Jody, you support and endorse Farrakhan as part of your Obama Party while you criticize the Ugandans.

I do? ND, you do realize there’s a difference between your imagination and reality, right?

People realize that gays like yourself, Jody, use “homophobic” the same way that Al Sharpton uses “racist”; it has nothing to do with either homophobia or racism, and is merely the attempt to berate and bully someone who you don’t like.

I don’t particularly care for Farakhan, Warren, or the Ugandan or American priests I linked to, most prominently because of their superstitious driven homophobia. So my dislike does get wrapped up with their rank silliness.

Sharpton I can take or leave. He’s been nutty since Tawana Brawley lo’ those years ago, though he has spoken out against homophobia in the black community, so he gets props for that.

None of which changes the fact that, yes, the statements you quoted were anti-gay, and that yes, it’s not that difficult to point to Evangelicals / Pentecostals fanning the flames of gay hate in the Third World.

Perhaps the blubbering bigot needs a reminder of the three questions he’s dodging.

Now, state for all of us whether or not this statement is antigay.

With a minority in the House and minority in the Senate and a liberal in the WH, could you explain to me exactly how in the hell Republicans can stop the repeal of DADT????

No surprise; the hypocrite and bigot doesn’t want to explain why he supports and endorses his Obama Party doing things that he shrieks and screams about Republicans doing. Instead, the coward hides behind his sexual orientation, even as he tries to hide behind his “race” to explain why it’s OK for him to support his Nazi-esque beliefs.

The problem with ridding the army of DADT isn’t that there are too many homophobic Democrats, it’s that there are too many Republicans full stop.

With a minority in the House and minority in the Senate and a liberal in the WH, could you explain to me exactly how in the hell Republicans can stop the repeal of DADT????

If liberals actually gave a rat’s ass, you’d think such stalwarts as Clinton and Chairman Obama might have lifted a finger while they were in the Senate. They didn’t. That tells me that they either A) don’t really give a shit or 2) they don’t think it’s just that important.

Further, doesn’t Chairman Obama surrounding himself with racists and homophobes tell you something? How about Howard Dean firing the guy from the DNC because his partner didn’t tow the party line?

How many times do you have to get kicked in the teeth to realize that they just don’t like you? While you’re furiously masturbating to the liberal platforms, has it ever occurred to you that it’s there by design to sucker ignorant proles into handing over your freedom and cash? Everything else they do is calculated to rake in the most money and consolidate power, why not “gay rights”?

Talk about bullshit, Davy. You’re rolling in it and trying to convince everybody else how wonderful it is.

But of course, this doesn’t include opposing gay marriage, making statements calling gays filth, or employment discrimination against gays, because you FULLY endorse and support Obama Party members who do all of the above.

And by the way, since you insist that every single Obama Party member is in full compliance with their party platform, that means the Obama Party supports bans on gay marriage, calling gays filth, and discriminating against gays.

You are a bigot. Worse, you’re a coward who tries to hide and justify his prejudice, hatred, and bigotry as being a natural part of his sexual orientation, and denigrates and degrades all gays in the process.

Actually, it does; your blabbering and spinning and screaming only demonstrates to a greater and greater degree the abject hypocrisy that liberals like yourself practice. You insist that statements you deem “homophobic” prove that all Republicans and conservatives are, but then you blabber that identical statements and worse made by Obama Party members mean nothing. That is the “logic” typical of a bigot.

Now, state for all of us whether or not this statement is antigay.

I believe that marriage is the union between a man and a woman. Now, for me as a Christian … it’s also a sacred union. You know, God’s in the mix.

And yet, amazingly, Jody, you support and endorse Farrakhan as part of your Obama Party while you criticize the Ugandans.

People realize that gays like yourself, Jody, use “homophobic” the same way that Al Sharpton uses “racist”; it has nothing to do with either homophobia or racism, and is merely the attempt to berate and bully someone who you don’t like.

Also, please stop with the bullshit. It doesn’t matter how many homophobic statements you can dig up from supporters or members of the Democratic Party because it is clear for all to see (in the national platform, in state platforms, in the policies of the congressional leaders, in governors, in the president, the vice-president, the secretary of state) that the Democratic party is not homophobic. Yes, they’re slow on gay issues. Yes, they have a torrid history with gay rights. But the only states that have passed gay marriage legislatively have done so as the result of the Democrats fighting against Republicans on the issue. So cut the bullshit, please. Republicans are much, much, much worse than Democrats on gay issues – there is no argument here.

Brilliant.

Please tell us whether or not these statements are antigay.

Yes, Farrakhan’s superstitious silliness is just as vile as as your average Ugandan Anglican Bishop’s.

If it’s “well known”, then you shouldn’t have any problems providing names, right?

Here’s three who have no problem with Uganda’s action. Rev. Rick Warren doesn’t seem to have much problem with what is going on there, either.

“It is well known that the violent flames of Ugandan homophobia have been fanned by U.S. Evangelical Christians, who are enabled by the very political party this blog supports!”

If it’s “well known”, then you shouldn’t have any problems providing names, right?

So, DavyJG, Africa was just like a giant, continent-sized Fire Island until the Republican Party “enabled” evangelical leaders to attend a conference in Uganda where they discussed reparative therapy for gays and that’s what compelled Uganda’s Parliament to propose legislation authorizing the execution of homosexuals? Hmmmmm. I think you may be onto something there. For example, the article reports that “In 12 Nigerian states that subscribe to Sharia law, homosexuality is punishable by death.” AH HA! The evangelical Christians must have gotten to them too! This is madness. When will our leaders stand up and demand that America stop exporting Christian hatred and homophobia to former gay sanctuaries like Uganda, Rwanda, Nigeria, Zimbabwe, Kenya, Somalia, Darfur, Iran, Libya, and Iraq?!

Please tell us whether or not these statements are antigay.

“God don’t like men coming to men with lust in their hearts like you should go to a female. If you think that the kingdom of God is going to be filled up with that kind of degenerate crap, you’re out of your damn mind.”

And:

“I believe that marriage is the union between a man and a woman”.

Also, since you state anything that is antigay is enabled by a person’s political party, would you also say that these statements, if antigay, indicate that the political party to which the person(s) making this statement belong is antigay as well?

(Source: http://www.voanews.com/english/Africa/2009-10-16-voa5.cfm)