Comments on: This is the GOP throwing its lot with the terrorists?!?!

By: Daniel

Daniel — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:06:27 +0000

TrulyScrumptious :

bush and blaire were both nominated for a nobel prize.

then we find out that the judges (who are supposed to be secret) hated both of them, so the nomination was null.

so lets see, bush gets nominated for his reaction to 9/11, but is taken out of the runnings because of his reaction to 9/11

obama gets nominated for doing nothing, and wins for doing nothing.

The_Livewire :
“He’s promoted peace with China by snubbing that evil reactionary, the Dali Lama”
i laughed at that one, the dali lama is a dastardly man, after all.

By: Daniel

Daniel — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:58:38 +0000

im a fan of hummus

OH NOES, I AM TERRORIZT

By: The_Livewire

The_Livewire — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:18:08 +0000

Well we can look at the ways that President Obama has already promoted peace: He's promoted peace with China by snubbing that evil reactionary, the Dali Lama His Sec of State also said to promote stability human rights don't matter. He's promoted Iran to an equal partner by defunding the Iranian Human Rights Watch. He's not provoked Iran by ignoring the deaths of democratic protestors. After all, if people could think for themselves, they might fight. He's promoted stability in Honduras by supporting their legally impeached and removed president over the Government. And don't forget how he's not taken side in his UN speech for Israel or against Hamas. His uncoditional surrender to Russia on Missile defence, his change in stance from fighting the Taliban to embracing them as partners for peace... I could go on and on how his policies have promoted peace. The peace of the opressor over the oppressed, the peace that comes from the death of liberty, the peace of the grave.

By: Sean A

Sean A — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 07:00:59 +0000

#5: “The Nobel Committee gave Obama the prize precisely because his foreign policy is the antitheis of everything conservatives stand for.”

The Prize is also the Nobel Committee’s insurance that Obama’s foreign policy stays that way, American national security be damned.

By: Tom the Redhunter

Tom the Redhunter — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 19:16:24 +0000

I must say that the Democrat reaction has been all very bizarre. The Nobel Committee gave Obama the prize precisely because his foreign policy is the antitheis of everything conservatives stand for. Yet they actually expect us to congratulate him.

By: TrulyScrumptious

TrulyScrumptious — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:22:39 +0000

The same thing coulda been said when George Bush was president. The Democrats wanted Al Qaeda in Iraq to win. The media was orgasmic every time a roadside bomb went off. They reveled in showing flag draped coffins coming home. They never spoke out against Ward Churchill’s blatherings about 9/11 being a bunch of Eichmanns. They said we must appreciate the art when a movie was made about Bush being assassinated.

And on and on and on

By: Mitchell Blatt

Mitchell Blatt — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 14:47:04 +0000

Yeah, the party that kills terrorists throws in with them…

Maybe the Democrats can go back to supporting terrorist in Gitmo.

By: ThatGayConservative

ThatGayConservative — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 12:38:17 +0000

I suppose they forgot that al-Qaeda routinely uses DNC lying points in their media releases. They also forgot that they’re media threw in with Hezbollah during their 2006 war with Israel.

Time after time the liberals are fairly indistinguishable from the terrorists so this seems to be more projection to confuse those they deem too stupid to remember.

By: JP

JP — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 09:54:54 +0000

All this time I thought we were criticizing the Nobel People for being Daft enough to give the prize to someone who has done little of nothing to deserve the prize.