<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s the federal spending, stupid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/11/03/its-the-federal-spending-stupid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/11/03/its-the-federal-spending-stupid/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:28:36 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: alanstorm</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/11/03/its-the-federal-spending-stupid/comment-page-1/#comment-502937</link>
		<dc:creator>alanstorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 03:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=18661#comment-502937</guid>
		<description>&quot;suppose Scozzafava was still pro-choice and pro-SSM but anti-stimulus and had a better record on tax-and-spend issues.  I think we would not have seen the Hoffman candidacy and I think she would have won the seat fairly easily.&quot;

I would guess Mr. Horwitz is right - the spending issue is one that the conservatives and libertarians can unite on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;suppose Scozzafava was still pro-choice and pro-SSM but anti-stimulus and had a better record on tax-and-spend issues.  I think we would not have seen the Hoffman candidacy and I think she would have won the seat fairly easily.&#8221;</p>
<p>I would guess Mr. Horwitz is right &#8211; the spending issue is one that the conservatives and libertarians can unite on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
