<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GOProud Lauds Bi-Partisan Domestic Partner Benefits Legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/20/goproud-lauds-bi-partisan-domestic-partner-benefits-legislation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/20/goproud-lauds-bi-partisan-domestic-partner-benefits-legislation/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:51:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aakash</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/20/goproud-lauds-bi-partisan-domestic-partner-benefits-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-443835</link>
		<dc:creator>Aakash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=12016#comment-443835</guid>
		<description>It is troubling that those who claim to be &quot;fiscal conservatives&quot; and part of the &quot;Leave Us Alone&quot; movement would prominently endorse a bill such as this.  This reiterates the point that, of those who claim to be conservative on small-government issues (just not on social issues), many of them are neither.

The bottom line is, that libertarians already concur with social conservatives, on most issues.  The agenda of groups  and leaders such as Senator Susan Collins (R.I.N.O.-ME) and Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL), and other Republican advocates of specialized state-sponsored measures such as this is inherently hypocritical.

While I don&#039;t agree with all of the points in this article, the late, great Dr. Murray Rothbard &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/ir/Ch3.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;provided a perspective on this&lt;/a&gt;.

I have seen a great deal of criticism (most of it very-valid) of Obama from the &quot;conservative&quot; Blogosphere... But why is there not more criticism over him &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsmax.com/us/gay_unions_census/2009/06/19/227080.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;for his support of proposals&lt;/a&gt; like &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_Partnership_Benefits_and_Obligations_Act&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this DPBO bill&lt;/a&gt;?

I remember, a few years ago, when my state&#039;s university system decided to grant benefits to same-gender couples who were living together, that caused a great deal of controversy.  It is troubling that a proposal that not long ago was considered &lt;b&gt;an extreme move&lt;/b&gt; now has this much support.&lt;b&gt;***&lt;/b&gt;  This bill seeks to repeal provisions of the Defense of Marriage Act, which passed by lopsided margins in both the &lt;a href=&quot;http://clerk.house.gov/evs/1996/roll316.xml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;U.S. House&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=104&amp;session=2&amp;vote=00280&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;U.S. Senate&lt;/a&gt;, and which even President Bill Clinton signed into law.

&lt;b&gt;Even if someone supports homosexuality&lt;/b&gt;, or if someone is &lt;b&gt;not a social conservative&lt;/b&gt;, the &lt;b&gt;remaining conservative principles&lt;/b&gt; should result in opposition to this bill.  &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=%22Leave+us+alone%22+coalition&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=&amp;aqi=g1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Leave us alone&lt;/a&gt;&quot; should truly mean that the federal government leaves people alone!


&lt;b&gt;***&lt;/b&gt;  I was quite heartened, however, when looking at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:HR02517:@@@P&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;list of 70+ co-sponsors&lt;/a&gt; in the U.S. House, and seeing that it is almost-&lt;b&gt;exclusively liberal Democrats&lt;/b&gt;!

(&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_Partnership_Benefits_and_Obligations_Act&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Barney Frank reportedly stated that&lt;/a&gt; supporters &quot;have a shot&quot; at passing this bill.  Let&#039;s hope and pray that their shot does not succeed.)


Also heartening was that the state of Arizona, which already provides these benefits, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/stories/2009/06/01/daily66.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;is poised to scale back&lt;/a&gt; this spending.  Like many states, they are facing a budget crisis.

With the current fiscal situation, which so many state governments - and our federal government!! - are mired in, it is irresponsible to push for additional government spending and service programs.  We should be looking &lt;b&gt;to cut back as much spending&lt;/b&gt; (especially at the federal level) as is reasonably possible.

Unlike the positions taken by HRC and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/6/19/744503/-Good-News-on-the-LGBT-front!-(and-what-you-need-to-do-to-help)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;DailyKos&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.examiner.com/x-6489-Madison-Political-Buzz-Examiner~y2009m6d17-Tammy-Baldwin-and-Rachel-Maddow-discuss-presidential-gay-rights-memorandum&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rachel Maddow&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/editorialsopinion/2009262135_edita26gay.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Seattle Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; and Barack Obama, this is a principle upon which all of us who are actual conservatives should be able to agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is troubling that those who claim to be &#8220;fiscal conservatives&#8221; and part of the &#8220;Leave Us Alone&#8221; movement would prominently endorse a bill such as this.  This reiterates the point that, of those who claim to be conservative on small-government issues (just not on social issues), many of them are neither.</p>
<p>The bottom line is, that libertarians already concur with social conservatives, on most issues.  The agenda of groups  and leaders such as Senator Susan Collins (R.I.N.O.-ME) and Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL), and other Republican advocates of specialized state-sponsored measures such as this is inherently hypocritical.</p>
<p>While I don&#8217;t agree with all of the points in this article, the late, great Dr. Murray Rothbard <a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/ir/Ch3.html" rel="nofollow">provided a perspective on this</a>.</p>
<p>I have seen a great deal of criticism (most of it very-valid) of Obama from the &#8220;conservative&#8221; Blogosphere&#8230; But why is there not more criticism over him <a href="http://www.newsmax.com/us/gay_unions_census/2009/06/19/227080.html" rel="nofollow">for his support of proposals</a> like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_Partnership_Benefits_and_Obligations_Act" rel="nofollow">this DPBO bill</a>?</p>
<p>I remember, a few years ago, when my state&#8217;s university system decided to grant benefits to same-gender couples who were living together, that caused a great deal of controversy.  It is troubling that a proposal that not long ago was considered <b>an extreme move</b> now has this much support.<b>***</b>  This bill seeks to repeal provisions of the Defense of Marriage Act, which passed by lopsided margins in both the <a href="http://clerk.house.gov/evs/1996/roll316.xml" rel="nofollow">U.S. House</a> and <a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=104&amp;session=2&amp;vote=00280" rel="nofollow">U.S. Senate</a>, and which even President Bill Clinton signed into law.</p>
<p><b>Even if someone supports homosexuality</b>, or if someone is <b>not a social conservative</b>, the <b>remaining conservative principles</b> should result in opposition to this bill.  &#8220;<a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=%22Leave+us+alone%22+coalition&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=&amp;aqi=g1" rel="nofollow">Leave us alone</a>&#8221; should truly mean that the federal government leaves people alone!</p>
<p><b>***</b>  I was quite heartened, however, when looking at the <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:HR02517:@@@P" rel="nofollow">list of 70+ co-sponsors</a> in the U.S. House, and seeing that it is almost-<b>exclusively liberal Democrats</b>!</p>
<p>(<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_Partnership_Benefits_and_Obligations_Act" rel="nofollow">Barney Frank reportedly stated that</a> supporters &#8220;have a shot&#8221; at passing this bill.  Let&#8217;s hope and pray that their shot does not succeed.)</p>
<p>Also heartening was that the state of Arizona, which already provides these benefits, <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/stories/2009/06/01/daily66.html" rel="nofollow">is poised to scale back</a> this spending.  Like many states, they are facing a budget crisis.</p>
<p>With the current fiscal situation, which so many state governments &#8211; and our federal government!! &#8211; are mired in, it is irresponsible to push for additional government spending and service programs.  We should be looking <b>to cut back as much spending</b> (especially at the federal level) as is reasonably possible.</p>
<p>Unlike the positions taken by HRC and <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/6/19/744503/-Good-News-on-the-LGBT-front!-(and-what-you-need-to-do-to-help)" rel="nofollow">DailyKos</a> and <a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-6489-Madison-Political-Buzz-Examiner~y2009m6d17-Tammy-Baldwin-and-Rachel-Maddow-discuss-presidential-gay-rights-memorandum" rel="nofollow">Rachel Maddow</a> and the <i><a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/editorialsopinion/2009262135_edita26gay.html" rel="nofollow">Seattle Times</a></i> and Barack Obama, this is a principle upon which all of us who are actual conservatives should be able to agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Livewire</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/20/goproud-lauds-bi-partisan-domestic-partner-benefits-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-425224</link>
		<dc:creator>The Livewire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=12016#comment-425224</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be interested to see how this goes, myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be interested to see how this goes, myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ILoveCapitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/20/goproud-lauds-bi-partisan-domestic-partner-benefits-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-425217</link>
		<dc:creator>ILoveCapitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=12016#comment-425217</guid>
		<description>And Iggy, my props to you again. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Iggy, my props to you again. <img src='http://www.gaypatriot.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ignatius</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/20/goproud-lauds-bi-partisan-domestic-partner-benefits-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-425214</link>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=12016#comment-425214</guid>
		<description>Hey, Matt -- friendship is when your questions become rhetorical.  Props to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Matt &#8212; friendship is when your questions become rhetorical.  Props to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ILoveCapitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/20/goproud-lauds-bi-partisan-domestic-partner-benefits-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-425210</link>
		<dc:creator>ILoveCapitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=12016#comment-425210</guid>
		<description>MM, welcome back!  Personally I missed your childish &#039;campaigning&#039; against me, but you might want to be careful and recall when &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/03/26/daniel-hannan-for-president-of-the-usa/#comment-395353&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bruce asked you to keep it offline&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MM, welcome back!  Personally I missed your childish &#8216;campaigning&#8217; against me, but you might want to be careful and recall when <a href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/03/26/daniel-hannan-for-president-of-the-usa/#comment-395353" rel="nofollow">Bruce asked you to keep it offline</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michigan-Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/20/goproud-lauds-bi-partisan-domestic-partner-benefits-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-425198</link>
		<dc:creator>Michigan-Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=12016#comment-425198</guid>
		<description>Bruce, congrats on putting some teeth into the GOProud efforts!  I understand why you might be disinclined to respond to torrentpine&#039;s taunts and baiting... kind of reminds me of ILC&#039;s comment at #5 to Ignatius&#039; comments at #2.

What is it about these guys who go looking for fights and need to endlessly taunt and badger?

Good going on your response.  I think it fit both of them, frankly, and I hope they both learn the lesson just once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce, congrats on putting some teeth into the GOProud efforts!  I understand why you might be disinclined to respond to torrentpine&#8217;s taunts and baiting&#8230; kind of reminds me of ILC&#8217;s comment at #5 to Ignatius&#8217; comments at #2.</p>
<p>What is it about these guys who go looking for fights and need to endlessly taunt and badger?</p>
<p>Good going on your response.  I think it fit both of them, frankly, and I hope they both learn the lesson just once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGayConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/20/goproud-lauds-bi-partisan-domestic-partner-benefits-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-425106</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGayConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 06:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=12016#comment-425106</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Of course, what with the new Republican chief counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee comparing us to pedophiles,&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sweet Jesus, you&#039;re gullible! That or you&#039;re completely dishonest. Which is it???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Of course, what with the new Republican chief counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee comparing us to pedophiles,</p></blockquote>
<p>Sweet Jesus, you&#8217;re gullible! That or you&#8217;re completely dishonest. Which is it???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocket</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/20/goproud-lauds-bi-partisan-domestic-partner-benefits-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-425080</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 04:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=12016#comment-425080</guid>
		<description>Um, can we at least get a link to the bill? and the press release?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, can we at least get a link to the bill? and the press release?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/20/goproud-lauds-bi-partisan-domestic-partner-benefits-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-425068</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 02:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=12016#comment-425068</guid>
		<description>The reason you get compared to pedophiles, torrentprime, is because, what with the gay community&#039;s support of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1056415/Teach-pleasure-gay-sex-children-young-say-researchers.html?Gay&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; teaching gay sex to five-year-olds&lt;/a&gt;, its need to &lt;a href=&quot;http://xpress.sfsu.edu/archives/news/004352.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; dress toddlers as sex slaves and take them to sex fairs to show off&lt;/a&gt;, and its insistence that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.xtra.ca/public/viewstory.aspx?AFF_TYPE=1&amp;STORY_ID=4379&amp;PUB_TEMPLATE_ID=9&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; age-of-consent laws are homophobic&lt;/a&gt;, it certainly acts like one.

Of course, instead of going after them, you&#039;re too busy going on TV and screaming how religious people who don&#039;t support gay marriage are &quot;stupid bitches&quot; and &quot;cunts&quot;. Your priorities are quite clear to the rest of the normal public, and quite frankly, you and yours are treated and called much better than you deserve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason you get compared to pedophiles, torrentprime, is because, what with the gay community&#8217;s support of <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1056415/Teach-pleasure-gay-sex-children-young-say-researchers.html?Gay" rel="nofollow"> teaching gay sex to five-year-olds</a>, its need to <a href="http://xpress.sfsu.edu/archives/news/004352.html" rel="nofollow"> dress toddlers as sex slaves and take them to sex fairs to show off</a>, and its insistence that <a href="http://www.xtra.ca/public/viewstory.aspx?AFF_TYPE=1&amp;STORY_ID=4379&amp;PUB_TEMPLATE_ID=9" rel="nofollow"> age-of-consent laws are homophobic</a>, it certainly acts like one.</p>
<p>Of course, instead of going after them, you&#8217;re too busy going on TV and screaming how religious people who don&#8217;t support gay marriage are &#8220;stupid bitches&#8221; and &#8220;cunts&#8221;. Your priorities are quite clear to the rest of the normal public, and quite frankly, you and yours are treated and called much better than you deserve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: torrentprime</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/20/goproud-lauds-bi-partisan-domestic-partner-benefits-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-425035</link>
		<dc:creator>torrentprime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 23:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=12016#comment-425035</guid>
		<description>@4  Your lack of answers is more or less what I expected. Well, that&#039;s not true. It&#039;s exactly what I expected.
Well, I am sure HRC (you know, the leftist gay Borg organization that worked with the last Congress on this bill) will be happy to have a conservative group to assist them with their efforts in lobbying. Of course, what with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2009/05/opposing-gay-marriage-gop-counsel-cited-pedophilia.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;new Republican chief counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee comparing us to pedophiles&lt;/a&gt;, just as the House GOP did a few weeks ago, I don&#039;t know how many Republicans will listen, but I am ever hopeful, as I assume GOProud is and you are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@4  Your lack of answers is more or less what I expected. Well, that&#8217;s not true. It&#8217;s exactly what I expected.<br />
Well, I am sure HRC (you know, the leftist gay Borg organization that worked with the last Congress on this bill) will be happy to have a conservative group to assist them with their efforts in lobbying. Of course, what with the <a href="http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2009/05/opposing-gay-marriage-gop-counsel-cited-pedophilia.html" rel="nofollow">new Republican chief counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee comparing us to pedophiles</a>, just as the House GOP did a few weeks ago, I don&#8217;t know how many Republicans will listen, but I am ever hopeful, as I assume GOProud is and you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom in Lazybrook</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/20/goproud-lauds-bi-partisan-domestic-partner-benefits-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-425030</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom in Lazybrook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 23:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=12016#comment-425030</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad that GOProud! has decided to support Susan Collins and Illeana R-L.  Both very &quot;Log Cabin&quot; type Republicans (e.g., liberal/moderate Republicans)  

That being said, I&#039;d like to see GOProud!&#039;s action plan in support of this bill towards its target audience of Conservative Congressmen and Senators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad that GOProud! has decided to support Susan Collins and Illeana R-L.  Both very &#8220;Log Cabin&#8221; type Republicans (e.g., liberal/moderate Republicans)  </p>
<p>That being said, I&#8217;d like to see GOProud!&#8217;s action plan in support of this bill towards its target audience of Conservative Congressmen and Senators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ILoveCapitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/20/goproud-lauds-bi-partisan-domestic-partner-benefits-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-425012</link>
		<dc:creator>ILoveCapitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 22:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=12016#comment-425012</guid>
		<description>Knock me over with a feather also, because Iggy actually read, understood and responded to a post of Bruce&#039;s rather than labeling it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/11/28/mission-accomplished-iraq-war-is-over/#comment-334782&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;jingoism&quot;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/04/23/goproud-comments-on-hate-crime-legislation/#comment-411804&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;anti-conservative&quot;&lt;/a&gt; or something equally stupid. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knock me over with a feather also, because Iggy actually read, understood and responded to a post of Bruce&#8217;s rather than labeling it <a href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2008/11/28/mission-accomplished-iraq-war-is-over/#comment-334782" rel="nofollow">&#8220;jingoism&#8221;</a>, <a href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/04/23/goproud-comments-on-hate-crime-legislation/#comment-411804" rel="nofollow">&#8220;anti-conservative&#8221;</a> or something equally stupid. <img src='http://www.gaypatriot.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriot</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/20/goproud-lauds-bi-partisan-domestic-partner-benefits-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-425007</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 21:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=12016#comment-425007</guid>
		<description>tp - based on the disdain you have shown over the years, I have no interest in answering your questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tp &#8211; based on the disdain you have shown over the years, I have no interest in answering your questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: torrentprime</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/20/goproud-lauds-bi-partisan-domestic-partner-benefits-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-425001</link>
		<dc:creator>torrentprime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 21:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=12016#comment-425001</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And I would also note that it seems to me (and I am certainly biased as the Treasurer) that GOProud is doing a lot more to advance gay conservative causes in the past few weeks than Log Cabin Republicans did for the past few years.&lt;/i&gt;
Three questions:
1) What did GOProud do for/with/about this legislation, besides this press release? Honest question, no snark.
2) How is this a gay &quot;conservative&quot; cause? Isn&#039;t this a gay cause that doesn&#039;t serve only the red gays? Wouldn&#039;t this legislation advance the interests of all GLBT Americans? Or was your comment completely unrelated to the legislation mentioned the first part of the post?
3) Will GOProud be working with HRC to gain passage of this bill?  HRC gave testimony on the issue and also issued similar press releases when this bill was introduced last Congress (this isn&#039;t a new bill, BTW), so I was wondering if HRC and GOProud would be working together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And I would also note that it seems to me (and I am certainly biased as the Treasurer) that GOProud is doing a lot more to advance gay conservative causes in the past few weeks than Log Cabin Republicans did for the past few years.</i><br />
Three questions:<br />
1) What did GOProud do for/with/about this legislation, besides this press release? Honest question, no snark.<br />
2) How is this a gay &#8220;conservative&#8221; cause? Isn&#8217;t this a gay cause that doesn&#8217;t serve only the red gays? Wouldn&#8217;t this legislation advance the interests of all GLBT Americans? Or was your comment completely unrelated to the legislation mentioned the first part of the post?<br />
3) Will GOProud be working with HRC to gain passage of this bill?  HRC gave testimony on the issue and also issued similar press releases when this bill was introduced last Congress (this isn&#8217;t a new bill, BTW), so I was wondering if HRC and GOProud would be working together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ignatius</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/20/goproud-lauds-bi-partisan-domestic-partner-benefits-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-424985</link>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 19:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=12016#comment-424985</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m chasing around my office the feather that knocked me over, having read praise for Susan Collins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m chasing around my office the feather that knocked me over, having read praise for Susan Collins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/05/20/goproud-lauds-bi-partisan-domestic-partner-benefits-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-424982</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 19:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=12016#comment-424982</guid>
		<description>Bruce - can you guys make sure that your press releases are linkable on the main web site? Makes getting the word out difficult when there is nothing to link to but the home page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce &#8211; can you guys make sure that your press releases are linkable on the main web site? Makes getting the word out difficult when there is nothing to link to but the home page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

