Comments on: MSNBC Gives Platform to Anti-Semite http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/01/msnbc-gives-platform-to-anti-semite/ The Internet home for American gay conservatives. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:00:47 -0700 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1 By: Mark J. Goluskin http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/01/msnbc-gives-platform-to-anti-semite/comment-page-1/#comment-416428 Mark J. Goluskin Sun, 03 May 2009 04:53:20 +0000 http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=11233#comment-416428 Finally, some one else has said it! There are only two votes in my life I regret. First, voting for Gov. Benedict Arnold not once, but twice. And voting for Pat Buchanan in the 1992 California Republican primary against President George H. W. Bush. He is so off the reservation. But, he suits MSNBC's purposes. To make conservatives look bad. I comment on this on my blog. Thank you again for saying it! Finally, some one else has said it! There are only two votes in my life I regret. First, voting for Gov. Benedict Arnold not once, but twice. And voting for Pat Buchanan in the 1992 California Republican primary against President George H. W. Bush. He is so off the reservation. But, he suits MSNBC’s purposes. To make conservatives look bad. I comment on this on my blog. Thank you again for saying it!

]]> By: MFS http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/01/msnbc-gives-platform-to-anti-semite/comment-page-1/#comment-416190 MFS Sat, 02 May 2009 20:32:29 +0000 http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=11233#comment-416190 Oh, come on gille. In 2000, when he accepted the Reform Party nomination, he was endorsed by later Socialist Party USA head Brian Moore based on his economic platform. Lani Guinier anyone? He dropped all the limited government talk after '92. Yet another example of the perniciousness of <i>Roe v. Wade.</i> Any traditional catholic must<i> ispo facto </i>be a "conservative through and through." Best wishes, -MFS Oh, come on gille.

In 2000, when he accepted the Reform Party nomination, he was endorsed by later Socialist Party USA head Brian Moore based on his economic platform.

Lani Guinier anyone? He dropped all the limited government talk after ’92.

Yet another example of the perniciousness of Roe v. Wade. Any traditional catholic must ispo facto be a “conservative through and through.”

Best wishes,
-MFS

]]> By: Peter Hughes http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/01/msnbc-gives-platform-to-anti-semite/comment-page-1/#comment-416147 Peter Hughes Sat, 02 May 2009 19:17:48 +0000 http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=11233#comment-416147 Still waiting for an example of so-called "credibility issues" with Fox News from our little people. Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? I rest my case. Regards, Peter H. Still waiting for an example of so-called “credibility issues” with Fox News from our little people.

Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?

I rest my case.

Regards,
Peter H.

]]> By: gillie http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/01/msnbc-gives-platform-to-anti-semite/comment-page-1/#comment-415867 gillie Sat, 02 May 2009 04:28:06 +0000 http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=11233#comment-415867 Statist? Pat B? No way. Isolationist maybe, but not statist all. Sorry guys, he is a conservative through and through. And a bigot kinda goes together doesn't it? :) Statist?
Pat B?

No way.
Isolationist maybe, but not statist all.

Sorry guys, he is a conservative through and through.
And a bigot
kinda goes together doesn’t it? :)

]]> By: SoCalRobert http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/01/msnbc-gives-platform-to-anti-semite/comment-page-1/#comment-415771 SoCalRobert Sat, 02 May 2009 00:05:39 +0000 http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=11233#comment-415771 Limited government? Pro-family? OMG! Does that make gillie anti-family? Pro-leviathan? Limited government? Pro-family? OMG! Does that make gillie anti-family? Pro-leviathan?

]]> By: MFS http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/01/msnbc-gives-platform-to-anti-semite/comment-page-1/#comment-415731 MFS Fri, 01 May 2009 22:18:08 +0000 http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=11233#comment-415731 gillie, Where do you get the idea that Buchanan is limited government? Since at least 1992, his positions have been statist and anti-free market. Perhaps you will recall that he was the left's favored "conservative" during the NAFTA debates. You seem to be under the impression that he himself was tagged a liberal in the original posting. I'm curious how you got there. Best wishes, -MFS gillie,

Where do you get the idea that Buchanan is limited government?

Since at least 1992, his positions have been statist and anti-free market. Perhaps you will recall that he was the left’s favored “conservative” during the NAFTA debates.

You seem to be under the impression that he himself was tagged a liberal in the original posting. I’m curious how you got there.

Best wishes,
-MFS

]]> By: ThatGayConservative http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/01/msnbc-gives-platform-to-anti-semite/comment-page-1/#comment-415722 ThatGayConservative Fri, 01 May 2009 21:59:31 +0000 http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=11233#comment-415722 Wow. Liberals don't understand the concept of anti-Semitism. Big shocker. Wow. Liberals don’t understand the concept of anti-Semitism. Big shocker.

]]> By: gillie http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/01/msnbc-gives-platform-to-anti-semite/comment-page-1/#comment-415692 gillie Fri, 01 May 2009 20:47:34 +0000 http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=11233#comment-415692 He is a limited Government, Anti Abortion, Anti-Gay, Bigoted, Pro Family, Close-the-Borders, Conservative who believes that the USA has had a lot of troubles over its overly blind support of Israel. And you think that makes him kicked out of your “movement”?!?!?!? HA! [<em>Gillie, please take the former Secretary of State's advice and <a href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/04/30/do-your-homework-first-condi-confronts-a-critic/" rel="nofollow">do your homework</a> before opening your mouth. First, your list above shows how ignorant you are of conservatives. Second, go familiarize yourself with Buchanan's record, he's adverse to free trade and free markets. I don't know that I'd call him a liberal, but he's clearly not a conservative. --Dan</em>] I think I only agree with him on ONE issue. Yet I do not think he is a liberal Too funny. GPW - Is it me or does the quality of your posts go down in relation to their frequency? He is a limited Government, Anti Abortion, Anti-Gay, Bigoted, Pro Family, Close-the-Borders, Conservative who believes that the USA has had a lot of troubles over its overly blind support of Israel.
And you think that makes him kicked out of your “movement”?!?!?!? HA!

[Gillie, please take the former Secretary of State's advice and do your homework before opening your mouth. First, your list above shows how ignorant you are of conservatives. Second, go familiarize yourself with Buchanan's record, he's adverse to free trade and free markets. I don't know that I'd call him a liberal, but he's clearly not a conservative. --Dan]

I think I only agree with him on ONE issue. Yet I do not think he is a liberal
Too funny.

GPW – Is it me or does the quality of your posts go down in relation to their frequency?

]]> By: Ignatius http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/01/msnbc-gives-platform-to-anti-semite/comment-page-1/#comment-415668 Ignatius Fri, 01 May 2009 20:01:15 +0000 http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=11233#comment-415668 So is the new definition of anti-Semitism anything defined as "antagonistic to the Jewish state", meaning however anyone wants to define it? If I disagree with Israeli policies, am I now anti-Semitic, as you imply? If I agree with Israel's right to self-defense, but disagree with how they're going about it and the U.S. role in support of it (diplomacy, materiel, money), I'm anti-Semitic? This kind of equation is meant to shut down any disagreement whatsoever with a magic epithet. So is the new definition of anti-Semitism anything defined as “antagonistic to the Jewish state”, meaning however anyone wants to define it? If I disagree with Israeli policies, am I now anti-Semitic, as you imply? If I agree with Israel’s right to self-defense, but disagree with how they’re going about it and the U.S. role in support of it (diplomacy, materiel, money), I’m anti-Semitic? This kind of equation is meant to shut down any disagreement whatsoever with a magic epithet.

]]> By: Peter Hughes http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/01/msnbc-gives-platform-to-anti-semite/comment-page-1/#comment-415650 Peter Hughes Fri, 01 May 2009 19:26:37 +0000 http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=11233#comment-415650 #1 - "But shall we even begin to talk about the credibility of some of folks on Fox News?" By all means, kiddo. Go ahead - cite specific instances of supposed lack of credibility. The burden of proof is on you. And if you can't or won't, it just proves that you are talking through your hat like every other liberal out there. Regards, Peter H. #1 – “But shall we even begin to talk about the credibility of some of folks on Fox News?”

By all means, kiddo. Go ahead – cite specific instances of supposed lack of credibility. The burden of proof is on you.

And if you can’t or won’t, it just proves that you are talking through your hat like every other liberal out there.

Regards,
Peter H.

]]> By: Leah http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/01/msnbc-gives-platform-to-anti-semite/comment-page-1/#comment-415645 Leah Fri, 01 May 2009 19:13:42 +0000 http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=11233#comment-415645 Well if the choice was Buchanan or Sullivan - they chose the better candidate. Well if the choice was Buchanan or Sullivan – they chose the better candidate.

]]> By: MFS http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/01/msnbc-gives-platform-to-anti-semite/comment-page-1/#comment-415640 MFS Fri, 01 May 2009 18:57:04 +0000 http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=11233#comment-415640 I take your point, GPW, but am personally agnostic on Buchanan. WFB was too, if I recall that NR cover story from back in the day. His economic views are demonstrably luddite (and probably closer to the sitting President's than not). His WWII book of revisionist history was positively shameful in blaming Churchill for "provoking" Hitler into invading Poland among other nonsense. Plus, he's still shilling for the worst (and most leftish) excesses of the Nixon administration. And, yet, despite it all, I still have a soft spot for this McLaughlin alum. Rachel Maddow's first or second show, he came on and - in a three minute segment, mind you - managed to demolish all the straw men and other specious arguments she has carefully set up in the prior thirty minutes. I have to give that grudging respect. Best wishes, -MFS I take your point, GPW, but am personally agnostic on Buchanan. WFB was too, if I recall that NR cover story from back in the day.

His economic views are demonstrably luddite (and probably closer to the sitting President’s than not). His WWII book of revisionist history was positively shameful in blaming Churchill for “provoking” Hitler into invading Poland among other nonsense. Plus, he’s still shilling for the worst (and most leftish) excesses of the Nixon administration.

And, yet, despite it all, I still have a soft spot for this McLaughlin alum. Rachel Maddow’s first or second show, he came on and – in a three minute segment, mind you – managed to demolish all the straw men and other specious arguments she has carefully set up in the prior thirty minutes.

I have to give that grudging respect.

Best wishes,
-MFS

]]> By: Inlookout http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/01/msnbc-gives-platform-to-anti-semite/comment-page-1/#comment-415635 Inlookout Fri, 01 May 2009 18:52:55 +0000 http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=11233#comment-415635 I agree. Buchanan is a blow hard and should be put to pasture. But shall we even begin to talk about the credibility of some of folks on Fox News? I agree. Buchanan is a blow hard and should be put to pasture. But shall we even begin to talk about the credibility of some of folks on Fox News?

]]>