I thought this post was about gay rights’ activists
5 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Nov | Jan » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |||


Blogcasting from the worldwide headquarters of the not-so-vast gay right wing conspiracy.
Representing the millions of patriotic gays and lesbians across the USA by standing up for freedom, fairness, free speech, privacy and true American values.
GayPatriot is the internet home for American gay conservatives and hailed as "the most reliably conservative gay blog on the Internet."
"Terrific blog" -- Michael Barone, principal coauthor of The Almanac of American Politics.



GayPatriot
Promote Your Page Too
FOLLOW GAY PATRIOT ON TWITTER!

Bruce Carroll Jr.(GayPatriot)
- Email: bruce -at- gaypatriot.org
B. Daniel Blatt (GayPatriotWest)
- Email: GayPatriotWest -at- aol.com
Sarjex Muller
- Email: Sarjex -at- gmail.com
Nick (ColoradoPatriot)
- Email: ColoradoPatriot -at- gmail.com
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Gay Patriot theme adopted for WP by One Fine Jay. Proudly powered by Wordpress.
Following the link, we see liberal blogger Matthew Iglesias complaining:
Clearly, Iglesias is talking about the irresponsible and destructive behavior of the nation’s Democrat minority during the Bush administration.
Comment by ILoveCapitalism — December 14, 2009 @ 4:32 pm - December 14, 2009
(E.g., when Democrats blocked regulation of Freddie and Fannie, thus ensuring the failure of the nation’s financial system. Or when Democrats systematically tried to undermine America’s war efforts and ensure defeat in Iraq.)
Comment by ILoveCapitalism — December 14, 2009 @ 4:33 pm - December 14, 2009
ILC they are very good points. The libtards are still doing their screaming, putting their hands over their ears and going “la la la… I cannot hear you”, as they continue to make up their narratives that are just so very fanciful. One commenter on the other site even had the hide to ask about what happened “under the old regime”, totally oblivious to the fact that in the last two years of the Bush Administration the Dummycrats were in charge of the playground.
However, taking your example of Freddie and Fannie, what you forgot is that it was a certain person named Obot who was the one who lobbied Congress to allow the packaging of mortgages of derivatives. Now he has the absolute hide to blame “greedy banks”, yet he bears a whole lot of responsibility for what took place. Also, as you rightly point out, when McCain and Bush tried to introduce legislation to stop the massive blowout in the housing and financial sectors it was the majority Dummycrats that refused to pass the legislation. Who then is culpable?….. Who in fact voted against that necessary legislation? Can there be any other reason than that the Dimbulbcrats were in fact attempting to manufacture a crisis?
The Dumbocrats in the Congress have a lot to answer for when it comes to their actions…. yes a whole lot… because they have been more corrupt than the previous Republican majority.
Comment by StraightAussie — December 14, 2009 @ 6:55 pm - December 14, 2009
SA, it just goes to show how our left-liberal friends stick to no principles, changing their tune whenever the shoe is on the other foot. Now that they have one-party rule – very temporarily – they want to bypass the very system that they manipulated to gain power. They would have shrieked if a Republican said such a thing, in the 5-6 years when Republicans held a similar dominance of the government.
As for regulating Fannie and Freddie: The Republicans had majorities in Congress at the time. But I do not believe they had the 60 votes in the Senate needed to overcome Democratic opposition. The Dems were the hard-core opponents of regulation – joined, shamefully but I believe only after it was clear that the Democrats would win the issue, by a much smaller number of GOP Senators.
Comment by ILoveCapitalism — December 14, 2009 @ 8:03 pm - December 14, 2009
You can have a system in which a defeated minority still gets a share of governing authority and participates constructively in the victorious majority’s governing agenda, shaping policy around the margins in ways more to their liking
The ability of a lefty like Iglesias to repress memories of his own people’s tactics is amazing.
My question is just how much tinkering around the margins we need to do when the whole agenda is toxic?
How does the minority participate when the majority leadership locks its own members out of policy making and demonizes people in their caucus who in lock-step (goose-step?)?
Comment by SoCalRobert — December 14, 2009 @ 9:13 pm - December 14, 2009