GayPatriot

The Internet home for American gay conservatives.

Powered by Genesis

My guess is she’ll say, “No”

December 2, 2009 by B. Daniel Blatt

Inhofe Asks Boxer to Investigate Possible Scientific ‘Conspiracy’ in ‘Climategate’:

Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), ranking member of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, is calling on Chairman Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) to conduct hearings on a possible conspiracy between some of the world’s most prominent climatologists to, among other things, manipulate data on so-called global warming.

Filed Under: Climate Change (Global Warming), Congress (111th)

Comments

  1. gillie says

    December 2, 2009 at 10:38 am - December 2, 2009

    1st – Don’t be so sure.
    I would love a hearing in which these scientist lecture the dopey congress folk on actual science.
    I would love to see them take some to task for cherry picking statements.
    I hope it happens! – It still wouldn’t convince the anti-sceince right, but it would at least set the record straight.

    2nd –
    “possible conspiracy between some of the world’s most prominent climatologists”
    I have yet to see a plausable explanation to as why these evil climatologists would want to create a conspiracy. What is their end goal?

  2. JP says

    December 2, 2009 at 11:46 am - December 2, 2009

    1st :
    They wont be able to do this without collusion because other scientists have been demanding the data to fact check this for years. FIOA requester were ignored and data destroyed to pervent it’s review. . . very UN-scientific.

    2nd:
    Usually when people lie about things to receive millions in money, that is considered fraud.
    So they lied to protect all that research funding.
    That, you would be certainly justified in calling “FRAUD”.

  3. V the K says

    December 2, 2009 at 11:58 am - December 2, 2009

    Phil Jones, one of the “scientists” who was exposed as a fraud in the emails has been forced out of his jobs. From 2002-2006, he collected $20 million in grants to study Global Warming.

    Reality has been bitch-slapping the libs pretty hard lately.

  4. The_Livewire says

    December 2, 2009 at 12:22 pm - December 2, 2009

    Hmm, is it gillie’s turn to trot out talking points today?

    Funny how he never answered my question on if he eats meat.

    Gillie likes to pretend the adjusted data is as good as raw data. Even if the ‘adjustments’ include hiding the decline or correcting tempatures to hide dips.

    Or best of all, Michael Mann’s admission that he had no knowlege of grafting ‘the thermometer record’ onto anything. Well it’s Mike’s trick, on Mike’s data graph. Apparently Mike has a split personality that does things w/o his knowing. Link.

  5. gillie says

    December 2, 2009 at 1:40 pm - December 2, 2009

    Livewire:
    Two links to look through
    pretty daminng stuff that should debunk sop that “fraud” talk

    http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/35233_Did_Climate_Scientists_Destroy_Data_A-_No.

    http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/35253_The_Comment_That_Killed_Global_Warming_(Not)

    So again.
    I would love an investigation so it could be shown once and for all that you anti science folks are “descend[ing] into a black hole of ever-widening stupidity”

  6. The_Livewire says

    December 2, 2009 at 1:54 pm - December 2, 2009

    The funny thing about folks “descend[ing] into a black hole of ever-widening stupidity”

    gillie has to look up to see them.

    Note how he’s still not answering a simple question.

  7. Richard says

    December 2, 2009 at 4:25 pm - December 2, 2009

    Why do I suspect that gillie has invested some money with Al Gore? He’s just looking after his financial interests… MUCH LIKE the AGW grifters are. After all, there’s millions of dollars in grants riding on their ability to manufacture apocalyptic scenarios about alleged global warming.

  8. ThatGayConservative says

    December 2, 2009 at 5:12 pm - December 2, 2009

    I would love a hearing in which these scientist lecture the dopey congress folk on actual science.

    “Dopey congress folk” except when the vote for legislation pushing global warmism or taking over the medical industry, right?

    I’d like to see those WH “scientists” explain to the American people how they came up with absurdly high pig flu death counts to which the CDC called bullshit. Or explain exactly how folks who aren’t Oncologists can determine that breast exams or mammograms aren’t necessary.

  9. ClassicFilm says

    December 2, 2009 at 7:39 pm - December 2, 2009

    I honestly don’t understand how liberals’ minds work. If it is a conservative who has done something wrong (whether real or perceived), libs scream and thrash and decry to the heavens. If it’s a liberal, they become blind mutes. Conservative bloggers have been taking Republicans to task since the dawn of time (ie., Romney on his involvement in cop killer Clemmons’ pardon 9 years ago, married Republicans’ affairs, etc.). Liberal bloggers and fringe media on Democrat misdoings? They are consistent in their hypocrisy… they never hold Democrats up to the light of integrity, and when in doubt, just say nothing. Or deny the existence of the evidence smack-dab in front of their faces.

    When it comes to statist scientists being in bed with Team Obama, who are destroying raw data and paper copies of that data, fiddling with and compromising data to get the desired result, liberals do nothing. CRU denying or revising the “rules” of scientific peer reviews that don’t purr, stroke, and coddle the bogus data results, ignoring countless information requests from other scientists for years? Writing emails on how to silence global warming dissenters, how to destroy other scientists’ careers for not supporting global waring, a warning to delete all incriminating emails that suppress global cooling data? Uh, look away, nothing to see here.

    These miscreant clowns (Mann, Jones, and many science colleagues) are despicable criminals and are being investigated (will the investigations be peer reviewed, one wonders?). Now if only Team Obama’s global warming cheerleaders (Boxer, Gore, Holdren, EPA, IPCC, Greenpeace, most socialist nations, liberal eco-nuts, Hollywood tree huggers) will just stop putting their fingers in their ears and look at the outpouring of evidence and the way they’ve been fooled for years. Or perhaps, they, too, were in on the international scam and stand to profit from carbon taxes and other “cash cows” from the climate change hoax. In which case, they will be the loudest deniers.

    Maybe by then, some liberals will finally wake up and smell the deception.

    Australia’s parliament today took the first bold step to vote NO on cap and trade.

  10. SoCalRobert says

    December 2, 2009 at 8:50 pm - December 2, 2009

    Geez, gillie… I don’t understand. Seems to me that if the likelihood that human activity isn’t destroying the planet would be good news.

    Also, gillie, I don’t consider myself “anti-science”. I suspect I know a lot more about science than than you do.

  11. gillie says

    December 2, 2009 at 10:03 pm - December 2, 2009

    “Funny how he never answered my question on if he eats meat.”

    I never saw that. The answer is not in the last few years. but not by choice…

    I miss the taste of good ol steak…
    But alas! The sacrifices we have to make to stay alive…

  12. The_Livewire says

    December 3, 2009 at 6:45 am - December 3, 2009

    Thank you gillie,

    I assume it’s for health reasons and not because of the IPCC report that eating meat is the major source of those pesky ‘greenhouse gasses’?

    I have the deepest sympathy. I’ve had to alter my diet because of teh room-mates health concerns. (Thank the Divine she doesn’t like egg nog, since it’s the only sweet I have right now)

  13. Otter says

    December 3, 2009 at 8:13 am - December 3, 2009

    gillie’s best effort to disprove clear evidence of fraud is… LGF? The people who veered so hard left that one could hear necks snapping acoss the continent?

    Sheesh.

Categories

Archives