(You may read “Go, Tano” anyway you wish. I know not how others may interpret it, but as for me, I like to see him wet himself.)

Read’s Tano at #23.

Congratulations Tano, you don’t need to post anymore, we can just predicit your posts.

Well Sean can, when it comes to reading minds, I don’t do picture books.

This was in response to the worst recession since the great depression.

Thanks to the liberals who are pushing for even more of what got us there in the first place and calling it “stimulus”.

If they did nothing it would be horribly worse.

Except it’s been shown time and again that we’d be better off if we had done nothing.

You provide the classic example of intellectual dishonesty on the right.

“Intellectual dishonesty” = Reality.

The stimulus was a necessary solution to a major crisis.

When your objective is to f*ck things up worse than they were.

Doing nothing was not be an option.

Yes it be.

The same way spending and military deficits were necessary after 9-11.

And they were well on their way to being eliminated until the liberals took the purse strings. Now we’re being saddled with the worst deficits in history.

The difference between the right and left is eventually you have pay for such measures.

And the left gives America the finger and leaves it for future generations to pay for it.

After the initial crisis, republicans did nothing. Obama says now that the economy is getting back on track deficit spending is going to have to wind down.

Except he has no intention of doing so.

Given that he told them to punch people who questioned him, yup.

You see, Tano, in conservative circles, we don’t make excuses for people based on their skin color. We understand that liberals like yourself think black people are primitive idiots who lack the emotional and intellectual control to be held to any sort of behavior standard, but don’t expect us to follow your racist beliefs.

Gosh, you do like to call my posts “whines.” I do see that word a lot on left-wing blogs (when writing about conservative criticism of liberals). Guess that’s where you get your marching orders (or your talking points).

Remember, Obama is the one who called himself a post-partisan politician. But, he has yet to provide any evidence of post-partisanship.

And please spare me what you think I would have done had Obama said nice things in the inaugural. I have praised him on more than one occasion when he got things right.

So, figure out why it is you’re so obsessed with Sarah Palin such that you’d tack a comment about her onto a post that had nothing to do with that good and accomplished woman. And then ask yourself why you spend so much time reading the posts of a man whose posts you consider “silly.”

I mean your point is so silly. I give you props for pointing out that Obama said nice things about Bush, but no, thats not enough. He has to say them on your schedule, in situations that you specify – which of course will be those situations where he chose to speak of other things. If he said nice things about Bush in the inaugural, it would have been the wrong kind of nice things, or then you’ll say he should of said them in the address to Congress. Or as a last resort, you could always just claim that he didn’t mean whatever he said.

So good for you – find another instance of Obama being gracious to a Republican – Jindal. But again, thats not enough. He has to make this kind of thing a regular feature of his presidency. Maybe he should just hire you as an advisor.

He needs to denounce idiots who get into street brawls? Where were the Republicans denouncing the old fart tea person who punched the leftie in the mouth? What next, a post about how the President should denounce me because I called Helio a paranoid?

Note how he cannot list Sarah Palin’s accomplishments, when challenged.

Or how he can’t back up, when challegned, his statements about Gov Palin.

Or how he dodges questions about how Holder can get around Miranda and criminal procedures?

Or how he won’t explain how sucking up has improved America he just wants us to trust that it does.

“I can envision a couple of different combinations, if ever I were to be in a position to really even seriously consider running for anything in the future, and I’m not there yet,” Palin tells Newsmax. “But Glenn Beck I have great respect for. He’s a hoot. He gets his message across in such a clever way. And he’s so bold – I have to respect that. He calls it like he sees it, and he’s very, very, very effective.”

Tano has all sorts of inside understanding from these words. So, since Tano clearly understands the hidden code in what his designated Palin-the-Moron said, I wonder if Tano could share his secret for decoding moron-speak. Perhaps Tano understands things differently from what normal people read and hear. Maybe plain speak just seems like moron speak to Tano. They should look into this at the ACORN Institute for the Practical Use of Drunks, Deadbeats, the Mentally Challenged and Deceased.

What does that have to do with the post to which you attach your comment? I don’t even mention Sarah Palin and you feel you have to denigrate her.

Talk about obsession.

This post is about Obama. Defend your man.

I see the buzz on Memeorandum today is all about Sarah making little noises about who she thinks just might be like super-awesome as a VP!
Yeah, it your man! Glenn Beck!

I don’t blame the later on Bernanke. This was in response to the worst recession since the great depression. If they did nothing it would be horribly worse. Even economists like Roubini’s admit that had to happen – hell some wanted MORE.

You provide the classic example of intellectual dishonesty on the right.

The stimulus was a necessary solution to a major crisis. Doing nothing was not be an option. – The same way spending and military deficits were necessary after 9-11. The difference between the right and left is eventually you have pay for such measures. After the initial crisis, republicans did nothing. Obama says now that the economy is getting back on track deficit spending is going to have to wind down.

Whereas conservatives say even if the economy is humming, deficit spending is OK (unless the Dems are in charge)

Watch out Helio, we’re comin’ to get you. We’re actually part of the great Kenyan moooslim commiefascist stormtroopin’ vanguard who are nosin’ around conservative sites to find out whos been naughty or nice. We got a nice waterboard ready for ya in your local Fema camp,,,

So, Tano and gillie, your diagnosis of my paranoia is second place to the issues at hand. Obama moves the census into the political hands of the White House. Obama has multiple meetings with SEIU which is pushing to get the voting rolls as populated as possible with government union employees who live entirely off the tax system. There have been ZERO hearings on the Nationalized Health Care, ZERO Obama touted “transparency” and ZERO attention to getting bills posted for anything approaching the examination time promised by Obama.

Glenn Beck has produced an impressive number of serious charges against Obama and Company, yet there has been no response. No denial, no defamation suits, no hearings, no nothing. I suppose Tano/gillie that you see Beck as a squirrelly little nebbish who is prattling to the choir. You surely have some simple explanation of how Beck is able to come up with the video evidence of these people walking and talking the Marxist walk and talk.

Also, Tano/gillie, you leave a trail longer than a banana slug in heat of not backing up your claims in comment section after comment section. Which leads me to countercharge you on the paranoia charge: you, Tano/gillie are pathetically lacking in substance. That is to say, like methane, we can’t see you, but we know when you have passed by.

There really should be a Kos Kids site where people like you can cut and paste little Bazooka Bubble Gum bits of political hyena snot in a comment section and then run away laughing like drunks peeing on themselves.

It’s interesting because Obama is finally, at long last, trying to warn that too much Porkulus / spending / deficits will injure the economy. He’s 10 months late to that party. Here’s how it worked.

Obama has been systematically debauching, i.e. destroying, the U.S. dollar with his $1.5 trillion deficits and 0% interest rates. (Before you blame the latter on Bernanke, remember, Obama chose to re-appoint Bernanke.) The Chinese are royally PO’ed, and right to be. In the last few days in China, they’ve threatened Obama with financial ruin if he doesn’t get his fiscal act together. Obama has no intention whatever of getting his act together. But he needs to stall and deceive the Chinese, so he’ll occasionally proclaim his good intentions.

Sorry for the digression. The subject is at least Obama.

[it] pull[ed] us out of the worst recession since the depression.
Stimulus passed, hit the economy, we finally broke out of the recession we were in since 2007.

From the Dear Reader, this morning:

Obama warns of a ‘double dip’ recession

What’s the view like from under His bus, gillie?

http://michellemalkin.com/2009/11/18/how-do-you-say-“you-lie”-in-mandarin/

Michelle Malkin reports on Obama lecturing Chinese students on the virtue of political dissent and how he welcomes fierce political opposition since it makes him “a better leader because it forces me to hear opinions that I don’t want to hear.” She then runs through a partial catalogue of Obama’s shameless and well-known thuggish crusades to silence and marginalize his critics.