A thought on titling blog posts
Last night, ever eager to provide something for you, our loyal readers, to peruse as you begin your day, I organized an idea I’d been considering (and expounding on in conversations with friends) on why the President won’t be able to get away with Bush-bashing for much longer. As long as he’s seen as the new guy, Americans wanting to give him the benefit of the doubt and will accept his whining as a justifiable expression of frustration at the difficulty of dealing with a new job.
We Americans, as Jennifer Rubin puts it, want our presidents “to succeed.”
Once I finished the post, I was eager to get it done so I could get to bed. So, I came up with the best title I could, Blaming Bush (& GOP) won’t help Obama recover* lost popularity*, even if it wasn’t ideal and unlikely to attract much attention–even though I thought I might have had an interesting insight–that we cut a new President some slack up until Labor Day because by that time, we’ve come back from our summer recreation to find that the same president is there who had been there when we turned away from regular news-watching (on or about Memorial Day).
I find that like last night, many of my titles don’t perfectly fit the post to which they’re attached (and then sometimes our critics respond to the title and not the post). Or don’t get at the essence of the idea I’m trying to express. Other times, however, the title comes with the post idea and on occasion has preceded it. More often than not, as last night, I’m just eager to find something that will work so I can get the post up and get on with my day (or move on to another post).
But, if I do find a clever way to “package” the idea, I increase the likelihood of links and thus attract more attention to the post. Sometimes, it seems a good title more readily attracts notice than does a thoughtful post. And yet the great irony is that often after putting a lot of time and thought into a post of which I’m particularly proud, I’m mentally drained and just eager to get it done so tack on a title that does the trick (as best it can). So the title fails to attract the punch (I believe) the post does.
Maybe we’ve heard this all before, you know, when they talk about books and covers.
*So unhappy was I with the title that I actually tweaker it earlier today.
7 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI



















I can usually tell which posts are yours and which are Bruce’s posts from the titles alone. For instance, I knew this was one of yours. You did surprise me earlier today, though, with the title “Democrats Upset that Bush Administration had Secret Effort to Kill or Capture Al Qaeda Leaders.” That wasn’t quite in your usual style.
Comment by Kurt — July 13, 2009 @ 10:29 pm - July 13, 2009
What’s a “titling”? A small tit? (sorry, couldn’t resist)
Comment by ILoveCapitalism — July 13, 2009 @ 11:11 pm - July 13, 2009
#2
That’s a Titleist. Not to be confrused with the Volvik.
Comment by ThatGayConservative — July 14, 2009 @ 12:34 am - July 14, 2009
#2,
Kate Moss,
Kiera Knightley
Grace Jones
Just to name a few.
Comment by The Livewire — July 14, 2009 @ 10:50 am - July 14, 2009
My humble recommendation: Use a title that’s clever, funny, or catchy, even if it doesn’t as accurately capture the spirit of the post as another one could. You will get more readers. Sacrifice precision for attention-grabbingness. People will decide soon enough if they want to continue reading, but they’re not even going to look at the text if they’re not interested in the title.
Just a suggestion.
Cf. “Global Warming Killed Michael Jackson” http://www.scottspiegel.com/?p=619
Comment by Scott Spiegel — July 14, 2009 @ 12:15 pm - July 14, 2009
I have a blogroll on my blog which puts up the title (where it fits) of the latest post for each blog I link. Shorter is better for this feature of Blogger, for people who have you permanently on their sidebar. Also works with Twitter, but I’m not a big Twitter person.
Comment by KarenT — July 14, 2009 @ 3:52 pm - July 14, 2009
#5
I used to do that even with e-mail subjects. Sometimes the one I want to use is too long, so I just make up something which usually has nothing to do with the content.
Comment by ThatGayConservative — July 14, 2009 @ 3:54 pm - July 14, 2009