<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does This Mean Andrew Sullivan Will Start Calling him a &#8220;Christianist&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/06/09/does-this-mean-andrew-sullivan-will-start-calling-him-a-christianist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/06/09/does-this-mean-andrew-sullivan-will-start-calling-him-a-christianist/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:04:07 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Elephant</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/06/09/does-this-mean-andrew-sullivan-will-start-calling-him-a-christianist/comment-page-1/#comment-441587</link>
		<dc:creator>American Elephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=12638#comment-441587</guid>
		<description>Sullivan and his groupies apparently define &quot;Christianists&quot; as people who try to use the law to force others to support their religious beliefs against their will -- or as torrent defined it above, forcing &quot;the Christian religion into secular law at the expense of those who don’t follow Christianity&quot;.

But of course neither are capable of providing any examples where anything of the sort has occurred, because it hasn&#039;t. 

Gays are free in every sense of the word except one -- they are not free to take other people&#039;s money as recompense for engaging in a behavior the majority do not deem worthy of recompense. 

Not being entitled to other people&#039;s money then, in the delusional minds of the left, qualifies as &quot;an expense&quot;.

The truth is, Sullivan and torrent are projecting their own fanatical behavior onto people who do not share it. They are the ones who-- without popular support in any state of the union -- are trying to force Americans to accept the falsehood that there is no difference between heterosexuality and homosexuality. They are attempting to force the public, when you get right down to it, to treat anal sex the same as it does reproduction. 

Shouldn&#039;t Sullivan and his groupies then be called Sodomists?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sullivan and his groupies apparently define &#8220;Christianists&#8221; as people who try to use the law to force others to support their religious beliefs against their will &#8212; or as torrent defined it above, forcing &#8220;the Christian religion into secular law at the expense of those who don’t follow Christianity&#8221;.</p>
<p>But of course neither are capable of providing any examples where anything of the sort has occurred, because it hasn&#8217;t. </p>
<p>Gays are free in every sense of the word except one &#8212; they are not free to take other people&#8217;s money as recompense for engaging in a behavior the majority do not deem worthy of recompense. </p>
<p>Not being entitled to other people&#8217;s money then, in the delusional minds of the left, qualifies as &#8220;an expense&#8221;.</p>
<p>The truth is, Sullivan and torrent are projecting their own fanatical behavior onto people who do not share it. They are the ones who&#8211; without popular support in any state of the union &#8212; are trying to force Americans to accept the falsehood that there is no difference between heterosexuality and homosexuality. They are attempting to force the public, when you get right down to it, to treat anal sex the same as it does reproduction. </p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t Sullivan and his groupies then be called Sodomists?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGayConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/06/09/does-this-mean-andrew-sullivan-will-start-calling-him-a-christianist/comment-page-1/#comment-441531</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGayConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=12638#comment-441531</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;President Obama only believes in himself.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

He is a cold-hearted, angry and vengeful god.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>President Obama only believes in himself.</p></blockquote>
<p>He is a cold-hearted, angry and vengeful god.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGayConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/06/09/does-this-mean-andrew-sullivan-will-start-calling-him-a-christianist/comment-page-1/#comment-441530</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGayConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=12638#comment-441530</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a part in Fred Barnes&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Rebel in Chief&lt;/i&gt; where he pointed out that Clinton had mentioned God or Jesus more often than Bush.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Well, will Obama be supporting policies that force the Christian religion into secular law at the expense of those who don’t follow Christianity?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yeah. We were promised that Bush would institute a theocracy. Didn&#039;t happen. Yet &lt;i&gt;another&lt;/i&gt; liberal lie shot to hell. No, I suspect Chairman Obama will support policies to force the Christian religion out of the country along with freedom and liberty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a part in Fred Barnes&#8217;s <i>Rebel in Chief</i> where he pointed out that Clinton had mentioned God or Jesus more often than Bush.</p>
<blockquote><p>Well, will Obama be supporting policies that force the Christian religion into secular law at the expense of those who don’t follow Christianity?</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah. We were promised that Bush would institute a theocracy. Didn&#8217;t happen. Yet <i>another</i> liberal lie shot to hell. No, I suspect Chairman Obama will support policies to force the Christian religion out of the country along with freedom and liberty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Livewire</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/06/09/does-this-mean-andrew-sullivan-will-start-calling-him-a-christianist/comment-page-1/#comment-441482</link>
		<dc:creator>The_Livewire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=12638#comment-441482</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know bob, are you reassured?

I for one know he&#039;s not a muslim.  Muslims believe in a higher power, President Obama only believes in himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know bob, are you reassured?</p>
<p>I for one know he&#8217;s not a muslim.  Muslims believe in a higher power, President Obama only believes in himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/06/09/does-this-mean-andrew-sullivan-will-start-calling-him-a-christianist/comment-page-1/#comment-441474</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 22:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=12638#comment-441474</guid>
		<description>hmm, i wonder if that could have anything to do with trying to reassure ignorant people that he&#039;s not a scary muslim...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm, i wonder if that could have anything to do with trying to reassure ignorant people that he&#8217;s not a scary muslim&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TnnsNE1</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/06/09/does-this-mean-andrew-sullivan-will-start-calling-him-a-christianist/comment-page-1/#comment-441447</link>
		<dc:creator>TnnsNE1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=12638#comment-441447</guid>
		<description>Me thinks the lady doth protest too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me thinks the lady doth protest too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chad</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/06/09/does-this-mean-andrew-sullivan-will-start-calling-him-a-christianist/comment-page-1/#comment-441441</link>
		<dc:creator>chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=12638#comment-441441</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t think you understand the meaning of the term &quot;christianist&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t think you understand the meaning of the term &#8220;christianist&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ILoveCapitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/06/09/does-this-mean-andrew-sullivan-will-start-calling-him-a-christianist/comment-page-1/#comment-441432</link>
		<dc:creator>ILoveCapitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=12638#comment-441432</guid>
		<description>Obama must be desperate to convince people he&#039;s good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama must be desperate to convince people he&#8217;s good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: torrentprime</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/06/09/does-this-mean-andrew-sullivan-will-start-calling-him-a-christianist/comment-page-1/#comment-441431</link>
		<dc:creator>torrentprime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=12638#comment-441431</guid>
		<description>Well, will Obama be supporting policies that force the Christian religion into secular law at the expense of those who don&#039;t follow Christianity?

If not, then I think he&#039;s safe from the label (not that your &quot;I can haz wordcount&quot; wasn&#039;t amusing).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, will Obama be supporting policies that force the Christian religion into secular law at the expense of those who don&#8217;t follow Christianity?</p>
<p>If not, then I think he&#8217;s safe from the label (not that your &#8220;I can haz wordcount&#8221; wasn&#8217;t amusing).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

