<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the Entertainment Value of Palin Derangement Sydrome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/11/17/on-the-entertainment-value-of-palin-derangement-sydrome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/11/17/on-the-entertainment-value-of-palin-derangement-sydrome/</link>
	<description>The Internet home for American gay conservatives.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:37:16 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/11/17/on-the-entertainment-value-of-palin-derangement-sydrome/comment-page-1/#comment-517450</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 07:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=19192#comment-517450</guid>
		<description>Actually, Talking Points, you&#039;re the one who&#039;s doing the lying, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-next-book-a-recommendation/#comment-509376&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; as I have pointed out previously&lt;/a&gt;.

But then again, all you&#039;re doing is repeating what your screaming Barack Obama pays you to say with taxpayer dollars. Really, it&#039;s Barack Obama who is repeating the lie that she faked her pregnancy and that her husband is having incestuous sex with their daughters.

Of course you support Barack Obama telling these lies, right Tano? You tell lies about Palin constantly. it&#039;s just what you Obama puppets do. No morals, no values, nothing but worshiping power. How many people have you hurt for your Barack Obama, Tano Brownshirt?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Talking Points, you&#8217;re the one who&#8217;s doing the lying, <a href="http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/11/17/sarah-palins-next-book-a-recommendation/#comment-509376" rel="nofollow"> as I have pointed out previously</a>.</p>
<p>But then again, all you&#8217;re doing is repeating what your screaming Barack Obama pays you to say with taxpayer dollars. Really, it&#8217;s Barack Obama who is repeating the lie that she faked her pregnancy and that her husband is having incestuous sex with their daughters.</p>
<p>Of course you support Barack Obama telling these lies, right Tano? You tell lies about Palin constantly. it&#8217;s just what you Obama puppets do. No morals, no values, nothing but worshiping power. How many people have you hurt for your Barack Obama, Tano Brownshirt?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tano</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/11/17/on-the-entertainment-value-of-palin-derangement-sydrome/comment-page-1/#comment-509366</link>
		<dc:creator>Tano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=19192#comment-509366</guid>
		<description>&quot;why else would Talking Points Tano repeat the lie that she faked her pregnancy, that her husband is having incestuous sex with their daughters,&quot;

Never did such a thing.
You are quite the pathological liar arent you ND? I mean really, no hesitation whatsoever. Are you writing to us from some asylum somewhere, or a prison cell?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;why else would Talking Points Tano repeat the lie that she faked her pregnancy, that her husband is having incestuous sex with their daughters,&#8221;</p>
<p>Never did such a thing.<br />
You are quite the pathological liar arent you ND? I mean really, no hesitation whatsoever. Are you writing to us from some asylum somewhere, or a prison cell?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: North Dallas Thirty</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/11/17/on-the-entertainment-value-of-palin-derangement-sydrome/comment-page-1/#comment-509175</link>
		<dc:creator>North Dallas Thirty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=19192#comment-509175</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The glorification of ignorance as a populist virtue – we don’t want none of them elitist types that actually know anything, do we?&lt;/i&gt;

The entertaining thing about watching Talking Points Tano scream that one is what his Barack Obama is doing -- such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/17/6-4-billion-in-porkulus-money-spent-in-phantom-districts/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; quoting job statistics from Congressional districts that don&#039;t exist&lt;/a&gt;.

I think that qualifies Barack Obama as beyond ignorant. But of course, Talking Points Tano would never acknowledge that; he&#039;ll just beclown himself by screaming that these districts DO exist and that anyone who says otherwise is a racist.

You really see the terror and screaming fits that Talking Points Tano has over Sarah Palin. I mean, why else would Talking Points Tano repeat the lie that she faked her pregnancy, that her husband is having incestuous sex with their daughters, and all the other &quot;facts&quot; that the Obama campaign was frantically putting out to smear her?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The glorification of ignorance as a populist virtue – we don’t want none of them elitist types that actually know anything, do we?</i></p>
<p>The entertaining thing about watching Talking Points Tano scream that one is what his Barack Obama is doing &#8212; such as <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/11/17/6-4-billion-in-porkulus-money-spent-in-phantom-districts/" rel="nofollow"> quoting job statistics from Congressional districts that don&#8217;t exist</a>.</p>
<p>I think that qualifies Barack Obama as beyond ignorant. But of course, Talking Points Tano would never acknowledge that; he&#8217;ll just beclown himself by screaming that these districts DO exist and that anyone who says otherwise is a racist.</p>
<p>You really see the terror and screaming fits that Talking Points Tano has over Sarah Palin. I mean, why else would Talking Points Tano repeat the lie that she faked her pregnancy, that her husband is having incestuous sex with their daughters, and all the other &#8220;facts&#8221; that the Obama campaign was frantically putting out to smear her?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Livewire</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/11/17/on-the-entertainment-value-of-palin-derangement-sydrome/comment-page-1/#comment-509043</link>
		<dc:creator>The_Livewire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=19192#comment-509043</guid>
		<description>*yawn*  And again Tano will not address Gov Palin&#039;s accomplishments.

&quot;As the saying goes – first time as tragedy, second time as farce. Is their a better embodiment of that concept than these two?&quot;

We&#039;re not talking about Carter/Obama here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*yawn*  And again Tano will not address Gov Palin&#8217;s accomplishments.</p>
<p>&#8220;As the saying goes – first time as tragedy, second time as farce. Is their a better embodiment of that concept than these two?&#8221;</p>
<p>We&#8217;re not talking about Carter/Obama here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tano</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/11/17/on-the-entertainment-value-of-palin-derangement-sydrome/comment-page-1/#comment-509030</link>
		<dc:creator>Tano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=19192#comment-509030</guid>
		<description>Well thanks for quoting me, Dan. But I think your analysis falls short a little. It seems you have some themes that you need to force reality into, whether it fits well or not. The themes in turn seem to have more to do with your real underlying purpose - insulting your political opponents - than shedding any light on the situation.

This need to insult yields a theme that must claim that liberals, or the left, are some irrational, hate-driven force (hey, I guess a little projection is at work here too!). So we see you natter on endlessly about how we all supposedly hate dear Sarah. 

But I don&#039;t hate her, nor do I know many lefties who do. We love Sarah. Sarah is a gift from heaven. Sarah is, by all rights, the heir to George Bush. As the saying goes - first time as tragedy, second time as farce. Is their a better embodiment of that concept than these two? 

Sarah so perfectly captures the absurdity of modern Republicanism - the way the cynical pols like to put the dunderhead &quot;personality&quot; up front, while all the really ruthless evil ones work behind the scenes to frame the decisions that the &quot;decider&quot; will get to make. The glorification of ignorance as a populist virtue - we don&#039;t want none of them elitist types that actually know anything, do we? The breezy effortless lying - witness the almost comically blatant lies about the &quot;bridge to nowhere&quot; - she is a natural. And of course, we also get to see, in all its glory, the hilarious pretzels that the rank and file of the &quot;movement&#039; - like you - go through to try and sell this product.

A farce indeed. The latest poll shows that only 28% of Americans think she is even minimally qualified for the Presidency. Thats not the total who support her - thats the number of those who think she should even be considered. This is a year AFTER she has appeared on your national ticket! Heck, even 44% of Republicans think she is unqualified!

So how on earth do you think someone like this could possibly worry Democrats, let alone provoke the hatred that grows out of fear? It is my fondest hope that she does well, that y&#039;all actually go out and nominate her. Would you please do that for me, Dan?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well thanks for quoting me, Dan. But I think your analysis falls short a little. It seems you have some themes that you need to force reality into, whether it fits well or not. The themes in turn seem to have more to do with your real underlying purpose &#8211; insulting your political opponents &#8211; than shedding any light on the situation.</p>
<p>This need to insult yields a theme that must claim that liberals, or the left, are some irrational, hate-driven force (hey, I guess a little projection is at work here too!). So we see you natter on endlessly about how we all supposedly hate dear Sarah. </p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t hate her, nor do I know many lefties who do. We love Sarah. Sarah is a gift from heaven. Sarah is, by all rights, the heir to George Bush. As the saying goes &#8211; first time as tragedy, second time as farce. Is their a better embodiment of that concept than these two? </p>
<p>Sarah so perfectly captures the absurdity of modern Republicanism &#8211; the way the cynical pols like to put the dunderhead &#8220;personality&#8221; up front, while all the really ruthless evil ones work behind the scenes to frame the decisions that the &#8220;decider&#8221; will get to make. The glorification of ignorance as a populist virtue &#8211; we don&#8217;t want none of them elitist types that actually know anything, do we? The breezy effortless lying &#8211; witness the almost comically blatant lies about the &#8220;bridge to nowhere&#8221; &#8211; she is a natural. And of course, we also get to see, in all its glory, the hilarious pretzels that the rank and file of the &#8220;movement&#8217; &#8211; like you &#8211; go through to try and sell this product.</p>
<p>A farce indeed. The latest poll shows that only 28% of Americans think she is even minimally qualified for the Presidency. Thats not the total who support her &#8211; thats the number of those who think she should even be considered. This is a year AFTER she has appeared on your national ticket! Heck, even 44% of Republicans think she is unqualified!</p>
<p>So how on earth do you think someone like this could possibly worry Democrats, let alone provoke the hatred that grows out of fear? It is my fondest hope that she does well, that y&#8217;all actually go out and nominate her. Would you please do that for me, Dan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: southernsue</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/11/17/on-the-entertainment-value-of-palin-derangement-sydrome/comment-page-1/#comment-508997</link>
		<dc:creator>southernsue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=19192#comment-508997</guid>
		<description>i will vote for sarah in 2012! she has been a very impressive governor. just look the facts up about her governing alaska.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i will vote for sarah in 2012! she has been a very impressive governor. just look the facts up about her governing alaska.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: straightAussie</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/11/17/on-the-entertainment-value-of-palin-derangement-sydrome/comment-page-1/#comment-508966</link>
		<dc:creator>straightAussie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=19192#comment-508966</guid>
		<description>Daniel, you are so very right. I comment as an outsider who also heard the woman speak on the TV when I was visiting the USA. I was impressed with what she had to say and cannot understand Sarah Derangement Syndrome.

I take issue with the nonsensical meme that Sarah thrusts herself into the limelight. On the contrary, the journalists and the left wing bloggers have been doing all of the thrusting. As a private citizen Sarah most definitely has the right to speak up about what is contained in your healthcare legislation and she is doing a great job of calling out BOW WOW Obambi over the fact that there are things in that legislation that is really very harmful to the population as a whole. 

The problem is that the ultra liberals are misogynists and in fact the worst of the misogynists is currently the POTUS. Even if I disagree with the bloggers at Hillbuzz on certain things they are calling it right about Sarah Palin. In fact even little things like the manner in which David Letterman went after her and belittled her daughters, it was Sarah&#039;s followers who took up the cudgel against Letterman rather than Sarah Palin. Hillbuzz was at the forefront of the protest against the misogyny of Letterman, and they were busy pointing out the best way of going about the protests. (you can learn a lot from these guys at least about how Dems operate, because they know this form of activism and they are really moderate Democrats, soon to be Independents). 

I am hoping that Sarah will learn to rise above the taunts and show the audiences at large who she really is - an intelligent and accomplished woman (something that cannot be said about your POTUS)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel, you are so very right. I comment as an outsider who also heard the woman speak on the TV when I was visiting the USA. I was impressed with what she had to say and cannot understand Sarah Derangement Syndrome.</p>
<p>I take issue with the nonsensical meme that Sarah thrusts herself into the limelight. On the contrary, the journalists and the left wing bloggers have been doing all of the thrusting. As a private citizen Sarah most definitely has the right to speak up about what is contained in your healthcare legislation and she is doing a great job of calling out BOW WOW Obambi over the fact that there are things in that legislation that is really very harmful to the population as a whole. </p>
<p>The problem is that the ultra liberals are misogynists and in fact the worst of the misogynists is currently the POTUS. Even if I disagree with the bloggers at Hillbuzz on certain things they are calling it right about Sarah Palin. In fact even little things like the manner in which David Letterman went after her and belittled her daughters, it was Sarah&#8217;s followers who took up the cudgel against Letterman rather than Sarah Palin. Hillbuzz was at the forefront of the protest against the misogyny of Letterman, and they were busy pointing out the best way of going about the protests. (you can learn a lot from these guys at least about how Dems operate, because they know this form of activism and they are really moderate Democrats, soon to be Independents). </p>
<p>I am hoping that Sarah will learn to rise above the taunts and show the audiences at large who she really is &#8211; an intelligent and accomplished woman (something that cannot be said about your POTUS)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayPatriot &#187; Why Sarah Palin Matters</title>
		<link>http://www.gaypatriot.net/2009/11/17/on-the-entertainment-value-of-palin-derangement-sydrome/comment-page-1/#comment-508961</link>
		<dc:creator>GayPatriot &#187; Why Sarah Palin Matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gaypatriot.net/?p=19192#comment-508961</guid>
		<description>[...] On the Entertainment Value of Palin Derangement Sydrome [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On the Entertainment Value of Palin Derangement Sydrome [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

