Please contact me at 847 692 3914 h or 847 997 0569c.
Anyone who wants to view my resume’ , send an email
to p.leddy@comcast.net. It will be posted on my website soon I hope.

Thanks a bunch , I like your site.

Patrick Leddy

That also demonstrates that Obama is a liar when he said he would not raise taxes on anyone who makes less than $250k. But we knew that already.

Of course, since it’s illegal in NYC to a) protest without a permit or b) wear a mask.

Unless you’re arguing that people who protest Republicans shouldn’t have to follow the law and should be immune from punishment.

Actually, no; that was sex-obsessed liberal commenters like Rachel Maddow and Anderson Cooper.

It’s almost as if they were trying to minimize and demean the tea parties. Why would journalists, who are supposed to be fair and unbiased, do that? Can’t they set aside their sexual needs and their party affiliation to do their jobs? Is Rachel Maddow’s expectation that she does not have to follow journalistic ethics because of her sexual orientation?

I think it would be fascinating if we could actually see into liberals’ minds when they use expressions like, “working people who really need it.” I’m sure NJ Liberal has a specific picture in his mind as he visualizes this group of helpless, desperate, and appreciative people who would surely perish without his and Obama’s help. Liberals create these illusions in their minds because it assures them that they are the most caring and altruistic people on Earth while simultaneously saving them the trouble of having to actually come into contact with the shiftless recipients of their “generosity.” Liberals have no interest in actual “people” or what they “need.” Liberals prefer the airbrushed, fictional groups of people they create in their minds who are constantly in need of their help. For example, liberals tirelessly fight global warming for “future generations,” for increases in S-Chip funding for “the children,” and for “tax cuts” (welfare) for “America’s working families.” Liberals care about fueling their own narcissism. They don’t give a fu*k about real people.

You called it teabagging. You should have expected to be laughed at.

We the dissatisfied preferred actual (God forbid!) SPENDING CUTS, but we had no alternatives, since (as established by the past couple years) Democrats in charge are far worse than Dubya on a coke-fueled drunken binge.

First, we have a juvenile, snarky reply containing not one iota of actual counter-argument. Either the poor boy has no reply, or he has decided (in his own mind) that his rebuttal is so devastatingly self-evident that any further detail is redundant. In other words, a deluded fool.

For the previous post, I respond:
-No tea parties because Bush didn’t offer “tax breaks to the rich.” He just cut the margin. The same group still generates (after the infamous “Bush tax cuts for the rich”) SIXTY FRIGGIN’ PERCENT of all revenue from income taxes today. I’m guessing NJ won’t be happy until it’s 90 or 95%.

-Bush didn’t destroy the surplus, as much of it was created by a)a “peace dividend” which gutted the logistical and training elements of our armed forces during the 90s thru reduced funding, and b)dishonest government account (of which both parties are guilty) including diverting Social Security revenue to general funds to inflate total Federal revenue.

The TARP program was a bad idea from the word “go,” although the original 3-page plan seems quite attractive now. NJ lackwit seems to be quite unaware that Nancy Pelosi torpedoed the original plan by refusing to twist a single arm to vote for passage. In other words, the right honorable representative deliberately set up a far worse situation which left her in control of the relief purse strings. A classic case of the Golden Rule: “those who have the gold, make the rules.”

Whining about people who make less than $250K a year is a pathetic red herring. The Tea Party protesters aren’t just worried about high taxes, or deficits, but how the jackasses in DC (both parties) have become so insulated from typical citizens that they think hundreds of billions of dollars for “relief” is a good idea.

The Tea Party protesters aren’t just conservative, or just Republicans; nor is this a GOP/FoxNews astroturf (Instapundit has been following developments from day one); these people just sick and tired of an overbearing Federal Bureaucracy which is mostly unelected these days.

On the other hand, since NJ clueless would seem (between the lines) to be a fan of an overweening, overcontrolling, and centrally-controlled Federal authority, I am not surprised he has strapped on the kneepads and loyally fellated his masters in DC.

Whoops, almost forgot; the top 5% pay 60% of the taxes, the bottom 30% pay none, so how is this “LARGEST in US history” tax break (ahhh, note, not tax “cut”) going to help “working people who really need it?” Are we talking the 65% who only pay 40% of taxes already, or the 30% who pay nothing?

Or is he dumb enough to call recent stories of reduced tax withholding a “tax break?”

CHICAGO (AP) — The husband of an Illinois congresswoman pleaded guilty Wednesday to tax violations and bank fraud for writing rubber checks and failing to collect withholding tax from an employee.

Robert Creamer, a political consultant married to four-term U.S. Rep. Jan Schakowsky, could face four years in prison on the two felony counts when he is sentenced Dec. 21.

This article was posted 8/31/2005 by USAToday. Here is the link for all who are interested in it’s entirety.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-08-31-congresswoman-husband_x.htm

Who apparently reacts with facts like Levi, scurrying for the shadows.

Regarding the MSM, their hostile reaction only serves to highlight their bias and further erode their credibility and the size of their audience. When the average person sees the MSM covering a global warming or a gay marriage rally, they don’t necessarily think the coverage is sympathetic. But seeing how they chose to cover the tea parties, the next time the MSM sympathetically covers a left leaning rally, a certain amount of people will now say “hey, that’s not how they treated the tea party protests”.

Regarding Democrat politicians, the more they diss the tea parties, the more people will say “hey, I don’t remember any prominent Republicans dissing anti-war protestors”.

The same thing applied to Sarah Palin’s candidacy. The MSM never had to deal with an attractive, telegenic, female Republican, who came from a humble middle class background, and had a husband who is supportive of her ambitions. So what did they do? They went after her with both guns blazing and alienated a lot of people.

The contempt that liberals have for conservatives is something that conservatives can use to their advantage. And the best way to use it to our advantage is to keep coming up with new ways for liberals to show thier bias………Sarah Palin, tea parties, that’s two new ways over the last 8 months. This is what we need to keep doing.

if your (revised) history is so offensive to you:

Where were you when Reid/Biden/Obama/Clinton signed off on TARP w/o any accountability?
Where were you when Reid/Biden/Obama/Clinton’s budget that went through congress destroyed the surpluses? (see here) that blip in 2001? Hint, President Bush didn’t cause it.

What tax break are you referring to? There is no tax break. Period. People who can read see that adjusting withholding is not a tax break. Point me to a tax break.

At the very least, get some new talking points.

People are upset because the current administration took the problems that upset them in the previous administration, and turned them up to 11.

And if we stand up for ourselves, it can’t be because we love our country and are horrified at their spending and deficits. It has to be a centrally organized political conspiracy.

Jan Schlowsky is a dim-witted hack.

And if we stand up for ourselves, it can’t be because we love our country and are horrified at their spending and deficits. It has to be a centrally organized political conspiracy.

Jan Schlowsky is a dim-witted hack.