Comments on: Why isn’t the New York Times investigating Buffy Wicks?

By: ThatGayConservative

ThatGayConservative — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:12:23 +0000

It took them a while to figure out that the attorney general firings was an actual story.

Maybe because it wasn’t a story but rather the frothings of the insane? Perhaps they didn’t want to become even more irrelevant than they already are?

But as the folks in Politico know, its the conservative outlets who drive media narriatives

Since when?

so be patient and wait for drudge to scream it a few times,

Drudge became a Conservative…..when?

By: ILoveCapitalism

ILoveCapitalism — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:35:36 +0000

Or, whack-a-troll.

By: The_Livewire

The_Livewire — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:23:59 +0000

Hmm, that might be because the US attourneys serve at the ‘whim of the president’.

And since VP Cheney isn’t a war criminal, there’s no point in calling him that.

Try again, whack-a-mole.

By: gillie

gillie — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:07:51 +0000

“I bet the Times would have dispatched an entire team of reporters to investigate if they had they learned an official in the Bush White House had participated in a conversation similar to the one Ms. Wicks was in on.”

I’ll bet they wouldn’t
It took them a while to figure out that the attorney general firings was an actual story.
Hell they still can’t call Cheney a war criminal.

Sadly the mainstream is slow to pick up on the noise of both the right and left.

But as the folks in Politico know, its the conservative outlets who drive media narriatives….so be patient and wait for drudge to scream it a few times, it will be front story news soon enough. The media usually follows the right’s lead.

By: V the K

V the K — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:02:18 +0000

On a related note, I bet if Glenn Beck had daydreamed about Obama's assassination, the left-wing media would explode with the bright hot fury of a thousand suns. But when a left-wing homosexual author does it, it's no big deal.

By: V the K

V the K — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:18:55 +0000

Why isn’t the New York Times investigating Buffy Wicks?

Because the mainstream press is nothing but the PR wing of the Democrat party. Next question.

By: heliotrope

heliotrope — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:10:21 +0000

Valerie Jarrett is the enabler. Why doesn’t the NYT investigate her? According Michelle Malkin’s book, Valarie Jarrett and her co-investors own the slum property where they hope to build the Chicago Olympics.

Obama’s tainted help are all engaged in one thing: getting their hands on tax dollars. They know that the deepest pockets anywhere is the treasury. Every aspect of their financial lives involves grabbing state and federal funds.