Stand Up Against the 9/11 SHOW TRIALS!

- The Obama Administration is STILL USING Military Tribunals for OTHER Detainees

- The US Government WILL NOT Release the defendants even if ACQUITTED

- Don’t put NY through more unnecessary psychological suffering than they already have to live with

This does not have to happen. Contact your Representatives in Congress Today and let them know how terrible a decision this is.

WE THE PEOPLE WANT MILITARY TRIBUNALS FOR WAR CRIMINALS

Why? Their only chance to have a show trial against the eeeeevil BusHitler.

It only takes someone with a brain and a basic understanding of our Constitution and case law to understand that not getting your Miranda rights read when caught means your case is thrown out.

Unless Holder plans to try the case outside Constitutional law, there is a big problem from the start in all of the evidence collected since KSM was captured.

Moussaoui — the 20th hijacker — was arrested IN THE USA and given his Miranda rights.

So Tano — stop being such an Obama lickspittle and use your own brain for a moment, please.

I know you hate, with a passion, anyone and everyone who works in this administration, and that has a tendency to cloud judgement, but do you really think that the career lawyers in the DOJ would bring specific charges in a criminal court if they didn’t feel they had sufficient evidence – evidence that can withstand procedural challenges – in order to win their case? Like – maybe the people who do this for a living might have thought of the issues you raise?

Were KSM & the AQs who will be tried in NYC given their Miranda rights as is required in a civilian court?

No.

Then will all of the evidence since his capture in Pakistan be thrown out?

Possibly.

What say you now?

Bonus points for the next person to use the phrase “airy persiflage” or “argle-bargle.”

Best wishes,
-MFS

Tano’s blabbering shows the priorities of the Obama Party; they pay puppets like him to spread lies on comment boards while they steal money from honest working people and businesses to give puppets like Tano free health insurance.

Tano, my perky little nematode, you are attacking military tribunals.

…on cue because Lord Obama flip-flopped about KSM (who BTW is a foreigner) being a prisoner of war, an enemy combatant, etc.

We all know that if Obama hadn’t flip-flopped on military tribunals, Tano would still be defending them. Which political arm do you think pays Tano and how much?

First he makes the obviously false assertion that KSM may well go free. That is patently absurd.

Translation: This IS a show trial.

but even if that one in a million chance comes true, that there is an acquittal, there will remain many other charges that can be brought against him, so he will be arrested the moment any acquittal comes down.

Translation: This IS a show trial.

“…there is no way we can prosecute the War on Terror while providing the full panoply of ordinary due-process protections ”
There you have it. That statement can be, and is, embraced wholeheartedly by every dictator, and every authoritarian in the world when asked why it is that they cannot allow their societies to live under democratic values.

Translation: military tribunals are undemocratic and must be abolished.

Tano, my perky little nematode, you are attacking military tribunals. I would grant you that you have a just position, but you make no case for your opinions. You claim that the open court is one of the “core values of our nation.” You say “citizens will soberly decide whether a particular individual in front of them is one guilty of the outrage.”

So, no more domestic relations courts or juvenile courts or closed hearings of any sort or manner, because they violate the “core values of our nation.” Furthermore, no more trials without a jury.

I realize how stupid you think conservatives are. You made yourself loud and clear. But how will you separate your bombastic words from the day to day regimen of the courts I have drawn under your all inclusive umbrella?

Edumacate us, we are all so very curious about the Tano court system.
And by the by, why hasn’t Holder just moved all the Gitmo boys to Manhattan? Why do some of them get to go to tropical isles and others have to stand trial.

Show me the light, Show-Trial-Tano.

Google ‘Little Eichmans’ While you’re at it, why don’t you google ‘Chickens coming home to roost’ You know, the phrase uttered by President Obama’s minister of 20+ years.

While you’re googling the holes in your arguement, why not look at some of the arguments made about Abu Grab and maybe answer the questions posed by Dan or heliotrope.

I know it’s different than waiting for the latest talking points to arrive via e-mail, but I’m sure you’re up to it.

This is just incoherent babbling. The targeting of America came first. Then came detainees. So how do you imagine anyone could argue that the latter cauesd the former?

“They have made the ridiculous argument that the Islamists will like us more if we treat them with all of the same constitutional protections enjoyed by Americans and that somehow terrorism will decline as a result. Of course, this is an unbelievably stupid argument”

Yes it is unbelievably stupid. Which is why no one has ever advanced such an argument. One only hears such things from rightwing pathetic liars like you who pretend that such strawman arguments are made.

“THEY THINK AMERICA DESERVED TO BE ATTACKED ON 9/11 AND THAT THE TERRORISTS ARE JUSTIFIED IN THEIR ACTIONS”

You are just totally insane now. The only people in the American political system who have expressed such a sentiment were Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson – the spiritual leaders of modern American conservatism.

http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/424/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=1695

Like I said, the Left will excuse ANYTHING, even mass murder if it helps them condemn America.