Gay Patriot Header Image

MSM: Handmaiden to Obama Campaign in Attempt to Destroy Palin

In this morning’s Wall Street Journal, Matthew Continetti, author of the just released The Persecution of Sarah Palin: How the Elite Media Tried to Bring Down a Rising Star, contends that that good woman’s various public appearances, including an interview with leading Obama cheerleader Oprah Winfrey, could “humanize” this charismatic Republican whom the media have portrayed as a polarizing harridan.

Yet, one wonders, if given a different media reaction to her sudden appearance last fall on the national political stage, she would have emerged as bright new force in politics as did another national political novice in 2008.  Like Barack Obama, she was new to the national scene and charismatic.  Yet, the media celebrated one and demonized the other.  Various news organizations dispatched entire teams to Alaska to dig around in her trash, yet ignored stories about Obama they could research by a few keystrokes and phone calls, you know, like say about how Mrs. Obama’s salary more than doubled soon after her husband won election to the Senate.  And let’s not forget that her husband secured a federal earmark for that employer.

That’s just one story the media didn’t investigate, well, actually they did, kind of.  They highlighted the errors in a chain e-mail account of Mrs. Obama’s professional situation, without probing the sudden increase in her salary nor wondering why such a high-salaried position was not filled when she resigned to become First Lady.

But, the media can’t let up with stories about (and invitations to) Sarah Palin’s ex-son-in-law-to-be (while ignoring the situations of and scandals surrounding various Obama relatives).  There seems to be a method to their madness, er, double standards, something Continetti caught in the prologue to his book.  It seems the media were acting at the behest of the Obama campaign.  Continetti quotes this from a November 5, 2008 article in the Wall Street Journal:

On his weekly strategy call with Democratic senators after the Republican convention in early September, Obama Chief of Staff Jim Messina began, “Let me walk you through this week’s events.” He was cut off by angry senators calling for a more aggressive response to the Republican running-mate pick: “Go after Palin.” “Define Palin.” “Make the race about Palin.” Mr. Messina was startled by the new nervousness in the party ranks.

After the American people responded favorably to Palin’s stirring speech to the GOP convention, Obama had been replaced as the new kid on the block.  The media which had so built him up, would help his campaign destroy her.

And yet the great irony is that while the media made one figure out to be a unifying figure and the other a polarizing force, it was that supposed polarizer who had actually accomplished more in elective office, governing as a pragmatist and building bridges across the partisan divide.  While that supposedly unifier, in 2007, ranked as the most liberal member of the United States Senate.

Share

42 Comments

  1. Obama’s (half) black. Anyone who dared ask questions would be banished to the mail room forever (at best).

    Comment by ThatGayConservative — November 13, 2009 @ 3:22 pm - November 13, 2009

  2. Absolutely hilarious.
    Funny how it is that she can read a speech well at the convention, and become an overnight star, and give her ticket a convention bounce, and the media has nothing to do with that. But when she appears in public on her own, and has to answer some basic questions that any national candidate has to answer, and ends up coming off like a complete brain-dead fool – thats the big bad media’s fault.

    And of course, you also pretend that there wasn’t any Fox News, Wall St. Journal, New York Post, Wash. Times, talk radio, in all, thousands of media outlets doing everything they could to trash and destroy Obama, before the election and up till today.

    Dont you get tired of this silly propagandizing?

    Comment by Tano — November 13, 2009 @ 3:23 pm - November 13, 2009

  3. Tano, please let me know if you’re aware of Sarah Palin’s accomplishments while she was in Alaska and detail Obama’s before he was elected President.

    Thanks

    Comment by B. Daniel Blatt — November 13, 2009 @ 3:47 pm - November 13, 2009

  4. Well, well, well…ol’ Turdo is back. Funny how he crawled back under his rock, and stayed there for weeks, until the Palin bashing started again. I’m waiting for the stories on why ms. o’s license was pulled.. and why she is no longer allowed to practice law.

    Comment by jonnot — November 13, 2009 @ 3:56 pm - November 13, 2009

  5. Don’t you get tired of this silly propagandizing?

    You really don’t get it, do you? If everyone had been given the same nasty treatment during the campaign, well, that’s dirty politics. But that’s not what happened.

    Obama said “Leave my family alone,” and the MSM did exactly that. What did Sarah Palin get? “Trig Truthers,” constant questioning of her parenting skills, sexual jokes directed toward her underage children, etc.

    You really think the reporting/punditry coming from Fox News, Rush Limbaugh and company is the same as having multiple people from the MSM go through Palin’s garbage and hack into her email accounts? What planet do you live on?

    Comment by bluecove — November 13, 2009 @ 4:00 pm - November 13, 2009

  6. Tano, without engaging in name calling, your boy, our Big Eared Chimp in Chief, never was asked any real questions for a fawning media/press. He had/has NUMEROUS connections to RADICALS and other anti-American wannabes. Furthermore, the Kenyan in Chief was running for the White House for a good 2-3 years BEFORE 2008. Palin was thown in with ZERO preparation.

    Now that ol’ Big Ears is sinking like a stone, (just 3 yrs till our Marxist-Moooslim in gone!), Palin should at least get fairer treatment from the 85% left biased media.

    Comment by rssg — November 13, 2009 @ 4:08 pm - November 13, 2009

  7. #2: “And of course, you also pretend that there wasn’t any Fox News, Wall St. Journal, New York Post, Wash. Times, talk radio, in all, thousands of media outlets doing everything they could to trash and destroy Obama, before the election and up till today.”

    No, Tano. During the campaign Obama was protected and championed by 99% of the media and any journalist who dared to actually engage in journalism (by, for example, asking questions about William Ayers) was crucified by Obama’s army of stenographer-sycophants. And now that we’ve had to endure 10 months of Obama in office, I no longer think the experience issue is relevant when comparing Obama to Palin. In fact, comparisons of Obama to any other politicians have become completely moot because no matter who you might compare him to, Obama will always come out being a useless, contemptible, sociopathic piece of garbage. Granted, Obama has been doing everything he can to earn the title of “useless, contemptible, sociopathic piece of garbage” since his inauguration, but it wasn’t until this morning that he really OWNED it. Because after all, what else would you possibly call a person who sees nothing wrong with attending a memorial for US soldiers murdered by an Islamic jihadist on a Tuesday and then slapping the Nation with a shocking, unilateral decision to provide full civilian criminal trials to an evil gang of Islamic enemy combatants accused of murdering 3000 Americans on a Friday? Seriously, what better name IS THERE for a person like that other than “useless, contemptible, sociopathic piece of garbage”? I can’t think of one. Of course, this means we’ll have to go to the trouble of coming up with some derivative of Obama’s new title to identify the mindless, ignorant losers who continue to support and defend him, like yourself.

    Comment by Sean A — November 13, 2009 @ 5:22 pm - November 13, 2009

  8. ObaMao surrounded himself with racist, sexist, anti-Semite, terrorist, bigot homophobes. He surrounded himself with NeoComms, criminals, thugs, brutes, slum lords and all manner of reprobates. The worst part is that mindless pussies like Tardo circled the wagons to protect him because he surrounded himself with typical liberals and threatened anybody who DARED ask questions.

    Joe the Plumber had the AUDACITY to ask for clarification on the Chump’s stated position and the left dutifully tried to destroy him. Nevermind the privacy violations. The same SOBs who whined about “domestic wiretaps” had no problem violating the privacy of people they don’t like. This isn’t a surprise from the type of human debris that excuses Chucky Schumer and the DSCC.

    Comment by ThatGayConservative — November 13, 2009 @ 5:38 pm - November 13, 2009

  9. Obama had a laughably unremarkable 10 minute career as a US Senator. But as said above, he was aiming for the White House for the past several years, went to the “right parties”, schmoozed with the right people in journalism/media, etc. Furthermore, Barry Soetoro’s obvious connections with radicals all his life, was never brought up.

    Don’t know how I feel about Palin – still too soon to know. I don’t love her, I don’t hate her. We’ll see. Right now, it’s imperative to get Obambi out of office ASAP and I’ll support basically anyone who has a good chance of accomplishing that.

    Comment by nes — November 13, 2009 @ 5:46 pm - November 13, 2009

  10. Wow Sean, thats quite a rant. I guess you are one of those who has no faith whatsoever in the American judicial system. In fact, I guess you believe we should dispense with a judicial system, and just arrest and execute anyone that we (excuse me, the government) believes guilty of a heinous crime.

    You are the useless, contemptible, sociopathic piece of garbage around here – the real America-hater. This country has institutions that will be protected against the scummy traitors like you.

    Comment by Tano — November 13, 2009 @ 5:53 pm - November 13, 2009

  11. “ObaMao surrounded himself with racist, sexist, anti-Semite, terrorist, bigot homophobes. ”

    Well, at least you have the honesty to admit that he has reached out to Republicans.

    “Joe the Plumber had the AUDACITY to ask for clarification on the Chump’s stated position and the left dutifully tried to destroy him.”

    Actually, the left completely ignored him. He became a media figure entirely through the efforts of the right, and the McCain campaign. It was only then, when he was trotted out as a campaigner for McCain, that he recieved the normal pushback that both parties give to whomever advocates for their opponent.

    Comment by Tano — November 13, 2009 @ 5:57 pm - November 13, 2009

  12. Tano, please address the points I raised in comment #3. Thanks. And please refrain from calling other commenters names.

    Comment by B. Daniel Blatt — November 13, 2009 @ 5:59 pm - November 13, 2009

  13. Actually, the left completely ignored him.

    Nice try, leftist child.

    Barack Obama ordered his campaign workers to break the law and open private government records for the sole purpose of smearing an individual who made Barack Obama look foolish.

    Not that this is unusual to anyone who is aware of Obama’s history of doing so. But it does make an excellent point; Obama illegally attacks anyone who dares criticize him publicly, but goes above and beyond the law to protect anti-American terrorists who killed and continue to try to kill thousands of Americans.

    Perhaps that’s why he clapped and cheered to Reverend Wright screaming “God damn America.”

    Comment by North Dallas Thirty — November 13, 2009 @ 6:15 pm - November 13, 2009

  14. But when she appears in public on her own, and has to answer some basic questions that any national candidate has to answer, and ends up coming off like a complete brain-dead fool – thats the big bad media’s fault.

    You do realize, Tano, that your Barack Obama’s latest attempt to smear Sarah Palin today involves using pictures of her that were proven to be fake over a year ago?

    Because, after all, if the media is not biased against Palin, as you claim, certainly they wouldn’t be beclowning themselves like this without a direct order from their Obama.

    Or, go ahead and throw the media under the bus and end up admitting that they are so obviously biased against Palin that they have resorted to using fake information to smear her. Not that this would surprise us — after all, there WAS Rathergate — but we should also remember that the Bush ANG documents were generated and aired in full cooperation and in coordination with the Obama Party.

    Comment by North Dallas Thirty — November 13, 2009 @ 6:20 pm - November 13, 2009

  15. I remember Obama always going second in the debates after Hillary and essentially repeating her answers. I don’t think Obama is very smart or very informed. I don’t get the impression that he has ever answered any question about anything in detail. I suspect he couldn’t point to Afghanistan on a map.

    I think Sarah Palin is very smart and a quick study. If she doesn’t know something, she has the critical thinking to sort it out. Palin wouldn’t be taking weeks to figure out where to put the troops. She’d consult, put the facts together, give the generals their orders, and probably be there before the troops arrive to serve them dinner.

    Comment by Ashpenaz — November 13, 2009 @ 6:38 pm - November 13, 2009

  16. Well, at least you have the honesty to admit that he has reached out to Republicans.

    Still lying, still projecting.

    But when Plugs Biden appears in public on his own, and has to answer some basic questions that any national candidate has to answer, and ends up coming off like a complete brain-dead fool – nobody notices because SOBs like Tardo are busy making damn sure the attention is focused elsewhere.

    And let’s not forget everytime he opens his hole, we see the poor, drooling sombitch for what he is. Guess Chairman Obama thought consulting oatmeal for foreign policy advice was too inconvenient.

    Comment by ThatGayConservative — November 13, 2009 @ 7:51 pm - November 13, 2009

  17. B-Rock was introduced as a bright new political face in 2006.

    Comment by Mitchell Blatt — November 13, 2009 @ 8:08 pm - November 13, 2009

  18. Wow Sean, thats quite a rant. I guess you are one of those who has no faith whatsoever in the American judicial system. In fact, I guess you believe we should dispense with a judicial system, and just arrest and execute anyone that we (excuse me, the government) believes guilty of a heinous crime.

    You are the useless, contemptible, sociopathic piece of garbage around here – the real America-hater. This country has institutions that will be protected against the scummy traitors like you.

    No sir. This is about putting America on trial. The evidence is classified intelligence. Naturally, the brain-dead lemmings are gleefully looking forward to even more classified information getting exposed. Naturally, the brain-dead lemmings are delighted at the opportunity of seeing the United States getting it’s ass screwed to the wall, by their own design, yet again.

    THAT, my simple, drooling idiot, is traitorous.

    Comment by ThatGayConservative — November 13, 2009 @ 8:18 pm - November 13, 2009

  19. “The evidence is classified intelligence.”

    Not hardly. He has confessed.

    In any case, I see you to have no confidence or love for foundational American values and institutions. Scratch a conservative, and out comes an anti-democratic authoritarian. All the Saddams of the world use the exact same logic as you, for accomplishing the same goals that you seem to hold dear – undermining the Anglo-American system of justice.

    Comment by Tano — November 13, 2009 @ 8:56 pm - November 13, 2009

  20. Let’s see, “The Wall Street Journal, owned by Rupert Murdock, Fox News where Palin will spend most of her time owned by Rupert Murdock.

    HarperCollins, Palin’s book publisher owned by Rupert Murdock.

    Comment by David — November 13, 2009 @ 8:59 pm - November 13, 2009

  21. Sarah Palin, a quick study and smart, so when will Palin appear on “Meet the Press” or “Face the Nation”?

    Never, because her handlers now that she can’t handle half an hour off script because she’ll babble incoherently.

    Comment by David — November 13, 2009 @ 9:02 pm - November 13, 2009

  22. Dan,

    Could you please read your own post, and my response before commenting? The post is about the MSM and how they covered Palin. My response, on the same subject, ridiculed your assertion that somehow the MSM is responsible for Palin exposing herself as totally clueless.

    The relative accomplishments in office of Palin and Obama are an entirely different subject, and a rather obvious attempt to change the subject.

    I repeat my question to you – don’t you get tired of this incessant BS? Look at the quote you offer – supposedly some great scandal, that Democratic politicians wanted to go after Palin, to define her, to make her central to the campaign. As if any political party would hesitate for a moment from exploiting a gift like that. And you – who runs a site that tries every day to destroy and character-assasinate a politician, you criticize politicians for doing the same?

    And once again – where is the recognition that the MSM consists of lots of conservative outlets? Who has the biggest cable outlet? Bigger than the other 3 combined? Who totally dominates the radio? Who has at least as many newspaper readers as liberals?

    And when are you going to rein in some of your regular commenters? Scroll through some of the comments on this thread – your peanut gallery is becoming downright toxic. Are you proud of making a comfortable place for this kind of rhetoric? Is this how you want your site defined?

    Comment by Tano — November 13, 2009 @ 9:09 pm - November 13, 2009

  23. Wow, the intelligence level of those who comment is sinking as quickly as the poison vomit level grows. Those who whined about Bush haters are making them look like angels. Grow up little boys and girls, get out of the sand box (or is it the cat box) and stop throwing crap. You have long since lost the ability to say anything of value.

    Dan, you are an intelligent and insightful blogger, sad that there’s so much shit to wade through in the comment section.

    Comment by a different Dave — November 13, 2009 @ 9:21 pm - November 13, 2009

  24. Tano, you have made an assertion that Sarah Palin is totally clueless. And no, my request that you identify her accomplishments is not a different subject from that of the post.

    You have yet to show that you know what she did while in Alaska while makes you assertion of her cluelessness suspect.

    I’m not even going to acknowledge the requests you make of me until you respond to the point I addressed you.

    Comment by B. Daniel Blatt — November 13, 2009 @ 9:38 pm - November 13, 2009

  25. #10: “I guess you are one of those who has no faith whatsoever in the American judicial system. In fact, I guess you believe we should dispense with a judicial system, and just arrest and execute anyone that we (excuse me, the government) believes guilty of a heinous crime.”

    Tano, as usual, you’ve guessed wrong, and your assumption that my position on the matter is based on a lack of faith in the American judicial system only highlights what an ignorant, uninformed dilettante you are with regard to the system that you pretentiously refer to as the “Anglo-American system of justice.” You’re not fooling anyone with the powdered-wig rhetoric. The fact is, if you knew even one thing about the American criminal justice system, the military courts, or the distinctions between the two, you would actually be able to comprehend how stupid you sound by contending that trying enemy combatants in a military forum UNDERMINES the American legal system.

    But nevermind that, Tano. It’s no surprise to me that you believe enemy combatants should be provided with civilian trials because that’s exactly what Obama TOLD YOU to believe. (What a shock!) For me, what really takes the cake is that like every other mindless, zombified Obama supporter, you COMPLETELY MISSED the other crucial issue. That is: even if you agree with the decision to try the Gitmo detainees in New York in civilian courtrooms, are you so obtuse in your blind faith to Obama that you see nothing wrong with the TIMING of how this went down? Are you completely incapable of recognizing that perhaps TODAY was not the best day to slap Americans with this decision (just before hopping a plane to Asia for the weekend)? Have you considered how the families of those who lost loved ones on 9/11 and at Ft. Hood might perceive these abrupt, unilateral developments? Or, are you so completely overtaken by your rapturous worship of Obama that you see nothing in his actions but genius, perfectly conceived and executed statesmanship? Would it make any difference to you whatsoever if instead, Obama had just made this announcement during his speech at the Ft. Hood memorial (maybe he could have given a warm “shout out” to KSM during his remarks)?

    Comment by Sean A — November 13, 2009 @ 10:04 pm - November 13, 2009

  26. Palin will go on Face the Nation and Meet the Press on the same day Obama does–but in the segment before he goes on, so he can copy her answers.

    Comment by Ashpenaz — November 13, 2009 @ 10:09 pm - November 13, 2009

  27. #22: “And when are you going to rein in some of your regular commenters? Scroll through some of the comments on this thread – your peanut gallery is becoming downright toxic. Are you proud of making a comfortable place for this kind of rhetoric? Is this how you want your site defined?”

    I agree, Dan. Some of these commenters on here are downright toxic and need to be reined in. In fact, one of them is so out of control that he said I was “the useless, contemptible, sociopathic piece of garbage around here,” and called me an “America-hater” and a “scummy traitor,” merely for expressing my opinion. Can you believe that? Savages!

    Comment by Sean A — November 13, 2009 @ 10:10 pm - November 13, 2009

  28. #19: “Not hardly. He has confessed.”

    Yes, Tano, KSM confessed to lots of things, but UH OH! Was he properly Mirandized beforehand? Hmmmmm. Surely, a eminent scholar of the “Anglo-American judicial system” such as yourself knows that an issue like that must be rigorously tested and explored the moment the case is placed on the docket. This is AMERICA after all.

    Comment by Sean A — November 13, 2009 @ 10:18 pm - November 13, 2009

  29. re: disparate treatment: I’m still waiting for the media to make hay about her tax issues.

    Comment by jpe — November 14, 2009 @ 3:29 am - November 14, 2009

  30. Scratch a conservative, and out comes an anti-democratic authoritarian. All the Saddams of the world use the exact same logic as you, for accomplishing the same goals that you seem to hold dear – undermining the Anglo-American system of justice.

    If that were true, liberals who love Stalin, Chavez, Castro, Saddam etc. would be Conservatives. Secondly, you come around and attack folks and then run crying to Dan like a little bitch. Boofuckinghoo.

    Comment by ThatGayConservative — November 14, 2009 @ 5:34 am - November 14, 2009

  31. one of them is so out of control that he said I was “the useless, contemptible, sociopathic piece of garbage around here,” and called me an “America-hater” and a “scummy traitor,” merely for expressing my opinion. Can you believe that?

    I can.

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — November 14, 2009 @ 8:44 am - November 14, 2009

  32. (No slag on you Sean A; quite the opposite.)

    Comment by ILoveCapitalism — November 14, 2009 @ 8:46 am - November 14, 2009

  33. You leftists are amusing.

    It was quite obvious during the campaign last year that Sarah Palin made the Obama campaign very nervous.

    Anyone with half a brain who was paying attention knows the Obama campaign went after Palin, even though McCain was at the top of the Republican ticket.

    So, was the Obama campaign stupid because they went after Palin? Or, is Obama that easily distracted?

    Neither of the above reflects well on Obama.

    You Obamabots will defend Obama to the death, because he is “The Won.”

    Yet, I’m quite capable of seeing the shortcomings of the guys I’ve supported in the past.

    Sycophantic lemmings is good start when it comes to describing Obama supporters.

    Comment by Blake — November 14, 2009 @ 12:15 pm - November 14, 2009

  34. #30: TGC, Tano’s stupid comment about “scratching a conservative, and out comes an anti-democratic authoritarian,” is just cumulative evidence of his acute ignorance of the distinctions between civilian and military courts and the policies supporting the existence of two different systems. Tano also tries to conceal the emotional and histrionic basis of his arguments by using lofty expressions like the “Anglo-American system of justice,” but his cover is blown when he starts squealing about conservatives wanting to “dispense with a judicial system, and just arrest and execute anyone that the government believes guilty of a heinous crime.” He’s been trained to equate military trials with just rounding up people and executing them because “what the hell, they’re probably terrorists and if we’re wrong, who cares about these Muslim losers anyway, right?” Tano is no longer capable of thinking for himself, so he can’t formulate an intellectual argument for why enemy combatants should be provided with access to civilian courts. The best he can do is dismiss military trials as nothing more than mass executions of dark-skinned people rounded up by US soldiers in the desert, and therefore affording them all of the constitutionally-based rights, protections, and privileges enjoyed by Americans is the only way to differentiate ourselves from savages. End scene. Like all liberals, Tano has an eight year old’s comprehension of the competing rights and legitimate purposes that were carefully considered and balanced when the system was established over 200 years ago, but none of that matters because Obama has made it very clear to Tano what he should think.

    By the way, I do believe there is one bright spot in all of this. With only 10 months of Obama’s disastrous Presidency behind us, it would normally be premature to start puffing too loudly about Obama’s deteriorating re-election prospects in 2012. However, with this new announcement I now feel perfectly comfortable predicting that Obama will be a one-term President. There’s no longer a shred of doubt in my mind about it. His economic, national security, immigration, and environmental policies will do exactly what they have been predicted to do: FAIL. And when you add to that the backdrop of these public trials dragging on for years, there’s no way Obama gets a second term. Even if everything goes precisely as Eric Holder has assured us it will, there is literally no way that these trials will not be a constant, embarrassing distraction from Obama’s Presidency. Conservatives and the 9/11 families will ensure that. And that’s a best case scenario. If one of these trials shows even a hint of going sideways on the Justice Department–CATASTROPHE.

    Yep. I said it. Obama gets the boot in 2012. Fire up those countdown clocks.

    Comment by Sean A — November 14, 2009 @ 12:28 pm - November 14, 2009

  35. [...] Blames Campaign For Couric Debacle GayPatriot: Did AP Ever Do a Fact Check On Obama’s Books? and MSM: Handmaiden to Obama Campaign in Attempt to Destroy Palin Hot Air: Palin: McCain’s campaign charged me for my own vetting; McCain aide: No we didn’t; [...]

    Pingback by Palin’s Still Under Their Skin… How Many Fact-Checking Editors at AP Scrutinized Either of Obama’s Books? Rush Limbaugh’s Take on Palin’s Book (video) « Frugal Café Blog Zone — November 17, 2009 @ 5:50 pm - November 17, 2009

  36. [...] to Sarah Palin book and publicity GayPatriot: Did AP Ever Do a Fact Check On Obama’s Books? and MSM: Handmaiden to Obama Campaign in Attempt to Destroy Palin Hot Air: Palin: McCain’s campaign charged me for my own vetting; McCain aide: No we didn’t; [...]

    Pingback by FIFY: Hey, Newsweek… Fixed Your Palin Cover for You. You’re Welcome. « Frugal Café Blog Zone — November 17, 2009 @ 8:45 pm - November 17, 2009

  37. [...] to Sarah Palin book and publicity GayPatriot: Did AP Ever Do a Fact Check On Obama’s Books? and MSM: Handmaiden to Obama Campaign in Attempt to Destroy Palin Hot Air: Palin: McCain’s campaign charged me for my own vetting; McCain aide: No we didn’t; [...]

    Pingback by Why Sarah Palin resigned is now becoming clear to the Socialists, and why they are so utterly fearful « VotingFemale Speaks! — November 18, 2009 @ 12:05 pm - November 18, 2009

  38. [...] to Sarah Palin book and publicity GayPatriot: Did AP Ever Do a Fact Check On Obama’s Books? and MSM: Handmaiden to Obama Campaign in Attempt to Destroy Palin Hot Air: Palin: McCain’s campaign charged me for my own vetting; McCain aide: No we didn’t; [...]

    Pingback by Video of Palin-Winfrey Interview… HuffPo Reports Oprah’s Ratings Jump to 2-Year High, Thanks to Sarah Palin (5-part video) « Frugal Café Blog Zone — November 18, 2009 @ 5:45 pm - November 18, 2009

  39. [...] Sarah — Get a Life People GayPatriot: Did AP Ever Do a Fact Check On Obama’s Books? and MSM: Handmaiden to Obama Campaign in Attempt to Destroy Palin Texas for Sarah Palin: Nashville, we have a problem HillBuzz: Anticipating Sarah Palin Going Rogue [...]

    Pingback by Sexist or Not? Americans Discuss the Sarah Palin Photo on Newsweek’s Cover (video) « Frugal Café Blog Zone — November 19, 2009 @ 5:03 pm - November 19, 2009

  40. [...] Sarah Palin understands meaning of freedom and Did AP Ever Do a Fact Check On Obama’s Books? and MSM: Handmaiden to Obama Campaign in Attempt to Destroy Palin Texas for Sarah Palin: Nashville, we have a problem HillBuzz: Anticipating Sarah Palin Going Rogue [...]

    Pingback by Some 17-Year-Olds Are Better Informed Than Adults… Norah O’Donnell Tries to Ambush Teen at Palin Book Signing (video) « Frugal Café Blog Zone — November 23, 2009 @ 2:54 am - November 23, 2009

  41. [...] Sarah Palin understands meaning of freedom and Did AP Ever Do a Fact Check On Obama’s Books? and MSM: Handmaiden to Obama Campaign in Attempt to Destroy Palin Texas for Sarah Palin: Nashville, we have a problem HillBuzz: Anticipating Sarah Palin Going Rogue [...]

    Pingback by Ex-Con “Queen of Smug” Martha Stewart Attacks Sarah Palin & Rachael Ray… Sorry, Martha, No One’s Listening to You (video) « Frugal Café Blog Zone — November 24, 2009 @ 9:59 am - November 24, 2009

  42. [...] Sarah Palin understands meaning of freedom and Did AP Ever Do a Fact Check On Obama’s Books? and MSM: Handmaiden to Obama Campaign in Attempt to Destroy Palin Sister Toldjah: Palin visits NC, meets Rev. Billy Graham, and receives huge welcome in Fort Bragg [...]

    Pingback by Fort Bragg Loves Sarah Palin, Also Visits Rev. Billy Graham (video) « Frugal Café Blog Zone — November 24, 2009 @ 11:58 am - November 24, 2009

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.