I will give william points for calling B. Daniel Blatt “sweetheart.” Somehow, though, I suspect that william is being a tad disingenuous. Maybe he uses “sweetheart” like a bouncer uses the word “pal.”

In any case, william’s trained eye and strong nose for political success cause him to give ample warning that Palin is a non-starter and not worth mentioning. So, shall conservatives table Palin and get on with trying to lure Specter back or should conservatives ignore william and allow Palin to soldier on?

All I have to do is read the first one to know where the article stands. As the writers do not understand that often != always. They found one example.

Now if only we had a press that would have sent eleven(!) people to fact check on PResident Obama’s connections to terrorists, or to racist ministers.

As to moving the goalposts, please note that you’re commenting to a post I wrote. And I accused you to defend your accusations and acknowledge your errors.

Keep moving the goalposts, sweetheart. At some point, you’re going to have to do more for her than cheer.

I cannot claim to have completely read “Going Rogue” — I had to skim the last 150 pages (or more than one-third). I only got the thing into my hands late Monday afternoon with a deadline of early evening. It’s terrible, I know, but if I didn’t read it all, neither can Sarah Palin claim to have completely written it.

What? No honest analysis of why the so-called “fact checkers” in the media were posting fake “facts” about Palin?

Doesn’t your argument about Palin stand up to examination, william? Are you afraid to admit that you and your fellow leftists tell lies about her? Are you worried that your “fact checks” won’t pan out when it’s obvious to everyone that you lie about Palin constantly?

But then again, we should remember that dimwit william has to defend the lies of Barack Obama as fact, such as Barack Obama’s claims about “stimulus jobs” in Congressional districts that don’t exist. William and the rest of the media “fact checkers” simply have no concept of reality any more; they just repeat Obama talking points. Typical of the intellectual laziness and vapidity that characterizes liberals and the Obama Party.

Americans—remember them?—should be asking themselves what it means that a woman of traditional American values can be so reviled, so relentlessly, so unscrupulously, so take-no-prisoners viciously. She doesn’t need to become president to perform an invaluable role. Why is she so popular in the heartland? Because she is us. A good-hearted ambitious American doing her best to offer her best. If they—and who are they, exactly?—hate her so much, then it has to be the case that she’s only a symbol of the hatred they feel for all the rest of us.

If someone needs to develop his substance, it doesn’t mean he has no substance, but that he needs more.

And I’ll address the supposed AP fact check that you link above as soon as you address the points I raised in my initial response to your comment. And answer the question I posed above.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_palin_book_fact_check

Read it, discuss its’ substance… or keep up with the stupid and go on mindlessly cheering for your beloved empty vessel, then froth that she’s some kind of victim. We haven’t heard that one enough.

Um, and, when did I say Palin had no substance? I did fault her for complaining too much about criticism, but in several of those posts, referenced her many accomplishments.

As to the supposedly fact-based critiques, well, others have done that and found such critiques to lack substance.

Oh, um, will you please acknowledge that misrepresented my posts and my tone?

Thanks.

We already did. You just ran away when it was revealed that your so-called “fact checking” involved just telling flat-out and obvious lies.

You would think that you wouldn’t be stupid enough to claim adherence to the facts when you were posting and spreading faked pictures of a person, william. But we have to remember that this is the Obama Party, who actually forged documents and tried to pass them off as true to discredit Bush. There is literally nothing the media and the leftist Obama Party that controls it won’t do, including just making things up — as you and they continue to demonstrate.

In the past 2 days, at least 5 stand-alone posts on Sarah Palin. You’d think maybe in all that bloviating, one would find something of substance? Nope, all these posts are just one whine after another about how badly she’s been mistreated by the demonizing left-wing media. Why not take some time out to address some of the fact-based critiques of the claims she makes in her memoirs? You know, the real reason most people don’t trust her: her problems with the truth.

Perhaps the saddest (or most hilarious) part of your obsessive whining is this: she “needs to develop his substance.” I just love that. You’ve literally written a half-dozen posts about somebody in the past 2 days… that you finally admit HAS NO SUBSTANCE.

I can’t help but think this is satire.

gillie and Tano better get here quick and give us the true blue view.

And need anyone be reminded, wasn’t Naomi Wolfe one of the advisors who badly botched the Gore campaign. You know, the whole “Alpha Male” thing. I never got this crowd. All the harping on Florida. You know if Gore would have but WIN HIS HOME STATE, Florida wouldn’t have mattered.