Hey, Ma’am, Why No Full Economic Analysis of Climate Control Scheme?
As the Golden State continues to shed jobs, you’d think our representatives in Washington would seek to avoid policies which could further damage the state’s fragile economy. But, not our junior Senator, Ma’am Barbara Boxer.
This lady just can’t seem to learn from her past mistakes. She promised us the “so-called stimulus” would great jobs. One in eight Californians are out of work, a higher percentage than at any point since World War II . And now, she’s pushing ahead with her climate control scheme, not even waiting for a “full economic analysis of the proposal.“
I guess she just don’t think 12.7% unemployment in Los Angeles County is high enough.
3 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
There is nothing sane about Boxer — unless in comparison to Pelosi. This is the same state, with annual acreage devouring infernos, that shut down water to at least 500 acres of almond groves on behalf of a weee wittle fish — that could have been caught with a mate, and put elsewhere. Like, a fishbowl. I’m sorry. That is California isn’t it? With all the rest of us looking in and wondering WTF?
Comment by Kendra — November 3, 2009 @ 2:11 pm - November 3, 2009
Off Topic, but you could ask the same question about ObamaCare. A European economist explains why it would be a disaster and why even European countries are now moving *away* from their own State-dominated systems:http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/03/video-the-real-lessons-of-europes-nanny-state-health-care-system/
Comment by ILoveCapitalism — November 3, 2009 @ 2:38 pm - November 3, 2009
Supposedly “the planet has a fever” and the liberals know where to shove the thermometer. If it causes even more wide-spread poverty, why so much the better.
Comment by ThatGayConservative — November 3, 2009 @ 4:04 pm - November 3, 2009