<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Administration Attack on FoxNews Makes President Look Petty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/19/administration-attack-on-foxnews-makes-president-look-petty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/19/administration-attack-on-foxnews-makes-president-look-petty/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:49:33 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/19/administration-attack-on-foxnews-makes-president-look-petty/comment-page-1/#comment-497952</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 06:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=18109#comment-497952</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;LOL….exactly how is the President going to silence Fox, Limbaugh, etc? Deny FCC re-licensing?&lt;/i&gt;

Yup. And less subtle things, such as his trying to ban them from the press pool today. Which you of course supported, right little Kevvie?

&lt;i&gt;The issue comes down to their so-called news reporting. Not on any other network do I see the so-called reporters continually offer their biased, personal commentary that I see on Fox.&lt;/i&gt;

Of course, Kevvie, because you are one of those liberals who thinks that everything Barack Obama does is right, believes that any criticism of Barack Obama is wrong, and insists that anyone who dares criticize or disagree with Barack Obama is a racist wingnut.

For you, reporting anything that is negative about Obama is &quot;biased&quot;. Your idea of news reporting is that everything said about Obama must be positive. Hence, to you, Fox News is &quot;biased&quot; because they report positive and negative things about Obama, while other networks are &quot;fair&quot; because they only report positive things about Obama and ignore or cover up anything that makes Obama look bad.

We understand that you are incapable of acknowledging that Barack Obama is not your perfect god-king, Kevvie. It&#039;s just getting funnier and funnier to watch you and your fellow pedophiles swirl farther and farther down the drain as you desperately spin to cover up his mistakes.

Do you really believe that Obama&#039;s mistakes will go away if no media reports them? Is that the theory here, Kevvie?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>LOL….exactly how is the President going to silence Fox, Limbaugh, etc? Deny FCC re-licensing?</i></p>
<p>Yup. And less subtle things, such as his trying to ban them from the press pool today. Which you of course supported, right little Kevvie?</p>
<p><i>The issue comes down to their so-called news reporting. Not on any other network do I see the so-called reporters continually offer their biased, personal commentary that I see on Fox.</i></p>
<p>Of course, Kevvie, because you are one of those liberals who thinks that everything Barack Obama does is right, believes that any criticism of Barack Obama is wrong, and insists that anyone who dares criticize or disagree with Barack Obama is a racist wingnut.</p>
<p>For you, reporting anything that is negative about Obama is &#8220;biased&#8221;. Your idea of news reporting is that everything said about Obama must be positive. Hence, to you, Fox News is &#8220;biased&#8221; because they report positive and negative things about Obama, while other networks are &#8220;fair&#8221; because they only report positive things about Obama and ignore or cover up anything that makes Obama look bad.</p>
<p>We understand that you are incapable of acknowledging that Barack Obama is not your perfect god-king, Kevvie. It&#8217;s just getting funnier and funnier to watch you and your fellow pedophiles swirl farther and farther down the drain as you desperately spin to cover up his mistakes.</p>
<p>Do you really believe that Obama&#8217;s mistakes will go away if no media reports them? Is that the theory here, Kevvie?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/19/administration-attack-on-foxnews-makes-president-look-petty/comment-page-1/#comment-497491</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=18109#comment-497491</guid>
		<description>LOL....exactly how is the President going to silence Fox, Limbaugh, etc?  Deny FCC re-licensing?  I doubt it.

I watch Fox, as well as the rest of the evil &quot;main stream media&quot; (funny that Fox never gets lumped in with that moniker).  I truly love Glenn Beck ranting - completely Bat$*t.  So - the commentary makers on these networks is beside the matter.  

The issue comes down to their so-called news reporting.  Not on any other network do I see the so-called reporters continually offer their biased, personal commentary that I see on Fox.  They clearly cheer on &quot;conservative&quot; related stories and attack &quot;liberal related stories&quot;.

Check out Jon Stewart&#039;s piece on their coverage of the March on Washington last week.  Fox can&#039;t even send a crew out (in a city where they have a major bureau) - they used footage from ABC.  Yet on the same day, they reported on a New Jersey protest of the &quot;Obama song&quot; by school children, devoted more than double the time to this &quot;news story&quot; and had a single reporter pointing to a small empty field where a protest had supposedly taken place (even the day before, I believe?)

If fair and balanced means running the opposite of Murdoch&#039;s twisted view of the liberally-biased media, then Fox certainly has hit the mark in droves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL&#8230;.exactly how is the President going to silence Fox, Limbaugh, etc?  Deny FCC re-licensing?  I doubt it.</p>
<p>I watch Fox, as well as the rest of the evil &#8220;main stream media&#8221; (funny that Fox never gets lumped in with that moniker).  I truly love Glenn Beck ranting &#8211; completely Bat$*t.  So &#8211; the commentary makers on these networks is beside the matter.  </p>
<p>The issue comes down to their so-called news reporting.  Not on any other network do I see the so-called reporters continually offer their biased, personal commentary that I see on Fox.  They clearly cheer on &#8220;conservative&#8221; related stories and attack &#8220;liberal related stories&#8221;.</p>
<p>Check out Jon Stewart&#8217;s piece on their coverage of the March on Washington last week.  Fox can&#8217;t even send a crew out (in a city where they have a major bureau) &#8211; they used footage from ABC.  Yet on the same day, they reported on a New Jersey protest of the &#8220;Obama song&#8221; by school children, devoted more than double the time to this &#8220;news story&#8221; and had a single reporter pointing to a small empty field where a protest had supposedly taken place (even the day before, I believe?)</p>
<p>If fair and balanced means running the opposite of Murdoch&#8217;s twisted view of the liberally-biased media, then Fox certainly has hit the mark in droves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Elephant</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/19/administration-attack-on-foxnews-makes-president-look-petty/comment-page-1/#comment-497398</link>
		<dc:creator>American Elephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=18109#comment-497398</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Media Matters lies, they were &lt;a href=&quot;http://biggovernment.com/2009/10/21/acorn-video-prostitution-scandal-in-philadelphia-pa-part-i/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;caught in another big one just today&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Media Matters lies, they were <a href="http://biggovernment.com/2009/10/21/acorn-video-prostitution-scandal-in-philadelphia-pa-part-i/" rel="nofollow">caught in another big one just today</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Elephant</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/19/administration-attack-on-foxnews-makes-president-look-petty/comment-page-1/#comment-497250</link>
		<dc:creator>American Elephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=18109#comment-497250</guid>
		<description>William, 

I hate to break it to you, but the poisonously partisan &quot;Media Matters&quot; lies far more than FOX News.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William, </p>
<p>I hate to break it to you, but the poisonously partisan &#8220;Media Matters&#8221; lies far more than FOX News.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGayConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/19/administration-attack-on-foxnews-makes-president-look-petty/comment-page-1/#comment-497105</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGayConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 21:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=18109#comment-497105</guid>
		<description>Without Fox News, that child pornographer Bernie Ward wouldn&#039;t have gotten on TV. Let&#039;s not forget, too, that Ellis Henican would only be known as Stormy and Harper Ellis from Sealab 2021 and Frisky Dingo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without Fox News, that child pornographer Bernie Ward wouldn&#8217;t have gotten on TV. Let&#8217;s not forget, too, that Ellis Henican would only be known as Stormy and Harper Ellis from Sealab 2021 and Frisky Dingo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean A</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/19/administration-attack-on-foxnews-makes-president-look-petty/comment-page-1/#comment-497069</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=18109#comment-497069</guid>
		<description>This just in: MoveOn.org calls on Democrats to punish Fox News for being biased while simultaneously admitting to what makes Fox News the least biased news outlet in the industry.

http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/20/moveon-demands-that-democrats-stay-off-fox-news/

That&#039;s right.  MoveOn.org believes the solution to the bias at Fox News is to encourage a boycott of Democrats refusing to go on Fox News to represent the liberal viewpoint.  These people are unbelievable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just in: MoveOn.org calls on Democrats to punish Fox News for being biased while simultaneously admitting to what makes Fox News the least biased news outlet in the industry.</p>
<p><a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/20/moveon-demands-that-democrats-stay-off-fox-news/" rel="nofollow">http://michellemalkin.com/2009/10/20/moveon-demands-that-democrats-stay-off-fox-news/</a></p>
<p>That&#8217;s right.  MoveOn.org believes the solution to the bias at Fox News is to encourage a boycott of Democrats refusing to go on Fox News to represent the liberal viewpoint.  These people are unbelievable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean A</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/19/administration-attack-on-foxnews-makes-president-look-petty/comment-page-1/#comment-497057</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=18109#comment-497057</guid>
		<description>No surprise, william&#039;s list of &quot;falsehoods&quot; that Fox News anchors and correspondents &quot;suggested&quot; or &quot;pushed&quot; includes no mention of FORMAT.  Fox example, if the day after Sarah Palin made the statements about &quot;death panels,&quot; a Fox News anchor brings up the topic of her statements for a Republican strategist and a Democratic strategist to debate the issue of government healthcare rationing, in william&#039;s world, that means the news anchor &quot;promoted&quot; or &quot;pushed&quot; the &quot;falsehood of death panels.&quot;  He believes that a &quot;balanced&quot; network would never mention the issue at all because it allows the debate to include viewpoints that aren&#039;t 100% positive toward Obama and Obamacare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No surprise, william&#8217;s list of &#8220;falsehoods&#8221; that Fox News anchors and correspondents &#8220;suggested&#8221; or &#8220;pushed&#8221; includes no mention of FORMAT.  Fox example, if the day after Sarah Palin made the statements about &#8220;death panels,&#8221; a Fox News anchor brings up the topic of her statements for a Republican strategist and a Democratic strategist to debate the issue of government healthcare rationing, in william&#8217;s world, that means the news anchor &#8220;promoted&#8221; or &#8220;pushed&#8221; the &#8220;falsehood of death panels.&#8221;  He believes that a &#8220;balanced&#8221; network would never mention the issue at all because it allows the debate to include viewpoints that aren&#8217;t 100% positive toward Obama and Obamacare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGayConservative</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/19/administration-attack-on-foxnews-makes-president-look-petty/comment-page-1/#comment-497053</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGayConservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=18109#comment-497053</guid>
		<description>I wonder if it would be too much to ask william to go back and provide the actual quotes to go with the MediaMorons nit picks. All we have in #33 is someone&#039;s (doubt william can think enough) &lt;b&gt;OPINION&lt;/b&gt; of tiny quotes.

STILL waiting for his answers to #16 &amp; 19.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if it would be too much to ask william to go back and provide the actual quotes to go with the MediaMorons nit picks. All we have in #33 is someone&#8217;s (doubt william can think enough) <b>OPINION</b> of tiny quotes.</p>
<p>STILL waiting for his answers to #16 &amp; 19.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene in Pennsylvania</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/19/administration-attack-on-foxnews-makes-president-look-petty/comment-page-1/#comment-497047</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene in Pennsylvania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=18109#comment-497047</guid>
		<description>Some more hope n change....
Barack Obama has held 22 fundraisers so far in his inept Presidency. At this point Bush 43 had done 8. This from MSDNC! wow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some more hope n change&#8230;.<br />
Barack Obama has held 22 fundraisers so far in his inept Presidency. At this point Bush 43 had done 8. This from MSDNC! wow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene in Pennsylvania</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/19/administration-attack-on-foxnews-makes-president-look-petty/comment-page-1/#comment-497046</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene in Pennsylvania</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=18109#comment-497046</guid>
		<description>william has a bit of selective outrage. Even his second paragraph...Jennings young man was &quot;not underage when counceled&quot; by Jennings. Ummm he was underage when he was molested! Are the rest of his &quot;charges&quot; similarly inaccurate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>william has a bit of selective outrage. Even his second paragraph&#8230;Jennings young man was &#8220;not underage when counceled&#8221; by Jennings. Ummm he was underage when he was molested! Are the rest of his &#8220;charges&#8221; similarly inaccurate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ILoveCapitalism</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/19/administration-attack-on-foxnews-makes-president-look-petty/comment-page-1/#comment-497029</link>
		<dc:creator>ILoveCapitalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=18109#comment-497029</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Barack Obama Chavez is attempting to ban Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, and others from the airwaves for “hate speech”.&lt;/blockquote&gt;It&#039;s the Euro-Commie way.  Any speech that challenges the elites *must*, by definition, be hateful and a cause of social disruption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Barack Obama Chavez is attempting to ban Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, and others from the airwaves for “hate speech”.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s the Euro-Commie way.  Any speech that challenges the elites *must*, by definition, be hateful and a cause of social disruption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Livewire</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/19/administration-attack-on-foxnews-makes-president-look-petty/comment-page-1/#comment-497018</link>
		<dc:creator>The_Livewire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=18109#comment-497018</guid>
		<description>*sigh*  And people wonder why I&#039;m a heritic.  Time to send e-mails and boil the blood pressure of my sister.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*sigh*  And people wonder why I&#8217;m a heritic.  Time to send e-mails and boil the blood pressure of my sister.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/19/administration-attack-on-foxnews-makes-president-look-petty/comment-page-1/#comment-497016</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=18109#comment-497016</guid>
		<description>Jake Tapper at ABC News also criticized the White House for declaring War on FoxNews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jake Tapper at ABC News also criticized the White House for declaring War on FoxNews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/19/administration-attack-on-foxnews-makes-president-look-petty/comment-page-1/#comment-497008</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=18109#comment-497008</guid>
		<description>And wait, there&#039;s more; turns out Barack Obama Chavez is &lt;a href=&quot;http://spectator.org/archives/2009/10/20/fcc-church-conspiracy-to-silen/print&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;attempting to ban Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, and others from the airwaves for &quot;hate speech&quot;&lt;/a&gt;.

By the bye, Ashpenaz and Livewire, you may wish to note that the ELCA has allegedly signed on to this -- and unleash hell accordingly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And wait, there&#8217;s more; turns out Barack Obama Chavez is <a href="http://spectator.org/archives/2009/10/20/fcc-church-conspiracy-to-silen/print" rel="nofollow">attempting to ban Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, and others from the airwaves for &#8220;hate speech&#8221;</a>.</p>
<p>By the bye, Ashpenaz and Livewire, you may wish to note that the ELCA has allegedly signed on to this &#8212; and unleash hell accordingly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Livewire</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/19/administration-attack-on-foxnews-makes-president-look-petty/comment-page-1/#comment-496999</link>
		<dc:creator>The_Livewire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=18109#comment-496999</guid>
		<description>Wow, so william can C&amp;P but not think on his own.

Hint William, I just read the first one before the eyes glazed over but a) Jennings said repeatedly he was 15, we&#039;ve no proof otherwise.  and b) he still was to report it by MD state law, so he still hid it.

That the boy may have been too old for Tim doesn&#039;t make it legal.

I assume the rest of your C&amp;P is as inaccurate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, so william can C&amp;P but not think on his own.</p>
<p>Hint William, I just read the first one before the eyes glazed over but a) Jennings said repeatedly he was 15, we&#8217;ve no proof otherwise.  and b) he still was to report it by MD state law, so he still hid it.</p>
<p>That the boy may have been too old for Tim doesn&#8217;t make it legal.</p>
<p>I assume the rest of your C&amp;P is as inaccurate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V the K</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/19/administration-attack-on-foxnews-makes-president-look-petty/comment-page-1/#comment-496994</link>
		<dc:creator>V the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=18109#comment-496994</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s odd that william has mastered the CTRL+C and CTRL+V function, but the use of the shift key still eludes him. 

So far, the New York Times, The Nation, and Helen Thomas have all said that declaring war on FoxNews was a bonehead decision on Obama&#039;s part. But I&#039;m sure Chairman Zero takes comfort that the little letter people are still in his corner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s odd that william has mastered the CTRL+C and CTRL+V function, but the use of the shift key still eludes him. </p>
<p>So far, the New York Times, The Nation, and Helen Thomas have all said that declaring war on FoxNews was a bonehead decision on Obama&#8217;s part. But I&#8217;m sure Chairman Zero takes comfort that the little letter people are still in his corner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B. Daniel Blatt</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/19/administration-attack-on-foxnews-makes-president-look-petty/comment-page-1/#comment-496989</link>
		<dc:creator>B. Daniel Blatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=18109#comment-496989</guid>
		<description>wow, william, you really are obsessed, sounds like you&#039;ve been spending a lot of time at george soros&#039; site, media mutters.  so what if you mind minor errors on Foxnews, I&#039;m sure if I were as obsessed as you, I could find even more for just msnbc, not to mention the other networks

and you still haven&#039;t shown Bush&#039;s moves to isolate msnbc or the new york times or to mount a serious media offensive against them as the obamafolk have done.

please address our points and don&#039;t keep engaging in left-wing rants, lest we wonder why you&#039;re so obsessed with a thread on a &quot;right-wing&quot; blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, william, you really are obsessed, sounds like you&#8217;ve been spending a lot of time at george soros&#8217; site, media mutters.  so what if you mind minor errors on Foxnews, I&#8217;m sure if I were as obsessed as you, I could find even more for just msnbc, not to mention the other networks</p>
<p>and you still haven&#8217;t shown Bush&#8217;s moves to isolate msnbc or the new york times or to mount a serious media offensive against them as the obamafolk have done.</p>
<p>please address our points and don&#8217;t keep engaging in left-wing rants, lest we wonder why you&#8217;re so obsessed with a thread on a &#8220;right-wing&#8221; blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: william</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/19/administration-attack-on-foxnews-makes-president-look-petty/comment-page-1/#comment-496986</link>
		<dc:creator>william</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=18109#comment-496986</guid>
		<description>America&#039;s Newsroom (9-11 a.m. ET): Obama official never reported &quot;statutory rape&quot;; Dems &quot;protect pedophiles&quot;; tea parties recruitment 

Hemmer advances smear that Jennings knew of &quot;statutory rape&quot; and &quot;never reported it.&quot; During the October 1 edition of America&#039;s Newsroom, co-host Bill Hemmer joined his network&#039;s smears against Department of Education official Kevin Jennings by claiming that Jennings knew of a &quot;statutory rape&quot; case involving a student but &quot;never reported it.&quot; In fact, the student in question was of legal age of consent at the time he was counseled by Jennings.

Kelly on Sotomayor comment: &quot;sounds to a lot of people like reverse racism.&quot; On May 26, co-host Megyn Kelly joined conservative commentators such as Rush Limbaugh by stating that then-Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor&#039;s &quot;wise Latina&quot; remark &quot;sounds to a lot of people like reverse racism, basically. Like she&#039;s saying that Latina judges are obviously better than white male judges, and that that&#039;s her assumption, and people get worried about putting a person like that on the U.S. Supreme Court.&quot; Kelly later added, &quot;I&#039;ve looked at the entire speech that she was offering to see if that was taken out of context, and I have to tell you ... it wasn&#039;t.&quot; In fact, Sotomayor was specifically discussing the importance of diversity in adjudicating race and sex discrimination cases; several conservative legal figures have made similar comments.

America&#039;s Newsroom falsehood: &quot;House Dems vote to protect pedophiles, but not veterans.&quot; On May 6, America&#039;s Newsroom pushed the falsehood that Democrats attempted to &quot;protect&quot; pedophiles in voting in favor of the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act. Hemmer teased a segment by stating that Democrats had reportedly &quot;voted to give special protection to pedophiles.&quot; During the segment, America&#039;s Newsroom ran on-screen text that read, &quot;House Dems vote to protect pedophiles, but not veterans&quot;:

Henneberg repeats right-wing myth that hate crimes bill could gag ministers. During the April 29 edition of America&#039;s Newsroom, correspondent Molly Henneberg repeated the right-wing myth that under the proposed Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act, religious groups &quot;may be prosecuted for their religious beliefs if they believe that homosexuality is a sin,&quot; and the disputed claim that the legislation &quot;could gag ministers who preach that [homosexuality is a sin], or even if a church may not want to marry a gay couple.&quot;

Fox News&#039; Hemmer &quot;keeping track of the stimulus money&quot; -- by lifting research from GOP website. On April 23, Hemmer repeatedly suggested information about four &quot;interesting&quot; projects reportedly funded by the recovery act was obtained through Fox News&#039; own research, even though nearly all of the information Hemmer mentioned, as well as that included in on-screen text and graphics, first appeared on Rep. Eric Cantor&#039;s Republican Whip website.

America&#039;s Newsroom promotes tea party organizing info on-air and online. America&#039;s Newsroom encouraged viewers to get involved with April 15 &quot;tea party&quot; protests across the country, which Fox News had described as primarily a response to President Obama&#039;s fiscal policies. The program frequently hosted tea party organizers, and posted on-screen organizing information, such as protest dates and locations. America&#039;s Newsroom also repeatedly directed viewers to its website, which featured a list of tea party protests. 

America&#039;s Newsroom directs viewers to &quot;virtual tea party.&quot; America&#039;s Newsroom repeatedly directed viewers to participate in a &quot;virtual tea party&quot; at Fox News&#039; purportedly non-biased website, Fox Nation. Hemmer told viewers, &quot;Can&#039;t get to a tea party? Fox Nation hosts a virtual tea party,&quot; while Kelly said, &quot;You can join the tea party action from your home if you go to the FoxNation.com ... a virtual tax day tea party.&quot; 

America&#039;s Newsroom pushes discredited GOP calculation of Obama&#039;s cap-and-trade proposal. On April 2, guest host Alisyn Camerota asserted that the cost of Obama&#039;s cap-and-trade proposal &quot;would be $3,100 per U.S. household.&quot; The claim was advanced by the House Republican Conference in a March 23 &quot;Talking Points&quot; press release, and the Republicans reportedly purported to back up the claim by pointing to a 2007 study by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). But MIT professor John Reilly, one of the authors of the study, has disputed the GOP&#039;s calculation, stating that his study &quot;has been misrepresented&quot; and that the Republicans&#039; claim of an average household cost of $3,128 is &quot;nearly 10 times the correct estimate&quot; based on his study&#039;s cap-and-trade model. PolitiFact.com rated the $3,100 figure a &quot;pants on fire&quot; falsehood.

America&#039;s Newsroom falsely claimed Obama budget &quot;4x bigger than Bush&#039;s costliest plan.&quot; On the April 3 edition of America&#039;s Newsroom, on-screen text falsely claimed that Obama&#039;s $3.6 trillion FY 2010 budget is &quot;4x bigger than Bush&#039;s costliest plan.&quot; In fact, President Bush submitted a $3.1 trillion budget for FY 2009 and a $2.9 trillion budget for FY 2008. 

America&#039;s Newsroom promotes McCaughey falsehood that stimulus would &quot;hav[e] the government essentially dictate treatments.&quot; On February 10, Hemmer and Kelly promoted the falsehood -- which first appeared in a Bloomberg &quot;commentary&quot; by serial misinformer Betsy McCaughey and was subsequently promoted by Limbaugh and Matt Drudge -- that the economic recovery bill included a provision that would, in the words of guest Stephen Moore, a Wall Street Journal economics writer, &quot;hav[e] the government essentially dictate treatments.&quot;

Happening Now (11 a.m.-1 p.m. ET): Home of repeated attempts to pass off GOP research as its own

Happening Now passes off GOP press release as its own research -- typo and all. During the February 10 edition of Happening Now, co-host Jon Scott purported to &quot;take a look back&quot; at how the economic recovery plan &quot;grew, and grew, and grew.&quot; In doing so, Scott referenced seven dates, as on-screen graphics cited various news sources from those time periods -- all of which came directly from a Senate Republican Communications Center press release. A Fox News on-screen graphic even reproduced a typo contained in the Republican press release. The following day, Scott apologized -- for running the typo. Scott&#039;s apology was criticized by Washington Post media critic and CNN host Howard Kurtz, who said: &quot;We sometimes jab at the pundits for using talking points, but in the case of Fox News anchor Jon Scott, it was literally true this week. ... You should be apologizing for using partisan propaganda from the GOP without telling your viewers where it came from. Talk about missing the point.&quot;

Happening Now posts &quot;FOXfact[s]&quot; about GOP budget nearly identical to GOP Rep. Ryan&#039;s op-ed. During two segments on the April 1, Happening Now aired &quot;FOXfact[s]&quot; purporting to describe facts about the House Republican budget. However, all of the seven &quot;FOXfact[s]&quot; displayed onscreen were nearly identical to portions of an op-ed by Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) published in that day&#039;s Wall Street Journal.

Happening Now crops clips of Obama to promote &quot;another apology tour.&quot; On June 2, Scott asked if &quot;the president&#039;s upcoming trip [to Europe and the Middle East will] be what conservatives might call another apology tour,&quot; and both Scott and co-host Jane Skinner aired cropped clips of Obama&#039;s remarks from an April 3 speech in France to falsely suggest that Obama only criticized the United States. In doing so, Happening Now joined conservative commentators and Fox News hosts who have cropped or misrepresented Obama&#039;s overseas remarks to falsely suggest, in the words of host Sean Hannity, that Obama was &quot;blam[ing] America first&quot; and, more broadly, that Obama&#039;s earlier overseas trip constituted an &quot;apology tour.&quot;

Live Desk (1-3 p.m. ET): Falsehoods, deceptive editing

Fox News presents deceptively cropped six-month-old Biden clip as new. On March 16, Live Desk co-host Martha MacCallum claimed that &quot;after weeks of economic doom and gloom, the Obama administration is now singing a slightly different tune. Take a look at what was said in recent interviews this weekend.&quot; Live Desk then aired clips of administration officials purportedly giving an optimistic view of the economy, which included video of Vice President Joe Biden stating, &quot;The fundamentals of the economy are strong.&quot; However, Biden did not make those remarks during an &quot;interview&quot; that weekend; he made them at a September 2008 campaign event in which he criticized statements by Sen. John McCain. MacCallum apologized the next day.

Fox&#039;s Camerota pushes bogus stat that cap-and-trade would cost &quot;every American family $1,761 annually.&quot; On September 30, guest co-host Alisyn Camerota pushed the bogus stat that cap-and-trade would cost &quot;every American family $1,761 annually.&quot; PolitiFact.com has labeled the statistic false and noted that the talking point has been pushed by Republicans.

Jarrett suggests DOJ &quot;thinks it&#039;s OK to intimidate white people, not OK to intimidate black people at the polls.&quot; On July 30, guest co-host Gregg Jarrett suggested that the Obama Department of Justice &quot;thinks it&#039;s OK to intimidate white people, not OK to intimidate black people at the polls.&quot; 

Live Desk: &quot;Dems and Unions Push to Kill Workers&#039; Right to Secret Ballot.&quot; During a report on the Employee Free Choice Act on the March 11 edition of The Live Desk, Fox aired a chyron stating, &quot;Dems and Unions Push to Kill Workers&#039; Right to Secret Ballot.&quot; In fact, the legislation would not eliminate employees&#039; right to a secret ballot; as The New York Times reported, &quot;Business groups have attacked the legislation because it would take away employers&#039; right to insist on holding a secret-ballot election to determine whether workers favored unionization&quot; [emphasis added]. Indeed, as The Christian Science Monitor has noted, &quot;[t]he proposed law gives workers a choice of forming a union through majority sign-up (&#039;card check&#039;) or an election by secret ballot.&quot;

MacCallum agrees with Bachmann&#039;s claim that Obama&#039;s proposals are a &quot;lurch toward socialism.&quot; On March 24, MacCallum responded to Rep. Michele Bachmann&#039;s (R-MN) claim that Obama proposals are a &quot;lurch toward socialism&quot; by stating: &quot;I think you&#039;re absolutely right about that.&quot;

&quot;Democrat&quot; Mark Sanford. While airing live footage of a press conference by South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford, Live Desk incorrectly identified the Republican as a Democrat. Gallagher later apologized for the error.

Special Report (6-7 p.m. ET): Video doctoring, cropped quotes, smears of Obama officials, falsehoods

Baier smears Jennings as failing to report &quot;sexual abuse.&quot; On October 1, host Bret Baier joined Fox News&#039; witch hunt against Jennings, claiming that &quot;Education Secretary Arne Duncan is standing behind his so-called safe schools czar after revelations that Kevin Jennings did not report a case of sexual abuse he encountered as a schoolteacher.&quot;

Wilson: Jennings &quot;admitted&quot; that &quot;he failed to alert authorities when a 15-year-old boy told him he was involved in a sexual relationship with an older man.&quot; On October 6, correspondent Brian Wilson stated: &quot;School safety czar Kevin Jennings is currently under fire because he admitted that in 1988, when he was a high school teacher, he failed to alert authorities when a 15-year-old boy told him he was involved in a sexual relationship with an older man. One member of the House believes Jennings would not have his current job if czars were required to face Senate confirmation hearings.&quot; Wilson repeated the 15-year old age claim even though FoxNews.com previously acknowledged that the student was of legal age -- 16 years old -- at the time.

Video doctoring: Goler reverses meaning of Obama quote to falsely suggest he supports European-style health care. On April 24, White House correspondent Wendell Goler cropped a comment by Obama and took it out of context -- effectively reversing the statement&#039;s meaning -- to falsely suggest that Obama supports creating a health care system &quot;like the European countries.&quot; Goler claimed that Obama &quot;doesn&#039;t want to do it halfway&quot; on health care, and then aired a clip from a March 26 online town hall event of Obama saying, &quot;If you&#039;re going to fix it, why not do a universal health-care system like the European countries?&quot; Following the clip, Goler reported: &quot;His critics worry universal health care would mean government-run health care.&quot; In fact, Obama actually said, &quot;Now, the question is, if you&#039;re going to fix it, why not do a universal health-care system like the European countries?&quot; [emphasis added] In doing so, Obama was paraphrasing the town hall question he had been asked -- &quot;Why can we not have a universal health-care system, like many European countries, where people are treated based on needs rather than financial resources?&quot; -- before explaining why he opposed such a system.

Fox&#039;s Garrett deceptively cropped Obama remark on judicial role. On May 1, saying it was a &quot;description of how the president hopes his nominee will interpret the law,&quot; congressional correspondent Major Garrett aired a clip in which Obama stated: &quot;I view that quality of empathy, of understanding and identifying with people&#039;s hopes and struggles, as an essential ingredient for arriving at just decisions and outcomes.&quot; Garrett then said: &quot;That aggravates those who believe justices should follow the Constitution and legislative intent.&quot; But Garrett omitted Obama&#039;s very next sentence, in which he stated: &quot;I will seek somebody who is dedicated to the rule of law, who honors our constitutional traditions, who respects the integrity of the judicial process and the appropriate limits of the judicial role.&quot;

Rosen: &quot;Rats could attack us in the sewers and court systems if all of Cass Sunstein&#039;s writings became law.&quot; On September 9, reporter James Rosen joined Glenn Beck&#039;s &quot;czars&quot; witch hunt by distorting Obama administration official Cass Sunstein&#039;s writings about organ donation and animal rights. 
Special Report packs in health care falsehoods. In an August 24 report on how, in the words of Baier, &quot;Republicans are trying to position themselves as the party looking out for seniors&#039; well-being,&quot; Rosen advanced the conservative talking point that Democrats plan to cut Medicare benefits for seniors and presented the widely debunked &quot;death panel&quot; falsehood as a he said/she said. Rosen also advanced the smear that Veterans Health Administration officials are referring veterans to a booklet that encourages them to end their lives prematurely.

Baier falsely suggests Obama has cited Canada as possible health reform model. On June 29, Baier falsely suggested that Obama has cited Canada&#039;s medical system as a &quot;possible model&quot; for his health care reform plan. In fact, Obama has explicitly rejected a Canadian-style health care system.

Special Report falsely suggests activism question deleted from questionnaire for Sotomayor. A June 4 report by legal correspondent Shannon Bream falsely suggested that Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) eliminated a question on judicial activism from the questionnaire for Sonia Sotomayor&#039;s Supreme Court nomination. In fact, Leahy reportedly removed the question in 2007 pursuant to a bipartisan agreement. The following day, Baier corrected Bream&#039;s report by acknowledging that the question was deleted &quot;long before Sotomayor was picked for the high court.&quot;

Fox News Sunday: &quot;Death book,&quot; health care misinformation

&quot;Death book&quot; distortions abound on Fox News Sunday. On the August 23 edition of Fox News Sunday, Chris Wallace hosted former Bush administration aide Jim Towey to discuss his Wall Street Journal op-ed, &quot;The Death Book for Veterans,&quot; and in doing so promoted numerous distortions about an end-of-life educational booklet used by the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). In addition to forwarding the smear that the booklet is a &quot;death book,&quot; Wallace promoted Towey&#039;s distortion that the booklet encourages veterans to &quot;pull the plug&quot; -- it doesn&#039;t; Wallace and Towey both suggested that the Bush administration suspended use of the booklet -- it didn&#039;t; and Wallace claimed that a VHA document requires doctors to direct veterans to the booklet -- it doesn&#039;t.

Wallace revives rationing bogeyman. On August 16, Wallace repeatedly advanced the conservative talking point that Democrats&#039; health care reform proposals would create a system of rationing care, omitting the fact that rationing already happens under the current system. Indeed, Wallace did not acknowledge that rationing already occurs, even after his guest, American Medical Association president J. James Rohack, said, &quot;[T]here&#039;s a myth that rationing doesn&#039;t occur right now. ... That&#039;s why this bill&#039;s important. It gets rid of some of the rationing that&#039;s occurring right now.&quot;

Wallace claimed Holder, confirmed 75-21, &quot;got into office by the skin of his teeth.&quot; On February 22, Wallace claimed that Attorney General Eric Holder &quot;got into office by the skin of his teeth.&quot; However, Holder was confirmed by the Senate in a 75-21 vote, and the Senate Judiciary Committee voted 17-2 in favor of reporting his nomination to the full Senate.

Wallace on Obama: &quot;pettiness,&quot; &quot;childishness&quot;; Obama admin. &quot;biggest bunch of crybabies.&quot; Wallace has claimed Obama did not appear on his show because of &quot;pettiness&quot; and &quot;childishness,&quot; and has called the Obama administration the &quot;biggest bunch of crybabies I have dealt with in my 30 years in Washington.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America&#8217;s Newsroom (9-11 a.m. ET): Obama official never reported &#8220;statutory rape&#8221;; Dems &#8220;protect pedophiles&#8221;; tea parties recruitment </p>
<p>Hemmer advances smear that Jennings knew of &#8220;statutory rape&#8221; and &#8220;never reported it.&#8221; During the October 1 edition of America&#8217;s Newsroom, co-host Bill Hemmer joined his network&#8217;s smears against Department of Education official Kevin Jennings by claiming that Jennings knew of a &#8220;statutory rape&#8221; case involving a student but &#8220;never reported it.&#8221; In fact, the student in question was of legal age of consent at the time he was counseled by Jennings.</p>
<p>Kelly on Sotomayor comment: &#8220;sounds to a lot of people like reverse racism.&#8221; On May 26, co-host Megyn Kelly joined conservative commentators such as Rush Limbaugh by stating that then-Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor&#8217;s &#8220;wise Latina&#8221; remark &#8220;sounds to a lot of people like reverse racism, basically. Like she&#8217;s saying that Latina judges are obviously better than white male judges, and that that&#8217;s her assumption, and people get worried about putting a person like that on the U.S. Supreme Court.&#8221; Kelly later added, &#8220;I&#8217;ve looked at the entire speech that she was offering to see if that was taken out of context, and I have to tell you &#8230; it wasn&#8217;t.&#8221; In fact, Sotomayor was specifically discussing the importance of diversity in adjudicating race and sex discrimination cases; several conservative legal figures have made similar comments.</p>
<p>America&#8217;s Newsroom falsehood: &#8220;House Dems vote to protect pedophiles, but not veterans.&#8221; On May 6, America&#8217;s Newsroom pushed the falsehood that Democrats attempted to &#8220;protect&#8221; pedophiles in voting in favor of the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act. Hemmer teased a segment by stating that Democrats had reportedly &#8220;voted to give special protection to pedophiles.&#8221; During the segment, America&#8217;s Newsroom ran on-screen text that read, &#8220;House Dems vote to protect pedophiles, but not veterans&#8221;:</p>
<p>Henneberg repeats right-wing myth that hate crimes bill could gag ministers. During the April 29 edition of America&#8217;s Newsroom, correspondent Molly Henneberg repeated the right-wing myth that under the proposed Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act, religious groups &#8220;may be prosecuted for their religious beliefs if they believe that homosexuality is a sin,&#8221; and the disputed claim that the legislation &#8220;could gag ministers who preach that [homosexuality is a sin], or even if a church may not want to marry a gay couple.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fox News&#8217; Hemmer &#8220;keeping track of the stimulus money&#8221; &#8212; by lifting research from GOP website. On April 23, Hemmer repeatedly suggested information about four &#8220;interesting&#8221; projects reportedly funded by the recovery act was obtained through Fox News&#8217; own research, even though nearly all of the information Hemmer mentioned, as well as that included in on-screen text and graphics, first appeared on Rep. Eric Cantor&#8217;s Republican Whip website.</p>
<p>America&#8217;s Newsroom promotes tea party organizing info on-air and online. America&#8217;s Newsroom encouraged viewers to get involved with April 15 &#8220;tea party&#8221; protests across the country, which Fox News had described as primarily a response to President Obama&#8217;s fiscal policies. The program frequently hosted tea party organizers, and posted on-screen organizing information, such as protest dates and locations. America&#8217;s Newsroom also repeatedly directed viewers to its website, which featured a list of tea party protests. </p>
<p>America&#8217;s Newsroom directs viewers to &#8220;virtual tea party.&#8221; America&#8217;s Newsroom repeatedly directed viewers to participate in a &#8220;virtual tea party&#8221; at Fox News&#8217; purportedly non-biased website, Fox Nation. Hemmer told viewers, &#8220;Can&#8217;t get to a tea party? Fox Nation hosts a virtual tea party,&#8221; while Kelly said, &#8220;You can join the tea party action from your home if you go to the FoxNation.com &#8230; a virtual tax day tea party.&#8221; </p>
<p>America&#8217;s Newsroom pushes discredited GOP calculation of Obama&#8217;s cap-and-trade proposal. On April 2, guest host Alisyn Camerota asserted that the cost of Obama&#8217;s cap-and-trade proposal &#8220;would be $3,100 per U.S. household.&#8221; The claim was advanced by the House Republican Conference in a March 23 &#8220;Talking Points&#8221; press release, and the Republicans reportedly purported to back up the claim by pointing to a 2007 study by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). But MIT professor John Reilly, one of the authors of the study, has disputed the GOP&#8217;s calculation, stating that his study &#8220;has been misrepresented&#8221; and that the Republicans&#8217; claim of an average household cost of $3,128 is &#8220;nearly 10 times the correct estimate&#8221; based on his study&#8217;s cap-and-trade model. PolitiFact.com rated the $3,100 figure a &#8220;pants on fire&#8221; falsehood.</p>
<p>America&#8217;s Newsroom falsely claimed Obama budget &#8220;4x bigger than Bush&#8217;s costliest plan.&#8221; On the April 3 edition of America&#8217;s Newsroom, on-screen text falsely claimed that Obama&#8217;s $3.6 trillion FY 2010 budget is &#8220;4x bigger than Bush&#8217;s costliest plan.&#8221; In fact, President Bush submitted a $3.1 trillion budget for FY 2009 and a $2.9 trillion budget for FY 2008. </p>
<p>America&#8217;s Newsroom promotes McCaughey falsehood that stimulus would &#8220;hav[e] the government essentially dictate treatments.&#8221; On February 10, Hemmer and Kelly promoted the falsehood &#8212; which first appeared in a Bloomberg &#8220;commentary&#8221; by serial misinformer Betsy McCaughey and was subsequently promoted by Limbaugh and Matt Drudge &#8212; that the economic recovery bill included a provision that would, in the words of guest Stephen Moore, a Wall Street Journal economics writer, &#8220;hav[e] the government essentially dictate treatments.&#8221;</p>
<p>Happening Now (11 a.m.-1 p.m. ET): Home of repeated attempts to pass off GOP research as its own</p>
<p>Happening Now passes off GOP press release as its own research &#8212; typo and all. During the February 10 edition of Happening Now, co-host Jon Scott purported to &#8220;take a look back&#8221; at how the economic recovery plan &#8220;grew, and grew, and grew.&#8221; In doing so, Scott referenced seven dates, as on-screen graphics cited various news sources from those time periods &#8212; all of which came directly from a Senate Republican Communications Center press release. A Fox News on-screen graphic even reproduced a typo contained in the Republican press release. The following day, Scott apologized &#8212; for running the typo. Scott&#8217;s apology was criticized by Washington Post media critic and CNN host Howard Kurtz, who said: &#8220;We sometimes jab at the pundits for using talking points, but in the case of Fox News anchor Jon Scott, it was literally true this week. &#8230; You should be apologizing for using partisan propaganda from the GOP without telling your viewers where it came from. Talk about missing the point.&#8221;</p>
<p>Happening Now posts &#8220;FOXfact[s]&#8221; about GOP budget nearly identical to GOP Rep. Ryan&#8217;s op-ed. During two segments on the April 1, Happening Now aired &#8220;FOXfact[s]&#8221; purporting to describe facts about the House Republican budget. However, all of the seven &#8220;FOXfact[s]&#8221; displayed onscreen were nearly identical to portions of an op-ed by Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) published in that day&#8217;s Wall Street Journal.</p>
<p>Happening Now crops clips of Obama to promote &#8220;another apology tour.&#8221; On June 2, Scott asked if &#8220;the president&#8217;s upcoming trip [to Europe and the Middle East will] be what conservatives might call another apology tour,&#8221; and both Scott and co-host Jane Skinner aired cropped clips of Obama&#8217;s remarks from an April 3 speech in France to falsely suggest that Obama only criticized the United States. In doing so, Happening Now joined conservative commentators and Fox News hosts who have cropped or misrepresented Obama&#8217;s overseas remarks to falsely suggest, in the words of host Sean Hannity, that Obama was &#8220;blam[ing] America first&#8221; and, more broadly, that Obama&#8217;s earlier overseas trip constituted an &#8220;apology tour.&#8221;</p>
<p>Live Desk (1-3 p.m. ET): Falsehoods, deceptive editing</p>
<p>Fox News presents deceptively cropped six-month-old Biden clip as new. On March 16, Live Desk co-host Martha MacCallum claimed that &#8220;after weeks of economic doom and gloom, the Obama administration is now singing a slightly different tune. Take a look at what was said in recent interviews this weekend.&#8221; Live Desk then aired clips of administration officials purportedly giving an optimistic view of the economy, which included video of Vice President Joe Biden stating, &#8220;The fundamentals of the economy are strong.&#8221; However, Biden did not make those remarks during an &#8220;interview&#8221; that weekend; he made them at a September 2008 campaign event in which he criticized statements by Sen. John McCain. MacCallum apologized the next day.</p>
<p>Fox&#8217;s Camerota pushes bogus stat that cap-and-trade would cost &#8220;every American family $1,761 annually.&#8221; On September 30, guest co-host Alisyn Camerota pushed the bogus stat that cap-and-trade would cost &#8220;every American family $1,761 annually.&#8221; PolitiFact.com has labeled the statistic false and noted that the talking point has been pushed by Republicans.</p>
<p>Jarrett suggests DOJ &#8220;thinks it&#8217;s OK to intimidate white people, not OK to intimidate black people at the polls.&#8221; On July 30, guest co-host Gregg Jarrett suggested that the Obama Department of Justice &#8220;thinks it&#8217;s OK to intimidate white people, not OK to intimidate black people at the polls.&#8221; </p>
<p>Live Desk: &#8220;Dems and Unions Push to Kill Workers&#8217; Right to Secret Ballot.&#8221; During a report on the Employee Free Choice Act on the March 11 edition of The Live Desk, Fox aired a chyron stating, &#8220;Dems and Unions Push to Kill Workers&#8217; Right to Secret Ballot.&#8221; In fact, the legislation would not eliminate employees&#8217; right to a secret ballot; as The New York Times reported, &#8220;Business groups have attacked the legislation because it would take away employers&#8217; right to insist on holding a secret-ballot election to determine whether workers favored unionization&#8221; [emphasis added]. Indeed, as The Christian Science Monitor has noted, &#8220;[t]he proposed law gives workers a choice of forming a union through majority sign-up (&#8216;card check&#8217;) or an election by secret ballot.&#8221;</p>
<p>MacCallum agrees with Bachmann&#8217;s claim that Obama&#8217;s proposals are a &#8220;lurch toward socialism.&#8221; On March 24, MacCallum responded to Rep. Michele Bachmann&#8217;s (R-MN) claim that Obama proposals are a &#8220;lurch toward socialism&#8221; by stating: &#8220;I think you&#8217;re absolutely right about that.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Democrat&#8221; Mark Sanford. While airing live footage of a press conference by South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford, Live Desk incorrectly identified the Republican as a Democrat. Gallagher later apologized for the error.</p>
<p>Special Report (6-7 p.m. ET): Video doctoring, cropped quotes, smears of Obama officials, falsehoods</p>
<p>Baier smears Jennings as failing to report &#8220;sexual abuse.&#8221; On October 1, host Bret Baier joined Fox News&#8217; witch hunt against Jennings, claiming that &#8220;Education Secretary Arne Duncan is standing behind his so-called safe schools czar after revelations that Kevin Jennings did not report a case of sexual abuse he encountered as a schoolteacher.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wilson: Jennings &#8220;admitted&#8221; that &#8220;he failed to alert authorities when a 15-year-old boy told him he was involved in a sexual relationship with an older man.&#8221; On October 6, correspondent Brian Wilson stated: &#8220;School safety czar Kevin Jennings is currently under fire because he admitted that in 1988, when he was a high school teacher, he failed to alert authorities when a 15-year-old boy told him he was involved in a sexual relationship with an older man. One member of the House believes Jennings would not have his current job if czars were required to face Senate confirmation hearings.&#8221; Wilson repeated the 15-year old age claim even though FoxNews.com previously acknowledged that the student was of legal age &#8212; 16 years old &#8212; at the time.</p>
<p>Video doctoring: Goler reverses meaning of Obama quote to falsely suggest he supports European-style health care. On April 24, White House correspondent Wendell Goler cropped a comment by Obama and took it out of context &#8212; effectively reversing the statement&#8217;s meaning &#8212; to falsely suggest that Obama supports creating a health care system &#8220;like the European countries.&#8221; Goler claimed that Obama &#8220;doesn&#8217;t want to do it halfway&#8221; on health care, and then aired a clip from a March 26 online town hall event of Obama saying, &#8220;If you&#8217;re going to fix it, why not do a universal health-care system like the European countries?&#8221; Following the clip, Goler reported: &#8220;His critics worry universal health care would mean government-run health care.&#8221; In fact, Obama actually said, &#8220;Now, the question is, if you&#8217;re going to fix it, why not do a universal health-care system like the European countries?&#8221; [emphasis added] In doing so, Obama was paraphrasing the town hall question he had been asked &#8212; &#8220;Why can we not have a universal health-care system, like many European countries, where people are treated based on needs rather than financial resources?&#8221; &#8212; before explaining why he opposed such a system.</p>
<p>Fox&#8217;s Garrett deceptively cropped Obama remark on judicial role. On May 1, saying it was a &#8220;description of how the president hopes his nominee will interpret the law,&#8221; congressional correspondent Major Garrett aired a clip in which Obama stated: &#8220;I view that quality of empathy, of understanding and identifying with people&#8217;s hopes and struggles, as an essential ingredient for arriving at just decisions and outcomes.&#8221; Garrett then said: &#8220;That aggravates those who believe justices should follow the Constitution and legislative intent.&#8221; But Garrett omitted Obama&#8217;s very next sentence, in which he stated: &#8220;I will seek somebody who is dedicated to the rule of law, who honors our constitutional traditions, who respects the integrity of the judicial process and the appropriate limits of the judicial role.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rosen: &#8220;Rats could attack us in the sewers and court systems if all of Cass Sunstein&#8217;s writings became law.&#8221; On September 9, reporter James Rosen joined Glenn Beck&#8217;s &#8220;czars&#8221; witch hunt by distorting Obama administration official Cass Sunstein&#8217;s writings about organ donation and animal rights.<br />
Special Report packs in health care falsehoods. In an August 24 report on how, in the words of Baier, &#8220;Republicans are trying to position themselves as the party looking out for seniors&#8217; well-being,&#8221; Rosen advanced the conservative talking point that Democrats plan to cut Medicare benefits for seniors and presented the widely debunked &#8220;death panel&#8221; falsehood as a he said/she said. Rosen also advanced the smear that Veterans Health Administration officials are referring veterans to a booklet that encourages them to end their lives prematurely.</p>
<p>Baier falsely suggests Obama has cited Canada as possible health reform model. On June 29, Baier falsely suggested that Obama has cited Canada&#8217;s medical system as a &#8220;possible model&#8221; for his health care reform plan. In fact, Obama has explicitly rejected a Canadian-style health care system.</p>
<p>Special Report falsely suggests activism question deleted from questionnaire for Sotomayor. A June 4 report by legal correspondent Shannon Bream falsely suggested that Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) eliminated a question on judicial activism from the questionnaire for Sonia Sotomayor&#8217;s Supreme Court nomination. In fact, Leahy reportedly removed the question in 2007 pursuant to a bipartisan agreement. The following day, Baier corrected Bream&#8217;s report by acknowledging that the question was deleted &#8220;long before Sotomayor was picked for the high court.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fox News Sunday: &#8220;Death book,&#8221; health care misinformation</p>
<p>&#8220;Death book&#8221; distortions abound on Fox News Sunday. On the August 23 edition of Fox News Sunday, Chris Wallace hosted former Bush administration aide Jim Towey to discuss his Wall Street Journal op-ed, &#8220;The Death Book for Veterans,&#8221; and in doing so promoted numerous distortions about an end-of-life educational booklet used by the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). In addition to forwarding the smear that the booklet is a &#8220;death book,&#8221; Wallace promoted Towey&#8217;s distortion that the booklet encourages veterans to &#8220;pull the plug&#8221; &#8212; it doesn&#8217;t; Wallace and Towey both suggested that the Bush administration suspended use of the booklet &#8212; it didn&#8217;t; and Wallace claimed that a VHA document requires doctors to direct veterans to the booklet &#8212; it doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Wallace revives rationing bogeyman. On August 16, Wallace repeatedly advanced the conservative talking point that Democrats&#8217; health care reform proposals would create a system of rationing care, omitting the fact that rationing already happens under the current system. Indeed, Wallace did not acknowledge that rationing already occurs, even after his guest, American Medical Association president J. James Rohack, said, &#8220;[T]here&#8217;s a myth that rationing doesn&#8217;t occur right now. &#8230; That&#8217;s why this bill&#8217;s important. It gets rid of some of the rationing that&#8217;s occurring right now.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wallace claimed Holder, confirmed 75-21, &#8220;got into office by the skin of his teeth.&#8221; On February 22, Wallace claimed that Attorney General Eric Holder &#8220;got into office by the skin of his teeth.&#8221; However, Holder was confirmed by the Senate in a 75-21 vote, and the Senate Judiciary Committee voted 17-2 in favor of reporting his nomination to the full Senate.</p>
<p>Wallace on Obama: &#8220;pettiness,&#8221; &#8220;childishness&#8221;; Obama admin. &#8220;biggest bunch of crybabies.&#8221; Wallace has claimed Obama did not appear on his show because of &#8220;pettiness&#8221; and &#8220;childishness,&#8221; and has called the Obama administration the &#8220;biggest bunch of crybabies I have dealt with in my 30 years in Washington.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/19/administration-attack-on-foxnews-makes-president-look-petty/comment-page-1/#comment-496966</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=18109#comment-496966</guid>
		<description>Fox was certainly biased in the Bush years, which drove me finally to CNN. When ObamaCare came around, CNN started their non-stop infomercial. All hands on deck, we got a job to do ... promote ObamaCare. It was a virtual pep rally posing as a news channel. 

The point is that most &#039;news&#039; has a point of view. To say that Fox is more biased than CNN is delusional. Really, really delusional. It makes me nervous that so many higher-ups are unable to get a grip on simple reality. 

BTW, I am just short of amazed at how supportive O&#039;Reilly has been of Obama&#039;s performance. He goes out of his way to cut him slack, and actually supports many of his policies ... to some degree. There&#039;s a bit of working class populism in that old Irish fella, and they buy into some of the economic hogwash of the Democrats. 

Do the Obamites ever even watch O&#039;Reilly? Maybe not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox was certainly biased in the Bush years, which drove me finally to CNN. When ObamaCare came around, CNN started their non-stop infomercial. All hands on deck, we got a job to do &#8230; promote ObamaCare. It was a virtual pep rally posing as a news channel. </p>
<p>The point is that most &#8216;news&#8217; has a point of view. To say that Fox is more biased than CNN is delusional. Really, really delusional. It makes me nervous that so many higher-ups are unable to get a grip on simple reality. </p>
<p>BTW, I am just short of amazed at how supportive O&#8217;Reilly has been of Obama&#8217;s performance. He goes out of his way to cut him slack, and actually supports many of his policies &#8230; to some degree. There&#8217;s a bit of working class populism in that old Irish fella, and they buy into some of the economic hogwash of the Democrats. </p>
<p>Do the Obamites ever even watch O&#8217;Reilly? Maybe not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean A</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/10/19/administration-attack-on-foxnews-makes-president-look-petty/comment-page-1/#comment-496956</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=18109#comment-496956</guid>
		<description>P.S.  The final sentence in Jacob Weisberg pathetic column that called Fox News &quot;un-American&quot; tacitly admits what I&#039;m talking about:  &quot;And no, I don&#039;t want to come on The O&#039;Reilly Factor to discuss it.&quot;

The fact is that whenever a liberal pundit has an opposing viewpoint from the host of a show on Fox, the response is consistently the same:  come on the show and let&#039;s debate it.  But the Left doesn&#039;t want debate.  The Left wants their viewpoint, and their viewpoint alone on the airwaves and in the media.  To actually have to debate their ideas would involve them making the distasteful concession that there ARE legitimate opposing viewpoints, and liberals find that intolerable.  Thus, instead of a format in which liberals and conservatives debate the issues (i.e. Moore appearing on Hannity&#039;s show), they prefer Olberman&#039;s chicken sh*t &quot;worst person in the world&quot; segments, during which Olberman condemns conservatives as evil, demonic maniacs (or, more recently, &quot;big bags of meat with lipstick&quot;) and he never provides any opportunity for the targets of his derision to respond.  That&#039;s &quot;balanced&quot; news coverage to the Left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S.  The final sentence in Jacob Weisberg pathetic column that called Fox News &#8220;un-American&#8221; tacitly admits what I&#8217;m talking about:  &#8220;And no, I don&#8217;t want to come on The O&#8217;Reilly Factor to discuss it.&#8221;</p>
<p>The fact is that whenever a liberal pundit has an opposing viewpoint from the host of a show on Fox, the response is consistently the same:  come on the show and let&#8217;s debate it.  But the Left doesn&#8217;t want debate.  The Left wants their viewpoint, and their viewpoint alone on the airwaves and in the media.  To actually have to debate their ideas would involve them making the distasteful concession that there ARE legitimate opposing viewpoints, and liberals find that intolerable.  Thus, instead of a format in which liberals and conservatives debate the issues (i.e. Moore appearing on Hannity&#8217;s show), they prefer Olberman&#8217;s chicken sh*t &#8220;worst person in the world&#8221; segments, during which Olberman condemns conservatives as evil, demonic maniacs (or, more recently, &#8220;big bags of meat with lipstick&#8221;) and he never provides any opportunity for the targets of his derision to respond.  That&#8217;s &#8220;balanced&#8221; news coverage to the Left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

