Gay Left Blogger Asks Why Gays Didn’t Protest at UN
Remember how after Prop 8 had passed, how all those angry gay activists marched across Los Angeles to protest outside the Temple of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Westwood while hurling insults against that faith and its followers? They reserved special scorn for Mormons, given their support for the successful California ballot initiative enshrining the traditional definition of marriage in the state constitution.
Now, with gays suffering persecution (and execution) in various regimes around the world, left-wing blogger Michael Petrelis wonders Why Didn’t Gays Protest UN’s General Assembly? If they’re going to protest one church opposing state recognition of same-sex marriage, why aren’t the protesting one international institution refusing to condemn extremists of another faith for persecuting and executing gays?
Petrelis reports that when, “when Rob Anderson, a gay journalist who has covered global gay issues for the New Republic in the past, posted [a] message to the GaysWithoutBorders group on Yahoo,” asking about rallies “being planned by/for/about queer issues,” he got no responses:
Unfortunately, no one replied to Rob and I’ve been unable to locate any info about any gay-specific actions of any sort taking place during the opening this week of the United Nation’s General Assembly.
In talking to another gay journalist, Petrelis learned that other issues likely have sapped the energy of potential protesters, depriving the of media attention. Still, he believes protests might have accomplished something:
You might ask, why do any or all of that organizing, when the competition for media and political attention is so fierce? The answers are because it is such an important week on the international agenda and efforts must be made at such times to show that we are an engaged community, because our actions could break through the competition and garner widespread or respectable attention, and simply to exercise our global gay networks.
Lefty Petrelis may be, but he is a man of integrity, standing up for gay people suffering around their world while those supposedly representing us remain silent. He doesn’t need for our opponent to be an American social conservative. He just wants to speak out when our fellows are the victims.
4 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.








Maybe because they’re too self-absorbed to give a crap about anyone outside of the US? I mean, they don’t see any chance of taking home an Iranian guy, so what do US gays care if they swing by a rope?
Comment by ThatGayConservative — September 25, 2009 @ 3:33 am - September 25, 2009
Exactly!
…but don’t know know you aren’t s’posed to air our dirty laundry for eeeeevil straight people to read?
What will happen to our cherished identity as VICTIM first and foremost if you do stuff like that?
What will happen if more and more same sex attracted people start thinking that just maybe the hyper-self-absorbtion Advocated by our “leaders” might be a problem (pun intended)?
Gay Culture will crumble!
You must be filled with self-loathing!
Comment by 23eagle — September 25, 2009 @ 10:53 am - September 25, 2009
The answer is simple: Mormonism, although it has a questionable theology, is on the side of Christ. Islam is not on the side of Christ. The number one drive (subconscious or otherwise) of militant leftists is to oppose Christ. Why should militant leftist gays oppose those who are on their side with respect to the fundamental commitment of opposing Christ? The logic is coupled with the self-absorption mentioned in comment 1 above. That, and the fact that Mormons, and Christians in general, pose very little real threat, hence it is easy to oppose them and score points for “bravery”. But opposing Muslims, who are a very real threat? Not so much.
Comment by Matteo — September 25, 2009 @ 12:42 pm - September 25, 2009
Petrelis may be a left-wing extremist with bad teeth, but I gotta give him props for consistency and integrity in holding his fellow left-wingers to account on this.
Comment by ILoveCapitalism — September 26, 2009 @ 10:56 am - September 26, 2009