http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVCDCQGZ6e0&NR=1

you might also like him here also

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A0dKMhYSX20

time for the afternoon walk

Translation: “The law does not concern itself with little things.”

Regards,
Peter H.

Regards,
Peter H.

Hardy-har har?

Regards,
Peter H.

My, that’s an impressive little list.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/05/05/carrie-prejean-topless-ph_n_196817.html

Regards,
Peter H.

Lez Get Real continues:

Miley Cyrus responded to Hilton through her Twitter.com account with the following comments:

“Everyone deserves to love and be loved and most importantly smile.”
“Jesus loves you and your partner and wants you to know how much he cares! That’s like a daddy not loving his lil boy cuz he’s gay and that is wrong and very sad!
“Like I said everyone deserves to be happy.”
“God’s greatest commandment is to love. And judging is not loving.”
“I am a Christian and I love you – gay or not – because you are no different than anyone else! We are all God’s children.”

Such statements will send the wrong message to our children who are influenced by this teenage megastar. Parents need to realize that Cyrus is not the positive role model she was once thought to be. OMM

Regards,
Peter H.

Bristol Palin commented on her role with The Candie’s Foundation, “I am so happy to have this opportunity to work with The Candie’s Foundation on spreading the message of teen pregnancy prevention. I feel that I could be a living example of the consequences of teen pregnancy.” Palin added, “If I can prevent even one girl from getting pregnant, I will feel a sense of accomplishment.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tuDJmVkPYpw

the idle time of youth

Exhibit #1 – Larry King, liberal CNN commentator:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matthew-philbin/2009/04/21/larry-king-gives-perez-hilton-pass-vitriolic-video-blog

Exhibit #2 – David Shuster, very liberal MSNBC commentator:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeff-poor/2009/04/30/msnbc-s-shuster-launches-attack-campaign-against-miss-california-gay-marr

Exhibits #3 & 4 – Jane Velez-Mitchell, lesbian Headline News anchor, and liberal CNN correspondent Erica Hill:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matthew-balan/2009/04/22/headline-news-anchor-defends-perez-hiltons-vulgar-comments

Do you REALLY want to shop down this aisle, Levite? Because your credibility is fast approaching quicksand level.

Regards,
Peter H.

Dan, what the hell are you talking about? You aren’t citing anything to support your preposterous nonsense about ‘the angry gay left’ but this Perez Hilton dust-up, so how can you say that it’s particularly widespread? The Hilton matter is irrelevant anyway – that guy is hardly representative of the gay left and is so transparently milking it for publicity that we should all dismiss him as an irrelevant attention whore. Which has happened – I don’t see anyone on the left applauding Perez Hilton or rushing his defense, do you?

The ‘angry gay left’s’ response to Proposition 8 has been extremely tame and measured. No one did anything that I would call crazy, though I’d be able to understand if they did. Can you think of any other situation where a group fights for decades for something in a civil and legal way, finally earns that something they’ve been fighting for, but gets it taken away by a heavily influenced popular vote? That’s an unprecedented situation as far as I know, and that old bag with the cardboard cross deserved to have it slapped out of her hands. People that voted to rescind the work of thousands of activists over years and years deserve to have their restaurants boycotted and to be called out publicly. You can’t force yourselves into other people’s personal lives and then complain because the people you’re interfering with don’t let you do it anonymously.

Woah, that turned into a bit of a rant.

It would be nice if the gay leadership, so aware of the hatred gay people experience and have experienced in our society, acknowledged the hatred in our own community. Instead of addressing this angry intolerance, in many cases, they abet it, if not actively countenance it.

I suspect that glossing over your own group’s flaws is a rather common attribute among minorities. But, there is one one “double minority” conundrum I have observed. Gay blacks seem to be under greater stress from the greater black population than is true of white gays and the greater white community.

My experience is with young people, so I may be way off here. However, I find the term “punk” hissed regularly in the way “faggot” was 30 or 40 years ago.

Our “culture” had been directed toward the politically correct diversity band wagon. But, minority viewpoints (read prejudices) die hard and are often forgiven by the culture elites as “a work in progress.”

Blacks, for example, do not admit to their prejudices about “country” blacks, good hair, high yellow, the “National Geographics” or the “bad seed” kids down the street. A Republican black is acting white and a John Conyers is just “in the game.” These little minority “truisms” abound in minority “culture” and I doubt there is much but time that can ease them out of practice.

Unfortunately, as you note, this is not an isolated occurrence. It almost appears as a manifestation of two very different realities colliding. The leftist culture (with all of its leftist occupants) has almost fully separated itself from the traditionalist American culture and occupied its own reality. This is getting uglier every month.