did fill out the proper paperwork and was still denied acess to my husband in the hospital. So the private free market model failed me. Hence, the need for legislation.

And you don’t know me or my priorities. Your pavlovian response proves that its not just the democrats who assume and overreact. This is, after all a gay conservative blog, correct? So the topics might actually involve gay issues, no?

Or, in other words, they’re mandating who you can hire and fire, providing freebies to others at your expense, and making it easy for just anyone with any purpose whatsoever to go anywhere in a hospital they like.

Republicans, on the other hand, think you should be free to hire whomever you want, that you shouldn’t be required to pay increased costs for state services, and that access to hospitals should be limited to people who take the time to fill out and complete the necessary legal paperwork.

The problem is, Chuck, your sexual orientation so dominates your life and consciousness that you don’t think of these things. The Obama Party figured out a long time ago that gays like yourself would support anything, no matter how ludicrous, as long as the Obama Party threw you trinkets and beads. It all revolves around making you think of yourself as an oppressed minority first and an intelligent citizen second.

Surely you can do better than looking up the GOA.

And surely you won’t mind sharing the names of these local democrats you’re gushing about while ignoring the fact that I mentioned the liberals on the federal level. What’s more, with “non discrimination” legislation, they aren’t hating you as long as you don’t try to run your own business.

Democrats in my state are not hating me, they are, in fact, trying to pass non discrimination legislation, extend benefits to same sex couples for state employees, and getting hospital visitation rights.

The Republicans? Trying to ammend the state constitution to ban same sex marriage and voting against the above listed legislation.

At issue is a provision in the Patriot Act reauthorization bill (S. 1266) authored by Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS). Now, GOA has long opposed the vast majority of Patriot Act powers as being detrimental to freedom in general and dangerous to gun owners in the particular.

In short, Sen. Roberts’ language would allow the FBI to seize ANY business records it believes would be relevant to an anti-terrorism investigation… without first seeking permission from any court in the land.

From the GOA

And let’s not forget that they played the Everyone knows all gays are pedophiles card back in 2006. Nevermind that he never had sex with any kids. The liberals didn’t smear Foley so much as the smeared YOU.

They show up at our parades. Well whoopty-fuckin-doo! They threw you under bus, backed up and ran over you repeatedly. And for what? So they could gain their absolute power to do NOTHING for 2 years.

If there’s any self-hating faggots ’round here, it’s people like you, boob, gillie and all the other douchebags who slobber over that arrogant SOB in the WH and the other liberals in Washington who HATE you, but pretend to like you so you’ll keep on slobbering.

Prove me wrong.

Conservatives have more important things to think about like national security, taxes, running their businesses, working hard and saving, practicing their faith, listening to and supporting what media they choose, and so forth.

The irony, Chuck, is that gay-sex liberals like yourself whine about the importance of “freedom and liberty”, but support the Obama Party and its desires to confiscate guns, limit freedom of speech, suppress religion, punish business, and confiscate personal property and earnings in the name of “redistribution”.

But then again, since your life is centered around your sexual orientation and whether it’s appropriately pandered to, I can see why you wouldn’t care about any of that old stuff. That’s what “breeders” do, not gay-sex liberals like yourself.

Gay Marriage wasnt on the ballot in 2004 (or 2008). Liberals prefer to impose their beliefs on people.

What was on the ballot in 2004 were attempts to defend traditional marriage from liberals attempts to dictate.

And contrary to your implication, it is not a right wing or conservative phenomenon, as Proposition 8 proved when it passed with a healthy majority in deeply liberal, deep blue California.

I guess all that Gay marriage on the ballot in 2004 was just an attempt at outreach to the gay community.

I know it may be hard to do for you both, but please do not confuse “opposing gay rights” (codeword: homophobe), with SUPPORTING the constitutional process and foundations of our government.

And I call bullshit on marriage being the be-all and end-all of “gay rights”. Since when? Marriage wasn’t even on the list 10 years ago.

To me, the rule of law and Constitutional integrity is more important than ANY social issue.

I know this is hard for liberals to comprehend, because they only obey the laws they approve of and ignore and defy the laws they don’t approve of. Examples: Gavin Newsome (gay marriage) & Nancy Pelosi (immigration).

The Judicial Branch was never intended to create public or social policy. That is supposed to be in the hands of We, The People. And the Judiciary has very little accountability to We, The People.

Boob did I get it right?

I am struck by the juvenile joy of sexual gratification in which these liberal gays wallow. It brings perspective to the comments here by thelittleletterpeople. Thelittleletterpeople are often trying to sell the myth that being gay is not sex centered. The gay left comments I just read give that theme a loud Bronx cheer.

He can’t list any of the rights he says he’s being denied, so I doubt it.

what’s odd (and potentially self-hating) is when you’re a gay person actively arguing against basic rights for gay people, the same SCOTUS that ruled that marriage was a right rejected the argument that gay marriage is therefore a right.

…the closest thing to fascism in this discussion is telling consenting adults what they can’t do sexually in the privacy of their bedroom because it’s bad for the “state”.

But of course no one is arguing against civil rights nor is there anyone trying to tell anyone what they can and cant do in the bedroom.

The other Pavlovian liberal response….lying.

Republican says he opposes Gay marriage: he is evil evil evil evil and the worst human being who has ever lived, ever.

Democrat says he opposes Gay marriage: well you see, he really supports gays having all the same rights just um, not called marriage you see so um, its nuanced, you see!

Do I have that right? I am not sure I can quite parse all the blaring left wing hypocrisy.