LOL….and where did it start at, Tano?

Perhaps you can now share with us your explanation for why public approval of Republicans is in the mid-twenties.

Because the Republicans in Congress deserve their share of criticism.

What we’re seeing is what happens as people slowly realize that Obama is truly and completely a total incompetent and racist who believes that his skin color makes everything that he does right. Granted, we have several years of liberal brainwashing to overcome, but more and more Americans are recognizing, such as Obama’s tirade against white policemen, that Obama is really and truly a racist on the order of KKK Robert Byrd.

[GP ED NOTE: This comment has been edited as it violated the community terms of conduct.]

I think what Hoyer and Pelosi are commenting on people who come out and scream and yell at forums that exist to create a dialogue and get information from the people. I think conservatives are very disappointed that simply screaming communism and socialism doesn’t seem to work much any more.

Thanks for sharing your hypothesis as to why public approval of Obama is now in the mid fifties.
Perhaps you can now share with us your explanation for why public approval of Republicans is in the mid-twenties.

The tea party people are NOT presenting their views. They are just chanting LIAR LIAR LIAR, or repeating bizarro slogans that they have recieved through their fillings.

So the bigot Tano says that every single person who disagrees with Pelosi and Obama is repeating “bizarro slogans that they have received through their fillings”.

So Tano makes it clear that Pelosi believes that everyone who disagrees with her is lying and is “un-American”.

So Tano believes the SEIU is justified in trying to “drown out” any and all dissent at these meetings.

This is why the polls keep dropping for him and his Obama. They’re just too dumb to realize that the rest of the country has caught on to their games of hypocritical stifling of dissent, demonizing their opponents, and calling everyone else a racist.

I’m glad this post is getting so much attention, too!

Just make sure to buy the bumper sticker and display it proudly!

In the bureaucratic world of organized town meetings, there are agenda items and timed periods for public response.

I had no idea that town halls had devolved into a tightly controlled meeting run by parliamentary rules and with SEIU members as ad hoc Sergeants at Arms.

So, as I read Tano, an elected representative is in charge of determining the decorum, location and structure of the meeting.

Ergo, if your e-mails, phoners and letters have all been glossed over, going to a town hall is a waste of time, because your elected representative has decided not to listen to you.

So much for citizen participation. Also, why do the Congressmen need to take a break and come back to meet with constituents?

These “people” come back and hold “town hall” meetings packed with union thugs so they have a choir to preach to. When the Proles start demanding to participate, the thugs start throwing seasoned citizens around. Where in the ever loving f*ck is the “democracy” and “efficient representation” you’re on about? Explain to me how that works, smartass.

From Botox’s memo (http://tinyurl.com/nn3ec2)

The Leadership is working in close coordination with the White House and outside groups (including but not limited to HCAN, Families USA, AFSCME, SEIU, AARP, etc.) to ensure complementary efforts during August. The President, Secretary Sebelius and other principals in the reform debate will be working throughout the month to hold events, promote the message in the press and move the reform effort forward.

You seriously want us to believe those “outside groups” (read Special Interests) are working for democracy?

Seriously, Tardo. What are you smoking?

I think another ends-justify-the-means amoral Alinskyite has revealed himself.

As long as the liberal Senators (of both parties) are dominating a town-hall, along with their core of voters, ten seconds of grace may be shown to the Usually Silent Majority. How magnanimous of this ‘postpartisan’ administration.

Seems like you missed the whole point here. The tea party people are NOT presenting their views. They are just chanting LIAR LIAR LIAR, or repeating bizarro slogans that they have recieved through their fillings. They are trying to SHUT DOWN the meeting by making noise. So, the SEIU folks are just saying, well, if you want to drown out the meeting, and just make noise, and thereby try to give the impression that “the people” are totally opposed to healthcare reform, then we are people too, and we can shout too, and we will drown out your chants and nonsense.

Mind you, I dont think this is all too swift. Sounds rather childish to me. But they are NOT trying to drown out reasoned discourse. They are trying to drown out the chanting thugs who are trying to shut down the meetings.

But of course, Pelosi and Hoyer did NOT say that disagreement on healthcare reform was unAmerican.

They said “Drowning out opposing views is simply un-American”.

But, as we see clearly, given that they endorse and support the SEIU, which openly brags that its members will, quote, “come out in strong numbers to drown out their voices,” what is obvious is that they do NOT consider it “un-American” to “drown out” opposing views when it’s coming from them and Barack Obama.

That makes it clear that it’s not the “drowning out”, it’s the disagreement with healthcare reform that is “un-American”.

Too bad your lies keep unraveling when facts are presented, Tano. It’s a testament to the absence of values and principles in your party that you, Pelosi, and Barack Obama lie as constantly as you do.

Unless of course they’re Obama Party union thugs, in which case Tano completely supports and endorses them “drowning out” others.

Too bad Tano is too much of a coward and an Obama shill to call his fellow leftists “un-American” for openly bragging that they plan to “drown out” other people.

Why are these teaparty people not given the same treatment as the codepinkers? Ya know, the minute they start their screaming, they get the polite bum’s rush from security.

Easy answer; because they’re not acting like the Code Pink and Obama Party protestors who went around violently disrupting town halls.

The problem here is the puppet Tano’s hypocrisy; in Tano’s mind, any objection, any criticism, anything other than complete and blind obedience to the Obama Party is a “disruption”. In contrast, Obama Party members can scream, throw things, and even violently attack conservatives, and Tano fully supports and endorses that. It’s like Pelosi’s screaming insistence that anyone who disagrees with her is a swastika-carrying Nazi, and Obama’s insistence that anyone who disagrees with him is a KKK racist.

I’m with Palin on this one–I just don’t see how you can avoid a government who wants to lower taxes deciding whose life is worth money to save. They’ll set up a panel to decide which humans are the best investment. I suspect that money will be spent on the healthcare of the young and attractive–but there won’t be funds for the old, unborn, fat, ugly, stupid, or gay.