Obama is many things, but I believe that he truly adores his wife and children. He’s also too aware of the cameras to be so clumsily caught. I’m sure that sweeping glance he made as he helped the lady down off the step took everything in, but he wasn’t batently “Ooo la la” as Sarkozy.

Gene, it’s perfectly reasonable to assume that this “news story” is just part of ABC’s usual round-the-clock, credibility-evaporating, scrotum-licking sycophantery for Obama that the network irrevocably chained itself to when it decided to produce the Obamacare infomercial “Prescription for America,” starring Obama spokesholes, Charlie Gibson and Diane Sawyer. However, I’d like to think that even ABC would not have bothered with this issue if the support for Obama’s Administration (and key items on his agenda) weren’t currently declining.

Isn’t it possible that all of the new, grim polling data (just six months into Obama’s Presidency) really does have the liberals in a panic? If they are already worried about the 2010 mid-term elections (and perhaps even Obama’s reelection in 2012), I could see them jumping all over this because the last thing they need is for the American public to start suspecting that Obama might be a womanizer. Think about it—2010/2012 elections aside, even the most ardent Obama suck-ups have to admit that at a minimum, the momentum Obama had coming into office that allowed him to royally fu*k things up within a few months is completely GONE. Now, he just has to be the President. His own Democrat-controlled Congress is giving him grief on cap and trade and healthcare. He’s completely pissed off the gays and the really whacko leftist moonbats who thought he was going to repeal DADT, immediately pull out of Iraq, etc., and he’s unequivocally broken dozens of well-documented campaign promises without a hint of remorse. Obama is facing uphill battles on everything, even with majorities in the House and Senate. Can you imagine what would happen if on top of all of this, it turned out Obama was a womanizer/philanderer too? Even with the MSM in their pocket I think it would be catastrophic for the Democrats if it turned out that they had put ANOTHER horndog into the White House. Sure, the liberals went to the mat to save Bill Clinton and they got branded as the adultery party in the process, but they certainly weren’t happy about having to do it. I think even the KosKids would tell Obama to go fu*k himself if he had to call on them to fight a protracted character battle for yet another scumbag leader of theirs on an issue having nothing to do with policy. I’m not saying they care about the ethics involved—I just think their attitude would be: how many times are we going to have to do this? Every time we get a candidate elected to the Presidency?

Of course, even assuming he was checking out that woman’s ass, it certainly doesn’t make him a philanderer and I am certainly not suggesting he is. Fiercely monogamous married men look at attractive women because they are heterosexual men. There’s nothing wrong with it (assuming it doesn’t involve leering and drooling). And despite the fact that Obama has two unmistakable characteristics associated with philanderers (acute narcissism and a cavalier disregard for the truth), I actually have no suspicions that he is a cheater. I can’t really say why, I just don’t see it in him and if it ever came out that he was unfaithful to his wife, I would be truly surprised. I just don’t see Obama feeding his own raging narcissism with other women. I think the political adoration he gets from his supporters feeds that void for him.

My point is that ABC may have jumped all over this non-story because Americans (even ones that voted for him) are starting to ask questions about this man that they neglected to ask before the election. The last thing the liberals need is for Americans to start asking questions about his marital fidelity too.

Oh don’t worry, Gene. Next up on President Obama’s domestic agenda: the creation of another massive government bureaucracy called the Federal Department of Rudimentary Spelling (…For The Children). Expect the 2347-page bill to be ram-rodded through Congress sometime tonight between 11:32 and 11:38 p.m. EST. I just hope all of the candidates on Obama’s short-list for Spelling Czar have got their taxes in order.

That’s the best part… they can’t! They’re surrounded by a sycophantic media that won’t give them any criticism and keeps them in a bubble. Obama could squat on the Oval Office rug and take a dump and Katie Couric would go on the Evening News talking about what great color and consistency it was.

Polls have to have the White House and Democrats in Washington nervous . . . Gosh, wasn’t it just a couple months ago that Democrats were full of hubris and self-confidence. Strutting around telling us how they had won and we need to get over it. How m…

http://briefingroom.thehill.com/2009/07/09/more-spelling-errors-plague-obama-releases/
At some point the Obamateleprompter administration should stop digging the hole. Just stop. Get back to basics, get some spelling correct before trying to fix global warming and free health care. Get some folks with a non public education.
Morons, boobs and crooks.

Something that people often don’t understand is the degree to which the dollar, given its awful technical fundamentals, is dependent on the U.S. being militarily strong – and willing to defend itself. I have a liberal friend who is an economist and ought to know better, but… he suggests solving the deficit by drastically cutting the military budget. But why did people flee to the dollar during this last financial crisis? Perceived *safety*. What safety? Where does ***safety*** come from, when we’re talking about entire countries and currencies? So, that’s another thing the dollar has going against it, these next few years: the likelihood that Obama is just a new Jimmy Carter who is going to make the U.S. look like a paper tiger… not the ultimate in safety.

Waiting for some Democrat blog to give them their talking points.