Although the question had been posed rhetorically over and again, from left to right, it perhaps came as a shock to her that anyone would have the audacity and the blatant disregard for protocol to ask it to her face. Rice, however, stood her ground propped by her unwavering pride that few persons on earth are privileged to enjoy. Yes, the indefatiguable truth that she had once served as Secretary of State of the United States of America, afforded her the confidence to take on and fend off this daring nay-sayer in a cool, collected and Condoleeza manner.

Good job, Madame Secretary!

Levi. I’m sure you can provide links to back up your statements. Like you always do.

And, if you are THAT ignorant to believe that another attack is not possible, you are the one asleep at the wheel.

They were caught. FDR ordered military tribunals. They were quickly convicted (late June of ‘42). Six were executed six weeks later; the remaining two did years in prison.

Looks like Condi’s the one that needs to do her homework first.

He wasn’t wrong with his information – she just deflected all of his questions and started babbling incoherently about things he wasn’t asking questions about. And yes, I would do anything in my power. The problem with the Bush administration is that they grabbed a bunch of powers they didn’t have. I also would have tried a little harder to stop 9-11 in the first place, Condi and the rest of the administration were not on the ball.

But then again it really doesn’t matter. Because IF we get attacked again at ANY point in Obama’s reign of power, you guys have it all figured out right? It will be Bush’s fault. The script is already written in that event. Pelosi, Reid and Levi are ready to point the fingers. So I guess that is why you would not want us to find out about other attacks. It just reinforces your arguments.

When 9-11 occurred, Republicans put all of the blame on Clinton, so why wouldn’t that be prudent in a future terror attack?

By the way, there isn’t going to be another terror attack. 9-11 was a total fluke that only occurred because Bush and Co. were asleep at the wheel. Obama won’t preside over a terrorist attack, and neither will the next President, and neither will the President after him/her. All of this will only reinforce the notion that 9-11 was the fault of lazy, negligent Republicans.

But then again it really doesn’t matter. Because IF we get attacked again at ANY point in Obama’s reign of power, you guys have it all figured out right? It will be Bush’s fault. The script is already written in that event. Pelosi, Reid and Levi are ready to point the fingers. So I guess that is why you would not want us to find out about other attacks. It just reinforces your arguments.

Every blog that I read on a regular basis that has a post with an embedded Youtube video seems to hijacked on my computer with another video. Every blog seems to have the same video regardless of what the poster intended, but the videos change each day.

I have cleared my internet cache, rebooted, both several times and run my Norton anti-virus scan. Nothing seems to work. – any suggestions?

That a person who doesn’t understand the constitution doesn’t understand a beat down by someone who does… doesn’t surprise me at all.

I would point out to that student (and to Levi, et al) that in previous wars, illegal combatants (out of uniform, deliberately targeting civilians with no strategic value) were, in many cases, shot in the field (perfectly legal).

Hey Levi and meli – it’s for you.

Checkmate.

Regards,
Peter H.

PS – Hi Jen and welcome to the site! Make yourself at home and please feel free to ignore the lower-case-losers.