<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Andrew Sullivan&#8217;s Anti-Tea Party Tantrum(s)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/04/13/andrew-sullivans-anti-tea-party-tantrums/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/04/13/andrew-sullivans-anti-tea-party-tantrums/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:26:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriot &#187; Tea Parties:Channeling Frustration with Ever Bigger Government Into Action</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/04/13/andrew-sullivans-anti-tea-party-tantrums/comment-page-1/#comment-407620</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriot &#187; Tea Parties:Channeling Frustration with Ever Bigger Government Into Action</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=10530#comment-407620</guid>
		<description>[...] took Republicans to task for his profligacy, we never took to the streets to do so.Â  Perhaps, as I suggested in a recent post we might have gotten more attention from our elected officials if we [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] took Republicans to task for his profligacy, we never took to the streets to do so.Â  Perhaps, as I suggested in a recent post we might have gotten more attention from our elected officials if we [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/04/13/andrew-sullivans-anti-tea-party-tantrums/comment-page-1/#comment-407152</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=10530#comment-407152</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;#19 - WTF are you talking about? &lt;/i&gt;

Little letter person FAIL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>#19 &#8211; WTF are you talking about? </i></p>
<p>Little letter person FAIL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/04/13/andrew-sullivans-anti-tea-party-tantrums/comment-page-1/#comment-407150</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=10530#comment-407150</guid>
		<description>As for -A-n-d-r-i-a-n-n-a- Sullington, why the guy has even a scintilla of credibility left after obsessing for months over whether Sarah Palin really is Trig Palin&#039;s mother is a complete mystery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for -A-n-d-r-i-a-n-n-a- Sullington, why the guy has even a scintilla of credibility left after obsessing for months over whether Sarah Palin really is Trig Palin&#8217;s mother is a complete mystery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/04/13/andrew-sullivans-anti-tea-party-tantrums/comment-page-1/#comment-407106</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=10530#comment-407106</guid>
		<description>#19 - WTF are you talking about?  Is English your second language?  Translate from hysterics to English, please.

Regards,
Peter H.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#19 &#8211; WTF are you talking about?  Is English your second language?  Translate from hysterics to English, please.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Peter H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m-class</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/04/13/andrew-sullivans-anti-tea-party-tantrums/comment-page-1/#comment-407045</link>
		<dc:creator>m-class</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=10530#comment-407045</guid>
		<description>have you noticed that fox news praise on low middle class people that conservatives are the morale party. bush had 6 years and never touched abortion but people voted under that and every time a dem goes in there going to take our guns, cant grow your on garden,socialism and it never happens they spend 4 years ramming  it threw our brain so next time will vote republican so can they get there tax breaks all about more money</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>have you noticed that fox news praise on low middle class people that conservatives are the morale party. bush had 6 years and never touched abortion but people voted under that and every time a dem goes in there going to take our guns, cant grow your on garden,socialism and it never happens they spend 4 years ramming  it threw our brain so next time will vote republican so can they get there tax breaks all about more money</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck In Del</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/04/13/andrew-sullivans-anti-tea-party-tantrums/comment-page-1/#comment-406997</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck In Del</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=10530#comment-406997</guid>
		<description>Hi ThatGayConservative,
   I was just attempting to point out what Sullivan believes, and that is entitlement reform, which he does not see as a top priority of the TeaParties. And he also thinks the TeaParties if they had a large march on Washington, would lose its core message, just like the anti war protests of the Liberals.  I get the impression he is waiting the TeaParties out to see exactly what forms.

To answer your questions:
 
1) Yes, he was critical of the anti-war march on washington as something that devolved into just every disaffected group getting on stage to speak.  People such as &quot;free mumia abul jamal&quot; spoke at the event. which had nothing to do wth the anti war movement.
 
2) Yes Sullivan is troubled by the massive debts and deficits. He was very skeptical of the bank bailouts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi ThatGayConservative,<br />
   I was just attempting to point out what Sullivan believes, and that is entitlement reform, which he does not see as a top priority of the TeaParties. And he also thinks the TeaParties if they had a large march on Washington, would lose its core message, just like the anti war protests of the Liberals.  I get the impression he is waiting the TeaParties out to see exactly what forms.</p>
<p>To answer your questions:</p>
<p>1) Yes, he was critical of the anti-war march on washington as something that devolved into just every disaffected group getting on stage to speak.  People such as &#8220;free mumia abul jamal&#8221; spoke at the event. which had nothing to do wth the anti war movement.</p>
<p>2) Yes Sullivan is troubled by the massive debts and deficits. He was very skeptical of the bank bailouts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveP.</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/04/13/andrew-sullivans-anti-tea-party-tantrums/comment-page-1/#comment-406976</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveP.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=10530#comment-406976</guid>
		<description>Shorter annne: Bush ran up big deficits, which was evil; so it&#039;s okay for Obama to run up deficits ten times as big because Bush did it first. 


&quot;HOW CAN ANY SELF RESPECTING MEMBER OF THE LGBT COMMUNITY EVEN THINK OF VOTING FOR THE HATE-MONGERING REPUBLICAN PARTY?&quot;
...because they think that being American is more important than being gay?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shorter annne: Bush ran up big deficits, which was evil; so it&#8217;s okay for Obama to run up deficits ten times as big because Bush did it first. </p>
<p>&#8220;HOW CAN ANY SELF RESPECTING MEMBER OF THE LGBT COMMUNITY EVEN THINK OF VOTING FOR THE HATE-MONGERING REPUBLICAN PARTY?&#8221;<br />
&#8230;because they think that being American is more important than being gay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/04/13/andrew-sullivans-anti-tea-party-tantrums/comment-page-1/#comment-406824</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=10530#comment-406824</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;HOW CAN ANY SELF RESPECTING MEMBER OF THE LGBT COMMUNITY EVEN THINK OF VOTING FOR THE HATE-MONGERING REPUBLICAN PARTY?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hate-mongering? You mean like the tolerant leftists who viciously attack young kids for posting their opinions on gay marriage and abortion on YouTube? Like the tolerant leftists who assault C-h-r-i-s-t-i-a-n-s in the streets, vandalize Holy places, harass people for not voting the way they like?

Oh, yeah... nothing but love on the left. /sarc. 

And maybe... just maybe... there are a few gay folk who think it&#039;s a bad idea to run up trillion dollar deficits year after year. Maybe some gay folk think a strong national defense is preferable to bowing to dictators. Maybe some gay folk aren&#039;t ashamed of America, and don&#039;t feel the need to apologize to the rest of the world for being what we are. And maybe, just maybe, some LGBT folk think that &lt;b&gt;freedom&lt;/b&gt; is better than being part of the kitchen staff on the Democrat plantation. 

Maybe some members of the LGBT community just respect themselves enough to put the needs of the country ahead of their selfish little wants and desires.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>HOW CAN ANY SELF RESPECTING MEMBER OF THE LGBT COMMUNITY EVEN THINK OF VOTING FOR THE HATE-MONGERING REPUBLICAN PARTY?</p></blockquote>
<p>Hate-mongering? You mean like the tolerant leftists who viciously attack young kids for posting their opinions on gay marriage and abortion on YouTube? Like the tolerant leftists who assault C-h-r-i-s-t-i-a-n-s in the streets, vandalize Holy places, harass people for not voting the way they like?</p>
<p>Oh, yeah&#8230; nothing but love on the left. /sarc. </p>
<p>And maybe&#8230; just maybe&#8230; there are a few gay folk who think it&#8217;s a bad idea to run up trillion dollar deficits year after year. Maybe some gay folk think a strong national defense is preferable to bowing to dictators. Maybe some gay folk aren&#8217;t ashamed of America, and don&#8217;t feel the need to apologize to the rest of the world for being what we are. And maybe, just maybe, some LGBT folk think that <b>freedom</b> is better than being part of the kitchen staff on the Democrat plantation. </p>
<p>Maybe some members of the LGBT community just respect themselves enough to put the needs of the country ahead of their selfish little wants and desires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGayConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/04/13/andrew-sullivans-anti-tea-party-tantrums/comment-page-1/#comment-406771</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGayConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 06:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=10530#comment-406771</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;after Bush presided over the tanking the economy that was so bad,&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah, we know. The liberals were just spectators on the sidelines. They had absolutely nothing to do with it. Makes you wonder why Rep. Henry Nostrils (D,CA) won&#039;t investigate THAT, don&#039;t it Anne?

&lt;blockquote&gt;(And, a Spanish court is looking in to indictments against six members of the Bush adminstration for TORTUREâ€¦ which kind of puts some icing on that rancid Bush cake.)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Nevermind that the Spanish court has no jurisdiction for doing so. But hey, it&#039;s just more masturbatory material for mindless liberal lemmings, right? Not only that, but it&#039;s yet another example of liberals taking the word of those taught since birth to lie to the Infidels and trained to claim they were tortured if captured.

Further, if allowed, it could also apply to the Il Douche &quot;administration&quot; if they do something the Spanish don&#039;t like. You&#039;ll recall that he decided to reserve the right to &quot;torture&quot; if he sees fit. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;HOW CAN ANY SELF RESPECTING MEMBER OF THE LGBT COMMUNITY EVEN THINK OF VOTING FOR THE HATE-MONGERING REPUBLICAN PARTY?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Easy. We put the country and other Americans before ourselves. Not to mention that we see the hatred, rage and bigotry of the liberal left and want no part or it. We see the hypocrisy of gay liberals telling us how much democrats love us and then we get Don&#039;t Ask/Don&#039;t Tell, the Defense of Marriage Act, Clinton&#039;s refusal to issue an amicus in Romer v. Evans etc. etc. 

Couldn&#039;t help but notice Chairman Obama ignoring the gay media, running around with homophobic and anti-American bigots. Couldn&#039;t help but notice the racism and sexism coming from the left during the campaign. Couldn&#039;t help but notice that no serious democrat contender in the last several elections support gay marriage and that they hold they SAME view as George W. Bush.

What&#039;s more, Republicans are far more accepting of us than gay liberals are.

So my question to you, Anne, is why in God&#039;s name would a so-called self-respecting gay or lesbian support the liberals? Why would you want to surround yourself with such blatant misery, anger, hatred, rage etc? 

I, for one, am Conservative BECAUSE I respect myself and others. What&#039;s your excuse?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>after Bush presided over the tanking the economy that was so bad,</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, we know. The liberals were just spectators on the sidelines. They had absolutely nothing to do with it. Makes you wonder why Rep. Henry Nostrils (D,CA) won&#8217;t investigate THAT, don&#8217;t it Anne?</p>
<blockquote><p>(And, a Spanish court is looking in to indictments against six members of the Bush adminstration for TORTUREâ€¦ which kind of puts some icing on that rancid Bush cake.)</p></blockquote>
<p>Nevermind that the Spanish court has no jurisdiction for doing so. But hey, it&#8217;s just more masturbatory material for mindless liberal lemmings, right? Not only that, but it&#8217;s yet another example of liberals taking the word of those taught since birth to lie to the Infidels and trained to claim they were tortured if captured.</p>
<p>Further, if allowed, it could also apply to the Il Douche &#8220;administration&#8221; if they do something the Spanish don&#8217;t like. You&#8217;ll recall that he decided to reserve the right to &#8220;torture&#8221; if he sees fit. </p>
<blockquote><p>HOW CAN ANY SELF RESPECTING MEMBER OF THE LGBT COMMUNITY EVEN THINK OF VOTING FOR THE HATE-MONGERING REPUBLICAN PARTY?</p></blockquote>
<p>Easy. We put the country and other Americans before ourselves. Not to mention that we see the hatred, rage and bigotry of the liberal left and want no part or it. We see the hypocrisy of gay liberals telling us how much democrats love us and then we get Don&#8217;t Ask/Don&#8217;t Tell, the Defense of Marriage Act, Clinton&#8217;s refusal to issue an amicus in Romer v. Evans etc. etc. </p>
<p>Couldn&#8217;t help but notice Chairman Obama ignoring the gay media, running around with homophobic and anti-American bigots. Couldn&#8217;t help but notice the racism and sexism coming from the left during the campaign. Couldn&#8217;t help but notice that no serious democrat contender in the last several elections support gay marriage and that they hold they SAME view as George W. Bush.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more, Republicans are far more accepting of us than gay liberals are.</p>
<p>So my question to you, Anne, is why in God&#8217;s name would a so-called self-respecting gay or lesbian support the liberals? Why would you want to surround yourself with such blatant misery, anger, hatred, rage etc? </p>
<p>I, for one, am Conservative BECAUSE I respect myself and others. What&#8217;s your excuse?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/04/13/andrew-sullivans-anti-tea-party-tantrums/comment-page-1/#comment-406665</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=10530#comment-406665</guid>
		<description>Andrew calls the movement a &quot;tantrum&quot; because it&#039;s all he knows anymore.  His blog (which I once used to read regularly) has devolved into nothing but tantrums over the past five years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew calls the movement a &#8220;tantrum&#8221; because it&#8217;s all he knows anymore.  His blog (which I once used to read regularly) has devolved into nothing but tantrums over the past five years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ILoveCapitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/04/13/andrew-sullivans-anti-tea-party-tantrums/comment-page-1/#comment-406661</link>
		<dc:creator>ILoveCapitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=10530#comment-406661</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s one very simple, clear, effective and important alternative that I&#039;ve seen you conservatives offer to &quot;our current trajectory&quot;.  And correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but that is: How about simply NOT INCREASING the frickin&#039; deficit from the 400-800B range up to the 1.6 trillion range?

Just that much, to start with.  It&#039;s not a complete solution to the nation&#039;s problems.  Much more would need to be proposed and done (i.e., cut).  But it&#039;s understandable, it&#039;s real, it&#039;s relatively easy (i.e., there was no good reason to boost the deficit to 1.6 trillion to begin with), and it would leave the country a damn sight better off than where it&#039;s now headed under Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s one very simple, clear, effective and important alternative that I&#8217;ve seen you conservatives offer to &#8220;our current trajectory&#8221;.  And correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but that is: How about simply NOT INCREASING the frickin&#8217; deficit from the 400-800B range up to the 1.6 trillion range?</p>
<p>Just that much, to start with.  It&#8217;s not a complete solution to the nation&#8217;s problems.  Much more would need to be proposed and done (i.e., cut).  But it&#8217;s understandable, it&#8217;s real, it&#8217;s relatively easy (i.e., there was no good reason to boost the deficit to 1.6 trillion to begin with), and it would leave the country a damn sight better off than where it&#8217;s now headed under Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ILoveCapitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/04/13/andrew-sullivans-anti-tea-party-tantrums/comment-page-1/#comment-406660</link>
		<dc:creator>ILoveCapitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=10530#comment-406660</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The major issues are Medicare, Medicaid, defense and social security. Until conservatives offer clear alternatives to our current trajectory...&lt;/blockquote&gt;But they do.  Queen Andie simply chooses not to notice.  In fact: she *needs* to not notice.  Because otherwise she could no longer preen and posture at being an alleged &quot;conservative&quot;, who has only been let down by the paucity of ideas among conservatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The major issues are Medicare, Medicaid, defense and social security. Until conservatives offer clear alternatives to our current trajectory&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>But they do.  Queen Andie simply chooses not to notice.  In fact: she *needs* to not notice.  Because otherwise she could no longer preen and posture at being an alleged &#8220;conservative&#8221;, who has only been let down by the paucity of ideas among conservatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/04/13/andrew-sullivans-anti-tea-party-tantrums/comment-page-1/#comment-406647</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=10530#comment-406647</guid>
		<description>#8 - I always thought that &quot;teabagging&quot; came from those closet cases at CNN and PMSNBC.  You know, like Anderson &quot;Prada&quot; Cooper, Keith &quot;Bathtub Boy&quot; Olbermann, Chris &quot;Tingles&quot; Matthews and David &quot;S&amp;M&quot; Shuster.

As far as I know, the only one who doesn&#039;t do &quot;teabagging&quot; is Rachel Madcow, and that&#039;s only because she uses a strap-on.

Checkmate.

Regards,
Peter H.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#8 &#8211; I always thought that &#8220;teabagging&#8221; came from those closet cases at CNN and PMSNBC.  You know, like Anderson &#8220;Prada&#8221; Cooper, Keith &#8220;Bathtub Boy&#8221; Olbermann, Chris &#8220;Tingles&#8221; Matthews and David &#8220;S&amp;M&#8221; Shuster.</p>
<p>As far as I know, the only one who doesn&#8217;t do &#8220;teabagging&#8221; is Rachel Madcow, and that&#8217;s only because she uses a strap-on.</p>
<p>Checkmate.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Peter H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/04/13/andrew-sullivans-anti-tea-party-tantrums/comment-page-1/#comment-406644</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=10530#comment-406644</guid>
		<description>#3:  &quot;Wasnâ€™t the point of our War for Independence that we donâ€™t have to care what some old queen thinks about how to live our lives?&quot;

Now THAT is a priceless comment!  Kudos Brendan!

Regards,
Peter H.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#3:  &#8220;Wasnâ€™t the point of our War for Independence that we donâ€™t have to care what some old queen thinks about how to live our lives?&#8221;</p>
<p>Now THAT is a priceless comment!  Kudos Brendan!</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Peter H.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Reginald</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/04/13/andrew-sullivans-anti-tea-party-tantrums/comment-page-1/#comment-406629</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne Reginald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=10530#comment-406629</guid>
		<description>It is truly appalling that anyone can be so oblivious as to attack the current administration on fiscal matters after Bush presided over the tanking the economy that was so bad, he and his people pushed the Fed and other government bodies to give/pledge/lend SEVEN TRILLION DOLLARS to banks, insurance companies, and other large corporations.

This isn&#039;t from some fly-by-night website... it&#039;s from a CNBC site listing the giveaways AS OF LAST NOVEMBER... two months before Obama even took office.

Here is the web page:

http://www.cnbc.com/id/27719011

If you want to be fiscal conservatives, that&#039;s one thing, but, that doesn&#039;t justify being a Republican!

---

Also...


If Republicans wanted my vote in the past 30 years, they should have asked for it, or at least not insulted those whom I love (and me) by questioning my very right to exist.

The Republican party is like an elephant carcass thatâ€™s stinking up they entire country.

Effff the GOP forever.

(And, a Spanish court is looking in to indictments against six members of the Bush adminstration for TORTUREâ€¦ which kind of puts some icing on that rancid Bush cake.)

HOW CAN ANY SELF RESPECTING MEMBER OF THE LGBT COMMUNITY EVEN THINK OF VOTING FOR THE HATE-MONGERING REPUBLICAN PARTY?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is truly appalling that anyone can be so oblivious as to attack the current administration on fiscal matters after Bush presided over the tanking the economy that was so bad, he and his people pushed the Fed and other government bodies to give/pledge/lend SEVEN TRILLION DOLLARS to banks, insurance companies, and other large corporations.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t from some fly-by-night website&#8230; it&#8217;s from a CNBC site listing the giveaways AS OF LAST NOVEMBER&#8230; two months before Obama even took office.</p>
<p>Here is the web page:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/27719011" rel="nofollow">http://www.cnbc.com/id/27719011</a></p>
<p>If you want to be fiscal conservatives, that&#8217;s one thing, but, that doesn&#8217;t justify being a Republican!</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>Also&#8230;</p>
<p>If Republicans wanted my vote in the past 30 years, they should have asked for it, or at least not insulted those whom I love (and me) by questioning my very right to exist.</p>
<p>The Republican party is like an elephant carcass thatâ€™s stinking up they entire country.</p>
<p>Effff the GOP forever.</p>
<p>(And, a Spanish court is looking in to indictments against six members of the Bush adminstration for TORTUREâ€¦ which kind of puts some icing on that rancid Bush cake.)</p>
<p>HOW CAN ANY SELF RESPECTING MEMBER OF THE LGBT COMMUNITY EVEN THINK OF VOTING FOR THE HATE-MONGERING REPUBLICAN PARTY?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrible Leftist</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/04/13/andrew-sullivans-anti-tea-party-tantrums/comment-page-1/#comment-406614</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrible Leftist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=10530#comment-406614</guid>
		<description>Question: Who came up with the &quot;teabagging&quot; label that the wingnut media has been using? Was that Gay Patriot, or was it gay patriots within Fox News?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question: Who came up with the &#8220;teabagging&#8221; label that the wingnut media has been using? Was that Gay Patriot, or was it gay patriots within Fox News?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGayConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/04/13/andrew-sullivans-anti-tea-party-tantrums/comment-page-1/#comment-406599</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGayConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=10530#comment-406599</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So, people who are against the Tea Party movementâ€¦ are they just okay with Obumbleâ€™s multi-trillion dollar deficits?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I keep hoping in all the bullshit Levi and Chuck dump on here that there might be some sort of explanation for their support of our money being spent. Unfortunately, there&#039;s  no explanation. Just blind support of Il Douche.

I keep asking liberals to explain all this spending and how kicking back our money to Il Douche&#039;s cronies will stimulate anything and nobody seems able to answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So, people who are against the Tea Party movementâ€¦ are they just okay with Obumbleâ€™s multi-trillion dollar deficits?</p></blockquote>
<p>I keep hoping in all the bullshit Levi and Chuck dump on here that there might be some sort of explanation for their support of our money being spent. Unfortunately, there&#8217;s  no explanation. Just blind support of Il Douche.</p>
<p>I keep asking liberals to explain all this spending and how kicking back our money to Il Douche&#8217;s cronies will stimulate anything and nobody seems able to answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriotWest</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/04/13/andrew-sullivans-anti-tea-party-tantrums/comment-page-1/#comment-406529</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriotWest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=10530#comment-406529</guid>
		<description>Chuck, I don&#039;t read Andrew&#039;s blog any more save when linked from other blogs.

So, as per your comment, two questions naturally arise:

(1) Has he criticized left-wing protests as theater?

(2) Has he criticized the size of the &quot;stimulus&quot; and the amount of Obama&#039;s spending increases (i.e., in the federal budget)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck, I don&#8217;t read Andrew&#8217;s blog any more save when linked from other blogs.</p>
<p>So, as per your comment, two questions naturally arise:</p>
<p>(1) Has he criticized left-wing protests as theater?</p>
<p>(2) Has he criticized the size of the &#8220;stimulus&#8221; and the amount of Obama&#8217;s spending increases (i.e., in the federal budget)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck In Del</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/04/13/andrew-sullivans-anti-tea-party-tantrums/comment-page-1/#comment-406527</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck In Del</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=10530#comment-406527</guid>
		<description>&quot;But I am glad that many are concerned about the growth of government and the necessary increase in taxation/borrowing/inflation that it must and will bring about. I stick by my view, however, that railing against pork is insufficient. The major issues are Medicare, Medicaid, defense and social security. Until conservatives offer clear alternatives to our current trajectory, alternatives that will indeed higher premiums or fewer healthcare services for middle class retirees, considerable deleveraging of our neo-empire, and unpopular trimming of social security or increases in the retirement age, the protest is theater, not politics.&quot;
 
From Sullivans blog today. He has posted several times about the need for entitlement reform.
 
Is he being picky? Yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But I am glad that many are concerned about the growth of government and the necessary increase in taxation/borrowing/inflation that it must and will bring about. I stick by my view, however, that railing against pork is insufficient. The major issues are Medicare, Medicaid, defense and social security. Until conservatives offer clear alternatives to our current trajectory, alternatives that will indeed higher premiums or fewer healthcare services for middle class retirees, considerable deleveraging of our neo-empire, and unpopular trimming of social security or increases in the retirement age, the protest is theater, not politics.&#8221;</p>
<p>From Sullivans blog today. He has posted several times about the need for entitlement reform.</p>
<p>Is he being picky? Yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leah</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/04/13/andrew-sullivans-anti-tea-party-tantrums/comment-page-1/#comment-406526</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=10530#comment-406526</guid>
		<description>The only reason Sully still calls himself a conservative is that it gives him more press. He is the &#039;conservative&#039; who agrees with liberals so they love him.
Thing is the rest of us figured out long ago that he can no longer carry that title. Unfortunately I don&#039;t even think he can carry the title of a rational human being any more.

I think the meds are getting to him, his attacks on the Palins, his meltdown when Ann Althouse announces her marriage, his anger at the tea parties and his more vocal antisemtism.  Rational and Sully can no longer be used in the same sentence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason Sully still calls himself a conservative is that it gives him more press. He is the &#8216;conservative&#8217; who agrees with liberals so they love him.<br />
Thing is the rest of us figured out long ago that he can no longer carry that title. Unfortunately I don&#8217;t even think he can carry the title of a rational human being any more.</p>
<p>I think the meds are getting to him, his attacks on the Palins, his meltdown when Ann Althouse announces her marriage, his anger at the tea parties and his more vocal antisemtism.  Rational and Sully can no longer be used in the same sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

